Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Unethical work must be filtered out or flagged

Researchers need guidance on how to handle published work whose ethics have been questioned, argue Graeme D. Ruxton and Tom Mulder.
  1. Graeme D. Ruxton

    1. Graeme D. Ruxton is professor in the School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Tom Mulder

    1. Tom Mulder is a student in the School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Illustration by David Parkins

In 2014, an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) described an experiment investigating whether human emotional states can be transferred to others by “emotional contagion”1. Researchers altered the news feeds of almost 700,000 Facebook users to investigate whether the percentage of positive or negative posts they view affects the tone of those they write. According to Facebook, all users consent to this kind of manipulation when they agree to the company’s terms of service.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 572, 171-172 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02378-x

References

  1. Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E. & Hancock, J. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8788–8790 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, M. N. Nature 511, 265 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinsman, J. & Buckley, S. J. Bioeth. Inq. 12, 179–182 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N. & Uskali, T. Media Commun. 4 (4), 75–85 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma, I. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10779 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rushe, D. The Guardian (2 October 2014).

  7. Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G. & Booth, A. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e195 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caplan, A. L., Parent, B., Shen, M. & Plunkett, C. EMBO Rep. 16, 1421–1426 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Congressional Budget Office. Federal Support for Research and Development (US Congress, 2007).

  10. Eggertson, L. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 182, E199–E200 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paul, C. & Brookes, B. Am. J. Public Health 105, e12–e19 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Algahtani, H., Bajunaid, M. & Shirah, B. Neurol. Sci. 39, 829–834 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tennenhouse, L. Univ. Manitoba J. Med. 1, 6–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mostow, P. J. Law Relig. 10, 403–431 (1993–1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links