Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Mountain height might be controlled by tectonic force, rather than erosion

What controls the height of mountain ranges? An analysis of the forces acting on mountains near tectonic-plate boundaries suggests that tectonic forces are the main controller, rather than climate-driven erosion.
  1. Kelin Wang

    1. Kelin Wang is at the Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

It is common knowledge that mountain ranges were created by tectonic forces, but how their height is maintained today is a matter of debate. A widely held view is that climate-controlled erosion limits their height1,2. In a paper in Nature, Dielforder et al.3 take a different stance. They show that, at least for mountain ranges that are near convergent tectonic-plate boundaries, tectonic force has a dominant role in controlling height.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 582, 189-190 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01601-4

References

  1. Brozovic, N., Burbank, D. W. & Meigs, A. J. Science 276, 571–574 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Egholm, D. L., Nielsen, S. B., Pedersen, V. K. & Lesemann, J.-E. Nature 460, 884–887 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dielforder, A., Hetzel, R. & Oncken, O. Nature 582, 225–229 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whipple, K. X. Nature Geosci. 2, 97–104 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, X. & Wang, K. Science 345, 1038–1041 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamb, S. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B07401 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Champagnac, J.-D., Molnar, P., Sue, C. & Herman, F. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B02403 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Byerlee, J. D. Pure Appl. Geophys. 116, 615–626 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zoback, M. D., Townend, J. & Grollimund, B. Int. Geol. Rev. 44, 383–401 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, K. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 6179–6194 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links