Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Move over, DNA: ancient proteins are starting to reveal humanity’s history

Proteins dating back more than one million years have been extracted from some fossils, and could help to answer some difficult questions about archaic humans.
  1. Matthew Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Homo floresiensis skull

Homo floresiensis is one of the species researchers hope to study by sequencing ancient proteins. Credit: Adapted from World History Archive/Alamy

Some time in the past 160,000 years or so, the remains of an ancient human ended up in a cave high on the Tibetan Plateau in China. Perhaps the individual died there, or parts were taken there by its kin or an animal scavenger. In just a few years, the flesh disappeared and the bones started to deteriorate. Then millennia dripped by. Glaciers retreated and then returned and retreated again, and all that was left behind was a bit of jawbone with some teeth. The bone gradually became coated in a mineral crust, and the DNA from this ancient ancestor was lost to time and weather. But some signal from the past persisted.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 570, 433-436 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01986-x

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 11 July 2019: An earlier version of this story did not make clear that the Stephanorhinus work cited in reference 6 was led by Enrico Cappellini.

References

  1. Chen, F. et al. Nature 569, 409–412 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, M. et al. Nature 531, 504–507 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, S. et al. Sci. Rep. 6, 23559 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Welker, F. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11162–11167 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Détroit, F. et al. Nature 568, 181–186 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappellini, E. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/407692v1 (2018).

  7. Rybczynski, N. et al. Nature Commun. 4, 1550 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demarchi, B. et al. eLife 5, e17092 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Welker, F. et al. Nature 522, 81–84 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hendy, J. et al. Nature Commun. 9, 4064 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendy, J. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2, 791–799 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jersie-Christensen, R. R. et al. Nature Commun. 9, 4744 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiddyment, S. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15066–15071 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links