Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Homing in on a key factor of climate change

The sensitivity of Earth’s climate to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels is a big unknown in predicting future global warming. A compelling analysis suggests that we can rule out high estimates of this sensitivity.
  1. Piers Forster

    1. Piers Forster is at the School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

The quantity known as equilibrium climate sensitivity is crucial for understanding Earth’s future temperature1, and ongoing uncertainty about its value makes it harder to adequately prepare for the long-term effects of climate change2. This key parameter enumerates the increase in Earth’s average surface temperature that would occur if atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were doubled and the climate system was given enough time to reach an equilibrium state. More than 150 estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) have been published3, many of which suggest that worryingly high sensitivities are possible — including one that was published in Nature just a few weeks ago4. On page 319, Cox et al.5 use an ingenious approach to rule out high estimates. If correct, this would improve the chances of achieving internationally agreed targets for minimizing global warming.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Nature 553, 288-289 (2018)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00480-0

References

  1. Stocker, T. F. et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weitzman, M. L. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5, 275–292 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A. & Hegerl, G. C. Nature Geosci. 10, 727–736 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, P. T. & Caldeira, K. Nature 552, 45–50 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C. & Williamson, M. S. Nature 553, 319–322 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charney, J. G. et al. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment (Natl Acad. Sci., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forster, P. M. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 85–106 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ceppi, P. & Gregory, J. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13126–13131 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Armour, K. C. Nature Clim. Change 7, 331–335 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links