Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon

Plans to triple the area of plantations will not meet 1.5 °C climate goals. New natural forests can, argue Simon L. Lewis, Charlotte E. Wheeler and colleagues.
  1. Simon L. Lewis

    1. Simon L. Lewis is professor of global-change science in the Department of Geography, University College London, and the School of Geography, University of Leeds, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Charlotte E. Wheeler

    1. Charlotte E. Wheeler is a forest researcher at the School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. Edward T. A. Mitchard

    1. Edward T. A. Mitchard is senior lecturer in forest-change mapping at the School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  4. Alexander Koch

    1. Alexander Koch recently completed a PhD in the Department of Geography, University College London, on forests and the global carbon cycle.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Keeping global warming below 1.5 °C to avoid dangerous climate change1 requires the removal of vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as well as drastic cuts in emissions. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggests that around 730 billion tonnes of CO2 (730 petagrams of CO2, or 199 petagrams of carbon, Pg C) must be taken out of the atmosphere by the end of this century2. That is equivalent to all the CO2 emitted by the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and China since the Industrial Revolution. No one knows how to capture so much CO2.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 568, 25-28 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8

References

  1. Lewis, S. L. Nature 532, 283 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Global Warming of 1.5 °C (IPCC, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griscom, B. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Poorter, L. et al. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FAO, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chazdon, R. L. & Guariguata, M. R. Biotropica 48, 716–730 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harper, A. B. et al. Nature Commun. 9, 2938 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu, B., Zhang, X., Bai, X., Fu, B. & Chen, D. Nature 566, 31–33 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Supplementary Information

  1. Methods, tables, figures and further references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links