Abstract
Over the past 15 years, SCT has emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with severe autoimmune diseases (ADs). Mechanistic studies recently provided the proof-of-concept that restoration of immunological tolerance can be achieved by haematopoietic SCT in chronic autoimmunity through eradication of the pathologic, immunologic memory and profound reconfiguration of the immune system, that is, immune ‘resetting’. Nevertheless, a number of areas remain unresolved and warrant further investigation to refine our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action and to optimize clinical SCT protocols. Due to the low number of patients transplanted in each centre, it is essential to adequately collect and analyse biological samples in a larger cohort of patients under standardized conditions. The European society for blood and marrow transplantation Autoimmune Diseases and Immunobiology Working Parties have, therefore, undertaken a joint initiative to develop and implement guidelines for ‘good laboratory practice’ in relation to procurement, processing, storage and analysis of biological specimens for immune reconstitution studies in AD patients before, during and after SCT. The aim of this document is to provide practical recommendations for biobanking of samples and laboratory immune monitoring in patients with ADs undergoing SCT, both for routine supportive care purposes and investigational studies.
Introduction
Background
Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases affecting 8–10% of the population. Therapeutic immunosuppression and novel biological therapies can suppress or attenuate the inflammatory process as long they are applied, but cannot switch off the underlying mechanisms inducing therapy-free remission, that is, cure. Although effective in most cases, chronic immunosuppression is associated with the reduction in quality-of-life, cumulative toxicity and increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and represents a considerable socioeconomic challenge. For patients with major organ involvement and therapy-resistant disease, high-dose immunosuppression followed by haematopoietic SCT has been used since 19951 worldwide and was shown to induce treatment-free, long-term remissions in several ADs.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 More recently, the use of MSCs has shown promising results in chronic GVHD7 and ADs,8 and common procedures for immune monitoring and biobanking will be applied for these various types of SCT in AD patients.
The concept of SCT for ADs
On the basis of experimental data from animal models,9, 10 haematopoietic SCT for ADs is applied with the goal of eradicating the autoreactive immunologic memory and to regenerate a naive and self-tolerant immune system from haematopoietic precursors. It has remained unclear for a long time whether clinical remissions observed after haematopoietic SCT were the result of prolonged immunosuppression or the outcome of a true reconfiguration of the immune system. A number of recent immunological studies have provided the proof-of-concept that a chronic autoreactive immune system can indeed be ‘reset’ into a naive and self-tolerant immune system. These data include the regeneration of naive B cells,5, 11 thymic reactivation,5, 12, 13, 14 the emergence of a polyclonal TCR repertoire5, 12, 14 and restoration of Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell (Treg) levels.15, 16 Although interest in MSC usage was originally raised by their potential capacity to differentiate into different cell lineages, recent work showing their immunological properties has led to a revized concept, envisioning their utilization for immunomodulatory purposes. Their clinically relevant immunomodulatory potential has been demonstrated in clinical trials for GVHD7 and in various types of ADs.8
Rationale for the development of guidelines for immune monitoring and biobanking in AD patients after SCT
Early clinical guidelines and recommendations17 for SCT in ADs were recently updated.18 Meanwhile, activity in the field is expanding with results from randomized phase II/III studies in major disease indications, such as systemic sclerosis (ASTIS).2 In parallel, clinical trials of MSC transplantation have been growing in number.8 Although the mechanisms of action of SCT in ADs have been partially elucidated, important issues remain unresolved from both clinical and scientific points of view. These include the variability associated with type of AD, patient age, continued use of immunosuppression and the effect of different transplantation techniques, for example, variable conditioning regimens and graft manipulation technology. The low number of patients transplanted at each centre requires multicentre studies under standardized conditions. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Autoimmune Diseases and Immunobiology Working Parties have, therefore, undertaken a combined initiative to develop guidelines for harmonized ‘good laboratory practice’ in biobanking and immune monitoring before and after SCT in patients with ADs. These guidelines do not replace established standard operating procedures in individual laboratories, and national regulatory requirements should always prevail. However, they aim to support the establishment of an international biobanking infrastructure and common testing protocols, thereby facilitating collaborative and comparative research studies in the field of stem cell therapies for ADs.
General recommendations
Clinical practice guidelines
In AD patients considered for SCT, referral should be made to a centre with appropriate inter-disciplinary interaction between haematological and AD specialists. Such centres should have JACIE accreditation or equivalent18 and should provide programmes for long-term follow-up, quarterly for the first year and biannually follow-up consultation, thereafter, ideally with dual review by both haematologists and disease specialists with assessment of disease-specific activity scores. Where possible, laboratories should participate in internal and external quality assurance schemes for flow cytometry, molecular genetics and immunological markers. National and/or EU regulations should be followed in relation to biobanking of cells and tissues.
Guidelines for basic laboratory immune analyses and biological sample storage
A minimum set of laboratory analyses is recommended for immune monitoring in patients before and at certain time-points after SCT by all contributing centres (Table 1). These include full blood count analysis on freshly isolated PBMCs, allowing enumeration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD3−/CD56+ natural killer cells, CD3+/CD56+ natural killer-like T cells and CD14+ monocytes. In addition, monitoring of total Ig levels and analysis of serum autoantibody titres in Ab-mediated ADs are recommended at baseline before the mobilization and SCT, quarterly for the first year and biannually thereafter. In addition to the mentioned basic laboratory immune analyses, storage of biological samples is recommended for extended immune monitoring at later time-points. A list of biological samples recommended for storage and potential immunologic investigations is provided (Table 2). To promote harmonized sample handling across different sites, standardized protocols for sample collection, processing and storage have been developed and are provided in the Supplementary Appendix.
Expert centre recommendations for extended immune monitoring
For centres with expertize in flow cytometry and adequate immune monitoring core facilities, it is recommended to analyse a broader set of biomarkers in patients before and after SCT. For immunocytometric analysis, eight panels were defined, dedicated to fine cytometric analyses of the different subsets of cells within the major cellular populations (Table 3). Comparison between centres may be possible given a preliminary calibration of all flow cytometers with the same rainbow fluorescent particles. For in-depth investigation of the T- and B-cell lymphopoiesis, it is recommended to analyse T-cell receptor excision circles19 and κ-deleting recombination excision circles,20 which can be measured simultaneously using duplex real-time PCR.21, 22 Furthermore, TCR repertoire analysis of peripheral blood T cells is suggested with Vbeta analysis and flow cytometry, spectratyping or high-throughput sequencing.23 Providing that efficient eradication of the autoreactive memory is a prerequisite for favourable long-term responses, it is suggested to analyse the frequency of autoantigen-specific T cells before and after SCT where possible, for example, islet-Ag-specific T cells in type 1 diabetes.24 Here, tetramer staining24, 25 or magnetic pre-enrichment of CD154+ T cells provides techniques for high-resolution analysis of Ag-reactive T cells directly from peripheral blood.26 In addition, gene expression profiling of either whole blood or lymphocyte subsets, using microarray technology, at defined time-points before and after SCT should be considered (Table 2).
Implications of immune monitoring for clinical practice: recommendations for infection prophylaxis and re-vaccination
Current Autoimmune Diseases Working Party guidelines already recommend that all patients receive Pneumocystis jiroveci, herpes and antifungal prophylaxis and are monitored for CMV and EBV (ideally by PCR) for infection (primary or reactivation) for at least 3 months after transplant, with active surveillance thereafter up to 2 years after SCT according to local practice.18 At that stage, CD4+ cell counts should be repeated and, if still below 200 cells/μL, prophylaxis or quarterly monitoring should be continued. If the patient suffers from recurrent or a life-threatening infection despite neutrophil recovery and has Ig or Ig subclass deficiency, i.v. Ig substitution should be considered after weighing up the benefits, risks and costs. Given the previous and often ongoing administration of immunosuppressive drugs following SCT, measurement of specific Ab levels is recommended before and after re-vaccination when performed according to published generic guidelines27 to confirm protection and administer booster vaccination in patients with inadequate response.
Disease-specific recommendations
Multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common acquired demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. MS is the result of an autoimmune inflammatory attack initiated by T and B cells and directed against components of central nervous system myelin. Axonal damage becomes prominent in secondary progressive disease and is the main cause of irreversible disability. HLA genes have a primary role in genetic susceptibility to MS, with a predominant role from HLA-DRB1*15 in the majority of populations.28, 29 Recent GWAS identified multiple non-MHC loci affecting the risk of developing MS.30 The majority of these genes are immune related, for example, IL-2 and IL-7 receptors, CD6, CD58, IRF8, and TNFRSF1A genes. The most commonly used rating scale to grade neurological disability in patients with MS is the Expanded Disability Status Scale.31 Historically considered a variant of MS, neuromyelitis optica is recognized as a distinct disease entity, whose hallmark is immune-mediated inflammation of optic nerves and the spinal cord caused by autoantibodies to the water channel aquaporin 4.32, 33 Besides being pathogenic, aquaporin 4 Abs are used as a marker of ‘minimal residual AD’ after SCT.34 In addition to the general guidelines and immune monitoring panels described above, specific recommendations for MS and neuromyelitis optica are provided (Table 4).
Systemic sclerosis
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare AD (prevalence 5–50 per 100 000) characterized by early endothelial vascular damage with activation of the immune response and enhanced collagen synthesis. Ag stimulation and genetic susceptibility contribute to autoimmunity, with consequent T- and B-cell activation, and fibroblast activation by pro-fibrotic cytokines, that is, transforming growth factor-β and connective tissue growth factor. Early T-cell infiltrates in skin and pulmonary tissue, autoantibody production by plasma cells, notably, anti-centromere and anti-topoisomerase-I and the presence of macrophages or altered endothelial cells promote inflammation and fibrosis. Several genetic associations have been observed between HLA types and autoantibody profiles, and genome-wide screening studies identified specific nucleotide polymorphisms in relevant genes related to SSc.35 More recently, use of microarray technology showed significant differences of gene patterns in skin biopsies from patients with diffuse and limited SSc, which also differed from normal controls.36 In this context, a few years ago, the EUSTAR biobanking group developed guidelines for collection, storage and distribution of SSc biospecimens (www.eustar.org). In addition to documenting a minimal essential data set, acquisition and storage of blood samples, and skin biopsies from patients with SSc after SCT are strongly encouraged in expert centres (Table 4).
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare chronic AD (prevalence 20–150 cases per 100 000) with heterogeneous clinical manifestations.37 It is characterized by the generation of Abs directed against a variety of autoantigens, including nuclear and cytoplasmic Ags, and by complement activation.37 Autoreactive plasma cells are key players in the induction and perturbation of immunopathology in SLE, and short-lived (HLA-DRhigh) plasmablasts are readily detectable in the peripheral blood of patients with active disease.38 Another hallmark of SLE is the upregulation of IFN-regulated gene transcripts.39 IFNα and its response proteins IP-10 and Siglec-1 are established markers for monitoring disease activity in SLE.40 Circulating Foxp3+ Tregs are expanded in SLE, with Helios-expressing Tregs being the most prominent Treg subset, which correlates with disease activity.41 Disease activity is most commonly measured by SLE disease activity index that comprises relevant clinical and laboratory values.42 On the basis of these disease-specific features, recommendations for immune monitoring in SLE are provided (Table 4).
Crohn’s disease
Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by recurring episodes of inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. It is thought to arise by dysregulated mucosal immune responses to the gut flora in genetically susceptible individuals.43 GWAS and meta-analyses have identified 140 susceptibility loci to Crohn’s disease in Caucasians, but their heritability is not fully explained.44 Disease activity is monitored by symptom-based scores, most commonly the Harvey–Bradshaw index45 and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire.46 Recent studies revealed an altered intestinal microbial and peripheral blood T-cell phenotype, in particular involvement of Th17 cells and IL-21/IL-22-producing CD4+ T cells in Crohn’s disease.47, 48 In addition, several biomarkers were shown to be important in assessment of disease, most notably serum cytokines (IL-22), metalloproteinase 9 and faecal calprotectin.49 In addition to the general recommendations for immune monitoring, specific parameters of the immune system may be important in Crohn’s disease (Table 4).
Type 1 diabetes
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an AD caused by autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against insulin-producing islet cells.50 Although the current standard treatment is insulin replacement therapy, several clinical trials for haematopoietic SCT have demonstrated long-term, insulin- and drug-free remissions in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.4, 51 Following SCT, metabolic end points such as C-peptide secretion, HbA1c level and daily insulin need should be monitored. Immunological end points can give better information on the efficacy of the immune intervention. Although no correlation with disease activity has been described between several islet-specific Abs involved in type 1 diabetes mellitus (ICA-512/IA-2, GAD65),50, 52 their prognostic and predictive value in the context of SCT remains to be determined. Monitoring T-cell responses after SCT may be more relevant. Here, tetramer-staining techniques allow testing T-cell responses to HLA-A2-restricted insulin B10, pre-pro-insulin, islet Ag, GAD65 and pre-pro islet amyloid polypeptide.24, 25 We recommend also considering the publication of the T-cell workshop initiative of the Immunology of Diabetes Society regarding guidelines on how to handle biological samples in clinical type 1 diabetes mellitus trials.53, 54
Rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), affecting ~1% of the population, is characterized by chronic joint inflammation, autoantibody production and variable degrees of bone and cartilage erosion.55 Disease activity can be measured using the Disease Activity Scores and Clinical Disease Activity Index.56 Immunopathology includes break of tolerance and accumulation of immune effector cells including macrophages and osteoclasts, DCs, B and T cells, especially Th17 subsets. Reduced T-cell receptor excision circles and shortened telomeres result in a contracted TCR repertoire in both naive and memory T cells.57, 58 Haematopoietic SCT was applied as a salvage therapy in severely affected patients in the ‘pre-biologic era’. Although remission occurred in the majority of cases, recurrence was common, irrespective of CD34+ graft selection.59, 60 In JIA patients undergoing Auto-SCT, restoration of initially reduced Foxp3+ Treg levels was observed with change in autoreactive T cells from a pro-inflammatory (IFN-gamma and T-bet high) to a tolerant phenotype (IL-10 and GATA-3 high) after SCT.15 Disease-specific recommendations for immune monitoring in RA/JIA are provided (Table 4).
Conclusions
Although activity in the field of SCT for ADs is rapidly expanding, the interpretation of results obtained from immune monitoring of clinical trials is often limited due to the heterogeneity of methods that are used for sample processing and analysis. With the guidelines provided here, we aim to define ‘good laboratory practice’ in handling of biological samples and to harmonize methods for preparation, storage and analysis of biological specimens for immune reconstitution studies. The implementation and dissemination of these guidelines aim to support the establishment of an international biobanking infrastructure and common testing protocols. Adequate reporting and connection between the individual centres exploiting these data will foster collaborative and comparative research studies throughout Europe for better patient care and to refine our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action that may directly translate into optimized protocols for SCT in ADs.
References
Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Baldomero H . Blood and marrow transplantation activity in Europe 1995. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 407–419.
van Laar JM, Farge D, Sont JK, Naraghi K, Marjanovic Z, Larghero J et al. for the EBMT/EULAR Scleroderma Study Group. Autologous stem cell transplantation versus vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 2490–2498.
Farge D, Labopin M, Tyndall A, Fassas A, Mancardi GL, Van LJ et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: an observational study on 12 years' experience from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Working Party on Autoimmune Diseases. Haematologica 2010; 95: 284–292.
Couri CE, Oliveira MC, Stracieri AB, Moraes DA, Pieroni F, Barros GM et al. C-peptide levels and insulin independence following autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2009; 301: 1573–1579.
Alexander T, Thiel A, Rosen O, Massenkeil G, Sattler A, Kohler S et al. Depletion of autoreactive immunologic memory followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory SLE induces long-term remission through de novo generation of a juvenile and tolerant immune system. Blood 2009; 113: 214–223.
Mancardi GL, Sormani MP, Di GM, Vuolo L, Gualandi F, Amato MP et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with an intermediate intensity conditioning regimen in multiple sclerosis: the Italian multi-centre experience. Mult Scler 2012; 18: 835–842.
Le BK, Frassoni F, Ball L, Locatelli F, Roelofs H, Lewis I et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet 2008; 371: 1579–1586.
Bernardo ME, Fibbe WE . Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in autoimmune disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1266: 107–117.
Van Bekkum DW . BMT in experimental autoimmune diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 11: 183–187.
Ikehara S . Stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: what can we learn from experimental models? Autoimmunity 2008; 41: 563–569.
Szodoray P, Varoczy L, Papp G, Barath S, Nakken B, Szegedi G et al. Immunological reconstitution after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory systemic autoimmune diseases. Scand J Rheumatol 2012; 41: 110–115.
Muraro PA, Douek DC, Packer A, Chung K, Guenaga FJ, Cassiani-Ingoni R et al. Thymic output generates a new and diverse TCR repertoire after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis patients. J Exp Med 2005; 201: 805–816.
Thiel A, Alexander T, Schmidt CA, Przybylski GK, Kimmig S, Kohler S et al. Direct assessment of thymic reactivation after autologous stem cell transplantation. Acta Haematol 2008; 119: 22–27.
Farge D, Henegar C, Carmagnat M, Daneshpouy M, Marjanovic Z, Rabian C et al. Analysis of immune reconstitution after autologous bone marrow transplantation in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 1555–1563.
de K I, Vastert B, Klein M, Teklenburg G, Arkesteijn G, Yung GP et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for autoimmunity induces immunologic self-tolerance by reprogramming autoreactive T cells and restoring the CD4+CD25+ immune regulatory network. Blood 2006; 107: 1696–1702.
Abrahamsson SV, Angelini DF, Dubinsky AN, Morel E, Oh U, Jones JL et al. Non-myeloablative autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation expands regulatory cells and depletes IL-17 producing mucosal-associated invariant T cells in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2013; 136: 2888–2903.
Tyndall A, Saccardi R . Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of severe autoimmune disease: results from phase I/II studies, prospective randomized trials and future directions. Clin Exp Immunol 2005; 141: 1–9.
Snowden JA, Saccardi R, Allez M, Ardizzone S, Arnold R, Cervera R et al. Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 770–790.
Douek DC, McFarland RD, Keiser PH, Gage EA, Massey JM, Haynes BF et al. Changes in thymic function with age and during the treatment of HIV infection. Nature 1998; 396: 690–695.
van Zelm MC, van der Burg M, van Dongen JJ . Homeostatic and maturation-associated proliferation in the peripheral B-cell compartment. Cell Cycle 2007; 6: 2890–2895.
Sottini A, Ghidini C, Zanotti C, Chiarini M, Caimi L, Lanfranchi A et al. Simultaneous quantification of recent thymic T-cell and bone marrow B-cell emigrants in patients with primary immunodeficiency undergone to stem cell transplantation. Clin Immunol 2010; 136: 217–227.
Mensen A, Ochs C, Stroux A, Wittenbecher F, Szyska M, Imberti L et al. Utilization of TREC and KREC quantification for the monitoring of early T- and B-cell neogenesis in adult patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Transl Med 2013; 11: 188.
Mori A, Deola S, Xumerle L, Mijatovic V, Malerba G, Monsurro V . Next generation sequencing: new tools in immunology and hematology. Blood Res 2013; 48: 242–249.
Velthuis JH, Unger WW, Abreu JR, Duinkerken G, Franken K, Peakman M et al. Simultaneous detection of circulating autoreactive CD8+ T-cells specific for different islet cell-associated epitopes using combinatorial MHC multimers. Diabetes 2010; 59: 1721–1730.
Newell EW . Higher Throughput Methods of Identifying T Cell Epitopes for Studying Outcomes of Altered Antigen Processing and Presentation. Front Immunol 2013; 4: 430.
Bacher P, Schink C, Teutschbein J, Kniemeyer O, Assenmacher M, Brakhage AA et al. Antigen-reactive T cell enrichment for direct, high-resolution analysis of the human naive and memory Th cell repertoire. J Immunol 2013; 190: 3967–3976.
Majhail NS, Rizzo JD, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C et al. Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 337–341.
Caillier SJ, Briggs F, Cree BA, Baranzini SE, Fernandez-Vina M, Ramsay PP et al. Uncoupling the roles of HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DRB5 genes in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2008; 181: 5473–5480.
Lincoln MR, Montpetit A, Cader MZ, Saarela J, Dyment DA, Tiislar M et al. A predominant role for the HLA class II region in the association of the MHC region with multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 1108–1112.
Sawcer S, Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, Spencer CC, Patsopoulos NA, Moutsianas L et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 2011; 476: 214–219.
Kurtzke JF . Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–1452.
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG . The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 805–815.
Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004; 364: 2106–2112.
Greco R, Bondanza A, Vago L, Moiola L, Rossi P, Furlan R et al. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Neuromyelitis Optica. Ann Neurol 2013; 75: 447–453.
Katsumoto TR, Whitfield ML, Connolly MK . The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Annu Rev Pathol 2011; 6: 509–537.
Milano A, Pendergrass SA, Sargent JL, George LK, McCalmont TH, Connolly MK et al. Molecular subsets in the gene expression signatures of scleroderma skin. PLoS One 2008; 3: e2696.
Tsokos GC . Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2110–2121.
Jacobi AM, Mei H, Hoyer BF, Mumtaz IM, Thiele K, Radbruch A et al. HLA-DRhigh/CD27high plasmablasts indicate active disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 305–308.
Bennett L, Palucka AK, Arce E, Cantrell V, Borvak J, Banchereau J et al. Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood. J Exp Med 2003; 197: 711–723.
Rose T, Grutzkau A, Hirseland H, Huscher D, Dahnrich C, Dzionek A et al. IFNalpha and its response proteins, IP-10 and SIGLEC-1, are biomarkers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1639–1645.
Alexander T, Sattler A, Templin L, Kohler S, Gross C, Meisel A et al. Foxp3+ Helios+ regulatory T cells are expanded in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1549–1558.
Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB . Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 288–291.
Khor B, Gardet A, Xavier RJ . Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2011; 474: 307–317.
Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2012; 491: 119–124.
Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM . A simple index of Crohn's-disease activity. Lancet 1980; 1: 514.
Irvine EJ, Feagan B, Rochon J, Archambault A, Fedorak RN, Groll A et al. Quality of life: a valid and reliable measure of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Canadian Crohn's Relapse Prevention Trial Study Group. Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 287–296.
Dige A, Stoy S, Rasmussen TK, Kelsen J, Hvas CL, Sandahl TD et al. Increased levels of circulating Th17 cells in quiescent versus active Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7: 248–255.
Hedin CR, McCarthy NE, Louis P, Farquharson FM, McCartney S, Taylor K et al. Altered intestinal microbiota and blood T cell phenotype are shared by patients with Crohn's disease and their unaffected siblings. Gut 2014; 63: 1578–1586.
Faubion WA Jr, Fletcher JG, O'Byrne S, Feagan BG, de Villiers WJ, Salzberg B et al. EMerging BiomARKers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EMBARK) study identifies fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum IL-22 as a novel combination of biomarkers for Crohn's disease activity: role of cross-sectional imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1891–1900.
Mallone R, Roep BO . Biomarkers for immune intervention trials in type 1 diabetes. Clin Immunol 2013; 149: 286–296.
Snarski E, Milczarczyk A, Torosian T, Paluszewska M, Urbanowska E, Krol M et al. Independence of exogenous insulin following immunoablation and stem cell reconstitution in newly diagnosed diabetes type I. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 562–566.
Di Lorenzo TP, Peakman M, Roep BO . Translational mini-review series on type 1 diabetes: Systematic analysis of T cell epitopes in autoimmune diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 2007; 148: 1–16.
Mallone R, Scotto M, Janicki CN, James EA, Fitzgerald-Miller L, Wagner R et al. Immunology of Diabetes Society T-Cell Workshop: HLA class I tetramer-directed epitope validation initiative T-Cell Workshop Report-HLA Class I Tetramer Validation Initiative. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 720–726.
James EA, Mallone R, Schloot NC, Gagnerault MC, Thorpe J, Fitzgerald-Miller L et al. Immunology of Diabetes Society T-Cell Workshop: HLA class II tetramer-directed epitope validation initiative. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 727–736.
McInnes IB, Schett G . The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2205–2219.
Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C et al. Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1360–1364.
Koetz K, Bryl E, Spickschen K, O'Fallon WM, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM . T cell homeostasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 9203–9208.
Nistala K, Wedderburn LR . Th17 and regulatory T cells: rebalancing pro- and anti-inflammatory forces in autoimmune arthritis. Rheumatology. (Oxford) 2009; 48: 602–606.
Snowden JA, Passweg J, Moore JJ, Milliken S, Cannell P, Van LJ et al. Autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in severe rheumatoid arthritis: a report from the EBMT and ABMTR. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 482–488.
Moore J, Brooks P, Milliken S, Biggs J, Ma D, Handel M et al. A pilot randomized trial comparing CD34-selected versus unmanipulated hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe, refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 2301–2309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Bone Marrow Transplantation website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander, T., Bondanza, A., Muraro, P. et al. SCT for severe autoimmune diseases: consensus guidelines of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation for immune monitoring and biobanking. Bone Marrow Transplant 50, 173–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.251
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.251
This article is cited by
-
Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles regulate acquired immune response of lupus mouse in vitro
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Combining systemic and locally applied cellular therapies for the treatment of systemic sclerosis
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2022)
-
Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals
Drugs (2022)
-
Stem cell therapies for autoimmune hepatitis
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021)
-
Stem/progenitor cell in kidney: characteristics, homing, coordination, and maintenance
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021)