A non-tailed twist in the viral tale

Microscopy studies indicate that the most common viruses in the sea lack a tail structure. However, most cultured marine viruses have tails. A family of these elusive non-tailed marine viruses has now been identified.
Julio Cesar Ignacio-Espinoza is in the Department of Biological Sciences and at the Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.

Search for this author in:

Jed A. Fuhrman is in the Department of Biological Sciences and at the Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.

Search for this author in:

Bacteriophages, the viruses that infect bacteria, are thought to be the most abundant biological entities on Earth1. It has been estimated that, if lined up end to end, bacteriophages from the oceans alone would cover a distance of 3 million parsecs, past many distant galaxies2. Most bacteriophages cultured in the laboratory or represented in DNA-sequence databases have a ‘tail’ structure, which might take the form of a tube with spider-leg-like protrusions (similar in shape to the base of the Apollo Moon lander). However, electron-microscopy analysis of ocean samples indicates that oceanic viruses are predominantly non-tailed3,4,5. Therefore, identifying the ‘missing’ non-tailed marine viruses might improve our understanding of how viruses regulate the microbial systems that control a large fraction of global carbon and nitrogen cycling2,6. In a paper in Nature, Kauffman et al.7 report the discovery of a non-tailed viral family that they suggest might be an important component of the missing viruses, and they explain why this group might have eluded detection until now.

Viruses can be key drivers of the evolution, community composition and mortality of microorganisms, although their major role in the oceans was not recognized until the 1990s2,6. The number of species a virus can infect is a crucial factor that can influence gene transfer between species and the spread of viral infection. Bacteriophage action is usually studied using models in which a virus infects only one or a small group of closely related host strains or species, because this is the pattern observed for most of the bacteriophages cultured so far. And yet such cultures represent just a small proportion8 of the hundreds of known bacterial phyla9.

Kauffman and colleagues sought to expand the breadth of marine viruses known. They analysed water samples collected off the coast of Massachusetts on three separate days, and attempted to identify bacteriophages that could infect any of the 1,334 strains of Vibrionaceae bacteria that they had isolated. The Vibrionaceae are an easily cultured bacterial group that contains the cholera-causing pathogen Vibrio cholerae, as well as more-benign relatives, such as bioluminescent bacteria that form symbiotic relationships with fishes and squid.

Of all the bacteria that the authors tested, 239 strains became infected with viruses, and Kauffman et al. isolated 241 previously unknown viruses, of which 18 were non-tailed. They named this non-tailed family (Fig. 1) the Autolykiviridae, after Autolykos, an elusive thief from Greek mythology who could not be caught. DNA-sequence analysis revealed that autolykiviruses have small genomes (approximately 10 kilobases in length), which diverge enough from those of known viruses to form their own distinct lineage. They differ from other bacteriophages in sequences encoding a specific structural fold in a capsid protein, which forms the outer viral shell. The putative capsid-encoding sequences identified by Kauffman and colleagues were most like those that encode a fold known as a double jelly roll. This fold was previously associated with non-tailed viruses, in contrast to the HK97 fold found in tailed bacteriophages10.

Figure 1 | Different viral forms. Viruses that contain a tail structure are the most common type of bacterium-infecting virus (bacteriophage) cultured in the laboratory or represented in DNA databases. However, in samples taken from marine environments, non-tailed viruses are more common3–5. Kauffman et al.7 report a previously unknown family of non-tailed marine viruses. a, T4, an example of a tailed virus. Its 169-kilobase genome is enclosed in a capsid structure, made of protein (dark purple), that is 111 nanometres long15. The average capsid length for tailed marine viruses5 is 65 nm. The tail structures in certain other types of tailed virus have a different shape from that of T4. b, The cortovirus PM2, one of the few non-tailed marine bacteriophages identified so far. PM2 has lipid (yellow) associated with its capsid. Non-tailed marine viruses have an average capsid size5 of 54 nm. c, An autolykivirus, a member of a family of non-tailed marine viruses identified by Kauffman et al.7. The properties of these bacteriophages are consistent with the presence of lipid.

To investigate the ecological role of autolykiviruses, the authors performed a monumental host-range analysis, testing the ability of their 241 marine-isolated viruses to infect and kill 318 of their marine bacterial strains. They found that the 18 non-tailed autolykiviruses were responsible for a disproportionately high number of bacterial cell deaths. This was mainly because the autolykiviruses had a substantially wider host range than the tailed group, and could infect multiple Vibrionaceae genera, whereas the tailed viruses studied could not. The authors therefore propose that the impact of autolykiviruses on the marine environment might be fundamentally different from that of tailed bacteriophages. Although this is possible, it is perhaps premature to generalize. Kauffman et al. examined only Vibrionaceae. Moreover, some tailed marine bacteriophages have wide host ranges11.

How did these viruses evade previous detection in highly studied systems? The authors note that this could be because some standard viral isolation approaches for lab culture and DNA analysis have sampling biases, which might arise if a virus particle contains lipid, as seems to be the case for the autolykiviruses.

Chloroform treatment is commonly used to disrupt cell membranes as a way of limiting bacterial contamination during bacteriophage isolation; however, Kauffman et al. report that chloroform can inactivate autolykiviruses. And when a density-gradient centrifugation approach is used to isolate bacteriophages for DNA-sequence analysis, autolykiviruses are found in a low-density fraction separate from the heavier fraction that contains most bacteriophages (and which is thus usually analysed). An additional snag is the presence of protein covalently bound to autolykiviral DNA that necessitates treatment with a protease enzyme for DNA extraction, an uncommon step in standard large-scale virus-sequencing studies. These technical obstacles should be considered both in future surveys and in the interpretation of existing ones.

Are these autolykiviruses the missing non-tailed marine viruses? Although this discovery certainly illuminates the value of analysing host–virus systems found in marine environments11,12,13, the Autolykiviridae constitutes just a fraction of the missing non-tailed viruses — the authors’ quantitative isolation technique demonstrated that only around 7% of the viruses (18 out of 241) cultured on Vibrionaceae were autolykiviruses. Autolykivirus-related sequences are found in DNA sequences of many phyla of bacteria and archaea (another single-celled group that lacks a nucleus). This suggests that other Autolykiviridae-like viruses exist, although the authors were unable to estimate the frequency of autolykivirus-like sequences. They observed that the autolykiviral infection cycle was slower than that of tailed bacteriophages in laboratory experiments, which might imply a disproportionately lower effect of autolykiviruses when viruses compete in nature.

Because the autolykiviruses were found by studying hosts representing only a tiny portion of the overall diversity of marine bacteria, the use of hosts from multiple phyla might reveal other viral groups previously missed. Modified experimental protocols might capture those excluded for the same types of technical reason that prevented autolykiviral identification. Finding previously unknown viral groups is crucial, because large-scale DNA surveys across organisms require reference sequences, and this study points us in the right direction. Luckily, a method is available for extracting viral DNA that avoids the problematic step of density gradients and includes a protease-treatment step14. This puts the search for further non-tailed viral relatives, and the quantitative study of their effect on marine microbial systems, within reach.

Nature 554, 38-39 (2018)

doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-00923-8
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up


  1. 1.

    Cobián Güemes, A. G. et al. Annu. Rev. Virol. 3, 197–214 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Suttle, C. A. Nature 437, 356–361 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Børsheim, K. Y., Bratbak, G. & Heldal, M. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 352–356 (1990).

  4. 4.

    Wommack, K. E., Hill, R. T., Kessel, M., Russek-Cohen, E. & Colwell, R. R.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2965–2970 (1992).

  5. 5.

    Brum, J. R., Schenck, R. O. & Sullivan, M. B. ISME J. 7, 1738–1751 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Fuhrman, J. A. Nature 399, 541–548 (1999).

  7. 7.

    Kauffman, K. M. et al. Nature 544, 118–122 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Holmfeldt, K. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12798–12803 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Hug, L. A. et al. Nature Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Sullivan, M. B., Waterbury, J. B. & Chisholm, S. W. Nature 424, 1047–1051 (2003).

  11. 11.

    Krupovic, M. & Koonin, E. V. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2401–E2410 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Kang, I., Oh, H.-M., Kang, D. & Cho, J.-C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12343–12348 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Nature 494, 357–360 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Steward, G. F. & Culley, A. I. in Manual of Aquatic Viral Ecology 154–165 (Assoc. Sci. Limnol. Oceanogr., 2010)

  15. 15.

    Comeau, A. M. & Krisch, H. M. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1321–1332 (2008).

Download references