Big burgers and petrol-guzzling vehicles: it’s a match made in the United States, with its drive-through fast-food joints. But last month, the US fast-food chain Sonic Drive-In tweaked its menu to introduce something different: a burger with some of its beef replaced with mushrooms. The Signature Slinger cheeseburger, Sonic promises, will deliver drive-through customers “all of the flavor with none of the guilt”.
The claimed conscience-easing credentials of the Slinger are twofold: reduced calories and a smaller carbon footprint. It’s targeted at those who wouldn’t switch to a non-meat alternative, such as soya. And the burger does not come alone. It’s merely the latest offering from a movement that has united chefs, scientists and health and environmental advocates. Led by the Culinary Institute of America in Hyde Park, New York, with predictable support from mushroom producers, the initiative seeks to promote both public health and environmental sustainability, by replacing 100% ground beef in some foods with a blend that contains up to half mushrooms. It’s the biggest new foodie trend that you haven’t heard of. Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the University of Southern California in Los Angeles are among the institutions that have started to cook with it routinely.
Does the science support the claims?
Beef has an outsize environmental footprint. Per gram of protein, beef requires on average 50 times more land and produces 100 times more greenhouse gases than do beans and other plant-based proteins. Replacing 30% of the beef with mushrooms in the roughly 10 billion burgers that Americans eat each year would reduce emissions equivalent to taking 2 million cars off the road, according to the World Resources Institute, an environmental think tank in Washington DC.
Still, mushroom cultivation is not a green panacea. Mushrooms are fussy about temperature and are usually grown inside energy-hungry climate-controlled sheds. A 2012 analysis reported that mushrooms have a greenhouse-gas impact almost ten times that of vegetables such as onions, carrots and cabbages (M. Berners-Lee et al. Energy Policy 43, 184–190; 2012).
Although individual consumers who choose a mushroom substitute might feel less guilty, demand for beef continues to rise alongside incomes around the world. As such, scientists and governments must continue to look for ways to reduce the impact of beef farming itself. Expanding cattle pasture is the main driver of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, and one-third of the world’s cropland goes to feeding animals — usually cattle. Research is needed to raise pasture productivity, improve feed and reduce methane emissions. So, too, is a renewed effort to combat deforestation.
On the health front, research has shown that substituting one-quarter of the beef in meals with mushrooms decreases caloric intake by about one-third. Saturated fats also drop, and chefs can often make do with less salt. Tests across US school dinners suggest that these benefits seem to come without a negative impact, such as leaving pupils hungry.
In an era of expanding waistlines, this is potentially good news. Earlier this month, health authorities in the United Kingdom called on food manufacturers to voluntarily reduce the calories in processed products by 20% by 2024. Doing so would save nearly £9 billion (US$12.7 billion) and prevent more than 35,000 premature deaths due to obesity-related illness over 25 years, Public Health England estimated. Sonic’s blended burger is substantially smaller than its regular cheeseburger and would more than deliver on that goal, starting at around 340 calories compared with 580 calories for the chain’s standard.
Will it and other mushroom-blended meats succeed where health and environmental advocates have failed, and persuade people to eat less beef? Certainly, it seems a better approach than simply asking people to change their ways by pointing out the cost.
But, as with zero-alcohol wine and sugar-free soft drinks, taste will ultimately determine consumer choice. So how does the Signature Slinger score? In a blind taste comparison, two Nature reporters were both able to correctly identify the mushroom blend. Setting aside the fact that both patties had the distinct taste and texture of fast food, one person preferred the pure beefburger, and the other the mushroom blend. Both agreed that if the blended burger was the future, then the future was better with (guilt-inducing) bacon.
Nature 555, 560 (2018)
Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter
Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.