Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.



The Editorial ‘Nurture negatives’ (Nature 551, 414; 2017) erroneously stated that Psychological Science had released a replication report. In fact, the report was in Perspectives on Psychological Science.

A quote in ‘The axolotl paradox’ (Nature 551, 286–289; 2017) implies that animals obtained from a breeding facility in Kentucky have a high rate of malformations. This is not the case. The animals referred to may trace their lineage to the facility, but have been bred and potentially inbred elsewhere.

Nature 552, 302 (2017)

Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing


Quick links