NEWS AND VIEWS

Oxidation softens mantle rocks

Seismic waves that propagate through a layer of Earth’s upper mantle are highly attenuated. Contrary to general thinking, this attenuation seems to be strongly affected by oxidation conditions, rather than by water content.
Tetsuo Irifune is in the Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan, and at the Earth Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Contact

Search for this author in:

Tomohiro Ohuchi is in the Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan.
Contact

Search for this author in:

The outermost layer of the solid Earth is divided into tectonic plates that move around on a region of the upper mantle called the asthenosphere. Seismic waves from earthquakes travel through the asthenosphere at relatively low speeds, and are highly attenuated as a result of energy dissipation, a property known as anelastic behaviour1. These seismic characteristics are usually associated with low viscosity (a ‘softening’) in the mantle rock peridotite. In a paper in Nature, Cline et al.2 demonstrate for the first time that this softening is influenced by oxidation conditions — a result that could have major implications for our understanding of the upper mantle.

The softening of peridotite in the asthenosphere was initially thought to be caused by small amounts of melted material3. Such material would act as a lubricant between crystals of the mineral olivine that are abundant in peridotite (Fig. 1). However, in the 1990s, it was shown that this effect is limited to particularly warm regions of the mantle, such as beneath the volcanoes that occur along mid-ocean ridges, where melted material is abundant enough to form interconnected networks4,5.

Peridotite rock sample containing crystals of the mineral olivine

Figure 1 | Mantle peridotite from San Carlos, Arizona. Peridotite is the dominant rock in the upper part of Earth’s mantle. It consists mainly of the mineral olivine (light green), with smaller amounts of other minerals such as pyroxene, spinel and garnet (darker colours). Cline et al.2 subjected aggregates of olivine to high temperatures and pressures, and to oscillations that mimic seismic waves known as shear waves. They discovered that the speed and attenuation of the waves were insensitive to the water content of olivine, but strongly dependent on oxidation conditions — findings that could reshape our view of the upper mantle. Credit: Tetsuo Irifune

Over the past two decades, the consensus has been that the presence of water leads to substantial softening of peridotite6. Experiments that measure the deformation of olivine crystals under large strains79 have shown that small amounts of water can enhance both the sliding of grain boundaries (the interfaces between crystals) and the deformation of individual crystals. However, the absence of appropriate equipment and techniques has meant that there have been no experiments to assess the anelastic behaviour of peridotite when it has a realistic water content (up to a few hundred parts per million10) and is under the small strains associated with seismic-wave propagation.

Cline and colleagues used a sophisticated method11 to subject aggregates of olivine to high temperatures and pressures, and to oscillations that mimic seismic waves known as shear waves. The authors considered aggregates that had a range of water contents and oxidation states, similar to those expected in the asthenosphere. They discovered that the speed and attenuation of the waves were insensitive to water content, in contrast to expectations from the results of the large-strain deformation experiments79.

Instead, Cline et al. found that the seismic properties of their olivine aggregates were markedly dependent on oxidation state: wave speed decreased and attenuation increased with increasing oxygen fugacity (degree of oxidation). This finding could imply that the low speeds and high attenuation of seismic waves in the asthenosphere, particularly above sinking (subducting) tectonic plates, are partly caused by the highly oxidized conditions that are expected in such regions.

To explain their results, the authors suggest that ferric iron (Fe3+) and associated metal-ion vacancies that exist in olivine become stabilized under oxidized conditions, yielding high concentrations of crystal defects and/or a modified grain-boundary structure. Such changes are expected to enhance the rate at which defects diffuse through the crystals, leading to the observed anelastic behaviour.

Because olivine is the most common mineral throughout the upper mantle, Cline and colleagues’ findings could have implications for the oxygen fugacity and water content of not only the asthenosphere but also the entire upper mantle. For instance, if oxygen fugacity were entirely responsible for the seismic attenuation, it would have to fall by a factor of about 100 between the asthenosphere and the underlying part of the upper mantle to account for the observed decrease in attenuation1. Such a drop is consistent with petrological data from deeper regions of the upper mantle12,13.

By contrast, if attenuation were attributable to water alone, water content would need to decrease by a factor of about 100 between the asthenosphere and the underlying layer, on the basis of an earlier model6 and observations1, and peridotite at the base of the upper mantle would be almost completely dry. This prediction conflicts with observations of the mantle’s electrical conductivity, which is sensitive to water content. Electrical-conductivity profiles are either roughly constant or increase with depth throughout the upper mantle below the asthenosphere1416, suggesting that water content should follow similar trends. This enigma can be solved if water is not the primary cause of seismic attenuation, as shown by Cline and colleagues.

Nevertheless, there are some issues regarding the applicability of Cline and colleagues’ results to the actual mantle. For instance, the authors artificially increased the water content of some of their olivine aggregates using a technique called doping, in which a trace amount of one element is substituted for another. This process introduced artificial crystal defects whose mobility might differ from the defects intrinsic to olivine — although the authors argue that these artificial defects do not affect their conclusions. The effect of oxygen fugacity on the mobility of these different types of defect is also unknown.

Future studies on the seismic properties of olivine could avoid the need for doping by subjecting aggregates to higher pressures than those used by Cline and colleagues. For example, measurements could be made using an oscillation technique that combines a large-volume press and X-ray observations17. Future experiments should include wider ranges of oxidation conditions and olivine grain sizes than those considered by Cline et al., to confirm the dominance of oxygen fugacity over other causes of anelastic behaviour.

Although some petrological evidence suggests that oxygen fugacity in the mantle generally decreases with depth12,13, it has been difficult to evaluate how such oxidation states vary laterally. The probable link between oxygen fugacity and attenuation of seismic waves in peridotite could enable 3D mapping of oxidation states in the deep mantle, using data obtained with an imaging technique called seismic tomography. Meanwhile, the lack of correlation between water content in mantle olivine and seismic attenuation, if confirmed by independent studies at higher pressures, might require scientists to reconsider the role of water in the softening of mantle rocks, and the distribution and circulation of water throughout the deep Earth.

Nature 555, 314-315 (2018)

doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-02828-y
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up

References

  1. 1.

    Dalton, C. A., Ekström, G. & Dziewoński, A. M. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, B09303 (2008).

  2. 2.

    Cline, C. J. II, Faul, U. H., David, E. C., Berry, A. J. & Jackson, I. Nature 555, 355–358 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Anderson, D. L. & Spetzler, H. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 4, 62–64 (1970).

  4. 4.

    Wilcock, W. S. D., Solomon, S. C., Purdy, G. M. & Toomey, D. R. Science 258, 1470–1474 (1992).

  5. 5.

    Hirth, G. & Kohlstedt, D. L. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 100, 15441–15449 (1995).

  6. 6.

    Karato, S. & Jung, H. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. Solid Earth 157, 193–207 (1998).

  7. 7.

    McDonnell, R. D., Peach, C. J. & Spiers, C. J. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104, 17823–17845 (1999).

  8. 8.

    Ohuchi, T. et al. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500360 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Karato, S., Paterson, M. S. & FitzGerald, J. D. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 91, 8151–8176 (1986).

  10. 10.

    Hirschmann, M. M. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 629–653 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Jackson, I. & Paterson, M. S. Pure Appl. Geophys. 141, 445–466 (1993).

  12. 12.

    McCammon, C. & Kopylova, M. G. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 148, 55–68 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Woodland, A. B. & Koch, M. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 214, 295–310 (2003).

  14. 14.

    Sarafian, E. et al. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 16, 1115–1132 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Utada, H., Koyama, T., Obayashi, M. & Fukao, Y. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 281, 249–257 (2009).

  16. 16.

    Yoshino, T., Matsuzaki, T., Yamashita, S. & Katsura, T. Nature 443, 973−976 (2006).

  17. 17.

    Li, L. & Weidner, D. J. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 053902 (2007).

Download references