Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A comprehensive study of long-term skeletal changes after spinal cord injury in adult rats


Spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced bone loss represents the most severe osteoporosis with no effective treatment. Past animal studies have focused primarily on long bones at the acute stage using adolescent rodents. To mimic chronic SCI in human patients, we performed a comprehensive analysis of long-term structural and mechanical changes in axial and appendicular bones in adult rats after SCI. In this experiment, 4-month-old Fischer 344 male rats received a clinically relevant T13 contusion injury. Sixteen weeks later, sublesional femurs, tibiae, and L4 vertebrae, supralesional humeri, and blood were collected from these rats and additional non-surgery rats for micro-computed tomography (µCT), micro-finite element, histology, and serum biochemical analyses. At trabecular sites, extreme losses of bone structure and mechanical competence were detected in the metaphysis of sublesional long bones after SCI, while the subchondral part of the same bones showed much milder damage. Marked reductions in bone mass and strength were also observed in sublesional L4 vertebrae but not in supralesional humeri. At cortical sites, SCI induced structural and strength damage in both sub- and supralesional long bones. These changes were accompanied by diminished osteoblast number and activity and increased osteoclast number and activity. Taken together, our study revealed site-specific effects of SCI on bone and demonstrated sustained inhibition of bone formation and elevation of bone resorption at the chronic stage of SCI.


Osteoporosis is a well-known secondary complication of spinal cord injury (SCI).1,2 Shortly after the injury, sublesional bone density and mass decline rapidly and linearly. This is particularly deleterious to the cancellous bone located in the metaphyseal-epiphyseal area of the distal femora and proximal tibiae, which experiences a 1%–4% per month bone loss in the first 6–12 months after SCI.35 This rate is 4-, 10-, and 30-fold greater than those observed during microgravity, prolonged bed rest, and early menopause, respectively. Hence, severe osteoporosis, with at least a 40% reduction in bone mineral content, is common in SCI patients.6 Studies in patients demonstrate that serum or urine levels of bone resorption markers, such as type I collagen C-telopeptide and N-telopeptide, increase within 2 weeks post-SCI and reach extremely high levels within 2–4 months.7 On the other hand, bone formation markers are at normal or slightly above normal levels during this acute phase.7,8 These data suggest that excessive bone resorption is the major contributor for the rapid bone loss in the acute phase.

During the chronic phase that begins 1–2 years after injury, bone mass reaches a nadir at a very low level9,10 but bone loss continues.11 As a result, 50% of SCI patients will sustain a low-impact or osteoporotic fracture at some point following their injury.4 Minor stress or trauma, such as transfers, range of motion exercises, bending, or minor falls, can cause a pathological fracture. These sublesional fractures are difficult to treat and are often associated with delayed union and nonunion.12,13 In addition to limiting mobility and predisposing to skin pressure ulcers, fractures and their management might trigger severe hypertensive crisis due to autonomic dysreflexia.

To date, there have been many studies using the rat SCI model to understand the mechanisms of SCI-induced bone damage and to explore possible treatments. However, there are several limitations associated with the previous studies that employed the SCI model, which reduce their potential clinical relevance. First, most of the studies used adolescent rats ranging from 4 to 8 weeks of age. Morse et al. have demonstrated that SCI also damages the growth plates of long bones in young rats (7 weeks old) by disorganizing the chondrocyte columnar structure, decreasing chondrocyte number, and accelerating chondrocyte apoptosis.14 This growth plate arrest is well correlated with clinical cases of children with SCI who have stunted bone growth below the injury site.15 However, the average age of human subjects at the time of SCI is 43 years, when growth plates have been closed for a long time and bone mass has passed its peak amount. Therefore, it should be more appropriate to perform experiments on adult rats to minimize the confounding factor of longitudinal bone growth. Secondly, most previous studies focused on analyzing bone changes at the acute stage. Because SCI is a lifelong condition, it would be most useful to delineate bone structural and cellular changes during the chronic stage of SCI and to investigate potential therapies that might improve bone strength at this stage. Lastly, there have been few and conflicting animal data characterizing the SCI damage on supralesional bones, particularly at the chronic stage. Besides disuse and bone denervation, other systemic factors, such as hormonal modifications, may also play pivotal roles in the development of osteoporosis after SCI.2 To date, the clinical outcome of SCI on forearm bone mass remains uncertain.1618

To prevent rapid bone loss, hypercalciuria, and sometimes hypercalcemia after SCI, antiresorptive drugs, such as bisphosphonates, are frequently administered to reduce high bone resorption. While these drugs decrease bone loss in SCI patients, they have not been shown to increase BMD in any skeletal sites tested.3,19,20 In addition, long-term use of bisphosphonates is associated with atypical femur fractures, which might worsen the condition of SCI patients. Mechanical loading, such as weight-bearing and functional electrical stimulation (FES), is promising if applied during the early stage of SCI but its effect at the later stage is unknown, with minor or no bone benefits reported.21,22

To delineate the damaging effect of SCI on the entire skeleton in a clinically relevant setting, we performed a comprehensive analysis of long-term structural and mechanical changes in axial and appendicular bones in adult male rats after SCI. Our study revealed site-specific effects of SCI on bone and demonstrated sustained inhibition of bone formation and elevation of bone resorption at the chronic stage of SCI. These results provide mechanistic insight for developing new effective treatments for SCI-induced severe osteoporosis.


SCI surgery and tissue harvest

All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) at Rutgers University and the University of Pennsylvania. Four-month-old male Fischer 344 rats (Taconic, Hudson, NY, USA, n = 5) were anesthetized by isoflurane and their back skin was incised at the mid-line. Muscle was sharply dissected from the spinal column to expose the T9–10 dorsal processes. After cutting the dorsal intravertebral ligament, a T9–10 laminectomy was used to expose the T13 cord. Rats were then moved to a New York University Impactor where their T13 spinal cord received modest injury delivered by a 10-g rod dropped from a 25 mm height. Muscle and skin were then closed with stitches and stainless steel clips, respectively. Post-surgery, manual bladder expression was performed 1–2 times per day throughout the entire experiment. The control group consisted of age- and gender- matched Fischer 344 rats (n = 6). Sixteen weeks later, rats were weighed, subjected to cardiac puncture for blood collection, and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Sublesional bones, including femurs and tibiae, and supralesional bones, including fourth lumbar vertebrae (L4) and humeri, were collected and fixed further in 4% PFA for subsequent measurements. Before fixation, the full lengths of long bones were measured by a Vernier caliper.

Evaluation of bone microarchitecture by micro-computed tomography

All bones were scanned by a compact fan-beam-type vivaCT40 (Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) at a 15 μm nominal voxel size. The scanned and analyzed areas of each type of bone are summarized in Table 1. All images were first smoothed by a Gaussian filter (sigma = 1.2, support = 2.0) and then thresholded corresponding to 392.1 (trabecular bone) and 582 mgHA·cm−3 (cortical bone). Three-dimensional analyses were performed to calculate trabecular parameters, such as trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone volume fraction (BV·TV−1), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), and structure model index (SMI), and cortical parameters, such as cortical BMD, cortical area (Ct.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), periosteal perimeter (Ps.Pm), endocortical perimeter (Ec.Pm), porosity, and polar moment of inertia (pMOI) as described by Bouxsein et al.23

Table 1 µCT-analyzed areas for measuring trabecular and cortical structural parameters in appendicular and axial bones at 16 weeks after SCI

Trabecular bone stiffness was calculated for humeri, femora, and L4 vertebrae based on thresholded micro-computed tomography (μCT) images as previously described.24 Briefly, microstructural finite element (µFE) models were generated by converting each bone voxel to an 8-node brick element. Bone tissue was modeled as an isotropic, linear elastic material with a Young’s modulus of 15 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.3. A uniaxial compression was applied along the axial direction of the model and the model was subjected to a linear elastic analysis to determine the bone stiffness.

Bone histology analysis

After μCT scans, right tibiae were decalcified and processed for paraffin sections. Five-μm longitudinal sections were stained either by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for counting the number of cuboidal and plump bone lining osteoblasts, or by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for counting the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts within the secondary spongiosa. All images were captured by Nikon Eclipse 90i and quantified using Bioquant Osteo Software (Bioquant Image Analysis, Nashville, TN, USA).

Serum chemistry

Blood was collected via cardiac puncture at euthanasia and left at room temperature for at least 30 min before centrifuging at 200 × g for 10 min to separate serum. Serum calcium levels were measured by Calcium Colorimetric Assay (Sigma-Aldrich). Osteocalcin and TRACP 5b level were determined by Rat Osteocalcin EIA Kit (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA, USA) and RatTRAPTM Assay (Immunodiagnostic Systems, Scottsdale, AZ, USA), respectively.


Data are expressed as means ± standard error (SEM) and analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test for comparison between control and SCI groups using Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


General observations

Initial body weight was the same among control (308 ± 15 g) and SCI (305 ± 14 g) groups. Sixteen weeks after surgery, the weight of SCI rats (289 ± 15 g) was 30% (P < 0.001) lower than that of controls (417 ± 8 g). Both sublesional and supralesional long bone lengths were significantly affected in SCI rats compared to controls (femur: control 41.5 ± 0.2 mm, SCI 37.8 ± 0.9 mm, P < 0.01; humerus: control 31.6 ± 0.2 mm, SCI 29.1 ± 0.5 mm, P < 0.01). These results suggest that SCI impairs normal weight gain and longitudinal bone growth.

Bone microarchitectural impairment in sublesional extremities after SCI

In SCI patients, the most severe bone loss occurs at the knee joint, including both distal femur and proximal tibia. There are three types of trabecular bone within this region: primary and secondary spongiosa in the metaphyseal area and subchondral trabecular bone in the epiphyseal area. All three types of bone are formed through endochondral ossification. During development, the two metaphyseal sites are formed within the primary ossification center and the epiphyseal site is formed within the secondary ossification center. While most previous studies focused on analyses of trabecular bone in the secondary spongiosa, there are very few reports describing the changes in trabecular bone at the other two sites under physiological and pathological conditions. To gain detailed knowledge about SCI damage on bone in the knee joint, all three sites were scanned by μCT at a high resolution at 16 weeks post-surgery. At the distal femoral site, we observed that the most drastic bone loss occurred in the secondary spongiosa immediately followed by the primary spongiosa, while, surprisingly, there was only modest bone loss in the subchondral region (Figure 1a). Specifically, 3D analysis of μCT data revealed striking 54% and 65% reductions in vBMD and BV·TV−1, respectively, in the secondary spongiosa from the SCI group compared to those from controls (Figure 1b). This was mainly due to significant decreases in Tb.N (36%) and Tb.Th (26%), and an increase in Tb.Sp (73%). Furthermore, a 2.9-fold increase in SMI suggests that SCI impairs the structural integrity of trabecular bone. In the primary spongiosa, similar but relatively smaller reductions in vBMD (47%), BV·TV−1 (56%), Tb.N (34%), Tb.Th (30%), and Tb.Sp (70%), and an increase in SMI were observed in SCI rats compared to controls (Figure 1c). By contrast, much milder trabecular bone damage (−16% in vBMD, −19% in BV·TV−1, −6% in Tb.N, −13% in Tb.Th, +7% in Th.Sp, and +69% in SMI) was detected in the subchondral area (Figure 1d), implying that the extent of trabecular bone loss induced by SCI is site-specific even within the same bone. Similar patterns of trabecular bone damage were also observed in the proximal tibial region (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

SCI causes severe trabecular bone loss and structural deterioration in the metaphyseal area but relatively moderate damage in the subchondral bone area in distal femur. (a) Representative longitudinal µCT images of distal femurs in control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. Brackets define the regions of three types of trabecular bone: subchondral trabecular bone (STB), primary spongiosa (PS), and secondary spongiosa (SS) in the metaphysis. (b) µCT measurement of trabecular structural parameters in the secondary spongiosa area. (c) µCT measurement of trabecular structural parameters in the primary spongiosa area. (d) µCT measurement of trabecular structural parameters in the subchondral trabecular area. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs control (con).

Next, we analyzed cortical bone structural parameters at the femoral mid-shaft. As shown in Figure 2, cortical BMD remained the same after SCI. However, compared to those from the control group, bones from the SCI group were slimmer with 14% and 8% reductions in Ps.Pm and Ec.Pm, respectively, resulting in a 16% decrease in Ct.Th and a 30% decrease in Ct.Ar. These structural changes led to a drastic 45% reduction in pMOI, a parameter reflecting the bending strength of cortical bone.

Figure 2
figure 2

SCI alters cortical bone structure and impairs cortical bone strength in femur. (a) Representative cross-sectional µCT images of femoral mid-shaft in control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. (b) µCT measurement of cortical structural parameters and bending strength. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs con.

The effects of SCI on bone microarchitecture in forelimbs

In addition to the paralysis of trunk and lower extremities below the injury site, SCI causes remarkable neuronal and hormonal changes throughout the entire body, which might affect the bones in the upper extremities. To explore this in our SCI rat model, the supralesional proximal humeri were scanned and analyzed by µCT. We did not detect any differences in trabecular bone within the subchondral site and the primary spongiosa after SCI (Figure 3a). In the secondary spongiosa, a trend of structural impairment was observed, with 15%, 20%, 21%, and 4% decreases in vBMD, BV·TV−1, Tb.N, and Tb.Th, respectively, and a 29% increase in Tb.Sp (Figure 3b) in the SCI group compared to controls, but none of the changes reached statistical significance. By contrast, we observed significant changes in the mid-shaft cortical bone of humeri in SCI rats (Figure 3c and 3d). Bone perimeters, Ps.Pm and Ec.Pm, decreased by 9% and 12%, respectively, in the SCI group compared to controls, but bone thickness (Ct.Th) increased by 9%. A small but significant increase in cortical BMD (3%) was also detected after SCI. Overall, those changes led to a trend of decrease in bending strength after SCI (a 17% decrease in pMOI, P = 0.056). Taken together, our results indicate that SCI also has harmful effects on the mobilized forelimbs, albeit to a much lesser extent compared to affected immobilized hindlimbs.

Figure 3
figure 3

SCI results in a trend of trabecular bone loss and significant cortical bone damage in supralesional humerus. (a) Representative longitudinal µCT images of proximal humeri in control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. Brackets define the regions of the secondary spongiosa (SS). (b) µCT measurement of trabecular structural parameters in the secondary spongiosa area. (c) Representative cross-sectional µCT images of humeral mid-shaft in control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. (d) µCT measurement of cortical structural parameters and bending strength. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs con.

SCI is detrimental to vertebral trabecular bone

Clinical studies describe conflicting conclusions about whether sublesional axial bones are as severely affected by SCI as appendicular bones.25,26 In our study, SCI rats lost significant amounts of trabecular bone in the sublesional L4 vertebral body, particularly within the central region (Figure 4a). Trabecular vBMD and BV·TV−1 in L4 from SCI rats were 31% and 37%, respectively, less than those from controls, and were accompanied by remarkable decreases in Tb.N (16%) and Tb.Th (27%) as well as increases in Tb.Sp (32%) and SMI (Figure 4b).

Figure 4
figure 4

The vertebral trabecular bone is impaired by SCI. (a) Representative longitudinal µCT images of L4 vertebrae in control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. Brackets define the central trabecular region of vertebra (CR). (b) µCT measurement of trabecular structural parameters inside the vertebra. ***P < 0.001 vs con.

The site-specific effect of SCI on trabecular bone strength

µFE analysis was performed to measure the integrated mechanical competence of trabecular compartments in femur, humerus, and vertebra (Figure 5). Strikingly, the loss of trabecular bone and deterioration of bone structure led to an almost complete diminishment of bone stiffness (91%) in the femoral secondary spongiosa from SCI rats compared to controls. In line with the above results that SCI causes a trend of trabecular bone impairment in humerus, we detected only a non-significant decrease in trabecular bone stiffness in this region after SCI. However, strong reduction in bone stiffness (52%) was observed in L4 vertebra.

Figure 5
figure 5

SCI has site-specific effects on trabecular bone stiffness. Based on a µFE model, bone stiffness was calculated from the secondary spongiosa area of femur and humerus and from the L4 vertebral trabecular bone. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. con.

Bone histology and serum biochemistry analysis

To understand the underlying cellular mechanisms of long-term SCI damage to bone, we performed histological analyses on right tibiae. At 16 weeks post-surgery, osteoblast number was 71% less and osteoclast number was 3.7-fold more than those in controls (Figure 6a). This imbalance between bone-forming and bone-resorbing cells was further attested by a decreased serum level of bone-formation marker (osteocalcin) and a trend of increased amount of resorption marker (TRAP; Figure 6b). Serum calcium level is usually elevated at the acute SCI stage due to the hyperactivation of osteoclasts (14). However, it returned to normal in SCI rats at this chronic stage (Figure 6b).

Figure 6
figure 6

Chronic SCI inhibits bone formation and stimulates bone resorption. (a) Histological analysis was performed to count osteoblast number and osteoclast number per bone surface in tibial metaphyseal area from control and SCI rats at 16 weeks after injury. (b) Biochemical assays of osteocalcin, TRAP, and serum calcium level in control and SCI groups. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001 vs con.


Bone is a dynamic tissue that undergoes constant remodeling, and coordination between osteoblastic and osteoclastic activities is required for optimal bone homeostasis. After SCI, the interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts favors bone resorption, leading to severe bone loss particularly in the sublesional appendicular bones and increased risk of low impact fractures in these bones. In this study, we used an adult rat T13 contusion model to reproduce the effects of SCI in mature patients and performed a comprehensive analysis of the long-term effects of SCI on bone structure and mechanics at multiple clinically relevant skeletal sites. Our high resolution μCT scans revealed that the most severe trabecular bone loss and structural deterioration occurred in the metaphyseal area of tibia and femur. By contrast, more modest but significant damage occurred in vertebral trabecular bone, and only a trend of trabecular bone loss was noted in humerus. Further μFE analysis confirmed this sequence in terms of the degree of mechanical property changes. At cortical sites, SCI does not induce bone demineralization but reduces bone amount and strength in both sub- and supralesional bones. Many factors, including local ones (immobilization and bone denervation) and systemic ones (hormonal and metabolic changes), contribute to SCI-induced bone damage. Our data indicate that trabecular bone is primarily sensitive to local factors while cortical bone is also sensitive to systemic factors.

Remarkably, we found that SCI has distinct site-specific effects on trabecular bone even within the same appendicular bone. In mammals, long bone is developed through endochondral ossification and eventually has two ossification centers.27 The primary ossification center is formed in the center of diaphysis at the embryonic stage by converting the hypertrophic cartilage in the growth plate into trabecular bone and marrow space. It consists of primary spongiosa, which is directly connected with the growth plate and is mainly shaped by bone modeling during longitudinal growth, and secondary spongiosa, which is derived from the primary spongiosa by a bone remodeling process. Shortly after birth, the epiphyseal cartilage is excavated by canals invaginated from the perichondrium to form the secondary ossification center. The trabecular bone within this center is anatomically located below the articular cartilage and is termed subchondral bone. Previous studies have principally examined pathological effects of SCI on trabecular bone in the metaphyseal region, whereas no studies have attempted to characterize the response of subchondral bone. Surprisingly, we found that subchondral bone is much more resistant to SCI damage than trabecular bone in the metaphyseal area. Moreover, unlike the other trabecular sites, where the bone loss is caused by both trabecular thinning and loss of trabecular bone, the SCI-induced subchondral bone loss occurs mainly through decreasing Tb.Th with little loss of Tb.N. To our knowledge, this is the first report delineating selective responses of trabecular bone within different anatomical regions of the same bone to the same injury. Further investigation will be required to identify whether this is specific for SCI only or represents a more general response to skeletal perturbations and to define the functional mechanisms.

Because of complicated post-surgery care, the majority of previous rodent studies examined bone phenotypes shortly (i.e., usually within 3 weeks) after SCI.14,28,29,30,31,32 The longest follow-up of bone phenotypes was 6 months after SCI in young (6-week-old) male Sprague–Dawley rats by Jiang et al.33 Similarly to our results, they reported a striking 76% reduction in BV·TV−1 in tibial metaphysis and a relatively milder 34% reduction in L4 vertebra at this chronic stage. However, their densitometric analysis and mechanical testing did not detect any changes in distal radius and humerus, respectively, leading to their conclusion that SCI has a negligible effect on supralesional bones. The discrepancy between our data and theirs on supralesional appendicular bone can be attributed to differences in rat strains (F344 vs Sprague–Dawley), type of SCI model (contusion vs transection), outcome measurement (areal BMD vs volumetric BMD), and animal age (4-month-old vs 6-week-old). While we found that adult SCI rats barely gained weight or even lost weight after paralysis, adolescent SCI rats almost doubled their body weight after 6 months.33 These data imply that SCI might have greater systemic effects on adult rats than on young rats.

Currently, there is no conventional treatment for SCI-induced osteoporosis at the chronic phase. Given the extreme degree of bone loss following SCI, which far exceeds that induced by other insults, such as estrogen deficiency,34 neurological deficit,35 and mechanical unloading,36 and the notable loss of osteoblasts at later stages, antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates would seem to be ineffective choices for treating bone loss at chronic SCI. The great reduction (−71%) in osteoblast number in tibial metaphysis revealed in our study suggests that, in contrast to acute SCI when the osteoblast number and activity are unaffected or even elevated,37 chronic SCI almost completely eliminates the osteoblasts in the metaphyseal region of tibia and femur. Therefore, in order to restore bone mass, to repair micro-architectural damage, and to reduce risk of fracture, anabolic treatments that greatly stimulate new bone formation via promoting osteoblast number and activity should be suitable therapies for SCI patients at the chronic stage. The treatment choices include teriparatide (recombinant human PTH1-34), the only FDA-approved anabolic treatment for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis,38 and monoclonal antibody against Sclerostin (Scl-Ab), which has shown potent efficacy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a phase 2 clinical trial.39 A recent patient study suggested a trend of bone improvement after 1 year of teriparatide injection together with gait training. However, it did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the limited number of subjects.40 In contrast, the preclinical data with Scl-Ab are very promising. Three weeks of Scl-Ab injections immediately after SCI completely restored the trabecular bone structure and cortical bone strength in rats.41

Our study has several limitations. First, we used age- and gender-matched naive rats instead of sham-operated rats as controls. According to our experience, sham operation does not have detectable effects on rat behavior and neuron functions and should not significantly affect our conclusions. Second, unlike human subjects, rats never cease longitudinal bone growth. As shown in our recently published paper,42 at age of 8 months, rat proximal tibial growth rate is still at 3 μm/day. Therefore, we cannot completely exclude the confounding factor of growth on the metaphyseal region, especially the primary spongiosa. Indeed, we still observed reduced bone length in both femur and humerus. Applying a 3D image registration approach we developed recently24 on in vivo longitudinally scanned μCT images should further improve the accuracy and significance of our data. Nevertheless, in terms of analyzing bone phenotypes and studying the underlying mechanism, this adult rat model is much more clinically relevant than young adolescent rats.

In conclusion, our comprehensive study has demonstrated that chronic SCI has deleterious effects on the entire skeleton, with the most severe bone loss and structural deterioration in the lower extremities followed by sublesional vertebrae. The upper extremities also experience bone damage but to a much lesser extent. Furthermore, our finding of sustained inhibition of bone formation and continuous elevation of bone resorption at the chronic stage of SCI strongly suggest that anabolic treatments should be vigorously pursued for promoting bone health and preventing fractures in patients with chronic SCI.


  1. Battaglino RA, Lazzari AA, Garshick E, Morse LR . Spinal cord injury-induced osteoporosis: pathogenesis and emerging therapies. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2012; 10: 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang SD, Dai LY, Jiang LS . Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilchrist NL, Frampton CM, Acland RH et al. Alendronate prevents bone loss in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 1385–1390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Szollar SM, Martin EM, Sartoris DJ, Parthemore JG, Deftos LJ . Bone mineral density and indexes of bone metabolism in spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 28–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Warden SJ, Bennell KL, Matthews B, Brown DJ, McMeeken JM, Wark JD . Quantitative ultrasound assessment of acute bone loss following spinal cord injury: a longitudinal pilot study. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 586–592.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dauty M, Perrouin Verbe B, Maugars Y, Dubois C, Mathe JF . Supralesional and sublesional bone mineral density in spinal cord-injured patients. Bone 2000; 27: 305–309.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maïmoun L, Couret I, Micallef JP et al. Use of bone biochemical markers with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for early determination of bone loss in persons with spinal cord injury. Metabolism 2002; 51: 958–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uebelhart D, Hartmann D, Vuagnat H, Castanier M, Hachen HJ, Chantraine A . Early modifications of biochemical markers of bone metabolism in spinal cord injury patients. A preliminary study. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 197–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eser P, Schiessl H, Willnecker J . Bone loss and steady state after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study using pQCT. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2004; 4: 197–198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frotzler A, Berger M, Knecht H, Eser P . Bone steady-state is established at reduced bone strength after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Bone 2008; 43: 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Bruin ED, Vanwanseele B, Dambacher MA, Dietz V, Stüssi E . Long-term changes in the tibia and radius bone mineral density following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 96–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garland DE . Clinical observations on fractures and heterotopic ossification in the spinal cord and traumatic brain injured populations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988: 86–101.

  13. Nottage WM . A review of long-bone fractures in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981: 65–70.

  14. Morse L, Teng YD, Pham L et al. Spinal cord injury causes rapid osteoclastic resorption and growth plate abnormalities in growing rats (SCI-induced bone loss in growing rats). Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 645–652.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duval-Beaupere G, Lougovoy J, Trocellier L, Lacert P . Trunk and leg growth in children with paraplegia caused by spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1983; 21: 339–350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabo D, Blaich S, Wenz W, Hohmann M, Loew M, Gerner HJ . Osteoporosis in patients with paralysis after spinal cord injury. A cross sectional study in 46 male patients with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 75–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlychou M, Papadaki PJ, Zavras GM et al. Paraplegia-related alterations of bone density in forearm and hip in Greek patients after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 324–330.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zehnder Y, Lüthi M, Michel D et al. Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moran de Brito CM, Battistella LR, Saito ET, Sakamoto H . Effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in spinal cord injury patients: a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 341–348.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zehnder Y, Risi S, Michel D et al. Prevention of bone loss in paraplegics over 2 years with alendronate. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 1067–1074.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Bruin ED, Frey-Rindova P, Herzog RE, Dietz V, Dambacher MA, Stüssi E . Changes of tibia bone properties after spinal cord injury: effects of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 214–220.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zamarioli A, Battaglino RA, Morse LR et al. Standing frame and electrical stimulation therapies partially preserve bone strength in a rodent model of acute spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92: 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Müller R . Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 1468–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lan S, Luo S, Huh BK et al. 3D image registration is critical to ensure accurate detection of longitudinal changes in trabecular bone density, microstructure, and stiffness measurements in rat tibiae by in vivo microcomputed tomography (μCT). Bone 2013; 56: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bauman WA, Kirshblum S, Cirnigliaro C, Forrest GF, Spungen AM . Underestimation of bone loss of the spine with posterior-anterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2010; 33: 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bauman WA, Schwartz E, Song IS et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry overestimates bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 628–633.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mackie EJ, Tatarczuch L, Mirams M . The skeleton: a multi-functional complex organ: the growth plate chondrocyte and endochondral ossification. J Endocrinol 2011; 211: 109–121.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yarrow JF, Conover CF, Beggs LA et al. Testosterone dose-dependently prevents bone and muscle loss in rodents following spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31: 834–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang HD, Shi YM, Li L, Guo JD, Zhang YP, Hou SX . Treatment with resveratrol attenuates sublesional bone loss in spinal cord-injured rats. Br J Pharmacol 2013; 170: 796–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan J, Li B, Chen JW, Jiang SD, Jiang LS . Spinal cord injury causes bone loss through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and Wnt signalling. J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 2968–2977.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Medalha CC, Amorim BO, Ferreira JM et al. Comparison of the effects of electrical field stimulation and low-level laser therapy on bone loss in spinal cord-injured rats. Photomed Laser Surg 2010; 28: 669–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY . Spinal cord injury causes more damage to bone mass, bone structure, biomechanical properties and bone metabolism than sciatic neurectomy in young rats. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 1552–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY . Changes in bone mass, bone structure, bone biomechanical properties, and bone metabolism after spinal cord injury: a 6-month longitudinal study in growing rats. Calcif Tissue Int 2007; 80: 167–175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Slade JM, Bickel CS, Modlesky CM, Majumdar S, Dudley GA . Trabecular bone is more deteriorated in spinal cord injured versus estrogen-free postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lloyd ME, Spector TD, Howard R . Osteoporosis in neurological disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 543–547.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cervinka T, Sievänen H, Hyttinen J, Rittweger J . Bone loss patterns in cortical, subcortical, and trabecular compartments during simulated microgravity. J Appl Physiol 2014; 117: 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY . Effects of spinal cord injury on osteoblastogenesis, osteoclastogenesis and gene expression profiling in osteoblasts in young rats. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 339–349.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Augustine M, Horwitz MJ . Parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein analogs as therapies for osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2013; 11: 400–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 412–420.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gordon KE, Wald MJ, Schnitzer TJ . Effect of parathyroid hormone combined with gait training on bone density and bone architecture in people with chronic spinal cord injury. PM R 2013; 5: 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Beggs LA, Ye F, Ghosh P et al. Sclerostin inhibition prevents spinal cord injury induced cancellous bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30: 681–689.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Altman AR, Tseng WJ, de Bakker CM et al. Quantification of skeletal growth, modeling, and remodeling by in vivo micro computed tomography. Bone 2015: 81: 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01DK095803 to LQ, 1K08HD049598 to YZ), Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders P30AR050950 (NIAMS/NIH), ASBMR Junior Faculty Osteoporosis Basic Research Award (to LQ), and NIH/NIAMS R03-AR065145 (to XSL). We thank Mr. Sean O’Leary for his invaluable assistance and technical help in all the procedures and animal care. We are grateful to the donors of the Spinal Cord Injury Project for their generous support of spinal cord injury studies at the W. M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience at Rutgers University. The authors thank Dr. Martin Heyworth for critically editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Qin.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, T., Tong, W., Chandra, A. et al. A comprehensive study of long-term skeletal changes after spinal cord injury in adult rats. Bone Res 3, 15028 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links