Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Information gerrymandering in social networks skews collective decision-making

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 573, 40-41 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02562-z

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 08 October 2019: Figure 1c incorrectly stated the numbers of blue and orange nodes that influence each participant in the blue part of the diagram. The graphic has now been updated.

References

  1. 1.

    Stewart, A. J. et al. Nature 573, 117–121 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hodas, N. O. & Lerman, K. Sci. Rep. 4, 4343 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shearer, E. Social Media Outpaces Print Newspapers in the US as a News Source (Pew Research Center, 2018); go.nature.com/2kgh7eo

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble (Penguin, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ingraham, C. The Washington Post (1 March 2015).

  6. 6.

    Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. Environ. Plan. A 37, 1191–1206 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Napoli, P. M. Telecommun. Policy 39, 751–760 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links