Main

The classical basal ganglia (BG) model1, 2 postulated that, in Parkinson's disease (PD) akinesia results from a functional imbalance between indirect and direct pathways. An over-activity of the sub-thalamic nucleus (STN) and the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) was supposed to have a key role in determining the OFF state. As similar benefits were obtained by STN deep brain stimulation (DBS) or STN lesion, it was suggested that STN-DBS represented a sort of functional ablation (‘the suppression hypothesis’, see Filali et al.3).

Some experimental studies using the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent's model corroborated those assumptions (Benazzouz et al.4; Windels et al.,5, 6 but consider Shi et al.7).

Alternatively, the efficacious STN-DBS, when delivered in PD patients and non-human primates, increased—and not decreased—GPi and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) discharge rate while modulating their pattern of activity; during STN-DBS GPi neuronal activity was indeed more regular, time-locked to the stimulus pulse, and had less bursting activity.8, 9, 10 When inhibition was found,11 it derived from short micro-stimulation periods, presumably confined to the cell bodies.

Moreover, first by disease modeling,12 and later by extracellular recordings during STN-DBS in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-intoxicated primates, those unexpected changes in GPi were found to be associated with a modification in the pattern of neuronal activity in the pallidal (ventralis anterior, ventral anterior nucleus (VA), as in the terminology of Hassler et al.13) and cerebellar (VL) receiving areas of the motor thalamus. The resulting neuronal activity in both the thalamic regions became increasingly periodic and regular, with a shift in oscillatory activity from low to high frequencies.14 Therefore, all these data indicate that some premises of the standard model, if centered on the putative hyperactivity of specific ‘pre-thalamic’ pathways, should be wrong, whereas not enough attention was, so far, dedicated to the biochemical counterpart of those electrophysiological evidence.

Here, our aim was to identify any clinically related biochemical change in GABA content occurring in the VA. In addition, we asked whether different acute treatments, namely levodopa (LD) or DBS, causing similar therapeutic effects, also share biochemical parameters in the VA as a possible ‘common transducer of efficacy’.

In support of a common pathway, the maximal clinical improvement by STN-DBS in the early postoperative stage usually does not exceed that obtained with LD.15, 16 There is also evidence against a common pathway; for example, the different impact on OFF dystonia. Further, LD-mediated and DBS-mediated effects on limbic and associative functions may differ strongly,17, 18 suggesting that incomplete mechanisms overlap.

Here, we took advantage of the ‘multi-target DBS strategy’, where several PD patients were included to the bilateral implantation of both STN and GPi;16, 19, 20, 21 this allowed to collect – and correlate with clinical scores – microdialysis data from the GPi and VA of the same patients (Figure 1). In particular, we studied whether clinically effective STN-DBS (185 Hz) or intra-operative LD administration (at a sub-dyskinetic dose) influenced GABA levels in the VA. In addition, as our previous investigations had shown that STN-DBS induced a large increase of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) concentration in the GPi, we evaluated to what extent LD did replicate that finding, which in turn would establish whether the nucleotide alteration is a critical, and clinically related, feature, shared by both therapeutic approaches.

Figure 1
figure 1

Trajectories of the multi-electrode probes holders aimed at the STN-VA. Each section shows representative diagrams of the multi-electrode holder (top) used and, at the bottom, two different partially superimposed sections of atlas (note the hand leafing the superior section). The bottom panel shows a coronal atlas section at 1.5 mm posterior to the inter-commissural midline (Fp 1.5, STN target) and at 4 mm anterior to the inter-commissural midline (Fa 4.0 VA target). To reach the STN passing through the VA, the central electrode of the multi-electrode holder (upper part) was aimed at a target at 8.5 mm of laterality, −4 mm with respect to the AC–PC plane, and at the mid-point of the AC–PC line. The trajectory had an angle of 70°–75° in the sagittal plane and of 85°–90° in the coronal plane. The more lateral electrode of the multi-electrode holder was at 3.5 mm of laterality from the central one. This laterality allowed to reach a target at 12.0 mm of laterality from the midline, which is the usual location of the STN target. On the contrary, the trajectory of electrode-B was 1.5 mm more medial than the central one and 2 mm more anterior. The probe membrane (4 mm length) was positioned between 11.0 and 7.0 mm above the target (+7 to +3 mm above the inter-commissural plane), along the trajectory of electrode-B. Given the angle in the sagittal planes (70°–75°), the trajectory had a laterality of 7.0 mm and, at the level of +7 to +3 mm above the inter-commissural plane, its anterior–posterior position was between +6 and +4 mm with respect to the midpoint of the inter-commissural line, corresponding to the center of the VA

The present work did not explore all the putative targets of STN-DBS and LD; however, our data emphasize that, while there may be some differences between LD and DBS mechanisms, as indicated by the DBS-mediated increase of GPi cGMP (in contrast with LD), the reduced GABA availability inside the VA, seen with both LD and DBS, may represent one critical index of any effective therapy for PD rigidity and akinesia.

Results

Effects of STN-DBS

Thalamic GABA changes

DBS produced a significant decrease in GABA content during stimulation (Table 1 and Figure 2; average 31.1%; ANOVA main effect df=2/18; ɛ=0.784, df=1.56/14.11; F=11.83, P=0.000523; 0.0016 Greenhause–Geisser correction). Post hoc Sheffé test showed the following: basal versus DBS P=0.000783; DBS versus recovery P=0.00413. Friedman ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon confirmed these levels of significance. In two cases, DBS was kept at 0 V for 20 min and no consistent change of GABA was detected (not shown).

Table 1 Microdialysis values and clinical scores before, during, and after STN-DBS
Figure 2
figure 2

Microdialysis data from the GPi and VA, and clinical evaluation before, during, and after STN-DBS. Clinically effective STN-DBS caused a clear augmentation of cGMP in the GPi and a statistical significant GABA reduction in the VA (see section Results). The clinical scores at the bottom (dotted line, selected items 22, 24, and 25 from UPDRS III) validate the effectiveness of the STN-DBS. The data are expressed as the mean±S.D.

Pallidal cGMP changes

DBS produced a clear-cut increase of cGMP as already described (Table 1 and Figure 2; average 606.2%; ANOVA main effect df=2/18; ɛ=0.515, df=1.03/9.28; F=20.56, P=0.00002). Post hoc Sheffé test showed: basal versus DBS P=0.000047; DBS versus recovery P=0.000489. Friedman ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon test confirmed these significances.

Clinical effect of DBS

There was a significant change of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale (UPDRS) score during STN-DBS (Table 1 and Figure 1; n=10; df=17; χ2=143.12; P=0.000001 Friedman ANOVA). Post hoc Wilcoxon test showed a significant UPDRS score amelioration from the first 10 min of DBS in comparison with all the basal scores. The score was significantly lower throughout DBS and during the first 10 min of recovery.

Correlations

Clinical score significantly correlated with cGMP increase (R Spearman: −0.73, P<0.05) and GABA decrease (R: +0.67, P<0.05). No significant correlation was observed between GABA and cGMP changes.

LD Effects

Thalamic GABA changes

LD produced a significant decrease of GABA content during 2 h after LD administration (Table 2 and Figure 3; ANOVA main effect df=2/10; ɛ=0.687, df=1.37/6.87; F=35.57, P=0.000028; 0.000387 Greenhause–Geisser correction). Post hoc Sheffé test showed the following: basal versus first LD hour P=0.000034; basal and first LD hour versus 2nd LD hour, NS. Friedman ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon test confirmed these significances. The average GABA decrease was 25% in the first hour and 15.9% in the second hour. LD effect was significant from the third fraction (from 20 to 30 min) up to the third fraction of the second hour (Table 2 and Figure 3).

Table 2 Microdialysis values and clinical scores before and during the first and second hour after LD intake
Figure 3
figure 3

Microdialysis data from the GPi and VA, and clinical evaluation before and during LD (100 mg melevodopa) administration. In agreement with STN-DBS treatment, LD cause a statistically significant GABA reduction in the VA (upper part). LD produced a significant GABA decrease from the third fraction up to 50 min. On the contrary, LD induced a negligible effect on GPi cGMP; a decrease of cGMP levels, if any, was observed in two patients (highlighted patients in Table 2, no. 2 and no. 6; see section Results). The data are expressed as the mean±S.D. Melevodopa (LD methyl ester) is a soluble form of LD,47 not currently in use in the United States, but routinely used in Italy (Sirio, by Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Parma, Italy) in order to obtain a relatively fast LD-like response (plasma peak at 20–50 min)

Pallidal cGMP changes

LD did not produce a significant change (Figure 3), although the mean cGMP concentration decreased from 1.89 fmol/50 μl in the basal fractions to 1.65 fmol/50 μl in the fractions from the first hour, and to 1.64 fmol/50 μl during the second hour. Friedman ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon test confirmed this lack of significance. However, examination of the individual patients' data showed a trend for no change in subjects presenting with low cGMP basal values (<1.5 fmol close to the detection limit), but a clear decrease (approximately 50%) after LD administration in subjects presenting with higher basal values (>3.0 fmol, patient-2 and 6; highlighted in Table 2). This suggested a ‘floor’ effect in subjects with low basal values.

Clinical effect of LD

Friedman ANOVA showed a significant change of UPDRS score after LD administration (n=6; df=17; χ2=83.13; P=0.000001). Post hoc Wilcoxon test showed a significant UPDRS score amelioration 30 min after LD administration in comparison with all the basal scores. The score was significantly lower up to 80 min after LD administration.

Correlations

A significant correlation was observed between GABA and cGMP changes (Pearson correlation r=0.97, t=8.01, P=0.0013), and between GABA and clinical score.

A closer look, case by case, at the GABA decrease and the UPDRS scores in both sub-groups (LD, alias melevodopa, and DBS; Figure 4) allows to recognize the homogeneity of the response following the drug challenge (Figure 4, left plot), whereas the DBS response features a much larger deviation (Figure 4, right plot). In many, but not all, patients the degree of clinical improvement tends to correlate with the change of GABA concentrations (see, for instance, cases 2–4 of the STIM group). Of course, the limited amount of cases discouraged further interpretations.

Figure 4
figure 4

Correlation between biochemical change of VA GABA and clinical score. The plot shows in detail, case by case, the GABA and UPDRS decline during the drug response (left plot) and the DBS effect (right plot). The data are presented as % decrease. The biochemical data are the average of the last two fractions before the start of each challenge. The clinical score represents the average of the last two fractions of the first hour following LD challenge or DBS switch-on. Note, on the left, the relative homogeneity of the response (comprised between 32 and 53%)

Finally, in two cases it was possible, given the patients' cooperation, to perform an LD challenge after the delivery of STN-DBS in the same surgery session (assuming that most of the DBS-mediated effects were over after an 80-min STIM cessation). Consider the example in Figure 5, which highlights the similar effects on GABA levels of 185-Hz DBS and 100-mg LD on the very same PD patient.

Figure 5
figure 5

Microdialysis data showing changes of GABA in the VA and of clinical scores before and during STN-DBS and, subsequently, following LD (100 mg melevodopa) administration. A similar reduction of GABA is produced by both treatments. The protocol was slightly shortened with respect to routine-1 (i.e. 30 min=3 samples for DBS response) and was stopped before complete recovery of GABA levels in order to reduce surgery time

Discussion

GABA decrease in the VA thalamus, during effective STN-DBS or following LD administration, appears consistent with some aspects of the established model of BG function.1, 2 Reduced GABA levels within the motor thalamus should dis-inhibit VA firing activity, with a profound impact on its patterning; reduced bursting and/or suppressed oscillatory activity are the most likely results, as inferred.22 The precise firing properties of the human VA/VL during effective STN-DBS are unknown, but previous studies in NHP may help the interpretation.

Extracellular recordings in MPTP-intoxicated primates documented, during STN-DBS, the relevant modification in the pattern of neuronal activity in the pallidal and cerebellar (VL) receiving areas of the motor thalamus. Both regions showed a more periodic and regular pattern, and a shift in oscillatory activity from low to high frequencies.14

Further, the Rubin and Terman12 model emphasized that a beneficial STN-DBS induces clustered firing patterns in GPi, whose clear consequence is a regularization of VA discharge (more tonic, no pausing). As pointed out by Guo et al., STN-DBS altered Parkinsonian GPi activity in a way that may improve thalamo-cortical relay fidelity.12, 22 Accordingly, the reduced GABA levels that we observed would impede prolonged post-spiking after hyper-polarization, and favors a more regular pattern of neuronal activity.

As an additional confirmation of the clinical relevance of the reduced levels of GABA in the VA, consider the relationship between the degree of GABA decline under LD and the degree of LD-mediated clinical benefit (Figure 4). This is even more reliable when patients under evaluation are, as here, those in whom pharmacological sensitivity to LD was consistently assessed during the pre-surgery phase.

Thalamic VA/VL nuclei form a crucial link between BG outputs and specific cortical areas.23 It is reasonable to speculate that, once VA–VL is modulated by STN-DBS (as a consequence of reduced GABA release), immediate changes in thalamo-cortical transmission occur. PET studies reported a re-activation of fronto-temporo-parietal cortex at rest after effective STN-DBS (Hilker et al.,24 but see Hershey et al.,25). Even when high-frequency STN-DBS decreased rCBF in the motor cortex at rest – implying a reduction of abnormal over-activity in the motor system – this allowed selective cortical reactivation during movement.26 Further, increased, movement-related, activity in MC followed efficacious pallidal DBS27 and STN-DBS in primates (J Vitek, unpublished).

It is difficult to match the GABA decrease in the VA with the increased cGMP reported in the GPi (or SNr) during STN-DBS (this paper and Galati et al.9, Stefani et al.20), indicative of increased GPi firing. As a matter of fact, the NOS/guanylate cyclase (sGC) pathway is mainly activated by glutamatergic excitatory transmission and extracellular cGMP, which is monitored by intra-cerebral microdialysis, reflects the in vivo functional state of this neurochemical pathway (for a review, see Pepicelli et al.28). Thus, the augmentation of cGMP in the GPi is a clear, although indirect, measure of pallidal neuron excitation driven by DBS-mediated glutamate release.

In principle, these findings do not fit with the early BG model, at least when suggesting that modulation of the hyper-excitability of the ‘indirect pathways’ is critical to rescue from akinesia.

However, the cGMP data are not artifactual (and acquired from severe PD patients!); in addition, cGMP correlated with clinical benefits, whereas it was null if DBS was fake (0 V; Figure 1 in Stefani et al.20). Besides, distribution studies have shown that nNOS and soluble sGC (both α-1 and β-1 subunits) are present at relatively high levels in the GPi of the human brain.29, 30 These studies, although not determining a precise cellular localization indeed provide the biochemical basis for nitric oxide/cGMP production in this brain region.

Furthermore, the large DBS-mediated increase of GPi cGMP matches with an abundant literature. Strong support for an ‘increased’ GPi functional activity was raised by PET studies in PD patients,25 electrophysiological studies in MPTP-treated primates,8 increased cytochrome oxidase subunit-1 (COI) mRNA expression,31 and modeling studies supporting axonal activation of the STN neurons during STN-DBS.32

So, the issue is not whether an increased firing in the GPi/SNr during STN-DBS is observed (several demonstrations are available), rather to what extent this correlates with the decreased thalamic GABA.

One possibility is that the STN-DBS-mediated increase of GPi neuronal activity leads to the reduction of thalamic GABA release owing to the frequency-dependent activation of inhibitory GABAB auto-receptors on VA GABAergic terminals, as it happens in the hippocampus during the induction of long-term potentiation.33

In the anterior thalamus, complex synaptic arrangements, including triads of three GABAergic synapses (pallidal and reticular fibers with local inter-neurons or projection cell dendrites) and serial synapses with local GABAergic inter-neurons that in turn establish synaptic contacts with projection cell dendrites, compose up to 50% of synaptic contacts.34 Therefore, it could be hypothesized that DBS-driven GPi activity would enhance GABA release from GPi fibers onto VA–VL GABAergic inter-neurons, which in turn would decrease synaptic inhibition on thalamic glutamatergic neurons, finally re-activating the thalamo-cortical pathway. If this were the case, the small, though significant, decrease of thalamic GABA levels we observed could underestimate a more marked reduction in release from thalamic GABAergic inter-neurons.

Another possible explanation is that the electric field around the STN-DBS electrode inhibits large (1.5–5.0 μm diameter) GPi fibers directed to the thalamus and passing along the dorsal border of the STN, while simultaneously exciting thin STN-GPi/SNr fibers.35

Third, an augmentation of cGMP levels may reflect regularization of neuronal activity as well as an increase in the mean discharge rate, and it may be the regularization that is more important in modifying the GABA levels in the thalamus. As noted previously, STN-DBS act as a modulator of endogenous oscillations.22 One model predicts that even during an (apparent) increase of GPi discharge, the more tonic firing pattern may impede irregular GABA release (propelled by spike trains) on target thalamo-cortical cells, restoring their responsiveness to sensory inputs.12

Alternatively, the two examined effects of DBS (increased cGMP in GPi and lower GABA in VA) might not be necessarily linked. Actually, STN-DBS reverberates on multiple sites, including a ventral tegmental area and pedunculopontine nucleus extended area,36 which in turn affects the ascending pathways toward the thalamus. In other words, the proteiform response to DBS on distant structures might overcome the strict boundaries of the direct/indirect pathway scheme.

In line with DBS-mediated mechanisms, LD promoted a similar decrease of GABA levels in the VA, together with a significant clinical improvement. To note, the LD-mediated decline of GABA was clearly more homogeneous than the DBS response (see Figure 4). In contrast with DBS, the LD-induced decline of GABA in the VA coincides with a reduction of GPi activity,3, 37, 38, 39 but with a negligible effect on GPi cGMP levels. In our experience, the apomorphine response in the GPi of human PD patients was characterized by a dose-dependent fast inhibition and showed partial desensitization.40

However, two subjects with higher basal levels of cGMP showed a clear decrease after LD administration, suggesting that LD might reduce GPi cGMP, an effect hard to detect if basal cGMP levels are close to the detection limit (as in the other four patients).

On the other hand, lack of cGMP change during LD challenge may imply functional de-rearrangements of the dopamine–cGMP interplay in advanced PD patients.

It has been reported that unilateral lesions of the nigro-striatal pathway with 6-OHDA in rats resulted in a significant decrease of cGMP levels in the ipsilateral caudate-putamen (CP) and GP.41, 42 Interestingly, in 6-OHDA-lesioned eukinetic rats administration of LD failed to affect the cGMP levels in the ipsilateral CP and GP, whereas it was able to decrease those levels in the same regions on the non-lesioned contralateral side; on the contrary, LD lowered cGMP levels in both hemispheres in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats at the peak of LD-induced dyskinesia.42 These results highlight that the cGMP response to LD in the BG could be different under dyskinetic and non-diskynetic conditions, and might explain the lack of LD-induced changes of cGMP in the GPi, as LD was administered to patients at a sub-dyskinetic dose.

Functional implications

The core finding of this investigation is the consistent and clinically related GABA decline in the motor thalamus, which may associate (during DBS) or may not associate (under LD) with simultaneous changes of GPi cGMP. Hence, the clinically relevant modulation of GABA in the VA occurs despite or besides ongoing changes of pallidal discharge. Parsimonious implications are that, during LD-mediated clinical amelioration, pathways other than the pallido-thalamic, but still affecting the VA, indeed contribute to the rebalancing of the thalamo-cortical output.

That said, the common effect on VA GABA levels, shared by both treatments, indicates that this reduction reflects some degree of mechanistic similarity underlying the clinical effects of STN-DBS and LD.

Few centers still use unilateral pallidotomy as a competitive surgical approach43 (of course, in advanced PD patients affected by disabling dyskinesias and reluctant to undergo bilateral DBS). Pallidotomy would suppress ipsilateral GABA transmission in the VA/VL. Our present data lend support to a putative re-evaluation of selective ablations (to interfere with endogenous release of GABA in VA) or, speculatively, to the implementation of devices aimed at rebalancing intra-thalamic GABA levels.

The dichotomy between the STN- and LD-mediated effects on the cGMP levels in GPi is not, per se, surprising if we take into account their different electrophysiological effects. In contrast with DBS, which may excite and/or cluster neuronal activity, exogenous LD has a strong inhibitory influence on the neuronal activity of GPi.38 An almost complete suppression of GPi discharge associates with LD-induced dyskinesia!38, 44

In conclusion, a number of investigations from multiple disciplines support the hypothesis that stimulation-induced modulation of pathological network activity represents the most likely mechanism of DBS.45 Recent contribution (by using an optogenic approach) suggested that high-frequency STN stimulation, in 6-OHDA rodents, promotes mostly a direct activation of cortical axons to STN.46

Nevertheless, in agreement with recent conclusions of Johnson et al.27 (‘DBS improves Parkinsonian motor symptoms by inducing global changes in firing pattern and rate along the pallido-thalamocortical sensorimotor circuit’), our results further emphasize the motor thalamus as the critical station where efficacious re-modulation (electrical or pharmacological) of pathological outputs promotes good therapeutic outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Sixteen advanced PD patients (mean age=58.9±6.5 years; mean UPDRS score in OFF=46.7±9.1; mean disease duration=11.4±3.7 years) were included in the study according to previously reported selection criteria.19, 38, 39 For epidemiological data, see Table 3. Response to STN-DBS was analyzed in 10 patients and response to L-DOPA was monitored in six patients. Actually, we routinely used melevodopa (Sirio 100+25), a soluble analog of LD/carbidopa, introduced since early 2000s in clinical practice in Italy. Given its pharmacokinetic profile,47 melevodopa allows to obtain a consistent peak response in 20–50 min, still maintaining an adequate steady-state response, at least in the 2 h examined here. In order to avoid misunderstanding, LD is used throughout the entire paper.

Table 3 Clinical characteristics of the 16 PD patients in the study

The two groups did not manifest significant differences in terms of disease history, duration, or LD dosage.

In addition, two PD patients accepted to undergo, in sequence, both STN-DBS and LD challenge, albeit with a shortened protocol.

Surgical and microdialysis technique

Permanent electrodes were implanted in both the STN and the GPi, bilaterally, according to our previous multi-target strategy.48 For trajectory details, and implantation procedures, see our previous works19, 20, 21 and the legend in Figure 1.

Written, informed consent was obtained from each patient. The Local Ethics Committee of the University of Tor Vergata approved the protocol and the consent form describing the risks and potential benefits of the study. The protocol included the following step procedures: electrophysiological single-unit micro-recordings in STN for proper identification of the best trajectory for lead implantation; insertion of the permanent DBS lead (Medtronic 3389) into the STN (final coordinates=AC–PC/2, 11–12 mm lateral to the midline, and 4–5 mm below the AC–PC); insertion of guide tubes into the VA and GPi for microdialysis (only at the end of the microdialysis session the permanent electrode was positioned also in the GPi, whose coordinates are as follows (for the lowest contact): 2–3 mm anterior to the AC–PC/2, 19–22 mm lateral to the midline of the third ventricle, and 6 mm below the inter-commissural line;16). To note, microdialysis onto human Parkinsonian brain was pioneered by Ungerstedt,49 extensively used by our group,9, 19, 20, 21 and recently replicated by Kilpatrick et al.50

As previously reported,19 the microdialysis concentric probes had the following features: external membrane diameter 0.6 mm, external tube diameter 0.5 mm, membrane PES with 20-kDa molecular weight cutoff, 4-mm dialyzing zone for GPi and VA (Metalant AB, Metalant, Sweden). The microdialysis probes were connected to a CMA100 microinjection pump (CMA Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden) set at 5 μl/min. Perfusion was started immediately with a sterile PBS solution containing (in g/l) NaCl (8), KCl (0.2), CaCl2 × 2 H2O (0.132), MgCl2 × 6 H2O (0.1), Na2HPO4 (1.15), KH2PO4 (0.2) (pH 7.4). The outlet of the probes was placed into plastic vials situated in a stand fitted to a stereotaxic frame. Complete sterility of all the materials used (probes connectors, tubing, vials, and solutions) was assured. Samples were collected every 10 min and immediately frozen. The amount of GABA in each fraction was determined by HPLC analysis coupled to fluorimetric detection. The buffers and gradient program used were those reported by Fedele and Raiteri.51 Homoserine was used as internal standard; the detection limit for GABA was approximately 100 fmol/40 μl. In order to ascertain that all the probes used sampled GABA with the same efficiency, at the end of the operation they were tested in vitro using standard solutions to determine the relative recovery of GABA (no significant difference for in vitro recovery has been observed among the probes used for different patients). The mean basal values of the amino acid collected by each probe in any patient were calculated from the tenth fractions (all fractions before assumed as under stabilization and, thus, discarded). cGMP concentration was determined by radio-immunoassay (RIA) as already described.20

At the end of the stabilization phase (90 min), basal microdialysis samples (60 μl, 10 min each) and clinical data were collected for 60 min (see Figures 2 and 3). Afterwards, either STN-DBS was switched on for 60 min (n=10 patients; Table 1 and Figure 2; the stimulation parameters for bipolar STIM were approximately 185 Hz, mean 2 V (range 1.8–2.4), 60 μs duration etc.) or melevodopa was administered orally (100 mg, n=6 patients; Table 1 and Figure 3).

After a 60-min DBS, 60 min of recovery were performed (Table 1). After LD administration, dialysis continued for further 120 min (two 60-min periods; Table 1).

All procedures were without additional risks for the patients, as the guide tubes for micro-recordings were already placed in each target (STN and GPi). That said, the microdialysis procedure per se indeed prolongs (an average of 3.5 h) the entire surgery section. This is why only in special occasions it was possible to obtain microdialysis data under both clinical challenges, albeit with a shortened protocol (DBS followed by LD, n=2; see Figure 5), or it was possible to check the lack of GABA title changes during a 0-V STN-DBS (n=2, not shown).

Clinical changes were assessed using a subset of the items of UPDRS (rigidity 0–4, finger tapping 0–4, hand movement 0–4; total=0 corresponds to ‘normal’, 12 maximum score) by a neurologist blinded to the stimulus intensity between 0 and 3 V or the time of LD administration.

Statistical analysis

Mean GABA and cGMP levels (expressed as pmol or fmol/50 μl, respectively) were compared by two-way ANOVA (first main factor: treatment with three levels: basal, treatment (DBS, LD, or none), recovery; second main factor: time with six levels) corrected by Greenhause–Gaisser correction and followed by post hoc Sheffè test to assess the significance of the differences between single fractions. A similar procedure was used for LD administration except the three levels of the first main factor were basal, LD1 (0–60 min after LD administration), and LD2 (60–120 min).

Given the possible non-normality of biochemical data, the results were also confirmed by non-parametric Friedman ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon post-hoc test. The clinical scores were compared using similar non-parametric methods. Correlations were studied between the maximal changes in the GABA and cGMP concentrations induced by DBS and LD (Pearson parametric correlations), and clinical score (non-parametric Spearman correlations). The changes were evaluated as the maximum change of each of these parameters in comparison with their mean basal score.