Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The controversial company using DNA to sketch the faces of criminals

Parabon Nanolabs shot to fame using DNA and genealogy analysis to solve cold cases. Then it hit a setback.
  1. Carrie Arnold

    1. Carrie Arnold is a science journalist based near Richmond, Virginia.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Two people wearing orange tinted goggles, lab coats and gloves use a UV torch to find traces of DNA on a piece of fabric

Traces of crime-scene DNA have been matched to suspects using genealogy databases. Credit: Jochen Tack/imageBROKER/Alamy

It was May 2019 when Parabon Nanolabs ran into a major controversy. At the time, it was the most famous forensic-genetics company on the planet. From its headquarters in Reston, Virginia, Parabon was helping police to crack cold-crime cases almost weekly, such as the murder of a Canadian couple in 1987 and the case of a young woman who was sexually assaulted and killed in the 1960s.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 585, 178-181 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02545-5

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 23 September 2020: An earlier version of this Feature erred in saying the Golden State Killer case was solved using data from two second cousins; they were distant cousins. It also mistakenly said that the assault of Margaret Orlando would have been a crowning achievement for the company, as the first active case that it had helped to solve. In fact, Parabon had helped to solve other active cases — this was the first to contravene the GEDMatch terms of use. Finally, the story stated that the restrictions on GEDMatch data forced Parabon to return to an earlier business strategy of using DNA to reconstruct faces. However, Parabon says that the restrictions were a temporary setback and didn’t significantly affect its business.

References

  1. Guerrini, C. J., Robinson, J. O., Petersen, D. & McGuire, A. L. PLoS Biol. 16, e2006906 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erlich, Y., Shor, T., Pe’er, I. & Carmi, S. Science 362, 690–694 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh, S. et al. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 7, 98–115 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links