Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Sizing up human brain evolution

An innovative computational analysis of factors that might have influenced human brain evolution suggests that ecological, rather than social, factors had a key role in the evolution of large, rapidly developing brains.
  1. Richard McElreath

    1. Richard McElreath is in the Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Most organisms are brainless but thriving. Brains are expensive to produce and maintain, and in the human lineage they have grown so large as to incur a substantial metabolic burden as the brain develops1. A human brain stops growing by the age of ten, long before the body reaches physical maturity, and this costly and fast process of brain growth has been proposed to cause a delay in body growth1. Brain growth is not given priority in this way in other apes, and the human pattern is puzzling because it keeps our bodies smaller, more vulnerable and less productive for longer. The answer to this riddle must lie in how the human brain helped our ancestors to survive and reproduce. In a paper in Nature, González-Forero and Gardner2 investigate the role of different factors as possible drivers of our unusually large brains, and determine how well these factors might account for the pattern of changes in brain and body size that occur as humans develop.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 557, 496-497 (2018)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05197-8

References

  1. Kuzawa, C. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13010–13015 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. González-Forero, M. & Gardner, A. Nature 557, 554–557 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker, S. T. & Gibson, K. R. J. Hum. Evol. 6, 623–641 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Humphrey, N. K. in Growing Points in Ethology (eds Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A.) 303–317 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernàndez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. Science 317, 1360–1366 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran, W. G. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 128, 134–155 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thornton, A. & McAuliffe, K. J. Zool. 295, 12–22 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links