Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 558, 361-364 (2018)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05414-4

References

  1. Waters, E. et al. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD001871 (2011).

  2. Grimes, R. W., Chamberlain, Y. & Oku, A. Sci. Diplomacy 3, 2 (2014).

  3. Sutherland, W. J. & Burgman, M. Nature 526, 317–318 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foresight. Future of the Sea (UK Government Office for Science, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Royal Society. Machine Learning: The Power and Promise of Computers that Learn by Example (Royal Society, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fiorella, K., L. Chen, R., Milner, E. & Fernald, L. Glob. Food Secur. 8, 39–47 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Defra Group Areas of Research Interest (DEFRA, 2017).

  8. UK Government. The What Works Network: Five Years On (UK Government, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Supplementary Information

  1. Principles for good evidence synthesis for policy

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links