The tyrosine phosphorylation barcode encoded in C-terminus of HER2 and its ubiquitination regulate diverse HER2 functions. PTPN18 was reported as a HER2 phosphatase; however, the exact mechanism by which it defines HER2 signaling is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that PTPN18 regulates HER2-mediated cellular functions through defining both its phosphorylation and ubiquitination barcodes. Enzymologic characterization and three crystal structures of PTPN18 in complex with HER2 phospho-peptides revealed the molecular basis for the recognition between PTPN18 and specific HER2 phosphorylation sites, which assumes two distinct conformations. Unique structural properties of PTPN18 contribute to the regulation of sub-cellular phosphorylation networks downstream of HER2, which are required for inhibition of HER2-mediated cell growth and migration. Whereas the catalytic domain of PTPN18 blocks lysosomal routing and delays the degradation of HER2 by dephosphorylation of HER2 on pY1112, the PEST domain of PTPN18 promotes K48-linked HER2 ubiquitination and its rapid destruction via the proteasome pathway and an HER2 negative feedback loop. In agreement with the negative regulatory role of PTPN18 in HER2 signaling, the HER2/PTPN18 ratio was correlated with breast cancer stage. Taken together, our study presents a structural basis for selective HER2 dephosphorylation, a previously uncharacterized mechanism for HER2 degradation and a novel function for the PTPN18 PEST domain. The new regulatory role of the PEST domain in the ubiquitination pathway will broaden our understanding of the functions of other important PEST domain-containing phosphatases, such as LYP and PTPN12.
Inappropriate responses to growth factors drive abnormal cell growth and transformation, which play crucial roles in the development and progression of human cancer1,2,3,4. Research on the action of growth factors led to the discovery of tyrosine phosphorylation and the receptor tyrosine kinase family in the early 1980s, including the receptors for epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin5,6,7,8. Cloning of EGF-activated receptors also identified the human EGF receptor (EGFR)-related gene 2, called HER2 or ErbB2. HER2 currently attracts extensive attention because its overexpression indicates poor prognosis in mammary, ovarian, gastric and other cancers9,10. Continuous endeavors focused on HER2 have resulted in the first targeted anti-tyrosine kinase therapy, Trastuzumab, for the treatment of metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, which has achieved remarkable success10.
HER2 is normally regarded as an orphan receptor. Upon the action of growth factors, HER2 is the preferred dimerization partner of other EGFR family members in initiating downstream cellular signaling. The heterodimerization of HER2 promotes an asymmetric interaction between the two kinase domains of each EGFR member, leading to elevated kinase activity and the specific tyrosine phosphorylation and ubiquitination of the HER2 C-terminal cytoplasmic domain11 (Figure 1A). Recent studies have demonstrated that the HER2 C-terminal phosphorylation and ubiquitination encode important cellular functions, such as cell survival, proliferation, polarity, migration and protein degradation12,13,14,15,16.
Among the six known HER2 C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites, the phosphorylation of the juxtaposed tyrosine Y1221 and Y1222 enables high affinity for SHC1 and PIK3R3 binding and is a predictor of poor survival rates in breast cancer patients12,13,17. The phosphorylation of another HER2 residue, Y1248, recruits DOK-R, activates MAPK signaling and correlates with invasive ductal carcinomas or breast cancer in females16,18,19. Whereas the phosphorylation of Y1139 increases STAT3 transcriptional activity and activates RAS through GRB214,20, the phosphorylation of Y1196 increases the binding affinity of HER2 to CRK, activating ERK through a RAS-independent pathway, which is required for HER2 to drive cell motility, disrupt apical-basal polarity and inhibit apoptosis12,13,15. In addition to these sites, the phosphorylation of HER2 Y1112 near the kinase domain plays an important role in regulation of HER2 ubiquitination through its interaction with c-Cbl E3 ligase21. As an orphan receptor, HER2 is less strongly regulated by degradation than EGFR after EGF stimulation; however, the Cbl-dependent lysosome routing of HER2 is significantly increased by anti-HER2 antibody treatment21. In addition, Hsp90 inhibitory antibodies promote HER2 ubiquitination and proteasome targeting22. The precise HER2 C-terminal phosphorylation barcode and other mechanisms that promote HER2 ubiquitination are not fully understood.
The HER2 C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation barcodes are precisely regulated by the concerted actions of both kinases and phosphatases. Recent research has identified several protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), including PTP-MEG2, PTPN12, PTPN13 and PTPN18, involved in HER2 signaling in specific cellular contexts; however, the mechanism by which these phosphatases specifically control HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation has never been explored in detail23,24,25,26. Compromised PTPN12 function is associated with triple-negative breast cancer, and PTPN13 mutations were found in a PIK3CA-targeted gene screen24,26. Therefore, in-depth knowledge of the precise role of each PTP in HER2 regulation is necessary if we try to understand HER2 signaling and develop more efficient HER2-targeted therapies.
PTPN18, also called BDP1, was the first HER2 tyrosine phosphatase identified23. Intriguingly, PTPN18 only dephosphorylates the phospho-tyrosine residues of HER2, not those of EGFR or IGF1R, suggesting the stringent substrate specificity of PTPN1823. Structurally, PTPN18 belongs to the small sub-family of PEST domain-containing PTPs, which also includes LYP/PTPN22 and PTP-PEST/PTPN1227,28,29. In general, PTP substrate specificity is defined by a combination of selectivity in the catalytic region and the adjacent regulatory domains. Whereas the C-terminal regulatory domain is important for proper LYP function, our recent studies on LYP have revealed that unique structural characteristics in its N-terminal catalytic region, including an LYP-specific insert and an adjacent serine-phosphorylation site, determine substrate specificity28,30. Similar to LYP, PTPN18 displays very low activity towards small artificial substrates, suggesting that a large structural rearrangement may occur upon the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex. To understand the mechanism underlying HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation and the substrate specificity of PTPN18, we set out to elucidate the action of PTPN18 on HER2 tyrosine phosphorylation by combined cellular, kinetic and crystallographic analyses. We have defined the structural basis and functional roles of catalytic region and PEST domain of PTPN18 in specific regulation of HER2 phosphorylation barcodes. Moreover, whereas the interaction of HER2 pY1196 and pY1248 with PTPN18 governs HER2-mediated cell migration and proliferation, we observed that the PTPN18 switches ubiquitination and degradation routes of HER2, which require both its catalytic region and C-terminal PEST domain. The identification of the ancillary role of PTPN18 in mediating HER2 ubiquitination broadened our knowledge of the function of the PEST domain in protein phosphatases27,31.
PTPN18 specifically regulates HER2 Y1112, Y1196 and Y1248 phosphorylation states
The C-terminal domain of HER2 receptor contains a series of tyrosine phosphorylation sites (Figure 1A). To determine the specific sites regulated by PTPN18, we knocked down PTPN18 expression and monitored changes in the tyrosine phosphorylation of HER2 and EGFR (Figure 1B). In general, knockdown of PTPN18 by PTPN18-targeting siRNA did not perturb the phosphorylation states of the EGFR C-terminal Y992, Y1045, pY1068, Y1148 sites or the HER2 Y1139 and Y1221/1222 double sites (Figure 1B and 1C); however, the phosphorylation of the HER2 Y1112, Y1196 and Y1248 sites was significantly elevated in a time-dependent manner. To determine whether PTPN18 specifically regulate HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 through its phosphatase activity, we overexpressed the wild-type PTPN18 (PTPN18-WT) and an inactive mutant (D197A) to evaluate their effects on EGF-induced HER2 phosphorylation. Overexpression of PTPN18-WT decreased the EGF-induced HER2 phosphorylation on Y1112, Y1196 and Y1248 by 3-4-fold, whereas the equal overexpression of the PTPN18-D197A did not significantly change the HER2 phosphorylation states of Y1196 and Y1248, but increased the phosphorylation of Y1112 (Figure 1D and Supplementary information, Figure S1A). To confirm the direct dephosphorylation of HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 by PTPN18, we next immunoprecipitated phosphorylated HER2 after EGF stimulation and monitored the dephosphorylation of HER2 by GST-PTPN18 in vitro (Figure 1E and Supplementary information, Figure S1B). Whereas PTPN18 shows little activity toward the pY1139 or pY1221/1222 sites of immunoprecipitated HER2, it efficiently dephosphorylated immunoprecipitated HER2 at the pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 sites. These results showed that PTPN18 specifically regulates HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 upon EGF stimulation via its phosphatase activity.
PTPN18 specifically recognizes HER2 by synergistic actions of the catalytic region and PEST domain
The temporal regulation of the HER2 Y1112, Y1196 and Y1248 phosphorylation states by PTPN18 suggested the dynamic association between PTPN18 and HER2. Therefore, we overexpressed the PTPN18-WT and examined the receptor-phosphatase complexes by co-immunoprecipitation. The EGF-induced receptor-phosphatase complex formation was peaked at 15 min (Figure 2A and 2B). We next monitored the interaction of HER2 with the PTPN18 substrate trapping-mutant D197A. The D197 in PTPN18 functions as the general acid during catalysis and is required for the cleavage of the scissile P-O bond in the tyrosine phosphorylated substrate. Accordingly, the PTPN18-D197A trapping mutant bound to the substrate, but its dissociation rate for the substrate was significantly decreased. Stronger interactions between PTPN18 D197A and HER2 were detected, and the formation of the receptor-phosphatase complex was observed from the first minute (Figure 2A and 2B). The effect of the D197A mutation supports the “kiss and run” mechanism of interaction between HER2 and its phosphatase PTPN18. We next mapped the key elements of PTPN18 in mediating HER2 interaction by different PTPN18 truncations (Figure 2C and 2D and Supplementary information, Figure S2A). Whereas the last 55 residues of the C-terminal PEST domain are required for the interaction of PTPN18-WT with HER2, the catalytic domain (CD) with the inactive C229S mutation also binds to HER2. Both N- and C-terminal interactions of PTPN18 with phosphorylated HER2 are specific and direct, as verified by an in vitro GST pull-down assay (Figure 2E). Therefore, whereas the C-terminal PEST domain of PTPN18 forms a relatively stable complex with HER2 after EGF stimulation, which required its last 55 residues, the CD of PTPN18 interacts with the phosphorylated tyrosine sites of HER2 transiently, with the “kiss and run” mechanism.
PTPN18 kinetically prefers HER2 Y1112, Y1196 and Y1248 phosphorylation sites
PTPN18 specifically regulated three HER2 sites out of 10 HER2 and EGFR phosphorylation sites, probably through recognition of the local microenvironment of these sites, such as the primary peptide sequence. Therefore, synthetic phospho-peptides corresponding to the 13 known HER2 and EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation sites, together with five phospho-peptides derived from several proteins involved in downstream HER2 signaling, were assessed for in vitro PTPN18 catalytic activity. PTPN18 selectively recognized the HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 phosopho-peptides over all other phospho-peptides (Figure 2F and Supplementary information, Table S1). The Km for PTPN18 catalysis of the HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 phospho-peptides ranged from 6 to 23 μM, and Kcat ranged from 4 to 11.2 s−1. The Kcat/Km ratio, which primarily reflects the substrate association with the enzyme, is a good indicator of enzyme-substrate specificity. The calculated Kcat/Km values of PTPN18 toward the three phospho-peptides were from 4 × 105 to 8 × 105 M−1s−1, well within the range of physiological substrates tested for other known tyrosine phosphatases30,32,33. Biochemically, PTPN18 was a relatively poor phosphatase for small artificial substrates, such as para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), with a Kcat/Km of 2.7 M−1s−1, 2000-fold lower than PTP1B, a prototype tyrosine phosphatase (Supplementary information, Figure S2B and S2C). The catalytic activity of PTPN18 towards the three phosphorylated peptides of HER2 was five orders of magnitude higher than towards the single phenyl-ring substrate, suggesting that the residues flanking the HER2 phosphorylation sites are among the determinants of the recognition of these sites by PTPN18.
Overall structures of PTPN18 in complex with specific HER2 tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides
The above cellular and biochemical experiments unequivocally revealed that PTPN18 specifically dephosphorylates HER2 at the pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 sites. To define the structural basis of the PTPN18-specific recognition of distinct HER2 phosphorylation sites, we solved the crystal structures of the catalytically inactive mutant PTPN18-C229S in complex with HER2-pY1248 at 2.0 Å, pY1196 at 2.2 Å and pY1112 at 2.5 Å (Supplementary information, Table S2). All three HER2 phosphorylated peptides bound to PTPN18 in an extended conformation at the N-terminus, perpendicular to the five central β-sheets, as did the previously solved structure of PTP1B C215A in complex with insulin receptor activation segments; however, these peptides assumed different conformations in the C-terminus (Figure 3A and Supplementary information, Figure S3). The HER2-pY1112 peptide has an “S” shape, whereas HER2-pY1196 and HER2-pY1248 exhibited a β-turn configuration (Figure 3A). Binding of the peptide also triggered a conformational change in PTPN18. In particular, binding of the HER2 phospho-peptide induced the closure of the WPD loop in which the tip traveled 6.2 Å to precisely position the catalytically invariant Asp for efficient catalysis as observed in PTP1B, YopH and several other PTPs. However, no such changes have been observed in LYP, another PTP member of the PEST family, in complex with an inhibitor or peptides (Figure 2A)28,30.
Detailed structure of PTPN18 in complex with HER2 phospho-peptides (ENPEpY1248 LGLD and ENPEpY1196 LTPQ)
In the structure of PTPN18-C229S in complex with the HER2 pY1248 peptide (Ac-ENPEpY1248 LGLD-NH2), seven residues (1246-1252) were unambiguously assigned to the Fo-Fc omitting electron-density map (Figure 3B). The D64, K63 and a water molecule coordinated by R138 from PTPN18 composed five backbone H-bonds of the HER2 pY1248 peptide and positioned the peptide along specific PTPN18 surface loops, which were the phosphotyrosine recognition loop, the P-loop, the WPD loop, the Q loop and the α-1 helix from N- to the C-terminus (Figure 3A and 3C and Supplementary information, Figure S4C).
In the core region of contact between the HER2 pY1248 peptide and PTPN18, the central pY inserts into the active site, forming eight hydrogen bonds with PTPN18. The phenyl ring of the HER2 pY1248 is packed by Y62, V65, R140 and Q276 of PTPN18. Outside of the pY-binding pocket, the D64 accepts two hydrogen bonds from the two main-chain amides of the central pY1248 and L1249, defining the initial configuration of the peptide C-terminus (Figure 3C and Supplementary information, Figure S4C). Consistent with these observations, the mutation D64A did not change the catalytic activity of PTPN18 towards the small artificial substrate pNPP but significantly decreased the activity towards the HER2 pY1248 peptide (Figure 6B). In the N-terminus of the peptide, a hydrogen bond between the P1246 and the K63 of PTPN18 defines the peptide orientation, which positions the P1246 in the hydrophobic area formed by residue Y62 and the aliphatic carbons of K63. C-terminally to the central pY, four residues of the HER2 pY1248 peptide form a β-turn, in which an internal hydrogen bond is formed between the L1249 backbone carbonyl and the D1252 backbone amide. The pY+1 L1249 of the HER2 pY1248 peptide sits in a well-defined hydrophobic pocket (Figure 4A). After the linker, G1250, L1251 and D1252 form extensive interactions with R198 from PTPN18 (Figure 3C and Supplementary information, Figure S4C).
Relative to the HER2 pY1248 site, the HER2 pY1196 peptide (Ac-ENPE pY1196 LTPQ-NH2) shares five identical residues from the N-terminal (pY–4)/E1192 to the C-terminal (pY+1/L1197) position. The Kcat/Km of PTPN18 towards the HER2 pY1196 site is approximately half of its Kcat/Km towards HER2 pY1248, which may explain the less specific interactions observed in the structure of the PTPN18-C229S in complex with the HER2 pY1196 peptide (Figure 3D and Supplementary information, Figure S4D). As expected, three residues of P1194, E1195 and central pY1196 complex of the PTPN18-pY1196 peptide assume positions identical to those in the PTPN18-pY1248 complex, and the pY+1 L1197 falls into the same hydrophobic pocket as L1249 (Figure 4B). Unlike the linker G1250 in the HER2 pY1248 peptide, the pY+2 T1198 of the HER2 pY1196 peptide forms an internal hydrogen bond with E1195, which distorts the peptide slightly outwards. After T1198, the pY+3 P1199 both engages in hydrophobic interactions and forms a hydrogen bond with R198 of PTPN18 (Figure 3D and Supplementary information, Figure S4D).
The structure of PTPN18 in complex with the HER2 phopho-peptide (PLQRpY1112 SEDP)
Unlike the HER2 pY1248 and HER2 pY1196 peptides that form a β-turn at their C-termini, the nine residues of the HER2 pY1112 peptide display an extended β-structure defined by seven hydrogen bonds along the peptide backbone, which are composed by residues of K63, D64, R198, C233, Q262 and R268 of PTPN18 (Figure 3A and 3E and Supplementary information, Figure S4E). The internal electrostatic interactions between the side-chains of the pY–1 R1111 and pY+3 E1115 and several backbone hydrogen bonds also help to stabilize the extended β conformation of the HER2 pY1112 peptide (Supplementary information, Figure S4E).
N-terminally to the central binding core of pY, the pY–1 R1111 and pY–2 E1110 have non-specific hydrophobic interactions with K63 and D64. The pY–3 L1109 sits in a pocket defined by Y62 and R138 from PTPN18 and pY1112 from HER2 (Figure 3E and Supplementary information, Figure S4E). The N-terminal pY–4 P1108 reaches a hydrophobic region defined by L108, P109 and the aliphatic parts of R61 and K139 from PTPN18 (Figure 3E and Supplementary information, Figure S4E). The hydrophobic interactions of PTPN18 with P1108 and L1109 of HER2 are unique in defining PTPN18 and HER2 pY1112 phospho-peptide interactions, as HER2 pY1196 and HER2 pY1248 have the polar residues Glu1192/1244 and Asn1193/1245 in the corresponding positions. Consistently, the mutation P109A, which reduces the hydrophobic interactions of these residues, decreased the ability of PTPN18 to dephosphorylate the HER2 pY1112 peptide, but not the HER2 pY1196 or pY1248 peptides. The R138L mutation, which maintained its hydrophobic property, decreased HER2 pY1196 and pY1248 peptide hydrolysis but had little effect on HER2 pY1112 peptide hydrolysis (Figures 3E and 6A-6B).
In the C-terminus, the pY+1 position of HER2 pY1112 peptide has an S1113 instead of a hydrophobic residue. A hydrogen bond between the carbonyl group of the backbone S1113 and the sulphur of C233 defines the backbone conformation, and the side-chain of the S1113 engages in a hydrogen bond with the guanine group of R198, which assumes a stretched conformation (Figure 3E and Supplementary information, Figure S4E). The main-chain amide of pY+2 E1114 is recognized by Q276 and its side-chain forms hydrogen bond with R198. The last C-terminal residue P1116 forms extensive hydrophobic interactions with Q34 and F30 from helix α1, and its main-chain carbonyl forms strong hydrogen bonds with R268 (Figure 3E and Supplementary information, Figure S4E). Consistently, the elimination of pY+4 P1116 from the peptide abolished PTPN18 activity towards the peptide (Supplementary information, Table S1). In addition, the mutations Q34A or R268A significantly reduced the activity of PTPN18 towards the HER2 pY1112 phospho-peptide, revealing an essential role for the region close to the “LYP-specific insert” in binding PTPN18 substrates (Figures 3E, 6A, 6B and Supplementary information, Figure S4E).
The hydrophobic PTPN18 pY+1 site
The structures of both the HER2 pY1248 and HER2 pY1196 peptide-PTPN18-C229S complexes revealed a hydrophobic site for packing the pY+1 Leu residue. The hydrophobic site is surrounded by the hydrophobic residue V65 from the “pY-binding loop”, P272, A273 and the aliphatic carbon chain of Q276 from the “Q-loop”, with the “P-loop” residue C233 serving as the bottom (Figure 4A, 4B and Supplementary information, Figure S5A and S5B). This hydrophobic site is reminiscent of the “second pY-binding site” of PTP1B in the complex structures of the PTP1B-C215A-insulin receptor segment and PTP1B-C215S-BPPM (Figure 4C and Supplementary information, Figure S5C)32,34,35. Unlike PTP1B, which favors a second pY C-terminally to the central pY, PTPN18 does not prefer pY at the pY+1 position, as illustrated by the very weak activity of PTPN18 towards the HER2 pY1221pY1222 site (Figures 1B, 1C, 1E and 2F). Relative to the second PTP1B pY-binding site, two key substitutions in PTPN18 explain the observed difference in substrate selectivity. The replacement of R24 in PTP1B with Q34 in PTPN18 decreases the basic potential for targeting the second pY, and the change of G259 in PTP1B to A273 in PTPN18 blocks the channel linking the phosphate to the phenyl ring (Figures 4A-4C and 6A, Supplementary information, Figure S2A-S2C). Whereas the electron density of pY1163 in the phenyl ring of pY+1 in the PTP1B-IRK segment complex is disordered, the pY+1 Leu of the HER2 pY1248 or HER2 pY1196 is buried deeper in the apolar pocket and has a defined electron density32. This effect is mostly due to the shorter side-chain of C233 in PTPN18 compared with I219 in PTP1B at the bottom of the hydrophobic pocket (Figure 4A-4C and Supplementary information, Figure S4A-S4D).
Unlike PTPN18, another PEST-PTP family member, LYP, prefers acidic residues at the pY+1 position30. LYP has a narrower pocket entrance, defined by the relatively longer side-chains of I63 and S271, compared with V65 and A273 in PTPN18 (Figures 4A, 4D, 6A and Supplementary information, Figure S5D). As a result, the pY+1 Asp of SKAP-HOM floats above the LYP-binding pocket.
Consistent with the above observations, the mutation of the PTPN18 residue V65 to alanine (V65A), V65 to the corresponding LYP residue I63 (V65I) and P272 to the corresponding PTP1B residue M258 (P272M) decreased PTPN18 activity towards the HER2 pY1248 and pY1196 peptides by > 2- fold (Figure 6A-6B). The residues surrounding this hydrophobic pocket, V65, C233, P272 and A273, are not conserved in most PTP family members (Figure 6A and Supplementary information, Figure S6). Therefore, the crystal structure and mutagenesis studies revealed that PTPN18 has a special pocket favoring a hydrophobic pY+1 residue and that this feature is a determinant of its substrate selectivity.
The side-chain plasticity of PTPN18 R198 enables two different peptide conformations
In the PTPN18-HER2 pY1112 complex structure, the R198 of PTPN18 assumes an extended conformation and the guanine group is engaged in favorable hydrogen bonds with the side-chains of pY+1 S1113 and pY+2 E1114 (Figure 5A and 5B). In the complex structure of PTPN18 and HER2 pY1196, R198 assumes a similar extended conformation that forms two hydrogen bonds with peptide main-chain carbonyl groups and hydrophobic interactions with pY+3 P1199 (Figure 5A and 5C). When PTPN18 is in complex with the HER2 pY1248 peptide, the presence of L1251 at the pY+3 position prohibits the extended R198 conformation and the χ3 of R198 switches from 180° to 48°, enabling the guanine group to form a defined salt bridge with the side-chain of pY+4 D1252 from the HER2 pY1248 peptide (Figure 5A and 5D).
Therefore, the side-chain plasticity of R198 enables PTPN18 to accommodate two types of peptide sequences and secondary structures in the C-terminus, a β-turn with pY+3 Leu and pY+4 Asp and an “S” shape with pY+1 Ser and pY+2 Glu/Asp (Figure 5A). The hydrogen bonds and charge-charge interactions between the peptides and the guanine group of R198 determine PTPN18 and phospho-peptide interactions. Consistent with these observations, eliminating the side-chain of R198 to Ala or changing it to negatively charged Glu decreased PTPN18 activity towards the HER2 pY1248 or pY1112 peptides by 2-3-fold (Figure 6A-6B).
Specific interactions between PTPN18 and HER2 pY1196 and pY1248 contribute to the regulation of the HER2-mediated phosphorylation cascade
HER2 is a potent upstream regulator of EGF-induced cell proliferation and migration. Two of the PTPN18-regulated HER2 phosphorylation sites, pY1196 and pY1248, mediate cell growth and migration via the activation of the phosphorylation cascades, including, but not limited to DOKR-ERK, PI3K-AKT-WT1, SRC-Paxillin-PAK and other cascades15,16,17,20,36. Therefore, PTPN18 is likely to regulate cell growth and invasion through its action on HER2 phosphorylation. Knockdown of PTPN18 and PTP-MEG2, two known HER2 phosphatases, promoted EGF-mediated cell growth and invasion. Conversely, overexpression of PTPN18 inhibited EGF-induced cell proliferation and invasion (Supplementary information, Figure S7A-S7B).
Next, we evaluated the importance of the specific interactions between PTPN18 and HER2 Y1196 and Y1248 phosphorylated sites in EGF-induced HER2 signaling, utilizing information derived from complex crystal structures. In PTPN18, P109 of PTPN18 forms strong hydrophobic interactions with P1108 of the HER2 pY1112 phospho-peptide, but has no direct role in binding to HER2 pY1196 and pY1248 phospho-peptides. The mutation of P109A significantly reduced the activity of PTPN18 towards the HER2 pY1112 phospho-peptide, but had little effect on its activity towards the HER2 pY1196 or pY1248phospho-peptides (Figure 6B). Conversely, the mutation of the specific pY1248-interacting residue R140 of PTPN18 to Ala (R140A) displayed strong activity towards the HER2 pY1112 but decreased activity towards HER2 pY1196 and pY1248 (Figure 6B). Therefore, R140A was a biased PTPN18 mutant that only regulated the HER2 Y1196 and Y1248phosphorylation states, whereas P109A was an HER2 pY1112biased mutant.
We evaluated these biased mutants by monitoring their effects on EGF-induced changes in HER2 phosphorylation. Consistent with kinetic studies, P109A only decreased the HER2 Y1196 and Y1248 phosphorylation, whereas R140A specifically downregulated the HER2 Y1112 phosphorylation state (Figure 6C). Neither mutant had significant effects on the HER2 Y1139 or Y1221/1222 phosphorylation. Next, we monitored the altered phosphorylation cascades downstream of the HER2 activation (Figure 6C). Overexpression of PTPN18-WT significantly decreased the EGF-induced phosphorylation of ERK202/204, AKT308, AKT473, SRC416, SRC527, Paxillin118 and PAK423, but did not significantly change the phosphorylation of PAK144. These phospho-proteins are not likely to be the direct substrates of PTPN18, as PTPN18 displays weak activity towards corresponding phospho-peptides (Supplementary information, Table S1). Overexpression of HER2-pY1112biased mutant P109A of PTPN18 exerts similar effects to the wild type; however, overexpression of R140A, which perturbs HER2-pY1196and pY1248, had much weaker effects compared with the wild type or P109A mutant (Figure 6C). Consistent with the change in the phosphorylation cascade, overexpression of wild-type or the P109A mutant suppressed the EGF-induced cell proliferation and invasion, whereas the R140A mutant had no such effect (Figure 6D and 6E). Taken together, these biochemical and cellular studies confirm that unique structural features of PTPN18 are responsible for recognition of the HER2 Y1196 and Y1248phosphorylation sites, which determine HER2-mediated cell growth and invasion by regulating the phosphorylation cascade downstream of HER2.
PTPN18 promoted K48-linked polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of HER2
Unlike the HER2-Y1196 and -Y1248 phosphorylation that mediate cell invasion and proliferation, the phosphorylation of HER2-Y1112 by antibody treatment recruited the c-Cbl ubiquitin ligase and shuttled the HER2 protein to the lysosome for degradation21. Therefore, knockdown of PTPN18 should promote HER2 degradation by increasing its interaction with c-Cbl. Unexpectedly, EGF-induced HER2 degradation was significantly decreased, rather than increased, by knockdown of endogenous PTPN18 (Figure 7A). In comparison, the knockdown of another HER2 phosphatase, PTP-MEG2, had little effect on the HER2 protein level. Conversely, overexpression of PTPN18, but not PTP-MEG2, augmented EGF-induced HER2 degradation (Figure 7B). These results demonstrate that PTPN18 is a negative regulator of HER2 stability. We then examined whether PTPN18 regulated HER2 degradation through ubiquitination. Knockdown of PTPN18 decreased EGF-induced HER2 ubiquitination, whereas overexpression of PTPN18 increased HER2 ubiquitination(Figure 7C-7D and Supplementary information, Figure S8A-S8B). Therefore, PTPN18 promoted HER2 degradation by upregulating HER2 ubiquitination.
Next, we examined whether proteasome or lysosome pathway underlies PTPN18-promoted HER2 degradation. Application of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 significantly increased the endogenous HER2 expression level and almost abolished the effects of PTPN18 overexpression (Figure 7E). Whereas EGF stimulation promoted the co-localization of HER2 to lysosome marker Lamp1, overexpression of PTPN18 did not significantly increase the co-localized portion. In contrast, more HER2 co-localized with RPN12, the proteasome marker, after the overexpression of PTPN18 (Figure 7F). These data suggest that PTPN18 promotes proteasome targeting and degradation of HER2.
The ubiquitination-linked lysine positions determined the specific topology of polyubiquitin chains and produced different cellular outcomes for the polyubiquitinated protein (Figure 7G). Whereas K63-linked polyubiquitin targets the Cbl-EGFR complex to the lysosome, K48- or K29-linked polyubiquitination might deliver the protein to the proteasome for degradation37. We then applied various lysine mutations of ubiquitin to determine which polyubiquitin chain mediates the effects of PTPN18 on HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 7G-7I). The co-expression of ubiquitin mutant K48R or UB-63, in which all lysines except K63 are mutated to R, resulted in a marked decrease in PTPN18-mediated HER2 ubiquitination. Conversely, overexpression of K63R mutant or UB-48 ubiquitin construct had little effect on HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 7H-7I). Taken together, these data suggest that PTPN18 promotes the proteasome-dependent degradation of HER2 through K48-linked polyubiquitination.
Phosphorylation of the "DQSPAGS" motif in the PTPN18 PEST domain recruited E3 ligase β-Trcp and mediated HER2 ubiquitination
To determine the region of PTPN18 that is required for specific HER2 ubiquitination, we used a series of PTPN18 truncations or mutant (Figure 8A). Overexpression of the CD and the 1-348, 1-405 and 1-420 truncations of PTPN18 failed to promote HER2 ubiquitination, whereas overexpression of the PEST domain of PTPN18 and PTPN18 truncations containing the 1-425 region promoted HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 8B and 8C). Thus, a specific motif encompassing 415 to 425 was the key in PTPN18-mediated HER2 ubiquitination. In some PEST domain-containing proteins, such as VEGFR, the phosphorylation of a specific serine residue in the phosphodegron motif is essential for the recruitment of F-box E3-containing ligases and efficient ubiquitination38. A similar mechanism might also underlie PTPN18-mediated HER2 ubiquitination. To elucidate the role of the serine in the specific 415-425 motif of PTPN18, we mutated S419 and S423 to Ala and tested the effect of these mutantions on HER2 ubiquitination. Mutation of either S419A or S423A significantly decreased and double mutation of S419A/S423A completely abolished PTPN18-mediated HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 8D and 8E).
To further test whether PTPN18 regulates HER2 ubiquitination through a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism, we examined the effects of several kinase inhibitors. Whereas the ERK or GSK3 inhibitor had little effect on HER2 ubiquitination, the AKT inhibitor significantly blocked HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 8F and 8G). Because “PADQSPAGSGAY” is not an AKT-favored peptide substrate sequence, whether AKT or another kinase downstream of AKT directly phosphorylates the S419 or S423 residues of PTPN18 requires further investigation. In addition, activation of AKT is downstream of activation of HER2. Therefore, a negative feedback loop of “activation of HER2-AKT-PTPN18-HER2 degradation” exists in HER2 regulation.
We also noticed that the “DQSPAGS” motif in PTPN18 was similar to the known β-Trcp recognition sequence of Cdc25B (DSGFCLDS), PDCD4 (DSGRGDS) and DLG (DSGLPS)39. Therefore, the phosphorylation of PTPN18 on its DQSPAGS motif may create a docking site for ubiquitin E3 ligases, β-Trcp. Consistent with this hypothesis, the full-length PTPN18 interacted with β-Trcp whereas the catalytic region of PTPN18 did not (Figure 8H). Whereas mutation of S419A diminished β-Trcp binding, the S423A mutation or S419A/S423A double mutation almost abolished β-Trcp binding (Figure 8I). Moreover, knockdown of β-Trcp blocked PTPN18-mediated HER2 degradation (Figure 8J and 8K). Therefore, PTPN18 functions as an ancillary protein to recruit E3 ligase β-Trcp for HER2 ubiquitination.
PTPN18 regulates degradation kinetics of HER2 and functions as a switch between lysosome routing and proteasome targeting
To define the role of the dephosphorylation of the HER2 pY1112 site in PTPN18-promoted HER2 degradation, we overexpressed PTPN18-WT and the D197A trapping mutant and compared the degradation kinetics of HER2. The PTPN18-WT and PTPN18 dominant-negative mutant D197A had similar effects on HER2 degradation at the early time point (4 h) (Figure 9A and Supplementary information, Figure S9A). After 4 h, PTPN18 D197A had stronger effect (from 8 to 12 h; Figure 9A and Supplementary information, Figure S9A). We then checked the effect of PTPN18-D197A mutant on HER2 ubiqutination and pY1112 phosphorylation of ubiquitnated HER2. Overexpression of PTPN18-WT decreased the HER2 Y1112 phosphorylation in the ubiquitinated HER2 fractions, whereas overexpression of the PTPN18 D197A mutant significantly increased the phosphorylation of Y1112 (Figure 9B). Consequently, more HER2 were ubiquitinated with overexpression of the D197A mutant (Figure 9B and Supplementary information, Figure S9B). Next, we monitored the cellular distributions of HER2 with overexpression of PTPN18-WT or the D197A mutant. Whereas the distributions of HER2 to proteasomes were similar between the wild type and the D197A mutant, more HER2 proteins co-localized with Lamp1 in response to D197A overexpression (Figure 9C). Therefore, the phosphatase activity of PTPN18 controlled HER2 degradation kinetics through regulation of Y1112 phosphorylation and HER2 lysosome targeting.
Previous studies have demonstrated that c-Cbl binding to the phosphorylated HER2 Y1112site is required for lysosome routing21. After EGF stimulation, formation of the HER2/c-Cbl complex significantly increased in PTPN18 knockdown cells (Figure 9D and Supplementary information, Figure S9C). Conversely, the level of c-Cbl bound to HER2 and pY1112-phosphorylated HER2 decreased significantly with PTPN18-WT overexpression, but it increased with overexpression of the PTPN18 D197A dominant-negative mutant (Figure 9E and Supplementary information, Figure S9D). To determine the relation between the cellular outcome and the specific interaction between PTPN18 and the HER2 Y1112 site, based on the complex crystal structures of PTPN18 and the HER2 phospho-peptides, we then analyzed the binding of HER2 to c-Cbl in the biased PTPN18 mutants P109A and R140A (Figure 6 and Supplementary information, Figure S6). In agreement with biochemical and structural data, the P109A mutant weakened the effect of PTPN18 on HER2 pY1112 dephosphorylation and c-Cbl binding, whereas the R140A mutant had a similar effect to the wild type although its activity towards HER2 pY1248 and pY1196 sites was abolished (Figures 6A-6C and 9F and Supplementary information, Figure S9E). Therefore, the tyrosine phosphatase activity of PTPN18 and specific interactions between PTPN18 and the HER2 Y1112 site determined the HER2 pY1112 phosphorylation states and HER2 binding to c-Cbl. Taken together, these data suggest that PTPN18 decreases lysosome routing through its phosphatase activity and promotes proteasome targeting through its C-terminal PEST domain.
HER2 ubiquitination is regulated by the PTPN18/β-Trcp complex in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line, and the HER2/PTPN18 ratio is correlated with breast cancer stage
Overexpression of HER2 has been highly correlated with breast cancer10,40. To investigate the PTPN18-regulated HER2 function in a more pathological context, we examined the expression of PTPN18 and HER2 in several cell lines derived from human breast cancers (Figure 10A and Supplementary information, Figure S10A). In all of these cell lines, both HER2 and PTPN18 were detected. SK-BR-3 cells have considerably higher HER2 expression but lower PTPN18 expression compared with other breast cancer cell lines, and the BT-549, MDA-MB-436 and MCF-7 cell lines have relatively lower HER2 expression and higher PTPN18 expression.
We next chose the MCF-7 breast tumor cell line to examine the regulation of HER2 by the PTPN18/-Trcp complex because it has higher PTPN18 expression and detectable HER2 expression. In the MCF-7 cell line, PTPN18 forms a complex with β-Trcp, which was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation of the endogenous PTPN18 and β-Trcp proteins (Figure 10B). Knockdown of either PTPN18 or β-Trcp decreased EGF-induced HER2 ubiquitination, suggesting the regulation of HER2 ubiquitination by the PTPN18/β-Trcp complex in MCF-7 cells (Figure 10C-10E and Supplementary information, Figure S10B). Knockdown of either β-Trcp or c-Cbl decreased but did not abolish EGF-induced HER2 ubiquitination. However, combined knockdown of β-Trcp and c-Cbl almost abolished EGF-induced HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 10D and 10E). These results indicate that β-Trcp and c-Cbl coordinately regulated HER2 ubiquitination. To dissect the functional role of PTPN18/β-Trcp in the regulation of the HER2-mediated tumor cell motility in MCF-7 cells, we knocked down either PTPN18 or β-Trcp to monitor their effects on EGF-induced cell invasion. As a result, knockdown of either PTPN18 or β-Trcp expression significantly increased EGF-induced MCF-7 cell invasion (Figure 10F).
Finally, we examined the expression of HER2 and PTPN18 in human breast tumors. The HER2 expression level had an increasing trend, whereas PTPN18 expression had a decreasing trend when comparing phase III to phase II breast tumors (Supplementary information, Figure S10C). The HER2 or PTPN18 levels demonstrated no statistical significance when comparing phase III to phase II breast tumors, most likely due to the limited number of tumor samples available, but the HER2/PTPN18 ratio was significantly higher in phase III compared with phase II breast tumors (Figure 10G and 10H). Taken together, these results show that PTPN18 and HER2 are co-expressed in many human breast cancer tissues and cell lines, and the HER2/PTPN18 ratio is correlated with breast cancer stage.
Receptor activation is often accompanied by the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of multiple sites, which generates signaling barcodes to direct various downstream functions, as in the activation of β2 adrenergic receptor and insulin receptor41,42,43. In the case of HER2, six tyrosine phosphorylation sites at the C-terminus have been linked to various cellular outcomes and were shown to be precisely controlled by phosphorylation regulators, however, the precise mechanism was less well studied. In the present study, we demonstrated that PTPN18 specifically dephosphorylates HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 sites among ten HER2 and EGFR C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites (Figure 1). The crystal structures of PTPN18 in complex with three HER2 phospho-peptides revealed that two special structural features of the PTPN18 CD confer substrate recognition: (1) a specific hydrophobic pY+1 site governing primary peptide-sequence selectivity (Figure 4), and (2) the side-chain plasticity of R198 that is responsible for the recognition of two types of peptide substrate conformations (Figure 5). Furthermore, by examining the PTPN18 regulation of HER2 function via dephosphorylation of specific HER2 sites, we unexpectedly discovered that PEST domain of PTPN18 promotes HER2 ubiquitination and targets HER2 for proteasome degradation through K48-linked polyubiquitination and a phosphorylation-regulated mechanism (Figures 5 and 6). The “HER2-AKT-PTPN18/β-Trcp-HER2 ubiquitination” feedback loop negatively regulates HER2 signaling. Our studies not only provide molecular details for the interaction between HER2 and PTPN18, but also reveal a novel mechanism of HER2 degradation and function of the PEST domain of PTP superfamily.
Molecular mechanism of PTPN18-regulated HER2 phosphorylation
The catalytic domain of PTPN18 interacts with HER2 via a “kiss and run” mechanism and directs the recognition of the specific phosphorylated tyrosine sites of HER2 (Figure 1). In vitro, the catalytic domain of PTPN18 displays a strong activity toward HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 phospho-peptides, but has a lower affinity toward other tested phospho-peptides and the small artificial substrate pNPP (Figure 2F, Supplementary information, Figure S2B-S2C and Table S1). The HER2:PTPN18 complex crystal structures revealed a hydrophobic pocket around the pY+1 site, which is defined by the five residues V65, P272, A73, C233 and Q276. Except for Q276 of PTPN18, these residues in the hydrophobic pocket are not conserved, and the combination of these four residues is unique among all known HER2 tyrosine phosphatases (Figure 6A and Supplementary information, Figure S6). Mutations of these residues to corresponding PTP proteins (e.g., V65I and P272M) significantly reduce the activity of PTPN18 toward HER2 pY1196 and pY1248phospho-peptides. Therefore, the hydrophobic pocket surrounding the pY+1 site is one of the determinants for PTPN18 substrate specificity.
Residues from other loops also contribute to substrate specificity of PTPN18. The unique R198 in the WPD loop, the combination of the F30 and Q34 in the α1 helix and the combination of the “138RKR140” in β6 are all unique for PTPN18. Mutations of R198, Q34, R138 and R140 to Ala all decreased activity of PTPN18 toward specific HER2 phospho-peptides (Figure 6A-6B and Supplementary information, Figure S6). In particular, the side-chain plasticity of R198 in the WPD loop is responsible for two different phospho-peptide binding modes. The R198 in the WPD loop mediating PTPN18 substrate plasticity is reminiscent of another R47 in the pY loop of PTP1B, which assumes different conformations upon binding to acidic or hydrophobic residues33,34. Although presenting on different loops and in different surface positions, the combined information derived from these two sets of structures indicates that substrate selectivity governed by the plasticity of the surface Arg may be an important mechanism for the substrate recognition of PTPs.
The three complex structures also revealed different interactions between PTPN18-HER2 pY1196/HER2 pY1248 and PTPN18-HER2 pY1112. Whereas P109 of PTPN18 specifically interacts with HER2 pY1112, R140 of PTPN18 specifically interacts with HER2 pY1196 and HER2 pY1248. Utilizing biased mutants derived from the crystallographic and enzymology studies, we demonstrated that specific disruption of the PTPN18:HER2 pY1196/HER2 pY1248 interface, but not the PTPN18:HER2 pY1112interface, altered phosphorylation network downstream of HER2 for invasion and proliferation (Figure 6C-6E). Conversely, specific disruption of the PTPN18:HER2 pY1112interface abolished the activity of PTPN18 in the regulation of the HER2/c-Cbl interaction and HER2 degradation dynamics (Figure 9)
In addition to the specific structural features in the CD of PTPN18, which substantially contributes to the specific PTPN18-HER2 interaction and regulation of the HER2 function, it is worth noting that the C-terminal PEST domain of PTPN18 is another important determinant for HER2 recognition (Figure 2D-2E). The current structures only reveal information for the CD of PTPN18 and a minimal region surrounding the specific HER2 phosphorylation sites. Future structural studies with full-length PTPN18 and HER2 are required to elucidate the exact mechanism of regulation of HER2 by PTPN18.
Molecular mechanism of PTPN18-regulated HER2 ubiquitination
Previous studies have revealed that HER2 weakly associates with c-Cbl for lysosome routing after EGF stimulation21,44. Alternatively, HER2 might be ubiquitinated and transported to the proteasome in certain cellular contexts, such as following the application of the HSP90 chaperone inhibitor geldanamycin22. Compared with the rapid degradation of HER2 by the proteasome, c-Cbl-mediated HER2 degradation is slower. This continual HER2 receptor trafficking in cells might result in returning of more receptors to the cell surface or assume other signaling functions45. Here, we discovered that PTPN18 specifically deregulates the HER2 pY1112 phosphorylation state and blocks the interaction between HER2 and c-Cbl, resulting in a decrease in lysosome routing. Unexpectedly, PTPN18 also promoted the distribution of HER2 to the proteasome for rapid HER2 destruction, suggesting fine-tuning of receptor ubiquitination barcode in parallel with the phosphorylation barcode. Therefore, PTPN18 functions as a switch from lysosome routing and cellular trafficking to rapid proteasomal destruction of HER2. The functional importance of this shift could be better understood with further studies on c-Cbl-mediated HER2 subcellular trafficking and the function of K63-linked HER2 ubiquitination.
Novel function of the C-terminal regulatory PEST domain
In addition to the catalytic region, the majority of the PTP family members contain either regulatory motifs or domains. The functional roles of the SH2 domain in SHPs and the KIM domain in STEP or HePTP are demonstrated to be important for their subcellular localization and binding to substrates; however, the roles of the regulatory domains in most other PTPs have not been elucidated46,47,48,49,50. In the case of PEST domain-containing phosphatases, including PTPN12, PTPN18 and PTPN22, the PEST domains are reported to mediate their substrate binding, but not related to their own ubiquitiantion or degradation. Here, we report a new functional role of the PEST domain of PTPN18, which recruits the E3 ligase β-Trcp for HER2 ubiquitination (Figure 8). PTPN18-mediated HER2 degradation is primarily K48-linked, and shifts HER2 from the slower lysosome-dependent degradation to the more rapid proteasome degradation (Figure 9). Therefore, our results reveal a previously unidentified mechanism for the regulatory domain of tyrosine phosphatases.
The PTPN18-dependent HER2 degradation is also reminiscent of Vpu-mediated CD4 receptor degradation51. In both cases, phosphorylation occurs on the ancillary protein (Vpu or PTPN18) rather than the receptor (CD4 or HER2). Furthermore, PTPN18 associates with CSK and PSTPIP, and members of the small PTP-PEST family (PTPN12, PTPN18 and PTPN22) all contain PEST domains at their C-termini. Both PTPN12 and PTPN22 are important signal transducers and are highly related to human diseases, such as cancer, diabetes and other autoimmune diseases24,29,52. Whether PTPN18 also promotes CSK and PSTPIP ubiquitination and whether all PEST-family phosphatases regulate ubiquitination of associated proteins in a phosphorylation-dependent manner are worthy of further investigation.
Materials and Methods
pNPP (Bio Basic) was used in enzymatic reactions to determine the intrinsic catalytic activity of PTPN18 and its mutants. All enzymatic reactions using pNPP substrate were carried out in DMG buffer (50 mM 3,3-dimethyl glutarate, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT) and the ionic strength was maintained at 0.15 M (adjusted by the addition of NaCl). Assays were initiated by adding enzyme to the reaction mixtures with substrate at different concentrations. Reactions were carried out in microplates at 37 °C. The dephosphorylation of pNPP was terminated by adding 120 μl of 1 M NaOH, and the enzymatic activity was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 405 nm28. Kinetic parameters were determined using the nonlinear regression hyperbolic fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation.
The PTPN18-catalyzed hydrolysis of pY-containing peptides was assayed by two different methods. The first was monitoring at 305 nm with excitation at 280 nm, showing the increase in tyrosine fluorescence after dephosphorylation53. The second method was an inorganic-phosphate assay with the end-point reading at 620 nm, as previously described54. The reaction was carried out at 37 °C in 50 mM 3,3-dimethylglutarate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 1 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA with an ionic strength of 0.15 M. All reactions were initiated by adding PTPN18 to a final concentration of 10 nM. The data were analyzed using nonlinear least-squares regression (KaleidaGraph, Synergy Software).
Structural determination and refinement
The crystals of PTPN18-HER2-pY1248 and -pY1112 peptides belong to the P21 space group, and the crystal of the PTPN18-HER2-pY1196 peptide belongs to the P212121 space group. In each asymmetric unit, the PTPN18-HER2-pY1248 contains one monomer, the PTPN18-HER2-pY1196 contains a dimer and the PTPN18-HER2-pY1112 peptide complex contains a tetramer. The structures of PTPN18-HER2-pY1248, pY1112 and pY1196 were determined by molecular replacement with Phaser55 in the CCP4 software package. A single chain of the PTPN18 catalytic domain (PDB code: 2OC3, water deleted) was used as the initial search model56,57. Further refinements were carried out using the PHENIX program with iterative manual building in COOT57. Composite omitted maps were built, and density modification was carried out to reduce the phase biases during further refinement. Ramachandran plots were calculated using PROCHECK and COOT. The statistics for the final solved structures are shown in Supplementary information, Table S2.
Plasmids expressing GST or GST fusion proteins were transformed into E. coli BL21. The bacteria were grown for 3 h at 37 °C, then incubated with 0.3 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside for 12 h at 25 °C. The bacteria were harvested and lysed by sonication. Then, GST and GST fusion proteins were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) for 2 h at 4 °C followed by extensively washing with PBS containing 1% Triton. The GST fusion proteins were then eluted by glutathione, and the purity of the proteins was examined by electrophoresis. Purified GST or GST fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads and then incubated with cell lysates (3 mg) overnight at 4 °C with gentle agitation. The beads were collected by centrifugation and washed eight times with cell lysis buffer. After removing the supernatant in the final wash, the samples were re-suspended in 2× SDS loading buffer and boiled for 5 min, and the proteins retained on the beads were analysed by western blotting.
Cell invasion assay
Twenty-four hours after transfection, HepG2 cells were resuspended in DMEM (serum free) and added (1.25 × 105/100 μl) to each Matrigel-coated upper chamber (BD Bioscience). The lower chamber contained 15 ng/ml EGF as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, un-migrated cells were removed and the inserts were stained with methanol and crystal violet. Then, eight randomly selected high-power fields per insert were used to quantify the number of migrated cells. Each experiment was repeated at least in triplicate. Data analysis was conducted with GraphPad software.
Cells transfected with control vectors, PTP-MEG2, wild-type PTPN18, or different PTPN18 mutants were seeded in 96-well plates containing DMEM and 10% FBS. Cell proliferation was then determined by MTT assay over a 36-h period by reading OD450 through a multi-well spectrophotometer (Molecular Device 190; 15). A standard curve was obtained by plotting cell numbers against absorbance values.
Detection of ubiquitinated HER2
HepG2 cells were co-transfected with HA-ubiquitin and various PTPN18 constructs to assess the effects of different PTPN18 domains on EGF-induced HER2 ubiquitination. Two days after transfection, the cells were treated with 100 ng/ml EGF or medium for 6 h and a proteasome inhibitor (MG132, 10 nm) was added. The cells were then scraped and resuspended in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA and 2% glycerol)58. After 1 h of end-over-end rotation at 4 °C, the lysate was cleared by high-speed centrifugation. The soluble lysates were incubated with 30 μl HA affinity beads for 2 h. The beads were washed at least three times with lysis buffer and then resuspended in 60 μl of 2× sample buffer. The ubiquitinated HER2 was detected by specific antibody. Different ubiquitin mutations on specific lysines (K48, K63, R48, R63 and KO) were also created and tested for specific HER2 polyubiquitination.
HepG2 cells were cultured in 10-cm plates and were transiently transfected with pcDNA3.1-FLAG control plasmid or plasmids encoding different PTPN18 fragments. Two days after transfection, the cells were treated with 100 ng/ml EGF at certain time points. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation by incubating with anti-FLAG-beads overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were analyzed by western blotting with specific antibodies. For c-Cbl and HER2 interaction, the HA-c-Cbl was immunoprecipitated by HA-affinity agarose and the associated HER2 was detected by specific antibodies.
Cells seeded in 24-well plates on chamber slides were cultured overnight, washed with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at room temperature. After cell permeabilization in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min, cells were blocked with 5% normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, then incubated with primary antibody (2.5% serum dilution) overnight. Secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen). Cells were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h. Slides were mounted in Prolong Gold (Invitrogen), stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and left in dark before fluorescence microscopic analysis.
Coordinates and structural factors were deposited in the Protein Data Bank with the following accession codes: 4GFU (PTPN18-HER2-pY1248 phospho-peptide), 4GFV (PTPN18-HER2-pY1196phospho-peptide), and 4NND (PTPN18-HER2-pY 1112 phospho-peptide).
(All other reagents and methods are described in Supplementary information, Data S1.)
This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB967700 to X Yu; 2012CB910402 to JP Sun), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000362 to X Yu, 31100580 and 31271505 to JP Sun, and 81171062 to Q Pang), and the Shandong Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ201320 to X Yu), the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (2014JC029 to X Yu), the State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT13028).
PTPN18 specifically regulates HER2 pY1112, pY1196 and pY1248 tyrosine phosphorylation states.
(A) The PTPN18-associated HER2 in (Figure 2D) was quantified and compared with control plasmid.
Peptide binding mode of PTP1B-IRK segment complex (A; yellow/blue) and LYP with SKAP-HOM peptide complex (B; green/red).
Crystal structures of PTPN18/C229S·Peptide Her2 structure complex.
The binding pocket for phospho-peptide pY+1 residue in PTPN18, PTP1B and LYP.
Sequence alignment of PTPN18 with PEST-family PTP and other PTPs reported to be involved in HER2 dephosphorylation.
PTPN18 and PTPN9 negatively regulate EGF induced cell proliferation and invasion
PTPN18 regulated HER2 ubiquitination.
PTPN18 regulated HER2/c-Cbl interaction and dynamic degradaion
Regulation of HER2 by PTPN18/β-Trcp complex in breast cancer cell lines and the HER2/PTPN18 ratio (expression ratio) is correlated with breast cancer stage.
Kcat/Km values of PTPN18 towards phospho-peptides derived from HER2, EGFR, SRC, ERK, NSF and Cofilin.
Crystallographic Data and Refinement Statistics
Materials and Methods
(protein kinase B)
(casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene)
(Dok-related docking protein)
(epidermal growth factor)
(epidermal growth factor receptor)
(extracellular signal-regulated kinase)
(Grb2-associated binder 1)
(growth factor receptor bound protein 2)
(hematopoietic protein tyrosine phosphatase)
(human epidermal growth factor receptor-2)
(insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor)
(mitogen-activated protein kinases)
(protein tyrosine phosphatase)
(rat sarcoma viral oncogene)
(sarcoma viral oncogene)
(C-terminal homology domain)
(signal transducer and activator of transcription 3)
About this article
(Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)
Journal of Neurochemistry (2019)