NEWS AND VIEWS

Cometary spin-down

The rotation rate of a comet more than halved in two months — a much greater change than has previously been observed. This suggests that the comet is in a distinct evolutionary state and might soon reorient itself.

Kilometre-sized chunks of ice and dust known as cometary nuclei were left over from the formation of the Solar System1. The vast majority of these objects orbit the Sun in one of two cometary reservoirs beyond the orbit of Neptune: the Kuiper belt and the Oort cloud. When an object from one of these reservoirs enters the inner Solar System, it becomes an active comet — its ice is transformed into gas and carries along embedded dust to form a diffuse envelope (coma) and tail. On page 186, Bodewits et al.2 report a dramatic decrease in the rotation rate of comet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák (comet 41P) indicating that this object could soon enter a phase of rotational instability and reorientation that has never before been seen in a comet.

A rotating celestial body that orbits the Sun without being perturbed has a constant spin state — its rotation rate and the orientation of its axis of rotation relative to inertial space (represented approximately by the positions of stars) are fixed. But, in practice, many factors can change a body’s spin state. These include the gravitational pull of other objects, collisions, asymmetric emission of thermal radiation from the body3 and, particularly in the case of comets, the recoil force from the asymmetric release of gas.

Gas that streams from a comet’s surface accelerates the region of origin in the opposite direction, like a rocket engine (Fig. 1). If the direction of this acceleration does not cross the body’s centre of mass, it will produce a turning effect called a torque. And if the time-averaged torques on all surface elements do not cancel each other out, they will alter the comet’s spin state. Outgassing forces will also affect the body’s orbit around the Sun4.

Figure 1 | Asymmetric outgassing from a comet. Bodewits et al.2 report that the rotation rate of comet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák decreased rapidly between March and May 2017. They suggest that this slowdown was caused by the release of gas from a particularly active area far from the comet’s rotation axis. Such asymmetric outgassing would have generated a strong recoil force, accelerating the active area in the opposite direction to the comet’s rotation and thereby reducing the comet’s rotation rate.

Moderate changes in rotation rate have been observed in several comets — in particular, those visited by spacecraft, for which high-quality data are available. For comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, the target of the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission, a clear connection has been established between outgassing-induced torques and changes in rotation rate5.

If a comet is spun up to a rotation rate at which the centrifugal force near the equator surpasses gravitational and cohesive forces, landslides and partial or even catastrophic fragmentation can occur6,7,8. Such events would be accompanied by strong sublimation (transformation of ice into gas) and dust production from newly exposed areas, which is one possible cause of sudden increases in brightness called outbursts.

Comet 41P is a small (1.4–2.0 km in diameter) body that originated from the Kuiper belt and was pulled into its current orbit in the inner Solar System by the gravity of Jupiter. During previous passes by the Sun, known as perihelion passages, the comet had a high level of outgassing activity, given its small size9. It passed by Earth at only one-seventh of the Earth–Sun distance (an astronomical unit, au) on 1 April 2017, and had its closest approach to the Sun at a distance of about 1 au on 12 April.

Bodewits et al. observed comet 41P in March 2017 using the Discovery Channel Telescope at the Lowell Observatory in Arizona, and then in May using the UltraViolet–Optical Telescope on board the Swift space observatory. Over the two-month interval between their observations, the authors found that the comet’s rotation period increased from an already long 20 hours to more than 46 hours. Such a high rate of change has not been seen in a comet before.

The authors conclude that comet 41P must be subject to an extremely effective torque. They suggest that this feature could be caused by outgassing from a particularly active area far from the body’s rotation axis, oriented such that the gas flows in approximately the same direction as the rotation. The efficiency of the torque is enhanced by the comet’s comparatively small size, high outgassing rate and slow overall rotation.

Bodewits and colleagues extrapolated the comet’s rotation period in time to explore the body’s past and future spin states (see Fig. 4 of the paper2). Assuming comparable torques during past perihelion passages, the authors found that the comet could have been rotating with a period of about 5 hours, which is near the fragmentation limit, before 2006. They hypothesize that this rapid rotation might be linked to a bright outburst that occurred during the comet’s 2001 perihelion passage9.

For instance, the rotation could have induced a landslide or partial fragmentation in the comet, which would have been visible as an outburst. Alternatively, or in addition, the event behind the outburst might have uncovered an active area that is now causing the strong torque. A similar sequence of events could have occurred in comet 103P/Hartley 2, which was visited by the Deep Impact Extended Investigation (DIXI) space mission8,10 in 2010.

Extrapolating comet 41P’s rotation rate forward in time, Bodewits et al. predict that the period would have exceeded 100 hours in mid-2017. Such an extremely slow rotation would no longer stabilize the comet’s spatial orientation, so that even small torques could make it wobble like a spinning top. If the current strong torque persists, it might eventually drive the comet to spin up again, possibly about a different axis.

A change in comet 41P’s rotation axis would affect the seasonal distribution of heating across the body’s surface, the associated levels of activity and the pattern of mass transport between different regions11. The global process of cometary erosion might therefore be redirected. Observations from the end of the 2017 activity period and from the next perihelion passage in 2022 could document this yet-to-be-seen phase of cometary evolution, and reveal valuable information about the nature of comets and other planetary bodies.

doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-00008-6
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up

References

  1. 1.

    Whipple, F. L. Astrophys. J. 111, 375–394 (1950).

  2. 2.

    Bodewits, D., Farnham, T. L., Kelley, M. S. P. & Knight, M. M. Nature 553, 186–188 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Rubincam, D. P. Icarus 148, 2–11 (2000).

  4. 4.

    Marsden, B. G. Astron. J. 74, 720–734 (1969).

  5. 5.

    Keller, H. U., Mottola, S., Skorov, Y. & Jorda, L. Astron. Astrophys. 579, L5 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Hirabayashi, M. et al. Nature 534, 352–355 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Jewitt, D. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 829, L8 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Steckloff, J. K., Graves, K., Hirabayashi, M., Melosh, H. J. & Richardson, J. E. Icarus 272, 60–69 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Combi, M. SOHO SWAN Derived Cometary Water Production Rates Collection (NASA, 2017).

  10. 10.

    A’Hearn, M. F. et al. Science 332, 1396–1400 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Keller, H. U. et al. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S357–S371 (2017).

Download references