Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe. Its molecular-gas state is simple, but its solid state has proved to be complex. In 1935, it was predicted that solid hydrogen should behave like an electrical conductor at elevated pressures, owing to its molecules being separated into their atomic constituents1. This prediction heralded a race to prove experimentally that solid hydrogen displays such metallic behaviour under ultrahigh compression. However, although there have been many claims of proof (for example, refs 2–4), these studies have been challenged. Now, writing in Nature, Loubeyre et al.5 report that dense hydrogen shows a discontinuous and reversible change in optical reflectivity at extreme pressure and low temperature that can be attributed to a phase transition into a metallic state.
It is common practice to use a device called a diamond anvil cell to achieve ultrahigh compression of a material and to study changes in the material’s physical properties at high density. A diamond anvil cell squeezes a sample, which is confined to a microscopic chamber in a thin metal foil, between two diamond anvils (Fig. 1a). The device operates on a deceptively simple physical concept: pressure is inversely proportional to the area of a surface over which a force is applied. In the present case, this simplicity comes with an inherent drawback: reaching extreme pressures inevitably implies working with tiny sample volumes.
Conventional techniques have been the bottleneck in applying extreme pressures to highly compressible materials such as hydrogen. Over the past few decades, research groups around the world have pushed the boundaries of pressure generation. They have also refined the tools and methods needed to accurately estimate pressures applied to a microscopic sample of compressed gas. Nevertheless, debate continues over the accuracy of reported pressures and the interpretation of results drawn from measurements of physical properties.
Recognizing this long-standing problem, Loubeyre and colleagues’ research group developed an innovative approach that involves the precise sculpting of diamond-anvil surfaces using a stream of massive ions6 — a technique called focused ion-beam milling. A similar experimental development has also been reported7. The profiled anvils produce extreme pressures that can be reliably estimated, reaching more than 400 gigapascals (about 4 million times Earth’s atmospheric pressure). Moreover, the shape of the anvils helps to confine dense hydrogen samples that are suitable for optical measurements.
Read the paper: Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hydrogen
Under increasingly extreme pressures, dense hydrogen becomes more and more opaque to visible light. For pressures in excess of about 300 GPa, solid hydrogen becomes penetrable only by electromagnetic radiation of lower energy than visible light2–4,8, such as infrared radiation (Fig. 1b). Loubeyre et al. measured the optical transparency of solid hydrogen at pressures much higher than those reached previously, using the near-to-mid-infrared emission from a source of synchrotron radiation — electromagnetic radiation that is produced when charged particles are accelerated in a curved path.
The authors found that a compressed sample of hydrogen blocks all light and exhibits an abrupt increase in optical reflectivity when the pressure is raised above 425 GPa (Fig. 1c). Moreover, they discovered that this transition is reversible. The authors attribute the change in optical reflectivity to a pressure-induced phase transition in which electrons in the sample become free to move like those in a metal. Hydrogen remains as a molecular solid up to the transition pressure; it possibly stays in this state above 425 GPa, but it is difficult to confirm this by spectroscopy because there is a reduced coupling between light and matter in these extreme conditions.
It can certainly be argued that a definite proof for metallic hydrogen would come only from a measurement of the sample’s electrical conductivity at high pressure as a function of temperature. Solid hydrogen should exhibit a high level of electrical conduction that should then decrease as the sample temperature is raised. However, even with experimental techniques developed in the past few decades to study condensed matter in extreme conditions, electrical-transport measurements of hydrogen remain a huge challenge9,10.
Nevertheless, Loubeyre and co-workers’ findings should be considered as a close-to-definite proof of dense hydrogen reaching a metallic state in extreme-pressure conditions. Computational predictions of the pressure at which molecular hydrogen enters a metallic state still lack accuracy, because they require many different quantum-mechanical corrections that are difficult to address. However, the experimental value of 425 GPa agrees with calculations11 that predict a transition in hydrogen to a different solid phase at a similar pressure.
Loubeyre and colleagues’ study has combined innovative techniques for ultrahigh-pressure generation with advanced experimental methods using synchrotron radiation. In doing so, it has raised expectations for the discovery of other remarkable properties of solid hydrogen at extreme density. For the time being, many questions remain. For instance, could electrical resistivity be measured across the metallic transition? Could superconductivity at a record-high temperature be achieved in hydrogen? And could the molecular order be disrupted under ultrahigh pressure and lead to an atomic phase in the solid state?
Competition is still strong between different research groups seeking to answer these questions, and to further unveil and understand the characteristics of hydrogen at extreme density. More exciting findings are sure to come at every stage of the race.
Nature 577, 626-627 (2020)
Wigner, E. & Huntington, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 764–770 (1935).
Mao, H. K. & Hemley, R. J. Science 244, 1462–1465 (1989).
Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A. & Drozdov, P. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04479 (2016).
Dias, R. P. & Silvera, I. F. Science 355, 715–718 (2017).
Loubeyre, P., Occelli, F. & Dumas, P. Nature 577, 631–635 (2020).
Dewaele, A., Loubeyre, P., Occelli, F., Marie, O. & Mezouar, M. Nature Commun. 9, 2913–2922 (2018).
Jenei, Zs. et al. Nature Commun. 9, 3563 (2018).
Loubeyre, P., Occelli, F. & LeToullec, R. Nature 416, 613–617 (2002).
McMinis, J., Clay, R. C. III, Lee, D. & Morales, M. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105305 (2015).
Azadi, S., Drummond, N. D. & Foulkes, W. M. C. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035142 (2017).
Eremets, M. I. & Troyan, I. A. Nature Mater. 10, 927–931 (2011).