A broader look at adolescents with perinatal HIV

An epidemiological study of adolescents who had acquired HIV around the time of birth highlights how high-income countries benefit from the ability to begin treating all infected children in the first years of life.
Patricia M. Flynn is in the Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.

Search for this author in:

It is estimated that more than 2.1 million children under 15 years of age are living with HIV infection worldwide (see Statistical Tables at Almost all of these children received the retrovirus from their mother, either around the time of birth (the perinatal period) or through breastfeeding. Writing in PLoS Medicine, the CIPHER (Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research) Global Cohort Collaboration1 has shed light on the population of children who survive perinatal HIV infection, living into adolescence and beyond. The collaboration’s far-reaching epidemiological study emphasizes the importance of early antiretroviral therapy (ART) for improving survival rates and clinical outcomes.

Before the availability of ART, the mortality rate of babies perinatally infected with HIV was 25% by 2 years of age2. Today, a much higher percentage of perinatally infected children survive into adolescence, but this population is little studied compared with other cohorts of people with HIV. Furthermore, it has been unclear whether or how perinatally acquired HIV might differentially affect adolescents living in different parts of the world.

The CIPHER investigators combined data from researchers in 12 regions of the world who followed adolescents with perinatal HIV infection. For a total of 38,187 adolescents, the authors report factors such as the age at which ART began, the person’s growth record, whether or not they dropped out of their treatment programme, and survival. Individuals were tracked from their first clinic visit and first ART treatment until 15 years of age, and data were collected from the 1980s or 1990s (depending on region) until 2014.

These data allowed the CIPHER researchers to compare adolescents in different countries, regions and country income levels. Their analysis demonstrates that country income level is associated with the stage of life at which ART typically begins. Not surprisingly, the initiation of both care and ART occurred much earlier in the high-income countries included in the study (14 European countries and the United States) than in other areas of the world. Specifically, children first visited a clinic at a median of 1.1 years of age and began ART at a median of 2.5 years in high-income countries, compared with 7.1 years and 8.0 years, respectively, in the low-income countries studied (26 countries in sub-Saharan Africa).

Growth is delayed in children with HIV infection3, and was markedly different between high- and low-income countries. The authors found that height-for-age scores were higher in high-income countries than in countries at other income levels at the times when the person first visited the clinic and began ART. In all regions, growth levels began to catch up after ART began. But the height-for-age scores achieved by children in high-income countries at the age of 10 and at the time of the last recorded clinic visit were similar to those of children and adolescents who did not have HIV. By contrast, height-for-age scores for children living in regions with lower incomes remained below average, probably because ART began significantly later in life. In addition, the cumulative incidence of mortality by age 15 was approximately 3 times greater in low-income countries than in high-income ones (2.6% and 0.9%, respectively).

This data set will no doubt improve our understanding of the population of young people living with HIV infection, in no small part owing to its impressive size and breadth. Previously, the only available data sets included many fewer children and adolescents, and were limited to regional or national cohorts. However, the work also comes with caveats. For instance, the cohorts studied in different parts of the world were established for different reasons — some were national registries, whereas others were groups followed as part of other research. As such, there could be some biases in the study. In addition, there were some differences in the data elements that were collected in different regions. Future studies looking at specific aspects of the data might therefore be limited to fewer adolescents.

The CIPHER investigators’ work adds to previous evidence4,5 for the benefits of early ART. Together, these key studies demonstrate that early ART can save lives and preserve normal growth and development in children with HIV infection. However, the scale-up of ART for infected children has lagged woefully behind that for adults. Data from the United Nations’ children’s agency Unicef (see show improvements in the availability of ART for children under 15 years of age since 2005, but there is still much to be done. In 2015, fewer than half of infected children were receiving ART (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 | Prevalence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for children living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries. Between 2005 and 2015, the percentage of children under 14 years of age who were living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries and who were receiving ART rose from less than 5% to 49%. But the CIPHER Global Cohort Collaboration1 reports that these children typically began ART later in life than their counterparts in high-income countries. Source: UNICEF

There are many barriers to the optimal provision of ART for children in low-income countries6. For instance, problems with infrastructure, including a lack of medical personnel and insufficient drug stocks, are common in many areas of the world. Drug development is challenging, because the physiological changes that occur during childhood can affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, and much work is therefore typically required to make drugs safe and effective for children of all ages. ART consists of three drugs that, in adults, can be given in one pill — but this is trickier in children, because the appropriate ratios of the drugs might vary with age. Finally, infant- and child-friendly formulations that do not require refrigeration and are easy to transport are currently lacking.

Because advances in preventing perinatal HIV infection have markedly decreased the numbers of infected children, there is unfortunately no longer a market benefit to developing paediatric ART, making it an unattractive focus for pharmaceutical companies. The current paper’s clear demonstration of the benefits of early ART demands that efforts to develop optimal drugs and formulations be increased. In addition, infrastructure must be put in place to make ART consistently available to the more than one million children with HIV infection who do not currently have adequate access to these live-saving drugs.

Nature 556, 439-440 (2018)

doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04476-8
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up


  1. 1.

    The Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) Global Cohort Collaboration et al. PLoS Med. 15, e1002514 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Scott, G. B. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 321, 1791–1796 (1989).

  3. 3.

    Barlow-Mosha, L. et al. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 20, 21552 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Violari, A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 2233–2244 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Laughton, B. et al. AIDS 26, 1685–1690 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Penazzato, M. et al. Clin. Infect. Dis. 64, 1597–1603 (2017).

Download references