Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Should we fertilize oceans or seed clouds? No one knows

Gather scientific evidence on the feasibility and risks of marine geoengineering to guide regulation of research, advise Philip Boyd and Chris Vivian.
  1. Philip Boyd

    1. Philip Boyd is professor of marine biogeochemistry at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Chris Vivian

    1. Chris Vivian is retired and formerly worked as a national marine adviser at the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

The climate clock is ticking. To turn it back, the world is putting its faith in ‘negative-emissions technologies’. These would suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and lock it up for centuries on the land, in the sea or beneath the sea floor (see ‘Marine geoengineering’). Although such technologies are yet to be developed, they are nonetheless implicit in assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). To limit warming to 1.5 °C compared to pre-industrial levels, as much as 20 billion tonnes (gigatonnes) of CO2 might need to be removed from the atmosphere each year until 21001.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 570, 155-157 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01790-7

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5 °C (IPCC, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. GESAMP Working Group 41. High Level Review of a Wide Range of Proposed Marine Geoengineering Techniques (eds Boyd, P. W. & Vivian, C. M. G.) GESAMP Rep. Stud. No. 98 (International Maritime Organization, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, G. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140055 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strong, A. L., Cullen, J. J. & Chisholm, S. W. Oceanography 22, 236–261 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schäfer, S. et al. The European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE): Removing Greenhouse Gases from the Atmosphere and Reflecting Sunlight away from Earth (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, P. W. et al. Science 315, 612–617 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keller, D. P., Feng, E. Y. & Oschlies, A. Nature Commun. 5, 3304 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silver, M. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20762–20767 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Genus, A. & Stirling, A. Res. Policy 47, 61–69 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerr, A., Hill, R. L. & Till, C. Technol. Soc. 52, 24–31 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links