Human embryo implantation modelled in microfluidic channels

Clark, Amander T.

doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02563-y

NEWS AND VIEWS
11 September 2019

Human embryo implantation modelled in microfluidic channels

An innovative microfluidic device has enabled the modelling of the events that occur in human embryos when they implant in the wall of the uterus. It could be used to help understand early pregnancy loss.

Amander T. Clark⁰

Amander T. Clark
1. Amander T. Clark is in the Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, and the Broad Stem Cell Research Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

Each year, millions of women around the world experience early pregnancy loss¹. Most pregnancy losses occur in the first trimester, around the time that the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus. Our lack of understanding of why some early pregnancies fail is frustrating to women and their partners. To fill this fundamental gap in our knowledge, models of human embryo implantation are greatly needed. Writing in Nature, Zheng et al.² report the creation of an advanced model of human embryo development that recapitulates many of the key events that happen around the time of implantation (that is, during the peri-implantation stage).

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 573, 350-351 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02563-y

References

Wang, X. et al. Fertil. Steril. 79, 577–584 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. et al. Nature 573, 421–425 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Shao, Y. et al. Nature Commun. 8, 208 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Christodoulou, N. et al. Nature Cell Biol. 20, 1278–1289 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Simunovic, M. et al. Nature Cell Biol. 21, 900–910 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Deglincerti, A. et al. Nature 533, 251–254 (2016).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. Nature 537, 57–62 (2016).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Itskovitz-Eldor, J. et al. Mol. Med. 6, 88–95 (2000).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Spence, J. R. et al. Nature 470, 105–109 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Irie, N. et al. Cell 160, 253–268 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Aach, J., Lunshof, J., Iyer, E. & Church, G. M. eLife 6, e20674 (2017).
Article Google Scholar