Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Is facial recognition too biased to be let loose?

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 587, 347-349 (2020)


Additional reporting by Antoaneta Roussi and Richard Van Noorden.


  1. Fussey, P. & Murray, D. Independent Report on the London Metropolitan Police Service’s Trial of Live Facial Recognition Technology (Univ. Essex, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 81, 77–91 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 2: Identification (NIST, 2019).

  4. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Ongoing Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 1: Verification. Updated 10 September 2020 (NIST, 2020).

  5. Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Face Recognition Vendor Test Part 3: Demographic Effects (NIST, 2019).

  6. Feldman Barrett, L., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M. & Pollak, S. D. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 20, 1–68 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raji, I. D. et al. Preprint at (2020).

Download references


Nature Careers


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links