Tumor cells exhibit unique metabolic adaptations that are increasingly viewed as potential targets for novel and specific cancer therapies. Among these targets, the carnitine palmitoyltransferase system is responsible for delivering the long-chain fatty acid (FA) from cytoplasm into mitochondria for oxidation, where carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPTI) catalyzes the rate-limiting step of fatty acid oxidation (FAO). With increasing understanding of the crucial role had by fatty acid oxidation in cancer, CPTI has received renewed attention as a pivotal mediator in cancer metabolic mechanism. CPTI activates FAO and fuels cancer growth via ATP and NADPH production, constituting an essential part of cancer metabolism adaptation. Moreover, CPTI also functionally intertwines with other key pathways and factors to regulate gene expression and apoptosis of cancer cell. Here, we summarize recent findings and update the current understanding of FAO and CPTI in cancer and provide theoretical basis for this enzyme as an emerging potential molecular target in cancer therapeutic intervention.
FAO has the capacity to act as the great power to fuel tumor growth in conditions of metabolic stress.
CPTI, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of FAO, is overexpressed in numerous tumors. Inhibition of CPTI is proved to suppress cancer growth.
Besides FAO, CPTI also functionally intertwines with other key pathways and factors in the regulation of gene expression and apoptosis of cancer cell.
In tumor microenvironment, CPTI also exerts important properties in tumor neovascularization.
What is the specific mechanism of FAO in contributing to cancer survival?
How do FAO, aerobic glycolysis and fatty acid synthesis (FAS) interact with each other in cancer cells under metabolic stress?
Are there any other molecules that regulate FAO and CPTI activity or are regulated by CPTI in tumor cells?
Is it feasible that we explore new anticancer therapies targeting CPTI while minimizing side effects of CPTI inhibition?
In endothelial cells, will CPTI become a new important therapeutic target for tumor neovascularization?
Altered energy metabolism constitutes the major part of tumor metabolic adaptation and has been well established as a hallmark of cancer.1, 2 The best-known metabolic abnormality in cancer cells is the Warburg effect, which is the increased glycolysis in the presence of oxygen.3 Apart from alteration in glucose metabolism, there are compelling evidences showing that cancer cells have specific alterations in different aspects of lipid metabolism. These alterations can affect the availability of membrane structural lipids, the synthesis and degradation of lipids that contribute to energy homeostasis and the abundance of lipids with signaling functions.4
Recent research has pointed to the crucial role of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) as an essential source of NADH, FADH2, NADPH and ATP, all providing survival advantage to cancer.5, 6, 7 As the key rate-limiting enzyme of FAO, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPTI) controls FAO directly and thus facilitates cancer metabolic adaptation. Meanwhile, CPTI also shares multiple connections with many other cellular signaling pathways, making it a multifunctional mediator in cancer pathogenesis.
In this review, we will summarize briefly the biological characteristics of FAO and its key enzyme CPTI. Emphasis will be laid on the confirmed functions of CPTI in various carcinomas and its related pathways in cancer metabolic homeostasis. In the end, we will show some novel findings about the functions of CPTI and further discuss the prospect as well as the problems encountered in targeting CPTI for cancer therapy.
CPTI Enzymes and FAO
In normal untransformed cells, the balance between fatty FAS (fatty acid synthesis) and FAO (β-oxidation) depends upon nutritional state and tissue mitochondrial metabolism.
FAO mainly occurs in mitochondria and involves a cyclical series of reactions that result in the shortening of fatty acids (two carbons per cycle). These reactions generate NADH, FADH2 and acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) in each round, until the last cycle when two acetyl-CoA molecules are produced from the catabolism of a four-carbon fatty acid. NADH and FADH2 that are generated by FAO enter the electron transport chain to produce ATP.5 The first step of FAO is fatty acid activation, producing long-chain acyl-CoA catalyzed by the long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase, which is the prerequisite of long-chain fatty acid catabolism.8 There are 26 genes encoding acyl-CoA synthetase that have discriminatory affinities for activating short-, medium-, long- and very long-chain fatty acids, respectively.9 Due to the lack of permeability of long-chain acly-CoAs to penetrate the mitochondrial inner membrane, the carnitine palmitoyltransferase system is responsible for transporting long-chain acly-CoAs into mitochondria from cytoplasm. Three components are involved in this transporting system: CPTI, the carnitine acylcarnitine translocase (CACT) and CPTII. CPTI grapples on the mitochondrial outer membrane with its C terminus and N terminus facing the cytoplasm.10 It catalyzes the rate-limiting step of FAO by converting acyl-CoAs into acylcarnitines. CACT is an inner membrane protein that exchange acylcarnitine and carnitine between outer and inner mitochondrial membranes. CPTII is located in the matrix side of the mitochondrial inner membrane11 and it is responsible for converting acylcarnitine back into acyl-CoAs for oxidation (Figure 1).
The CPTI family of proteins, by shuttling long-chain fatty acid into mitochondria, constitutes the rate-limiting step of FAO.12 It comprises of three subtypes, CPTIA, CPTIB and CPTIC, which show tissue-specific distribution.13, 14 CPTIA and CPTIB distribute widely in human body and demonstrate considerable similarities; both of them have a central role in mitochondrial β-oxidation. Malonyl-CoA, the product of the first committed step in FAS and usually derived from glucose, is the physiological inhibitor of CPTIA and CPTIB and turns them into enzymes exhibiting strong flux control on FAO.15 Although there exists considerable sequence similarity, the sensitivity of these two enzymes to their inhibitor malonyl-CoA differs greatly (CPTIA has a tenfold higher Ki for malonyl-CoA),15 which makes CPTIA the more prevailing enzyme that accomplishes the rate-limiting step in β-oxidation.16
CPTIC is one of the CPTI isoforms expressed exclusively in the brain.17 Like CPTIA and CPTIB, the brain-specific CPTIC displays high-affinity binding to malonyl-CoA, but its enzymatic activity cannot be observed using conventional substrates.18, 19, 20 Gene-targeting studies have demonstrated that CPTIC was not essential for the survival of mice but these animals did exhibit reduced FAO.21 Recent studies showed that CPTIC was localized both in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, but its presence in endoplasmic reticulum is predominant. Despite these progresses, the exact subcellular localization of CPTIC and its cellular function remains unclear.20
In summary, although CPTIA, CPTIB and CPTIC have specific tissue distribution, targeted inhibition/depletion of the three isoforms leads to a considerable suppressed phenotype in cancer cells including repressed proliferation, chemoresistance and neovascularization (studies focusing on their functions are listed in Table 1). A deeper understanding of the three isoforms is without doubt needed for developing drugs or therapies targeting these enzymes.
FAO in Cancer Metabolism
Although the relevance of FAO in cancer cells has not been examined thoroughly like glycolysis, glutaminolysis and FAS, current work has started to bring to light the function of FAO in tumor cells.
Increasing ATP supply for tumor survival
FAO has the capacity to act as the great power to fuel tumor growth by increasing ATP production in conditions of metabolic stress. For example, CPTIC is upregulated in tumors of the lung, and enhances tumor survival in conditions of metabolic stress (glucose or oxygen deprivation) in vitro.22 Overexpression of CPTIC in cancer cells promotes FAO and ATP production, adaptation to metabolic stress and resistance to mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) inhibitors.18, 23 Moreover, cells derived from solid tumors that undergo loss of attachment (LOA) to the extracellular matrix (known as anoikis) display inhibition of glucose uptake and catabolism, which results in the loss of ATP, NADPH (as a result of decreased flux through the pentose phosphate pathway) and increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).5 Interestingly, antioxidants counteract ROS accumulation and reactivate FAO, increase ATP levels and prevent LOA-induced anoikis, although the exact mechanism by which the increasing ATP rescues anoikis remains unclear.24
In addition, some tumors such as prostate cancer25 and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, are highly dependent on FAO for survival and growth.26, 27 Either genetically or pharmacologically inhibition of FAO reduces ATP supply and impairs cell proliferation in PC3 prostate cancer,25 Burkitt’s lymphoma28 and human glioblastoma.29 All evidence showed that FAO contributes to cancer cell proliferation by increasing ATP supply.
FAO contribution to the total NADPH pool
Apart from producing NADH and FADH2 directly to supply extra ATP for cancer survival,5 FAO is also an important source of NADPH. The major effect of FAO in NADPH production lies in its promoting acetyl-CoA generation. The acetyl-CoA enters the Krebs cycle and together with oxaloacetate give rise to citrate, which can be exported to the cytoplasm and engage in NADPH-producing reactions: the transformation of malate to pyruvate catalyzed by malic enzyme (ME1) and the oxidation of isocitrate into α-ketoglutarate catalyzed by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1).5
The production of FAO-derived cytosolic NADPH provides redox power for cancer cells to counteract oxidative stress. For example, inhibition of FAO in human glioblastoma cells by etomoxir, a CPTI inhibitor, impairs NADPH production and increases ROS, resulting in ATP depletion and cell death.30 Next, NADPH is a coenzyme for anabolic enzymes in the synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol, and is thus the key for the generation of new building blocks that sustain cell growth and proliferation.31 Current data further showed that the function of FAO in maintaining NADPH homeostasis is regulated through the LKB1-AMPK axis.32 When starved from glucose, cells lacking the ability to activate AMPK show NADPH depletion, increased oxidative stress and increased apoptosis.33
FAO in tumor chemoresistance and hypoxia
Chemoresistance is one of the essential ways that cancer evades from death and a major cause of treatment failure in patients with cancer. As is mentioned above, CPTIC overexpression in cancer cells promotes FAO and resistance to mTORC1 inhibitors. In contrast, the inhibition of FAO sensitizes cancer cells to drugs and helps cancer to overcome chemoresistance. For example, the inhibition of FAO inhibited paclitaxel-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell proliferation34 and increased the resistance of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to glucocorticoids.35 These studies suggested that FAO inhibition is a potential strategy to overcome drug resistance in tumors.
Besides chemoresistance, the ability to survive in hypoxia is also significant for tumor cells. How do FAO work under hypoxia in cancer cells? In tumor tissue, intermittent blood supply leads to an alternating situation of lack-of-oxygen and reoxygenation, which causes oxidative stress.23, 36 Hypoxia induces a HIF-1α-dependent accumulation of lipid droplets and decreased FAO in tumor cells, whereas the hypoxia-reoxygenation leads to increased FAO in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, thereby providing reduced power to protect against accumulation of ROS.37 Current studies further demonstrated that HIF-1 inhibited two enzymes in FAO, the medium- and long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenases MCAD and LCAD. And LCAD loss further promotes cancer by reduction of PTEN, highlighting the significance of FAO inhibition in cancer.38 However, in lung cancer and breast cancer, tumor cells constitutively expressing CPTIC show increased FAO, ATP production and resistance to hypoxia.18 Further study shows that CPTIC is induced by AMPK activation under hypoxia and a p53–AMPK–CPTIC axis evoked in response to metabolic stress has also been implicated.18, 39
FAO and aerobic glycolysis
Aerobic glycolysis is perceived as the dominant energy-supplying pathway to fulfill the high demand of the rapid proliferating tumor cells.40 However, emerging evidence is indicating that some tumors, including prostate tumor, leukemia and large B-cell lymphoma, utilize FAO as their main energy supply for proliferation and survival.26, 41, 42 For example, prostate cancer has low avidity for FDG (2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose) due to enhanced FAO and decreased glycolysis, therefore cannot get ideal FDG-PET imaging result.43 Furthermore, inhibition of CPTI by etomoxir leads to activated aerobic glycolysis and potentiated FDG signaling.44 It is reasonable to speculate that the inhibition of CPTI leads to the activation of aerobic glycolysis, which elicits complementary effects for energy loss due to impaired FAO. More in-depth analysis is required to determine whether the complementary effect results from the direct interaction between FAO and aerobic glycolysis, or is mediated by other enzymes responded to the energy deprivation (such as AMPK; Figure 2).
FAO and FAS
De novo FAS is amplified in many cancers and is believed to be used mainly for the newly synthesized membrane phospholipids as well as the signal molecules, which are needed for the cancer cells’ rapid proliferation.45 Also, FAO is indispensible for many cancers especially under metabolic stress. FAO and FAS are antagonistic and incompatible in relationship.16, 46, 47 Moreover, current data further demonstrated that genetic manipulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1) or acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2 (ACC2) in cancer cells yielded different outcomes in terms of FAS and FAO.5 ACC2-generated malonyl-CoA can inhibit CPTI and thus control FAO, but ACC1-derived malonyl-CoA is just an intermediate for FAS and exerts no suppressive effect on CPTI.48, 49 Therefore, ACC determines which pathway is active, depending on the level of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA.5 In addition, simultaneous suppression of FAS and FAO has been demonstrated to be quite effective in anticancer therapy in some cancers (e.g., prostate cancer, myeloma).50, 51 All results above show that FAS and FAO may support each other.26
Although still under debate, there are two reasonable explanations for the simultaneous suppression of FAS and FAO. Firstly, different effects of the compartmentalized malony-CoA on CPTI may contribute to the co-activation. Secondly, the free fatty acid needed for FAO not only comes from extracellular environment but also originates from de novo lipogenesis. FAS supplies the material for FAO, and meanwhile FAO promotes the accumulation of acetyl-CoA that is needed to initiate FAS26 (Figure 2).
CPTI Promotes Cancer Survival Under Metabolic Stress
Numerous studies have shown that the overexpression of CPTI is tightly associated with tumor progression in breast cancer,52, 53, 54 gastric cancer,55 prostate cancer,25, 50 lung cancer,18 ovarian cancer,56, 57 hepatoma,58 myeloma51 and high grade glioblastoma29, 59(roles of CPTI in various tumors are summarized in Table 1).
CPTI serves to activate FAO that increases ATP and NADPH reserves, protecting cancer against the environmental stress such as glucose deprivation and hypoxia.60, 61 CTP1C expression displays an inverse correlation with the activation of mTOR pathway and attenuates tumor sensitivity to rapamycin (a mTOR inhibitor),18 which suggests that the CPTIC-involved pathway parallels to mTOR-enhanced glycolysis.62 Moreover, CPTIC is an essential downstream mediator of the AMPK pathway as well as a target gene of p53 in a p53/AMPK-dependent manner.39
Knockdown or inhibition of CPTI by inhibitors (such as etomoxir and ST1326) suppresses cancer cell growth. CPTI is proved to have the potential to be a new target in anticancer treatment (e.g., breast cancer,54 prostate cancer,50 leukemia7, 63). For example, inhibition of CPTIA results in impaired cancer cell proliferation in acute myeloid leukemia.7, 28, 64 Pharmacological inhibition of CPTIA by ST1326 results in intensive cytotoxicity in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Interestingly, altered β-oxidation followed by inhibition of CPTIA remarkably attenuate c-myc–mediated lymphomagenesis, implying a potential role CPTI had in the pathogenesis of c-myc–driven cancer.28
Essential Role of CPTI in Cancer Cell Apoptosis
CPTI and bcl-2 family
Recent studies demonstrated that the truncated Bid of the bcl-2 family decreased CPT-1 activity in a malony-CoA-independent manner, thereby resulting in the accumulation of palmitoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) and cancer cell apoptosis.65 And the overexpression of Bcl-2 cripples this effect through direct interaction with CPTIA.66 In contrast, pharmacologic inhibition of FAO with etomoxir or ranolazine inhibited cancer cell proliferation and sensitized human leukemia cells to apoptosis induced by ABT-737, a molecule that released proapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins such as Bak from antiapoptotic family members, suggesting that CTP1 can antagonize Bcl-2-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, after ABT-737 treatment, the inhibition of FAO facilitates the formation of Bak-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition independently of p53 (ref. 42; Figure 3).
CPTI and cytotoxic lipids
An alternative way through which CPTI regulates tumor apoptosis is by controlling the production of potentially toxic lipid metabolites such as ceramide and its precursors—palmitoyl-CoA and palmitic acid. In prostate cancer cells, inhibition of CPTIA by etomoxir increases substantially the level of 16C and 18C containing-ceramides,50 which are synthesized de novo by palmitic acid and stearic acid and exerts the most dramatic impact on intrinsic apoptosis activity.67 Moreover, the palmitoyl-CoA and palmitate of ceramide precursors also induce apoptosis via de novo synthesis of ceramide.66, 68 CPTIA can protect cells from apoptosis by clearing the cytoplasmic long-chain fatty acyl-CoA such as palmitoyl-CoA and thus impede the production of ‘palmitate/palmitoyl-CoA/ceramide’.
Regulation of CPTI Expression in Cancer Cells
MiR-370 regulates CPTIA in hepatocellular carcinoma cells
MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs which serve as essential endogenous regulators for gene expression at the post-transcriptional level.69, 70 Certain sets of circulating microRNAs might function as a tumor surveillance mechanism exerting continuous inhibition on tumor formation.71, 72 In hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), CPTIA is downregulated by miR-370 which targets the 3′ untranslated region of CPTIA.73 Bio-information and molecular analysis demonstrated that CPTIA is a direct target of miR-370 and the rate of FAO reduced by 40% due to the downregulation of CPTIA by miR-370. Meanwhile, the lipogenic genes SREBP-1c, DGAT2, FAS and ACC1 can be activated by the overexpression of the direct lipogenesis regulator miR-122 through the effect of miR-370. It was hypothesized that in HepG2, miR-370 contributed to hepatic triglyceride accumulation by directly downregulating CPTIA and promoting lipogenesis through the activation of miR-122.73 Therefore, miR-370 is regard as a potential regulator of CPTI gene expression.
CPTI serves as a downstream effector of PAX3-FKHR in ARMS
CPTI expression is regulated by a different pathway in aggressive alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). It has been confirmed that the downregulation of CPTIA decreases the motility of human ARMS cell line Rh30, and CPTIA also serves as a transcriptional target of a PAX3-FKHR fusion transcription factor, which regulates cell migration and promotes metastasis.74 As a fusion transcription factor produced by chromosomal translocation, PAX3-FKHR has been linked closely to cell differentiation, metastasis, and migration of ARMS.75, 76, 77 This is the first study showing that CPTIA contributes to cancer cell motility as the downstream effector of PAX3-FKHR, implying a potential value of targeting CPTIA for ARMS therapy74 (Figure 3).
Transcriptional regulation of CPTIA by RXR-NR4A receptor
Retinoid X receptors (RXRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and can be activated by 9-cis retinoic acid. RXRs form homodimers and heterodimers with other nuclear receptors such as the retinoic acid receptor and NR4 subfamily nuclear receptors, Nur77 and NURR1. RXR has a vital role in the transcription of tumor suppressor genes which induce differentiation and suppress cancer growth.78, 79 As NR4 subfamily nuclear receptors (e.g., Nur77, NURR1) are ubiquitous heterodimerization partners of RXR in forming heterodimers,80 current study also revealed that when the cancer cells are incubated with HX600, a selective RXR agonist for Nur77-RXR and NURR1-RXR, the expression of CPTIA is induced through Nur77 or NURR1-mediated mechanism in the teratocarcinoma cells or heptoma carcinoma HepG2 cells81 (Figure 3).
Regulation of CPTI by hormone in tumor cells
A large body of literature supports that prolactin (PRL) released from the anterior pituitary gland promotes cell proliferation, survival, migration/invasion and angiogenesis.82 In MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, recent study showed that PRL stimulation increased the expression of CPTIA (liver isoform) at both mRNA and protein level, and PRL-mediated effects are partially dependent on the LKB1-AMPK pathway.53 This result suggests that PRL may enhance fatty acid β-oxidation by stimulating CPTI expression and/or activity in breast cancer cells (Figure 3).
Androgen increases the production of ROS in prostate cancer cells, which has been postulated to have a key role in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer.83 Furthermore, R1881 (synthetic androgen) increased the expression and activity of CPTI, the rate-limiting enzyme in the process of mitochondrial FAO, through AR-mediated pathway, leading to increased production of ROS associated with prostate cell proliferation and mutagenesis.84 On the other hand, decreased expression of AR isoform in prostate cancer is also detected after the inhibition of CPTIA by etomoxir.50 These results not only underscore the importance of CPTIA in modulating AR in prostate cancer,50 but also indicate that there exist mutual feedback regulations between AR and CPTI (Figure 3).
Regulation of CPTI by histone deacetylation
Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) has a crucial role in transcriptional repression of gene expression.85, 86 Current data showed that the nuclear localization of CPTI existed exclusively in neoplastic cells, and HDAC1 and CPTI coimmunoprecipitats in nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells. The treatment with HDAC inhibitors such as trichostatin A and butyrate significantly decreased nuclear expression of CPTI and its bond to HDAC186 (Figure 3). The peculiar localization of CPTI in the nuclei of human carcinomas and the functional link between nuclear CPTI and HDAC1 suggest that CPTI may act as a new role in the histonic acetylation level of tumor, but the function and mechanism need to be further explored.
The Therapeutic Window of CPTI in Cancer Therapy
The inhibition of CPTI irreversibly suppressed FAO, which was thought to be a potential anticancer target in many studies. The inhibition drugs of CPTI have already been developed in the treatment of heart diseases. Among which the inhibitory effect of etomoxir on CPTI is fully demonstrated.87 As an irreversible inhibitor of CPTI, etomoxir has been developed as a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic heart failure for a long time.88, 89, 90 Recently, etomoxir has gained decent anticancer results in many experiments. Nevertheless, etomoxir is proved to have some serious toxic effect91 and thus is still in the preclinical stage.5 Previous studies presented that etomoxir treatment induced cardiac hypertrophy by increasing oxidative stress and stimulating NF-κB.91, 92 What is more, the suppression of CPTI by etomoxir eventually reactivated the original low level glycolysis in prostate cancer.44 Other CPTI inhibitory drugs, such as perhexiline, is also proved to be toxic (such as neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity) especially after long-term therapy.93 These side effects are caused mainly by the low selectivity of the drugs—inhibiting CPTI in target spot as well as in normal ones, leading to metabolic disorder. Based on such background, a more selective CPTI inhibitor named ST1326 (Teglicar) is developed.94 Its effect is reversible and liver specific, showing impressive safety records except for the fat liver, as expected.95 ST1326 is now in phase 2 studies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and is also showing great potential in the treatment of leukemias.96, 97
The aberrant expression of CPTI directly alters the intensity of FAO, acclimatizing cancer cells to metabolic stress. In spite of FAO, there are other key regulatory pathways through which CPTI modulates growth, gene expression and apoptosis of cancer cells. Depending on cancer types, the function of CPTI couples with diverse modulators in specific cancer and can be modulated at different levels. CPTI is also indispensable at the junction of FAO, aerobic glycolysis and FAS. There may exist undiscovered ‘bridges’ involving CPTIA that coordinate the three biological processes, which is crucial to the metabolic adaption in cancer.
In cancer cells, CPTI acts as a multifunctional enzyme and benefits cancer survival as well as growth at multiple fronts. In tumor microenvironment, CPTI that expresses in non-tumorous cells also has a major impact on cancer survival. In endothelial cells (ECs), overexpressed CPTI can promote cancer growth through acceleration of tumor neovascularization.98 A recent article on Nature indicates that loss of CPTIA in the ECs results in impaired cancer cell proliferation and inhibits de novo nucleotide synthesis and DNA replication.98 In another study, it has been shown that the inhibition of CPTIA in ECs induces hyperpermeability in vitro and leakage of blood vessel in vivo through increasing Ca2+ oscillation frequency.99 These novel studies point to an important role that CPTI had in promoting cancer angiogenesis. In the future, further efforts should be directed to interpret the precise molecular mechanism of CPTI in cancer angiogenesis and fully tap the potential of CPTI inhibition in cancer therapeutic intervention.
carnitine palmitoyltransferase I
fatty acid oxidation
fatty acid synthesis
carnitine acylcarnitine translocase
mTOR complex 1
loss of attachment
reactive oxygen species
acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1
acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2
retinoid X receptors
histone deacetylase 1
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA . Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674.
Zhao Y, Butler EB, Tan M . Targeting cellular metabolism to improve cancer therapeutics. Cell Death Dis 2013; 4: e532.
Bensinger SJ, Christofk HR . New aspects of the Warburg effect in cancer cell biology. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23: 352–361.
Santos CR, Schulze A . Lipid metabolism in cancer. FEBS J 2012; 279: 2610–2623.
Carracedo A, Cantley LC, Pandolfi PP . Cancer metabolism: fatty acid oxidation in the limelight. Nat Rev Cancer 2013; 13: 227–232.
Hossain F, Al-Khami AA, Wyczechowska D, Hernandez C, Zheng L, Reiss K et al. Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation modulates immunosuppressive functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhances cancer therapies. Cancer Immunol Res 2015; 3: 1236–1247.
Ricciardi MR, Mirabilii S, Allegretti M, Licchetta R, Calarco A, Torrisi MR et al. Targeting the leukemia cell metabolism by the CPTIa inhibition: functional pre-clinical effects in leukemias. Blood 2015; 126: 1925–1929.
Yan S, Yang XF, Liu HL, Fu N, Ouyang Y, Qing K . Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase in fatty acid metabolism involved in liver and other diseases: an update. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 3492–3498.
Watkins PA, Maiguel D, Jia Z, Pevsner J . Evidence for 26 distinct acyl-coenzyme A synthetase genes in the human genome. J Lipid Res 2007; 48: 2736–2750.
van der Leij FR, Kram AM, Bartelds B, Roelofsen H, Smid GB, Takens J et al. Cytological evidence that the C-terminus of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I is on the cytosolic face of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Biochem J 1999; 341: 777–784.
Rufer AC, Thoma R, Hennig M . Structural insight into function and regulation of carnitine palmitoyltransferase. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66: 2489–2501.
Bonnefont JP, Djouadi F, Prip-Buus C, Gobin S, Munnich A, Bastin J . Carnitine palmitoyltransferases 1 and 2: biochemical, molecular and medical aspects. Mol Aspects Med 2004; 25: 495–520.
Flavin R, Peluso S, Nguyen PL, Loda M . Fatty acid synthase as a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Future Oncol 2010; 6: 551–562.
Schreurs M, Kuipers F, van der Leij FR . Regulatory enzymes of mitochondrial beta-oxidation as targets for treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 380–388.
Casals N, Zammit V, Herrero L, Fado R, Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Serra D . Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C: from cognition to cancer. Prog Lipid Res 2015; 61: 134–148.
McGarry JD, Brown NF . The mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase system. From concept to molecular analysis. Eur J Biochem 1997; 244: 1–14.
Carrasco P, Jacas J, Sahun I, Muley H, Ramirez S, Puisac B et al. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C deficiency causes motor impairment and hypoactivity. Behav Brain Res 2013; 256: 291–297.
Zaugg K, Yao Y, Reilly PT, Kannan K, Kiarash R, Mason J et al. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C promotes cell survival and tumor growth under conditions of metabolic stress. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 1041–1051.
Wolfgang MJ, Lane MD . Control of energy homeostasis: role of enzymes and intermediates of fatty acid metabolism in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Nutr 2006; 26: 23–44.
Sierra AY, Gratacos E, Carrasco P, Clotet J, Urena J, Serra D et al. CPTIc is localized in endoplasmic reticulum of neurons and has carnitine palmitoyltransferase activity. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 6878–6885.
Wolfgang MJ, Cha SH, Millington DS, Cline G, Shulman GI, Suwa A et al. Brain-specific carnitine palmitoyl-transferase-1c: role in CNS fatty acid metabolism, food intake, and body weight. J Neurochem 2008; 105: 1550–1559.
Casals N, Zammit V, Herrero L, Fado R, Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Serra D . Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C: from cognition to cancer. Prog Lipid Res 2016; 61: 134–148.
Harjes U, Kalucka J, Carmeliet P . Targeting fatty acid metabolism in cancer and endothelial cells. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 97: 15–21.
Schafer ZT, Grassian AR, Song L, Jiang Z, Gerhart-Hines Z, Irie HY et al. Antioxidant and oncogene rescue of metabolic defects caused by loss of matrix attachment. Nature 2009; 461: 109–113.
Liu Y . Fatty acid oxidation is a dominant bioenergetic pathway in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2006; 9: 230–234.
Caro P, Kishan AU, Norberg E, Stanley IA, Chapuy B, Ficarro SB et al. Metabolic signatures uncover distinct targets in molecular subsets of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2012; 22: 547–560.
Monti S, Savage KJ, Kutok JL, Feuerhake F, Kurtin P, Mihm M et al. Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response. Blood 2005; 105: 1851–1861.
Pacilli A, Calienni M, Margarucci S, D'Apolito M, Petillo O, Rocchi L et al. Carnitine-acyltransferase system inhibition, cancer cell death, and prevention of myc-induced lymphomagenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105: 489–498.
Cirillo A, Di Salle A, Petillo O, Melone MA, Grimaldi G, Bellotti A et al. High grade glioblastoma is associated with aberrant expression of ZFP57, a protein involved in gene imprinting, and of CPTIA and CPTIC that regulate fatty acid metabolism. Cancer Biol Ther 2014; 15: 735–741.
Pike LS, Smift AL, Croteau NJ, Ferrick DA, Wu M . Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation by etomoxir impairs NADPH production and increases reactive oxygen species resulting in ATP depletion and cell death in human glioblastoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1807: 726–734.
Chiarugi A, Dölle C, Felici R, Ziegler M . The NAD metabolome — a key determinant of cancer cell biology. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12: 741–752.
Kawashima I, Mitsumori T, Nozaki Y, Yamamoto T, Shobu-Sueki Y, Nakajima K et al. Negative regulation of the LKB1/AMPK pathway by ERK in human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Exp Hematol 2015; 43: 524–533; e521.
Jeon SM, Chandel NS, Hay N . AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis to promote tumour cell survival during energy stress. Nature 2012; 485: 661–665.
Li J, Zhao S, Zhou X, Zhang T, Zhao L, Miao P et al. Inhibition of lipolysis by mercaptoacetate and etomoxir specifically sensitize drug-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell to paclitaxel. PLoS One 2013; 8: e74623.
Tung S, Shi Y, Wong K, Zhu F, Gorczynski R, Laister RC et al. PPARalpha and fatty acid oxidation mediate glucocorticoid resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2013; 122: 969–980.
Kostecka A, Sznarkowska A, Meller K, Acedo P, Shi Y, Mohammad Sakil HA et al. JNK-NQO1 axis drives TAp73-mediated tumor suppression upon oxidative and proteasomal stress. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1484.
Bensaad K, Favaro E, Lewis CA, Peck B, Lord S, Collins JM et al. Fatty acid uptake and lipid storage induced by HIF-1alpha contribute to cell growth and survival after hypoxia-reoxygenation. Cell Rep 2014; 9: 349–365.
Huang D, Li T, Li X, Zhang L, Sun L, He X et al. HIF-1-mediated suppression of acyl-CoA dehydrogenases and fatty acid oxidation is critical for cancer progression. Cell Rep 2014; 8: 1930–1942.
Sanchez-Macedo N, Feng J, Faubert B, Chang N, Elia A, Rushing EJ et al. Depletion of the novel p53-target gene carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C delays tumor growth in the neurofibromatosis type I tumor model. Cell Death Differ 2013; 20: 659–668.
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB . Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009; 324: 1029–1033.
Zha S, Ferdinandusse S, Hicks JL, Denis S, Dunn TA, Wanders RJ et al. Peroxisomal branched chain fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway is upregulated in prostate cancer. Prostate 2005; 63: 316–323.
Samudio I, Harmancey R, Fiegl M, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Korchin B et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Invest 2010; 120: 142–156.
Effert PJ, Bares R, Handt S, Wolff JM, Bull U, Jakse G . Metabolic imaging of untreated prostate cancer by positron emission tomography with 18fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose. J Urol 1996; 155: 994–998.
Schlaepfer IR, Glode LM, Hitz CA, Pac CT, Boyle KE, Maroni P et al. Inhibition of lipid oxidation increases glucose metabolism and enhances 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]Fluoro-D-glucose uptake in prostate cancer mouse xenografts. Mol Imaging Biol 2015; 17: 529–538.
Zaidi N, Lupien L, Kuemmerle NB, Kinlaw WB, Swinnen JV, Smans K . Lipogenesis and lipolysis: the pathways exploited by the cancer cells to acquire fatty acids. Prog Lipid Res 2013; 52: 585–589.
McGarry JD, Mannaerts GP, Foster DW . A possible role for malonyl-CoA in the regulation of hepatic fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis. J Clin Invest 1977; 60: 265–270.
Zadra G, Photopoulos C, Loda M . The fat side of prostate cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1831: 1518–1532.
Abu-Elheiga L, Matzuk MM, Abo-Hashema KA, Wakil SJ . Continuous fatty acid oxidation and reduced fat storage in mice lacking acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. Science 2001; 291: 2613–2616.
Wakil SJ, Abu-Elheiga LA . Fatty acid metabolism: target for metabolic syndrome. J Lipid Res 2009; 50: S138–S143.
Schlaepfer IR, Rider L, Rodrigues LU, Gijon MA, Pac CT, Romero L et al. Lipid catabolism via CPTI as a therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2014; 13: 2361–2371.
Tirado-Velez JM, Joumady I, Saez-Benito A, Cozar-Castellano I, Perdomo G . Inhibition of fatty acid metabolism reduces human myeloma cells proliferation. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46484.
Gatza ML, Silva GO, Parker JS, Fan C, Perou CM . An integrated genomics approach identifies drivers of proliferation in luminal-subtype human breast cancer. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 1051–1059.
Linher-Melville K, Zantinge S, Sanli T, Gerstein H, Tsakiridis T, Singh G . Establishing a relationship between prolactin and altered fatty acid beta-oxidation via carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2011; 11: 56.
Pucci S, Zonetti MJ, Fisco T, Polidoro C, Bocchinfuso G, Palleschi A et al. Carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1A (CPTIA): a new tumor specific target in human breast cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 19982–19996.
Li S, Zhou T, Li C, Dai Z, Che D, Yao Y et al. High metastaticgastric and breast cancer cells consume oleic acid in an AMPK dependent manner. PLoS One 2014; 9: e97330.
Roy D, Mondal S, Wang C, He X, Khurana A, Giri S et al. Loss of HSulf-1 promotes altered lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer. Cancer Metab 2014; 2: 13.
Shao H, Mohamed EM, Xu GG, Waters M, Jing K, Ma Y et al. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A functions to repress FoxO transcription factors to allow cell cycle progression in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 7: 3832–3846.
Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Hernandez-Esquivel L, Marin-Hernandez A, El Hafidi M, Gallardo-Perez JC, Hernandez-Resendiz I et al. Mitochondrial free fatty acid beta-oxidation supports oxidative phosphorylation and proliferation in cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2015; 65: 209–221.
Wakamiya T, Suzuki SO, Hamasaki H, Honda H, Mizoguchi M, Yoshimoto K et al. Elevated expression of fatty acid synthase and nuclear localization of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C are common among human gliomas. Neuropathology 2014; 34: 465–474.
de Souza CO, Kurauti MA, de Fatima Silva F, de Morais H, Curi R, Hirabara SM et al. Celecoxib and Ibuprofen Restore the ATP Content and the Gluconeogenesis Activity in the Liver of Walker-256 Tumor-Bearing Rats. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015; 36: 1659–1669.
Schlaepfer IR, Nambiar DK, Ramteke A, Kumar R, Dhar D, Agarwal C et al. Hypoxia induces triglycerides accumulation in prostate cancer cells and extracellular vesicles supporting growth and invasiveness following reoxygenation. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 22836–22856.
Reilly PT, Mak TW . Molecular pathways: tumor cells Co-opt the brain-specific metabolism gene CPTIC to promote survival. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 5850–5855.
Samudio I, Harmancey R, Fiegl M, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Korchin B et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Invest 2010; 120: 142–156.
Lee EA, Angka L, Rota SG, Hanlon T, Mitchell A, Hurren R et al. Targeting mitochondria with avocatin B induces selective leukemia cell death. Cancer Res 2015; 75: 2478–2488.
Giordano A, Calvani M, Petillo O, Grippo P, Tuccillo F, Melone MA et al. tBid induces alterations of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation flux by malonyl-CoA-independent inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1. Cell Death Differ 2005; 12: 603–613.
Paumen MB, Ishida Y, Han H, Muramatsu M, Eguchi Y, Tsujimoto Y et al. Direct interaction of the mitochondrial membrane protein carnitine palmitoyltransferase I with Bcl-2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 231: 523–525.
Grosch S, Schiffmann S, Geisslinger G . Chain length-specific properties of ceramides. Prog Lipid Res 2012; 51: 50–62.
Namgaladze D, Lips S, Leiker TJ, Murphy RC, Ekroos K, Ferreiros N et al. Inhibition of macrophage fatty acid β-oxidation exacerbates palmitate-induced inflammatory and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 1067–1077.
Ambros V . microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 2001; 107: 823–826.
O'Driscoll L . The emerging world of microRNAs. Anticancer Res 2006; 26: 4271–4278.
Li XJ, Ren ZJ, Tang JH . MicroRNA-34a: a potential therapeutic target in human cancer. Cell Death Disease 2014; 5: e1327.
Igaz I, Igaz P . Tumor surveillance by circulating microRNAs: a hypothesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71: 4081–4087.
Iliopoulos D, Drosatos K, Hiyama Y, Goldberg IJ, Zannis VI . MicroRNA-370 controls the expression of microRNA-122 and CPTIalpha and affects lipid metabolism. J Lipid Res 2010; 51: 1513–1523.
Liu L, Wang YD, Wu J, Cui J, Chen T . Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPTIA): a transcriptional target of PAX3-FKHR and mediates PAX3-FKHR-dependent motility in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cells. BMC Cancer 2012; 12: 154.
Calhabeu F, Hayashi S, Morgan JE, Relaix F, Zammit PS . Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma-associated proteins PAX3/FOXO1A and PAX7/FOXO1A suppress the transcriptional activity of MyoD-target genes in muscle stem cells. Oncogene 2013; 32: 651–662.
Jothi M, Nishijo K, Keller C, Mal AK . AKT and PAX3-FKHR cooperation enforces myogenic differentiation blockade in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cell. Cell Cycle 2012; 11: 895–908.
Linardic CM . PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Lett 2008; 270: 10–18.
Kim MS, Lim DY, Kim JE, Chen H, Lubet RA, Dong Z et al. Src is a novel potential off-target of RXR agonists, 9-cis-UAB30 and Targretin, in human breast cancer cells. Mol Carcinog 2014; 54: 1596–1604.
Li J, Chanrion M, Sawey E, Wang T, Chow E, Tward A et al. Reciprocal interaction of Wnt and RXR-alpha pathways in hepatocyte development and hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0118480.
Gilardi F, Desvergne B . RXRs: collegial partners. Subcell Biochem 2014; 70: 75–102.
Ishizawa M, Kagechika H, Makishima M . NR4A nuclear receptors mediate carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A gene expression by the rexinoid HX600. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 418: 780–785.
Clevenger CV, Furth PA, Hankinson SE, Schuler LA . The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma. Endocr Rev 2003; 24: 1–27.
Shigemura K, Sung SY, Kubo H, Arnold RS, Fujisawa M, Gotoh A et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate androgen receptor- and serum starvation-elicited downstream signaling of ADAM9 expression in human prostate cancer cells. Prostate 2007; 67: 722–731.
Lin H, Lu JP, Laflamme P, Qiao S, Shayegan B, Bryskin I et al. Inter-related in vitro effects of androgens, fatty acids and oxidative stress in prostate cancer: a mechanistic model supporting prevention strategies. Int J Oncol 2010; 37: 761–766.
Burdelski C, Ruge OM, Melling N, Koop C, Simon R, Steurer S et al. HDAC1 overexpression independently predicts biochemical recurrence and is associated with rapid tumor cell proliferation and genomic instability in prostate cancer. Exp Mol Pathol 2015; 98: 419–426.
Mazzarelli P, Pucci S, Bonanno E, Sesti F, Calvani M, Spagnoli LG . Carnitine palmitoyltransferase I in human carcinomas: a novel role in histone deacetylation? Cancer Biol Ther 2007; 6: 1606–1613.
Lopaschuk GD, Wall SR, Olley PM, Davies NJ . Etomoxir, a carnitine palmitoyltransferase I inhibitor, protects hearts from fatty acid-induced ischemic injury independent of changes in long chain acylcarnitine. Circ Res 1988; 63: 1036–1043.
Bristow M . Etomoxir: a new approach to treatment of chronic heart failure. Lancet 2000; 356: 1621–1622.
Ratheiser K, Schneeweiss B, Waldhausl W, Fasching P, Korn A, Nowotny P et al. Inhibition by etomoxir of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I reduces hepatic glucose production and plasma lipids in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 1991; 40: 1185–1190.
Wolf HP . Possible new therapeutic approach in diabetes mellitus by inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPTI). Horm Metab Res Suppl 1992; 26: 62–67.
Merrill CL, Ni H, Yoon LW, Tirmenstein MA, Narayanan P, Benavides GR et al. Etomoxir-induced oxidative stress in HepG2 cells detected by differential gene expression is confirmed biochemically. Toxicol Sci 2002; 68: 93–101.
Cabrero A, Merlos M, Laguna JC, Carrera MV . Down-regulation of acyl-CoA oxidase gene expression and increased NF-kappaB activity in etomoxir-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J Lipid Res 2003; 44: 388–398.
Ashrafian H, Horowitz JD, Frenneaux MP . Perhexiline. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2007; 25: 76–97.
Giannessi F, Pessotto P, Tassoni E, Chiodi P, Conti R, De Angelis F et al. Discovery of a long-chain carbamoyl aminocarnitine derivative, a reversible carnitine palmitoyltransferase inhibitor with antiketotic and antidiabetic activity. J Med Chem 2003; 46: 303–309.
Conti R, Mannucci E, Pessotto P, Tassoni E, Carminati P, Giannessi F et al. Selective reversible inhibition of liver carnitine palmitoyl-transferase 1 by teglicar reduces gluconeogenesis and improves glucose homeostasis. Diabetes 2011; 60: 644–651.
Samudio I, Konopleva M . Targeting leukemia's "fatty tooth". Blood 2015; 126: 1874–1875.
Ricciardi MR, Mirabilii S, Allegretti M, Licchetta R, Calarco A, Torrisi MR et al. Targeting the leukemia cell metabolism by the CPTIa inhibition: functional preclinical effects in leukemias. Blood 2015; 126: 1925–1929.
Schoors S, Bruning U, Missiaen R, Queiroz KC, Borgers G, Elia I et al. Fatty acid carbon is essential for dNTP synthesis in endothelial cells. Nature 2015; 520: 192–197.
Patella F, Schug ZT, Persi E, Neilson LJ, Erami Z, Avanzato D et al. Proteomics-based metabolic modeling reveals that fatty acid oxidation (FAO) controls endothelial cell (EC) permeability. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015; 14: 621–634.
The work was supported grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81272852, 81472407 to FD), Oversea Hong Kong & Macao Scholars Collaborative Research Fund of NSFC in China (No. 81328020, to QJW and FD).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Edited by J Chipuk
About this article
Cite this article
Qu, Q., Zeng, F., Liu, X. et al. Fatty acid oxidation and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: emerging therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Death Dis 7, e2226 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.132
MicroRNA-377-3p inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis through negative regulation of CPT1C-mediated fatty acid oxidation
Cancer & Metabolism (2022)
Cancer & Metabolism (2021)
Inhibition of CPT1a as a prognostic marker can synergistically enhance the antileukemic activity of ABT199
Journal of Translational Medicine (2021)
BMC Cancer (2021)
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2021)