From one human genome to a complex tapestry of ancestry

Rotimi, Charles N.; Adeyemo, Adebowale A.

doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00237-2

NEWS AND VIEWS
10 February 2021

From one human genome to a complex tapestry of ancestry

In the 20 years since the first drafts of the human genome were made public, an explosion in genome sequencing has revealed how our evolutionary history and health can be understood by analysing the diversity in our genomes.

Charles N. Rotimi ⁰ &
Adebowale A. Adeyemo ¹

Charles N. Rotimi
1. Charles N. Rotimi is at the Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Adebowale A. Adeyemo
1. Adebowale A. Adeyemo is at the Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

The successful sequencing of the human genome¹^,² in 2001 is considered by many to be one of the greatest achievements in biology. The published sequences were generated from the DNA of a few anonymous volunteers of differing ethnic backgrounds. However, a single genome (even one generated from many individuals) can provide only so much information. It was immediately clear that we would need to generate and compare more sequences from different people, if we were to harness information coded in genomes to better understand our health and heritage. So far, we have genomes for hundreds of thousands of individuals — more than was imaginable 20 years ago. Even so, we are just beginning to sequence diverse populations in the numbers needed to realize the promise of genomics.

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 590, 220-221 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00237-2

References

International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Venter, J. C. et al. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
Article Google Scholar
The International SNP Map Working Group. Nature 409, 928–933 (2001).
Article Google Scholar
The International HapMap Consortium. Nature 426, 789–796 (2003).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
The International HapMap Consortium. Nature 449, 851–861 (2007).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
The International HapMap 3 Consortium. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Popejoy, A. B. & Fullerton, S. M. Nature 538, 161–164 (2016).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Bustamante, C. D., De la Vega, F. M. & Burchard, E. G. Nature 475, 163–165 (2011).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Martin, A. R. et al. Nature Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
McClellan, J. M., Lehner, T. & King, M.-C. Cell 171, 261–264 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Rotimi, C. N. et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, R225–R236 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. et al. Nature 586, 741–748 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Genovese, G. et al. Science 329, 841–845 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Adeyemo, A. A. et al. Nature Commun. 10, 3195 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
The SIGMA Type 2 Diabetes Consortium. Nature 506, 97–101 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Keita, S. O. Y. et al. Nature Genet. 36, S17–S20 (2004).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Nature Biotechnol. 20, 637 (2002).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Baker, J. L., Rotimi, C. N. & Shriner, D. Sci. Rep. 7, 1572 (2017).
Article Google Scholar