Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Physicists doubt bold superconductivity claim following social-media storm

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 560, 539-540 (2018)


Updates & Corrections

  • Update 23 August 2018: This story has been updated to reflect the latest results on superconductivity at high pressures.


  1. Thapa, D. K. & Pandey, A. Preprint at (2018).

  2. Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. I. Nature 525, 73–76 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drozdov, A. P. et al. Preprint at (2018).

  4. Skinner, B. Preprint at (2018).

Download references


Latest on:

Nature Careers


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links