Abstract
Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) has been reported to facilitate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and bone metastasis in breast cancer xenograft models. To investigate the role of BMP-2 in the development of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), and to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying its influence on breast cancer metastasis, we conducted a comprehensive molecular study using breast cancer cell lines and clinical samples. Our results showed that downregulation of Rb by BMP-2 was associated with ubiquitin-mediated degradation activated by phosphorylation of Rb via the PI3K/AKT signal pathway. In addition, the Smad signaling pathways are implicated in upregulation of CD44 protein expression by BMP-2. It was suggested that cross-talk exists between Rb and CD44 signaling pathways, as recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) was found to regulate CD44 expression partly through Rb signals. In clinical tissues, BMP-2 was positively and negatively correlated with CD44 and Rb expression, respectively. Based on the in vitro and in vivo results, we have established an integrated mechanism by which rhBMP-2 induces EMT and stemness of breast cancer cells via the Rb and CD44 signaling pathways, which then contribute to breast cancer metastasis. These findings may be helpful for developing new strategies for the treatment and prognosis of advanced breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths among women worldwide, second only to lung cancer;1 metastasis is the main cause for breast cancer related deaths.2,3
The concept that cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive cancer formation and progression has recently gained attention. Studies have shown that breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs, marked as CD44+/CD24−) promote tumor progression and exhibit enhanced invasive properties to favor distant metastasis in patients.4,5
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors belonging to the TGF-β superfamily. BMP-2 was reported to facilitate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)6 and promote the motility and invasiveness of breast cancer cells in vitro and in mouse xenograft model.7,8 A recent study reported that the BMP-2 pathway can be activated by pollutants exposure, and contributes to stem cell transformation and breast cancer initiation.9 However, the mechanisms by which BMP-2 promotes EMT and breast cancer metastasis, and its relationship with BCSC development, remain largely unknown.
Although EMT is a well-characterized process during normal development, its role in cancer progression is controversial.10 Many studies suggested that EMT occurs during the generation of cancer stem cells within primary tumors capable of metastasis.11,12,13 However, in some cases, a partial EMT or MET (mesenchymal–epithelial transition) is necessary, such as during differentiation and formation of tubules in kidney development.14,15
Rb (retinoblastoma) is a well-known cancer suppressor that initiates and maintains cell cycle arrest, modulates apoptosis, and is essential for early embryonic development. Rb regulates cell growth and differentiation by modulating the activity of transcription factors such as E2F family members.16,17 Inactivation of Rb in the mouse mammary epithelium induces aggressive and metastatic mammary tumors with basal stem cell-like phenotypes.18
CD44, an alternatively spliced transmembrane protein, functions as a receptor for hyaluronan, and act as the co-receptor for multiple receptor kinases linked with breast cancer.19 CD44 expression is essential for maintenance of the cancer stem cell phenotype.20
In this study, we investigated the role of BMP-2 in BCSC development. We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the influence of BMP-2 on breast cancer progression using recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2). This is the first study that reveals an integrated mechanism behind the effect of BMP-2 on cancer stem cell formation and breast cancer metastasis.
Results
rhBMP-2 induced EMT-like transformation, enhanced the migration/invasion ability of breast cancer cells in vitro, and promoted lung metastases of breast cancer in vivo
To evaluate the activity of rhBMP-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was used as a marker for detecting rhBMP-2 activity. Various concentrations of rhBMP-2 were used to induce the differentiation of mouse myoblast C2C12 cells into osteoblasts. Results showed that ALP activity reached the maximum value at rhBMP-2 concentrations of 4–8 ng/ml (Figure 1Aa) (**P<0.01, n=3). Therefore, 4 ng/ml was chosen as the optimal dose of rhBMP-2 used to induce MCF-7 cells in subsequent experiments. Results indicated that 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2 was able to activate Smad-dependent signaling pathways in MCF-7 cells (Figure 1Ab).
BMP-2 level (compared with total cell protein) in MCF-7 cells was measured via ELISA. Intracellular concentration of BMP-2 was found to be 356.46 pg/mg, whereas extracellular BMP-2 concentration was 499.59 pg/mg (Figure 1Ac, Supplementary Table S1). This showed that native BMP-2 protein was produced in MCF-7 breast cancer cells at relatively low levels.
To investigate the potential role of BMP-2 in breast cancer development, we treated three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and a mouse breast cancer cell line 4T1) with rhBMP-2 for 24 h. We found that rhBMP-2 induced elongated morphologic changes in all three breast cancer cell lines. Especially in MCF-7 cell line, rhBMP-2 drove MCF-7 cells from a paving stone sheet-like shape to fibroblastic-spindle shape with pseudopodia formation (Figure 1Aa), which was considered to be a characteristic of EMT.21 This indicated that rhBMP-2 may promote EMT of breast cancer cells. As actin cytoskeleton reorganization is considered another characteristic of EMT, we then used atomic force microscopy (AFM) and fluorescence microscopy to observe the structure of actin cytoskeleton in rhBMP-2-induced MCF-7 cells. We found that rhBMP-2 promoted reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in MCF-7 cells (Figure 1Ad).
We then performed a wound-healing assay on rhBMP-2-induced breast cancer cells and found that 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2 significantly enhanced breast cancer cell migration into the wound (Figure 1Aa–b). In addition, results from transwell invasion assays demonstrated that the average numbers of rhBMP-2-treated MCF-7 and 4T1 cells invading through the membrane were significantly increased compared to those in the control group (Figure 1Ac). Therefore, rhBMP-2 treatment could enhance both migration and invasion capabilities of breast cancer cells in vitro.
To further investigate the effect of rhBMP-2 on breast cancer in vivo, we generated a lung metastatic breast cancer model by inoculating Balb/c mice with 4T1 murine breast cancer cells via the caudal vein. As shown in Figure 1C, the number of metastatic tumor nodes in the lung was significantly higher in mice treated with rhBMP-2 than in those treated with PBS. This suggests that rhBMP-2 promotes breast cancer metastasis in vivo.
rhBMP-2 induced differential expression of the genes associated with tumor metastasis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
To determine the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of BMP-2 on breast cancer cells, we used the RT2 Profiler PCR Array (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to detect changes in the expression of 84 genes known to be associated with tumor metastasis (Supplementary Table S2).
Differential expressions of the 84 genes in rhBMP-2-induced MCF-7 and control cells were calculated (Supplementary Table S3). We identified 26 genes that were either significantly upregulated (Fold difference>1.2; P-value<0.05) or downregulated (Fold difference<0.8; P-value<0.05) (Figure 2A). The most upregulated genes were CD44 and MMP11, whereas the most downregulated genes were RB1 and CDH1 (E-cadherin). To further investigate the relationship between the expression status of these four genes and the metastatic phenotype of clinical breast cancer, we analyzed the expression of these four genes in a data set (available online, GSE10797) consisting of normal breast tissues and invasive breast cancer samples. We found that expressions of BMP-2 and CD44 were significantly upregulated, whereas expressions of RB1 and CDH1 (E-cadherin) were significantly downregulated in invasive breast cancer (Figure 2B). This suggested that the expression of these four genes is associated with invasiveness of breast cancer cells.
Western blot was performed to determine whether rhBMP-2 could affect protein expressions of Rb, E-cadherin, and CD44. Rb, and E-cadherin were downregulated in MCF-7 cells; CD44 was upregulated following rhBMP-2 induction (Figure 2Aa). Similarly, in MDA-MB-231 cells, which were considered more aggressive than MCF-7 cells, Rb expression was downregulated upon rhBMP-2 induction (Figure 2Ab). As the 4T1 cell line was derived from rodents, we did not perform the assay on these cells.
CD44 is a cell-surface glycoprotein involved in cell–cell interactions, cell adhesion, and migration.22 Immunocytochemistry assays demonstrated that rhBMP-2 upregulated CD44 expression and induced the redistribution of cellular CD44 to the leading edges and lamellipodia of MCF-7 cells (Figure 2D).
rhBMP-2 promoted Rb phosphorylation and degradation through Smad-independent PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, and modulated the migration ability of MCF-7 breast cancer cells
To explore the role of Smad-dependent signal pathways in association with BMP-2 and Rb, we silenced Smad4 in MCF-7 cells by specific Smad4 siRNA. We found that silencing of the Smad4 protein in MCF-7 cells did not affect rhBMP-2-induced downregulation of Rb (Figure 3Aab).
We then examined Smad-independent signal pathways, especially the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. We found that rhBMP-2 significantly increased the phosphorylation of Akt (473) and Rb (Ser807/811), and downregulated the expression of Rb in MCF-7 cells (Figure 3Aab); no effect on AKT (308) was observed. Specific inhibitors of PI3K (LY294002) and Akt (MK-2206) were used to study the role of PI3K/Akt signaling on rhBMP-2-induced changes in Rb expression. Results indicated that phosphorylation of Akt (473) and Rb (Ser807/811) was significantly decreased when cells were pre-treated with LY294002 or MK-2206. Concomitant impairments in Rb downregulation were also observed (Figure 3Aab).
Phosphorylation is known to trigger ubiquitination and degradation of regulatory proteins in many important cell signaling processes.23 Therefore, we used a cell permeable inhibitor of ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, PYR-41,24 to study the phosphorylation and potential degradation of Rb (Figure 3A e). We found that downregulation of Rb induced by rhBMP-2 was significantly impaired when cells were pre-treated with PYR-41. This was correlated with reduced phosphorylation in Rb (Ser807/811) (Figure 3Af). This strongly suggested that phosphorylation of Ser807/811 sites triggers the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of Rb. Our results suggested that BMP-2 induces phosphorylation and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the Rb protein through a Smad-independent PI3K/Akt/Rb signaling pathway.
To gain further insights into the relationship between Rb protein levels and the migration capability of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, we used specific siRNA to deplete Rb proteins in MCF-7 cells. In addition, we constructed a pcDNA3.1-Rb over-expression plasmid, which was used to transiently transfected MCF-7 cells. A wound-healing assay was subsequently carried out to determine changes in MCF-7 cell motility. We found that depletion and over-expression of the Rb protein significantly enhanced and weakened the motility of MCF-7 cells, respectively (Figures 3B and C).
rhBMP-2 upregulated CD44 protein expression and promoted cell motility and BCSC development via Smad-dependent and PI3K/Akt-Rb signaling pathways
Similarly, we found that depletion of CD44 by si-CD44 significantly decreased the motility of MCF-7 cells, and neutralized the stimulatory effect of rhBMP-2 (Supplementary Figures 1A–C). To investigate the relationship between rhBMP-2 and CD44, we silenced Smad4 in MCF-7 cells with 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2 for 24 h, and found that upregulation of CD44 by rhBMP-2 was inhibited (Figure 4Aab). Upregulation of the CD44 protein may possibly be mediated by the classical Smad signaling pathway. The Smad4 protein possesses a MH1 domain, which recognizes the double-stranded DNA sequence motif 5′- CAGAC-3′ known as the Smad-binding element (SBE).25 The promoter sequence of CD44 was found to harbor an SBE-rich region (−3090 to −2705 bp, Supplementary Table S4). We hypothesized that the Smad complex may bind to these SBEs and regulate expression of CD44. We therefore constructed a CD44 luciferase reporter system (Figure 4Ac), and found that rhBMP-2 markedly enhanced CD44 promoter activity in MCF-7 cells, which was impaired by interfering Smad4 expression (Figure 4Ad). This result demonstrated again that the Smads complex may bind to the CD44 promoter and directly regulate rhBMP-2-mediated increase in CD44 expression (Figure 4Ae).
To investigate whether stemness is enhanced following BMP-2 treatment, we quantified CD44+/CD24− populations in rhBMP-2 (4 ng/ml)-induced MCF-7 cells using the FACSCalibur flow cytometer. We found that the CD44+/CD24− cells induced by rhBMP-2 showed a 4.8-fold increase compared with untreated cells (Figure 4A a b). We also performed 3D tumor spheroid formation assays to evaluate the effect of rhBMP-2 on proliferation of BCSCs. We observed an increase in the average size of tumor spheroids in the rhBMP-2 treatment group compared with in the control group (Figure 4Aab). These results demonstrated that rhBMP-2 promotes the development of CSCs in MCF-7 cells. In addition, siSmad4 neutralized the rhBMP-2-induced upregulation of CD44+/CD24− population in MCF-7 cells (Figure 4Aab), which demonstrated that the stimulatory effect of rhBMP-2 on BCSC development was mediated through the Smad signaling pathway.
To determine the relationship between Rb and CD44, we assessed the level of CD44 in Rb- depleted MCF-7 cells by western blot. Our results showed that CD44 expression was significantly upregulated in Rb-silenced cells compared with that in control MCF-7 cells (Figure 4Aab). Further study showed that CD44 upregulation by rhBMP-2 was impaired when cells were pre-treated with PI3K and AKT inhibitors (LY294002 and MK-2206) (Figure 4Aab). These results suggested that expression of CD44 was partially regulated by PI3K/Akt-Rb signaling.
BMP-2 expression was inversely correlated with Rb expression, and was positively correlated with CD44 expression in breast carcinoma tissues
To determine the protein levels of BMP-2, Rb, and CD44 in breast cancer tissues, we collected 40 breast carcinoma tissue samples (classification of the samples is shown in Supplementary Table S5), and immunohistochemical analysis was performed.
The widely accepted German semi-quantitative scoring system used to quantify staining intensity and area was used.26 Breast tumor samples were divided into three categories based on BMP-2 levels, and were defined by their expression scores as low (0–4), medium (5–8), or high (9–12).
By analyzing the immunohistochemical images and immunoreactive scores of BMP-2, CD44, and Rb proteins in each sample, we confirmed that BMP-2 expression was positively correlated with CD44 expression in the breast carcinoma cohort (Figures 5a and b, Supplementary Figure 2). In contrast, BMP-2 expression was found to be negatively correlated with Rb expression (Figure 5a and c; Supplementary Figure 3).
Discussion
BMPs are highly conservative functional proteins belonging to the transformation growth TGF-β superfamily. They were originally identified based on their ability to facilitate bone formation at extra-skeletal sites. However, for the last decade, they have been extensively studied in several cancers.27,28,29,30 Functional studies revealed contradictory roles of BMPs in both cancer promotion and inhibition.31,32,33,34 Especially in breast cancer, different BMP ligands have been shown to decrease as well as increase cancer cell growth and migration.35 In our previous study, we showed that BMP-2 inhibited cancer cell growth both in vitro and in vivo by inducing G1 arrest and apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines.36 Here, we further investigated the mechanism underlying the influence of BMP-2 on breast cancer metastasis through a comprehensive molecular study using breast cancer cell lines and clinical breast cancer samples. Our results indicated that BMP-2 promoted EMT and migration/invasion of breast cancer cells. In addition, it was shown to favor lung metastasis in vivo, which was in agreement with several other recent studies.6,7,8 A possible interpretation to the dual roles of BMP-2 is that in the early stages of breast cancer development, BMP-2-induced apoptosis plays a dominant role owing to low number of tumor cells; as the tumor continues to develop, EMT and stemness induced by rhBMP-2 have more significant roles than programmed tumor cell deaths. Therefore, the timing of BMP-2 induction may lead to differential outcomes in tumors, such as death or metastasis.
Notably, rhBMP-2 promoted the formation of tumor spheroids and increased the population of CD44+/CD24− cells in MCF-7 breast cancer cells (Figure 4B) in this study. These observations suggest that rhBMP-2 enhances the stemness of breast cancer cells. BMP signaling was thought to have important roles in regulating the survival and maintenance of CSCs,37,38 and the contributions of BMP-2 to the development of CSCs in different cancers are debated.34,39,40,41,42 Although BMP-2 was shown to inhibit CSC tumorigenicity in osteosarcoma and renal cell carcinoma,34,39 in support of our finding, BMP-2 was also reported to promote CSC formation in colon and ovarian cancers.41,42 Interestingly, in another study, BMP-2/7 heterodimer was shown to inhibit CSC subpopulations and onset of bone metastases.40 Therefore, the relationship between BMP signaling and CSC remains controversial. One possible explanation may be that the BMP-2/7 heterodimer introduces a competitive effect on other BMP signals, thus disrupting regulatory processes of CSC formation and metastases. Nevertheless, the contradictory reports also unveiled the complexities behind the signaling mechanisms of BMP-2 in EMT and CSC formation. As a result, there is an imperative need to further study the signaling mechanisms underlying the effect of BMP-2 on EMT and BCSC formation.
We investigated the mRNA and protein expressions of 84 genes known to be involved in tumor metastasis in rhBMP-2-treated MCF-7 cells; rhBMP-2 significantly downregulated Rb and E-cadherin and upregulated CD44 expression in MCF-7 cells (Figure 2). Rb is a well-known tumor suppressor. It inhibits transcription of genes required for the G1-S phase, which results in cell cycle arrest.16 It is usually inactivated by mutations in several human cancers.43,44 Furthermore, functional loss of the Rb gene has been shown to contribute to aggressive tumor phenotypes and induce EMT in breast cancer.18,21,45 Arima et al.21 showed that Rb can bind to the E-cadherin promoter in conjunction with AP-2α. Knockdown of Rb by small interfering RNA in MCF-7 breast cancer cells resulted in deregulation of E-cadherin, disruption of cell–cell adhesion, and induction of mesenchymal-like phenotypes. Our study further showed that deregulation of Rb, E-cadherin, and disruption of cell–cell adhesion was induced by rhBMP-2 in MCF-7 cells. These findings suggested that E-cadherin is downregulated by rhBMP-2 via depletion of Rb, and contributes to EMT. Our study highlighted the crucial role of Rb in BMP-2 signaling during EMT induction.
We also found that BMP-2 downregulated Rb protein through a Smad-independent PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in breast cancer cells. Results indicated that Rb was phosphorylated and subjected to ubiquitin-dependent degradation, which was mediated by the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Figure 3A a–f). Consistent with our findings, phosphorylation has been shown to be a common strategy that triggers the ubiquitination and degradation of certain proteins in many important cell processes.23,46 Different to our finding of phosphorylation of Rb on Ser807/811, phosphorylation of Rb on Ser567 had been reported to trigger ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Rb in melanoma cell though it was activated by p-38 signal pathways, and resulted in cell apoptosis.47 Moreover, the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway has been shown to activate phosphorylation of Rb, leading to disassociation of the Rb-E2F complex and cell proliferation but they only speculated the degradation of Rb caused by proteasome-mediated degration,47,48,49 so we firstly demonstrated this mechanism to down-regulate Rb by rhBMP-2 to promote metastasis in MCF-7 cells.
CD44 is a transmembrane glycoprotein widely expressed in physiological and pathological systems,22 and is associated with tumor metastasis and BCSCs.4,5,50 According to recent studies, the cleaved intracellular domain of CD44 (CD44ICD) activates stemness factors such as Nanog, Sox2, and Oct4, and contributes to tumorigenesis of breast cancer, which may explain the effect of CD44 on BCSC maintenance.51 In this study, we showed that BMP-2 upregulated CD44 expression and promoted CSC development in breast cancer cells. On one hand, our results showed that rhBMP-2 caused CD44 to localize in the leading edges and lamellipodia of MCF-7 cells (Figure 2D), which was consistent with Kim et al.52 Their study showed that the formation of F-actin-positive cellular protrusions such as filopodia and invadopodia, which are essential for initiation and progression of metastasis,53 was CD44-dependent. On the other hand, rhBMP-2 upregulated the expression of CD44 proteins and promoted the stemness of breast cancer cells (Figure 4B). These findings indicate that CD44 enables breast cancer cells to disseminate from the primary tumor, and promotes their ability to self-renew and colonize to distant sites.
We then sought to further decipher the signaling pathways between BMP-2 and CD44. Smad proteins are the central mediators of the TGF-β family of signaling molecules. Although the R-Smads, Smad1/5/8, are phosphorylated following activation by BMP receptors, the Co-Smad, Smad4, are recruited and combined with p-Smad1/5/8; the fully assembled complex then acts as a transcription factor to regulate the expression of target genes.
Through Smad4 siRNA silencing and the CD44 promoter luciferase reporter system, we found that rhBMP-2 upregulated CD44 expression in MCF-7 cells via binding of Smad4 to the promoter sequence of CD44 (Figure 4Aa–e), which contains a SBE-rich region (Supplementary Table S4).
Our study further showed that upregulation of CD44 was partially caused by activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway and reduction in Rb protein level (Figure 4C). This result was consistent with that of a recent study, which showed that CD44 expression was required for collective motility and metastatic progression initiated by loss of Rb function in breast cancer.52 This suggested that cross-talks between Rb and CD44 pathways are required for BMP-2-dependent EMT and development of BCSCs.
In support of this conclusion, our immunohistochemical assays performed in clinical breast cancer samples also shown an inverse correlation between the expression levels of BMP-2 and Rb and a positive correlation between BMP-2 and CD44 (Figures 5a–c).
In summary, this is the first study demonstrating that BMP-2 promotes EMT and breast cancer stemness via Rb and CD44 signaling pathways (Figure 6). We found that Rb and CD44 are two key mediators in the rhBMP-2 signaling pathway. In addition, both PI3K/AKT and Smad signaling are implicated in the regulation of Rb and CD44 expression. Our in vitro and in vivo findings highlight the crucial roles of BMP-2, Rb, and CD44 in breast cancer metastasis, which may provide new strategies for the treatment and prognosis of advanced breast cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, cultures, and treatments
The human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, mouse myoblasts cell line C2C12, and mouse mammary carcinoma cell line 4T1 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). MCF-7 and C2C12 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco). MDA-MB-231 cells and 4T1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) with 10% FBS. All cell lines were grown in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in a humidified incubator.
Activity assay of rhBMP-2
C2C12 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at an initial density of 5×104 cells/well, and were cultured overnight. Following a 12-h starvation period, cells were induced with different concentrations of rhBMP-2(0, 1, 4, 8, 16, 32 ng/ml) for 72 h. An ALP substrate kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to determine activity of rhBMP-2.
Lung metastasis of breast cancer in Balb/c mice
Balb/c mice (4–5 weeks old) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Research Centre of Zhongshan University, and were maintained in its SPF laboratory. Female Balb/c mice (60), 4–6 weeks of age, were randomly divided into three groups (n=20). Two groups were intravenously injected with 4T1 cells, and were defined as experimental groups, whereas the un-injected group was set as blank control. Mice in one of the experimental groups were treated daily with 20 μg rhBMP-2 via the tail vein for 21 days; the other two groups were treated with PBS for 21 days. After animals were sacrificed, lung tumor nodules were counted, and lung tissues were fixed in formalin.
3D spheroid formation in MCF-7 cells
Matrigel (60–100 μl) was embedded into the bottom of a 24-well plate to form a 0.5–1-mm thick solidified gel layer. MCF-7 cells were dissociated and diluted to a density of 103 cells/ml. Complete medium containing 5% Matrigel was mixed with the cell suspension at a 1:1 ratio and seeded onto a 24-well plate. Cell samples were divided into three groups, which were induced by different concentrations of rhBMP-2 (0, 4, 8 ng/ml). All cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 incubator for three days, after which the tumor spheres were observed under an inverted microscope. The diameters of 30 randomly chosen tumor spheres were measured for each group.
Flow cytometry assay
MCF-7 cells were cultured in six-well plates, and were divided into three groups (blank control, 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2-induced and siSmad4 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2-induced). Cells in the siSmad4 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2-induced group were transiently transfected with Smad4 siRNA for 24 h. Both the 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2-induced group and siSmad4 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2-induced groups were then induced with 4 ng/ml rhBMP-2 for 24 h. Cells in each group were incubated with fluorophore-conjugated CD44 or CD24 antibodies for 30 min on ice. They were then washed with HBSS, and fluorescent signals were measured by the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
Western blot
Proteins were extracted using the Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Equal amounts of protein (50 μg) were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against Rb (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), p-Rb (Ser807/811, Cell Signaling Technology), CD44 (Cell Signaling Technology), p-AKT (Ser473, Cell Signaling Technology), p-ATK (Thr308, Cell Signaling Technology), Histone3 (Cell Signaling Technology), AKT (Cell Signaling Technology) and β-actin (Proteintech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA). Membranes were washed in TBS-Tween, and were incubated with anti-mouse secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:8000 for 1 h. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reaction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and were exposed on X-ray films (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA).
Immunocytochemistry
MCF-7 cells grown on cover slips were washed twice with PBS, and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. They were then incubated with 200 μl of 100 nM anti-CD44 (FITC) antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in the dark for 1 h. Cells were subsequently washed three times in PBS to remove any unbound antibodies. Fluorescent images were obtained with a Carl Zeiss LSM510 Meta Duo Scan laser scanning confocal microscope.
Wound-healing assay
Breast cancer cells were seeded onto 12-well plates. When the cells achieved 80% confluence, they were serum-starved for 12 h in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS (1 mM thymidine). A wound was made across the cell monolayer using the tip of a 200-μl pipette. The adherent monolayer was washed twice with DMEM at 37 °C to remove the non-adherent cells. Cells were then incubated with different concentrations (0, 4 ng/ml) of rhBMP-2 for another 24 h. The open wound surface area and the number of the cells in the area were photographed by an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and quantified with ImagePro Plus software. All experiments were repeated three times.
Transwell migration experiment
Cell migration and invasion were examined by a transwell assay using QCMTM 96-well plates (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA). After trypsinization, 100 μl 5×105 cells/ml were added to the upper surface of a 96-well plate, 150 μl of different concentrations (0, 4 ng/ml) of rhBMP-2 was plated and used as a chemoattractant in the bottom well. After 24 h of incubation, cells on the upper surface were removed by PBS and 150 μl dissociation buffer was added into each well, and further incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. CyQuant GR staining reagents (50 μl) were added to the mixture for 15 min at room temperature. Samples were transferred to a new low fluorescence background 96-well plate, which was read using 480/520 nm transmitted light.
Ubiquitination inhibition assay
MCF-7 cells were grown in complete DMEM with 10% FBS for 24 h, and were serum-starved for 12 h with 1% FBS. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 inhibitor, PYR-41 (5 μM, Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA) was added to MCF-7 cells for 30 min, followed by rhBMP-2 (4 ng/ml) induction for 24 h with 5% FBS. Proteins were extracted using the Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein (40 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and protein levels of Rb and p-Rb (Ser807/811) were detected by western blots.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean±S.D.s derived from multiple experiments, as indicated. Differences were assessed by the unpaired-Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.005).
Study approval
All animal procedures were approved by the Center for Animal at Jinan University in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press 2011) and the Animal Welfare Act. The immunohistochemistry study used breast carcinoma tissues was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, and was carried out according to the IRB-approved protocol. Each patient was properly informed and informed consents were obtained from all patients prior to the study.
References
DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A . Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 52–62.
Mundy GR . Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 584–593.
Geng SQ, Alexandrou AT, Li JJ . Breast cancer stem cells: Multiple capacities in tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett 2014; 349: 1–7.
Sheridan C, Kishimoto H, Fuchs RK, Mehrotra S, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Turner CH et al. CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res 2006; 8: R59.
Abraham BK, Fritz P, McClellan M, Hauptvogel P, Athelogou M, Brauch H . Prevalence of CD44+/CD24-/low cells in breast cancer may not be associated with clinical outcome but may favor distant metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1154–1159.
Kang MH, Kang HN, Kim JL, Kim JS, Oh SC, Yoo YA . Inhibition of PI3 kinase/Akt pathway is required for BMP2-induced EMT and invasion. Oncol Rep 2009; 22: 525–534.
Jin H, Pi J, Huang X, Huang F, Shao W, Li S et al. BMP2 promotes migration and invasion of breast cancer cells via cytoskeletal reorganization and adhesion decrease: an AFM investigation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 93: 1715–1723.
Katsuno Y, Hanyu A, Kanda H, Ishikawa Y, Akiyama F, Iwase T et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling enhances invasion and bone metastasis of breast cancer cells through Smad pathway. Oncogene 2008; 27: 6322–6333.
Clement F, Xu X, Donini CF, Clement A, Omarjee S, Delay E et al. Long-term exposure to bisphenol A or benzo(a)pyrene alters the fate of human mammary epithelial stem cells in response to BMP2 and BMP4, by pre-activating BMP signaling. Cell Death Differ 2016; 24: 155–166.
Nieto MA, Cano A . The epithelial-mesenchymal transition under control: global programs to regulate epithelial plasticity. Semin Cancer Biol 2012; 22: 361–368.
Thiery JP . Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 442–454.
Garber K . Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is important to metastasis, but questions remain. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 232–233.
Tsai JH, Yang J . Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis. Genes Dev 2013; 27: 2192–2206.
Lim J, Thiery JP . Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: insights from development. Development 2012; 139: 3471–3486.
Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA . Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009; 139: 871–890.
Classon M, Harlow E . The retinoblastoma tumour suppressor in development and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 910–917.
Inoue Y, Kitagawa M, Taya Y . Phosphorylation of pRB at Ser612 by Chk1/2 leads to a complex between pRB and E2F-1 after DNA damage. EMBO J 2007; 26: 2083–2093.
Jiang Z, Deng T, Jones R, Li H, Herschkowitz JI, Liu JC et al. Rb deletion in mouse mammary progenitors induces luminal-B or basal-like/EMT tumor subtypes depending on p53 status. J Clin Invest 2010; 120: 3296–3309.
Ponta H, Sherman L, Herrlich PA . CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4: 33–45.
Owens TW, Naylor MJ . Breast cancer stem cells. Front Physiol 2013; 4: 225.
Arima Y, Inoue Y, Shibata T, Hayashi H, Nagano O, Saya H et al. Rb depletion results in deregulation of E-cadherin and induction of cellular phenotypic changes that are characteristic of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 5104–5112.
Chetty C, Vanamala SK, Gondi CS, Dinh DH, Gujrati M, Rao JS . MMP-9 induces CD44 cleavage and CD44 mediated cell migration in glioblastoma xenograft cells. Cell Signal 2012; 24: 549–559.
Varedi KS, Ventura AC, Merajver SD, Lin XN . Multisite phosphorylation provides an effective and flexible mechanism for switch-like protein degradation. PloS One 2010; 5: e14029.
Kapuria V, Peterson LF, Showalter HD, Kirchhoff PD, Talpaz M, Donato NJ . Protein cross-linking as a novel mechanism of action of a ubiquitin-activating enzyme inhibitor with anti-tumor activity. Biochem Pharmacol 2011; 82: 341–349.
Baburajendran N, Jauch R, Tan CY, Narasimhan K, Kolatkar PR . Structural basis for the cooperative DNA recognition by Smad4 MH1 dimers. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: 8213–8222.
Mao XY, Fan CF, Zheng HC, Wei J, Yao F, Jin F . p53 nuclear accumulation and ERalpha expression in ductal hyperplasia of breast in a cohort of 215 Chinese women. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 29: 112.
Buijs JT, Rentsch CA, van der Horst G, van Overveld PG, Wetterwald A, Schwaninger R et al. BMP7, a putative regulator of epithelial homeostasis in the human prostate, is a potent inhibitor of prostate cancer bone metastasis in vivo. Am J Pathol 2007; 171: 1047–1057.
Theriault BL, Shepherd TG, Mujoomdar ML, Nachtigal MW . BMP4 induces EMT and Rho GTPase activation in human ovarian cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 1153–1162.
Hardwick JC, Kodach LL, Offerhaus GJ, van den Brink GR . Bone morphogenetic protein signalling in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008; 8: 806–812.
Ma Y, Ma L, Guo Q, Zhang S . Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and its receptors in epithelial ovarian cancer and their influence on the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 29: 85.
Peng J, Yoshioka Y, Mandai M, Matsumura N, Baba T, Yamaguchi K et al. The BMP signaling pathway leads to enhanced proliferation in serous ovarian cancer-A potential therapeutic target. Mol Carcinog 2016; 55: 335–345.
Hu F, Meng X, Tong Q, Liang L, Xiang R, Zhu T et al. BMP-6 inhibits cell proliferation by targeting microRNA-192 in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1832: 2379–2390.
Kang MH, Kim JS, Seo JE, Oh SC, Yoo YA . BMP2 accelerates the motility and invasiveness of gastric cancer cells via activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316: 24–37.
Wang L, Park P, La Marca F, Than KD, Lin CY . BMP-2 inhibits tumor-initiating ability in human renal cancer stem cells and induces bone formation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015; 141: 1013–1024.
Alarmo EL, Kallioniemi A . Bone morphogenetic proteins in breast cancer: dual role in tumourigenesis? Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17: R123–R139.
Chen A, Wang D, Liu X, He S, Yu Z, Wang J . Inhibitory effect of BMP-2 on the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 2012; 6: 615–620.
Khammanivong A, Gopalakrishnan R, Dickerson EB . SMURF1 silencing diminishes a CD44-high cancer stem cell-like population in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer 2014; 13: 260.
Czerwinska P, Kaminska B . Regulation of breast cancer stem cell features. Contemp Oncol 2015; 19: A7–A15.
Wang L, Park P, Zhang H, La Marca F, Claeson A, Valdivia J et al. BMP-2 inhibits the tumorigenicity of cancer stem cells in human osteosarcoma OS99-1 cell line. Cancer Biol Ther 2011; 11: 457–463.
Buijs JT, van der Horst G, van den Hoogen C, Cheung H, de Rooij B, Kroon J et al. The BMP2/7 heterodimer inhibits the human breast cancer stem cell subpopulation and bone metastases formation. Oncogene 2012; 31: 2164–2174.
Kim BR, Oh SC, Lee DH, Kim JL, Lee SY, Kang MH et al. BMP-2 induces motility and invasiveness by promoting colon cancer stemness through STAT3 activation. Tumour Biol 2015; 36: 9475–9486.
McLean K, Gong Y, Choi Y, Deng N, Yang K, Bai S et al. Human ovarian carcinoma-associated mesenchymal stem cells regulate cancer stem cells and tumorigenesis via altered BMP production. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 3206–3219.
Weinberg RA . The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 1995; 81: 323–330.
Taya Y . RB kinases and RB-binding proteins: new points of view. Trends Biochem Sci 1997; 22: 14–17.
Knudsen ES, McClendon AK, Franco J, Ertel A, Fortina P, Witkiewicz AK . RB loss contributes to aggressive tumor phenotypes in MYC-driven triple negative breast cancer. Cell Cycle 2015; 14: 109–122.
Ang XL, Wade Harper J . SCF-mediated protein degradation and cell cycle control. Oncogene 2005; 24: 2860–2870.
Delston RB, Matatall KA, Sun Y, Onken MD, Harbour JW . p38 phosphorylates Rb on Ser567 by a novel, cell cycle-independent mechanism that triggers Rb-Hdm2 interaction and apoptosis. Oncogene 2011; 30: 588–599.
Bao JM, He MY, Liu YW, Lu YJ, Hong YQ, Luo HH et al. AGE/RAGE/Akt pathway contributes to prostate cancer cell proliferation by promoting Rb phosphorylation and degradation. Am J Cancer Res 2015; 5: 1741–1750.
Zhang Z, Gao N, He H, Huang C, Luo J, Shi X . Vanadate activated Akt and promoted S phase entry. Mol Cell Biochem 2004; 255: 227–237.
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF . Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 3983–3988.
Cho Y, Lee HW, Kang HG, Kim HY, Kim SJ, Chun KH . Cleaved CD44 intracellular domain supports activation of stemness factors and promotes tumorigenesis of breast cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 8709–8721.
Kim KJ, Godarova A, Seedle K, Kim MH, Ince TA, Wells SI et al. Rb suppresses collective invasion, circulation and metastasis of breast cancer cells in CD44-dependent manner. PloS One 2013; 8: e80590.
Shibue T, Brooks MW, Inan MF, Reinhardt F, Weinberg RA . The outgrowth of micrometastases is enabled by the formation of filopodium-like protrusions. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 706–721.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273570), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (201300000041), the key project of Guangdong drug discovery initiative (2013A022100033), the China-UK Healthtech Open Innovation programme of GDD (2015Q-P156) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502412).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
edited by Alessandro Rufini
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Cell Death Discovery website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, P., Chen, A., He, W. et al. BMP-2 induces EMT and breast cancer stemness through Rb and CD44. Cell Death Discov. 3, 17039 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.39
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.39
This article is cited by
-
BMP signaling in cancer stemness and differentiation
Cell Regeneration (2023)
-
Application of rhBMP in spinal fusion surgery: any correlation of cancer incidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis
European Spine Journal (2023)
-
Secretion of BMP-2 by tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) promotes microcalcifications in breast cancer
BMC Cancer (2022)
-
BMP2 promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis through BMP receptor 2-mediated SMAD1/5 activation
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
BMP2 as a promising anticancer approach: functions and molecular mechanisms
Investigational New Drugs (2022)