Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Carbon dioxide loss from tropical soils increases on warming

Plots of tropical forest soils were warmed by 4 °C for two years to observe the effects on soil carbon emissions. The increase in efflux of carbon dioxide was larger than expected — a result with worrying implications for climate change.
  1. Eric A. Davidson

    1. Eric A. Davidson is in the Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, Maryland 21532, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

The carbon stored in soil could have a big impact on climate change. The global flux of carbon in and out of soils is six to ten times greater than the emissions of carbon dioxide produced as a result of human activities1,2. The inputs of carbon to soils from plant detritus (dead wood, leaves and roots) roughly balance the losses to the atmosphere produced by the respiration of soil microorganisms that feed on that material. However, just a 1% imbalance of global soil-carbon effluxes over influxes would equal about 10% of global anthropogenic carbon emissions. Carbon in tropical soils was thought to be less vulnerable to loss under climate change than is soil carbon at higher latitudes, but experimental evidence for this was lacking. In a paper in Nature, Nottingham et al.3 report that tropical-forest soils might be more vulnerable to warming than was thought.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 584, 198-199 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02266-9

References

  1. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bond-Lamberty, B. & Thomson, A. Biogeosciences 7, 1915–1926 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nottingham, A. T., Meir, P., Velasquez, E. & Turner, B. L. Nature 584, 234–237 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lal, R. Carbon Mgmt 4, 439–462 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Conant, R. T. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3392–3404 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carey, J. C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13797–13802 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M. & Charnov, E. L. Science 293, 2248–2251 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A. & Luo, Y. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 154–164 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wieder, W. R. et al. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1782–1800 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sullivan, M. J. P. et al. Science 368, 869–874 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turetsky, M. R. et al. Nature 569, 32–34 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links