Extreme emission seen from γ-ray bursts

Cosmic explosions called γ-ray bursts are the most energetic bursting events in the Universe. Observations of extremely high-energy emission from two γ-ray bursts provide a new way to study these gigantic explosions.

Astrophysical explosions known as γ-ray bursts (GRBs) can release in one second the amount of energy that the Sun will produce in its entire lifetime1. The emission from GRBs covers a broad stretch of the electromagnetic spectrum and occurs in two stages: the prompt-emission phase and the afterglow phase. The main emission mechanism is thought to be synchrotron radiation, whereby the gyration of energetic electrons around magnetic-field lines releases photons. Until now, emission from GRBs has been observed only at energies below 100 gigaelectronvolts (GeV). Three papers in this issue24 report observations of γ-rays that have energies above 100 GeV from two bright GRBs, dubbed GRB 190114C and GRB 180720B.

The Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov (MAGIC) Collaboration2 detected photons in the teraelectronvolt range (1 TeV is 103 GeV) from GRB 190114C, using the MAGIC telescopes at La Palma, Spain. The first detections started about one minute after the burst triggered NASA’s two spaceborne GRB detectors: the Burst Alert Telescope on board the Swift satellite and the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor on board the Fermi satellite. The high-energy photons continued to rain down on the MAGIC telescopes for about 20 minutes, with the flux decreasing rapidly over this time. The MAGIC Collaboration and colleagues3 detected this GRB using several other ground-based and space-borne telescopes. When combined with the MAGIC data, this rich data set allowed the authors to model the event comprehensively and study how the TeV emission was produced.

Abdalla et al.4 detected photons of energies above 100 GeV (but below 1 TeV) from GRB 180720B, using the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) array of telescopes in Namibia. Although these photons were lower in energy and fewer in number than those observed from GRB 190114C, they were detected from deep in the afterglow phase (10 hours after the GRB was triggered and lasting for 2 hours). The flux and maximum energy of the afterglow emission both decrease over time, owing to deceleration of the jets — the two narrow, oppositely directed channels through which most of the explosive energy of a GRB is released. Consequently, the detection of such high-energy photons deep in the afterglow phase is also groundbreaking.

The MAGIC and HESS observatories both use an array of optical telescopes called imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs), which are designed to detect γ-rays in the very-high-energy range (roughly from 30 GeV to 100 TeV). More precisely, the IACTs detect the light (known as Cherenkov radiation) that is produced when such γ-rays hit Earth’s atmosphere and produce a shower of charged particles. These facilities have been operating for more than a decade. GRBs, as the most powerful explosions in the Universe, have been one of the main observational targets, but, until now, have evaded detection. The current results are therefore a triumph for these observatories.

The discoveries are also a triumph for GRB theories. Theoretically, there are three mechanisms by which high-energy γ-rays can be produced during the afterglow phase5. The first is synchrotron radiation from electrons accelerated by the external shock — the shock wave that is generated when the exploded matter collides with surrounding interstellar gas. This emission component has a maximum energy that depends only on the Lorentz factor of the outflow (a parameter that denotes how fast the external shock is moving). To reach energies above 100 GeV, the Lorentz factor must be greater5 than about 1,000, which is only marginally possible. Observations show that the Lorentz factor of GRB jets is usually a few hundred during the prompt-emission phase and decreases over time during the afterglow phase6.

The second high-energy radiation mechanism is synchrotron radiation from protons accelerated by the GRB external shock. This emission component can, in principle, contain TeV γ-rays. However, because protons are much less efficient emitters than are electrons, the conditions for this mechanism to be dominant are rather demanding. Finally, the third mechanism is called synchrotron self-Compton7 (SSC), whereby the same accelerated electrons that emit synchrotron photons can scatter off some of these photons, resulting in photons that have energies above 100 GeV (Fig. 1a). For typical shock-microphysics parameters inferred from afterglow modelling of other GRBs, it is expected that the SSC mechanism should usually be the main way in which high-energy γ-rays are produced5.

Figure 1 | Emission from a γ-ray burst. a, Three papers24 report the detection of high-energy radiation from astrophysical explosions known as γ-ray bursts (GRBs). The explosive energy from a GRB is thought to be channelled into two narrow jets. Photon emission occurs in two stages: the prompt-emission phase and the afterglow phase. In the afterglow phase, low-energy photons are thought to be generated by a mechanism called synchrotron radiation. High-energy photons are thought to be mainly produced through a process dubbed synchrotron self-Compton (SSC), whereby the scattering of synchrotron photons off energetic electrons gives the photons a boost in energy5,7. b, One key prediction of the SSC mechanism is that there should be two ‘humps’ in the spectral energy distribution of the afterglow spectrum: one corresponding to synchrotron photons and the other to SSC photons5,7. Results from the three papers firmly establish the existence of such an SSC component.

One key prediction of the SSC mechanism is that there should be two ‘humps’ in the spectral energy distribution of the afterglow spectrum5,7 (Fig. 1b). Such a two-hump structure has been commonly observed for high-energy jets launched from supermassive black holes known as blazars8, and the same structure has been confidently expected for GRBs. Previous observations of high-energy afterglows of GRBs using the Large Area Telescope on board the Fermi satellite have not convincingly shown the existence of a second hump in the spectral energy distributions9. However, some tentative evidence has been collected from another bright burst1012, GRB 130427A.

The multi-wavelength observations of GRB 190114C obtained by the MAGIC Collaboration and colleagues have firmly established, for the first time, the existence of the SSC component in a GRB afterglow3. This conclusion has been confirmed by independent modelling from other groups1315. The double-hump feature is comparatively less clear in the spectral energy distribution obtained by Abdalla et al. for GRB 180720B. However, in the late afterglow phase, electron synchrotron radiation cannot produce photons of energies above 100 GeV without the need to introduce exotic particle-acceleration mechanisms. As a result, the SSC mechanism is the preferred explanation for the observed spectral energy distribution4,13.

Why did it take so long to detect a theoretically expected common spectral component? The observation of a GRB by an IACT requires that the burst is bright (to produce a sufficient number of high-energy photons) and nearby (to avoid absorption of the photons by the infrared background radiation in the Universe). Furthermore, the telescope needs to have the correct observational conditions. For instance, a particular GRB would not be detected by an IACT if the event occurred during the daytime, in poor weather or in an area of the sky that was not accessible by the telescope. Nevertheless, the breakthrough results reported in the current papers suggest that, with dedication and probably a bit of luck, a revolutionary discovery can be made.

Now that photons of energies above 100 GeV have been detected from GRBs, it is expected that such detections will become routine in the future — especially with the full operations of the available IACTs and of observatories that use other detection techniques, such as the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory in Mexico. The field will also greatly benefit from the operations of facilities such as the future international Cherenkov Telescope Array and the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory in Daocheng, China. As history has repeatedly shown, the opening of a new spectral window in GRB research always reveals many treasures for researchers to mine. This spectral window at the highest energies will not be any different, and could be even more rewarding.

Nature 575, 448-449 (2019)


  1. 1.

    Zhang, B. The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).

  2. 2.

    MAGIC Collaboration. Nature 575, 455–458 (2019).

  3. 3.

    MAGIC Collaboration et al. Nature 575, 459–463 (2019).

  4. 4.

    Abdalla, H. et al. Nature 575, 464–467 (2019).

  5. 5.

    Zhang, B. & Mészáros, P. Astrophys. J. 559, 110–122 (2001).

  6. 6.

    Racusin, J. L. et al. Astrophys. J. 738, 138 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Sari, R. & Esin, A. A. Astrophys. J. 548, 787–799 (2001).

  8. 8.

    Ghisellini, G., Righi, C., Costamante, L. & Tavecchio, F. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, 255–266 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Kumar, P. & Barniol Duran, R. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, L75–L79 (2009).

  10. 10.

    Ackermann, M. et al. Science 343, 42–47 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Liu, R.-Y., Wang, X.-Y. & Wu, X.-F. Astrophys. J. 773, L20 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Fan, Y.-Z. et al. Astrophys. J. 776, 95 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Wang, X.-Y., Liu, R.-Y., Zhang, H.-M., Xi, S.-Q. & Zhang, B. Astrophys. J. 884, 117 (2019).

  14. 14.

    Derishev, E. & Piran, T. Astrophys. J. 880, L27 (2019).

  15. 15.

    Fraija, N. et al. Astrophys. J. 883, 162 (2019).

Download references

Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.


Sign up to Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing