Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS FEATURE

Is facial recognition too biased to be let loose?

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 587, 347-349 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03186-4

Additional reporting by Antoaneta Roussi and Richard Van Noorden.

References

  1. Fussey, P. & Murray, D. Independent Report on the London Metropolitan Police Service’s Trial of Live Facial Recognition Technology (Univ. Essex, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 81, 77–91 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 2: Identification (NIST, 2019).

  4. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Ongoing Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 1: Verification. Updated 10 September 2020 (NIST, 2020).

  5. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Face Recognition Vendor Test Part 3: Demographic Effects (NIST, 2019).

  6. Feldman Barrett, L., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M. & Pollak, S. D. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 20, 1–68 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raji, I. D. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00964 (2020).

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links