Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • CORRESPONDENCE

Preprints help journalism, not hinder it

  1. Jonathan Tennant

    1. Open Science MOOC, Leicester, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Laurent Gatto

    1. de Duve Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. Corina Logan

    1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

In suggesting that preprints could distort the public’s understanding of science, Tom Sheldon perpetuates the fallacy that peer review is a guarantee of validity (Nature 559, 445; 2018). There are countless examples to the contrary (see, for instance, A. Margalida and M. À. Colomer PeerJ 4, e1670; 2016).

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 560, 553 (2018)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06055-3

Competing Interests

Jonathan Tennant is founder of the preprint server paleorXiv; and member of the Knowledge Exchange working group on preprints.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links