Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Upregulation of mitogen-inducible gene 6 triggers antitumor effect and attenuates progesterone resistance in endometrial carcinoma cells

Abstract

Researches regarding mitogen-inducible gene 6 (Mig-6) have confirmed its role as a tumor suppressor and progesterone resistance factor in endometrium. In this study, after confirming the downregulation of Mig-6 protein in endometrial carcinoma (EC) tissues, the expression of Mig-6 was upregulated in Ishikawa cells by pCMV6-Mig-6 plasmid. We observed the increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation and invasion potential of Ishikawa cells after upregulation of Mig-6. The proapoptosis ability of P4 significantly enhanced by 39.36%, the antiproliferation ability increased by 37.90% and the anti-invasion ability increased by 48.89%, suggesting the antiprogesterone resistance potential of Mig-6 in endometrium. In addition, the results suggested that Mig-6 may induce Ishikawa cell apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway, inhibit cell proliferation via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway and the anti-invasion potential may associate with matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 downexpression. Therefore, upregulation of Mig-6 may add a new strategy to suppress endometrial tumorigenesis and attenuate the progesterone resistance during P4 treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang YW, Vande Woude GF . Mig-6, signal transduction, stress response and cancer. Cell Cycle 2007; 6: 507–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hackel PO, Gishizky M, Ullrich A . Mig-6 is a negative regulator of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal. Biol Chem 2001; 382: 1649–1662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang YW, Staal B, Su Y, Swiatek P, Zhao P, Cao B et al. Evidence that MIG-6 is a tumor-suppressor gene. Oncogene 2007; 26: 269–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poetsch M, Woenckhaus C, Dittberner T, Pambor M, Lorenz G, Herrmann FH . Significance of the small subtelomeric area of chromosome 1 (1p36.3) in the progression of malignant melanoma: FISH deletion screening with YAC DNA probes. Virchows Arch 1999; 435: 105–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nomoto S, Haruki N, Tatematsu Y, Konishi H, Mitsudomi T, Takahashi T et al. Frequent allelic imbalance suggests involvement of a tumor suppressor gene at 1p36 in the pathogenesis of human lung cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000; 28: 342–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasi S, Sala G, Huiping C, Caprini E, Russo G, Iacovelli S et al. Loss of RALT/MIG-6 expression in ERBB2-amplified breast carcinomas enhances ErbB-2 oncogenic potency and favors resistance to Herceptin. Oncogene 2005; 24: 4540–4548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruan DT, Warren RS, Moalem J, Chung KW, Griffin AC, Shen W et al. Mitogen-inducible gene-6 expression correlates with survival and is an independent predictor of recurrence in BRAF(V600E) positive papillary thyroid cancers. Surgery 2008; 144: 908–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim TH, Franco HL, Jung SY, Qin J, Broaddus RR, Lydon JP et al. The synergistic effect of Mig-6 and Pten ablation on endometrial cancer development and progression. Oncogene 2010; 29: 3770–3780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Z, Qu L, Zhong H, Xu K, Qiu X, Wang E . Low expression of Mig-6 is associated with poor survival outcome in NSCLC and inhibits cell apoptosis via ERK-mediated upregulation of Bcl-2. Oncol Rep 2014; 31: 1707–1714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu J, Keeton AB, Wu L, Franklin JL, Cao X, Messina JL . Gene 33 inhibits apoptosis of breast cancer cells and increases poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91: 207–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burney RO, Talbi S, Hamilton AE, Vo KC, Nyegaard M, Nezhat CR et al. Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 2007; 148: 3814–3826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong JW, Lee HS, Lee KY, White LD, Broaddus RR, Zhang YW et al. Mig-6 modulates uterine steroid hormone responsiveness and exhibits altered expression in endometrial disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 8677–8682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaman S, Wang R, Gandhi V . Targeting the apoptosis pathway in hematologic malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 55: 1980–1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stacey DW . Cyclin D1 serves as a cell cycle regulatory switch in actively proliferating cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15: 158–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emmert-Buck MR, Roth MJ, Zhuang Z, Campo E, Rozhin J, Sloane BF et al. Increased gelatinase A (MMP-2) and cathepsin B activity in invasive tumor regions of human colon cancer samples. Am J Pathol 1994; 145: 1285–1290.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fridman R, Toth M, Pena D, Mobashery S . Activation of progelatinase B (MMP-9) by gelatinase A (MMP-2). Cancer Res 1995; 55: 2548–2555.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCawley LJ, Matrisian LM . Matrix metalloproteinases: multifunctional contributors to tumor progression. Mol Med Today 2000; 6: 149–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ziel HK, Finkle WD . Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 1167–1170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang J, Shang Y . Estrogen and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol 2013; 75: 225–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferby I, Reschke M, Kudlacek O, Knyazev P, Pante G, Amann K et al. Mig6 is a negative regulator of EGF receptor-mediated skin morphogenesis and tumor formation. Nat Med 2006; 12: 568–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen YC, Colvin ES, Maier BF, Mirmira RG, Fueger PT . Mitogen-inducible gene 6 triggers apoptosis and exacerbates ER stress-induced beta-cell death. Mol Endocrinol 2013; 27: 162–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim TH, Lee DK, Cho SN, Orvis GD, Behringer RR, Lydon JP et al. Critical tumor suppressor function mediated by epithelial Mig-6 in endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 2013; 73: 5090–5099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xia Z, Dickens M, Raingeaud J, Davis RJ, Greenberg ME . Opposing effects of ERK and JNK-p38 MAP kinases on apoptosis. Science 1995; 270: 1326–1331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang B, Gu Y . Low expression of ERK signaling pathway affecting proliferation, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human gastric HGC-27 cells line. Mol Biol Rep 2014; 41: 3659–3669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Z, Dong Q, Wang Y, Qu L, Qiu X, Wang E . Downregulation of Mig-6 in nonsmall-cell lung cancer is associated with EGFR signaling. Mol Carcinog 2012; 51: 522–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin CI, Barletta JA, Nehs MA, Morris ZS, Donner DB, Whang EE et al. Thyroid-specific knockout of the tumor suppressor mitogen-inducible gene 6 activates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways and suppresses nuclear factor-kappaB activity. Surgery 2011; 150: 1295–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gotoh N . Feedback inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 41: 511–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fiorini M, Ballaro C, Sala G, Falcone G, Alema S, Segatto O . Expression of RALT, a feedback inhibitor of ErbB receptors, is subjected to an integrated transcriptional and post-translational control. Oncogene 2002; 21: 6530–6539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta GP, Massague J . Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell 2006; 127: 679–695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chambers AF, Matrisian LM . Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1260–1270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zucker S, Lysik RM, Zarrabi MH, Moll U . M(r) 92,000 type IV collagenase is increased in plasma of patients with colon cancer and breast cancer. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 140–146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Crissman JD, Azoury RS, Barnes AE, Schellhas HF . Endometrial carcinoma in women 40 years of age or younger. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 699–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gallup DG, Stock RJ . Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium in women 40 years of age or younger. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 417–420.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rackow BW, Arici A . Endometrial cancer and fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee WL, Lee FK, Su WH, Tsui KH, Kuo CD, Hsieh SL et al. Hormone therapy for younger patients with endometrial cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 51: 495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Park JY, Nam JH . Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. Oncologist 2015; 20: 270–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim JJ, Chapman-Davis E . Role of progesterone in endometrial cancer. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28: 81–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Savaris RF, Groll JM, Young SL, DeMayo FJ, Jeong JW, Hamilton AE et al. Progesterone resistance in PCOS endometrium: a microarray analysis in clomiphene citrate-treated and artificial menstrual cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 1737–1746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Sabbagh M, Lam EW, Brosens JJ . Mechanisms of endometrial progesterone resistance. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 358: 208–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li X, Feng Y, Lin JF, Billig H, Shao R . Endometrial progesterone resistance and PCOS. J Biomed Sci 2014; 21: 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Aghajanova L, Velarde MC, Giudice LC . Altered gene expression profiling in endometrium: evidence for progesterone resistance. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28: 51–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Miyamoto T, Watanabe J, Hata H, Jobo T, Kawaguchi M, Hattori M et al. Significance of progesterone receptor-A and -B expressions in endometrial adenocarcinoma. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004; 92: 111–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jeong JW, Lee KY, Kwak I, White LD, Hilsenbeck SG, Lydon JP et al. Identification of murine uterine genes regulated in a ligand-dependent manner by the progesterone receptor. Endocrinology 2005; 146: 3490–3505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grant 81070471 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Grant RC201161 from Developing Health Engineering Fund Project of Jiangsu Province of China. We thank the State Key Laboratory of Reproduction Medicine at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University for excellent technical assistance. This study was done in the Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (also named Jiangsu Province Hospital).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Zhu, S., Zhou, Y. et al. Upregulation of mitogen-inducible gene 6 triggers antitumor effect and attenuates progesterone resistance in endometrial carcinoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther 22, 536–541 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2015.52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2015.52

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links