Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Impact of pre-transplant co-morbidities on outcome after alemtuzumab-based reduced intensity conditioning allo-SCT in elderly patients: A British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation study


The advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has permitted the extension of allo-SCT to selected patients into their eighth decade but GVHD remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Alemtuzumab is increasingly used to reduce the risk of severe GVHD, but there are concerns that T-cell depletion may compromise outcome particularly in older patients. We therefore studied the impact of pre-transplant factors on the outcome of 187 patients with a haematological malignancy over the age of 60 transplanted using an alemtuzumab-based RIC regimen of whom co-morbidity scoring was possible in 169. Of the patients, 120 had a haematopoietic cell transplantation co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) of 0 or 1 and 49 had a score of 2 or more. The 5-year OS was 33%. In multivariable analysis, OS was determined by co-morbidity score (P=0.001) and disease status at transplant (P=0.004) but not by patient age. Non-relapse mortality was determined by co-morbidity score (P=0.001). Two-year OS for patients with a HCT-CI of 0–1 was 59 versus 6% for patients with a higher score. Alemtuzumab-based RIC allografts can be delivered safely in patients aged over 60 but co-morbidity scoring is mandatory to identify patients who will benefit.


The demonstration that reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens permit the delivery of a GVL effect with a marked reduction in transplant-related toxicity has permitted the extension of allogeneic transplantation to older adults in whom this potentially curative treatment modality was previously precluded.1, 2, 3, 4 A major factor limiting the utilisation of RIC regimens in this population has been the substantial risk of GVHD in patients who receive a T-replete stem cell inoculum and consequently there is increasing use of in vivo T-cell depletion using alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG).5,6,7,8 However, in vivo T-cell depletion is associated with delayed immune reconstitution, which may result in an increased risk of infectious death and disease relapse.9,10 This has led to concerns that any benefits accruing from the utilisation of alemtuzumab or ATG may be offset by an increased risk of both non-relapse mortality (NRM) and disease recurrence particularly in older patients. There is therefore an urgent requirement to identify, with greater precision, the tolerability of RIC regimens incorporating in vivo T-cell depletion in older patients with particular reference to factors determining long-term outcome.

The development of a weighted scoring system, the haematopoietic cell transplantation co-morbidity index (HCT-CI), which captures multiple-organ co-morbidities, has been shown to provide a robust guide to transplant toxicity and survival in younger adults undergoing allo-SCT using either a myeloablative or RIC regimen.11,12 Recently, it has been shown that such a scoring system also accurately predicts the outcome in patients transplanted using an alemtuzumab-based RIC regimen.13,14 However, to date, there have been no studies of the utility of co-morbidity scoring on predicting outcome after a T-cell depleted allograft in older patients. We therefore studied patient and donor factors predicting outcome in patients over the age of 60 undergoing allo-SCT using an alemtuzumab-based preparative regimen with the aim of identifying factors predicting survival and transplant toxicity.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, we examined factors predicting outcome in 187 patients with haematological malignancies who underwent an alemtuzumab-based RIC allograft for a haematological malignancy at participating centres (Table 1). The median age of the patients was 62.7 years (range 60.0–72.8). Forty-five patients were aged 65–69 and five patients were aged 70–72. Sixty-two patients received a graft from a sibling donor and 125 from an adult unrelated donor. One hundred and sixty-eight patients were transplanted using GCSF-stimulated PBSC, 18 using cells collected from a BM harvest and one using PBSC and BM collected from the same donor. The HCT-CI index was assessed in all patients pre-transplant but insufficient data were available for its accurate calculation in 18 patients.

Table 1 Characteristics of study population

Transplant regimens and GVHD prophylaxis

Patients over the age of 60 who were transplanted in transplant centres, which routinely utilised alemtuzumab-based RIC regimens including combinations of fludarabine and melphalan (Flu/Mel),15 fludarabine and Bu (Flu/Bu),16 BCNU, BEAM17 and fludarabine and Cy (Flu/Cy) (Table 1)18 were studied. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CYA (5 mg/kg) commenced pre-transplant and subsequently dose-adjusted to achieve therapeutic levels. Alemtuzumab was administered pre-transplant according to the relevant conditioning regimen over a period of 2–5 days in total doses ranging from 30 to 100 mg. Patients received aciclovir, co-trimoxazole and anti-fungal prophylaxis according to institutional policies. Acute and chronic GVHD were classified according to published criteria.19

Statistical analysis

OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariable and multivariable survival comparisons and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated from Cox regression models.20 NRM and relapse rate (RR) were calculated by competing risks analysis. Relapse was the competing risk for NRM, whereas death in remission was the competing risk for RR. Univariable and multivariable models were calculated by the method of Fine and Gray.21,22 The HCT-CI index was calculated for each patient, and treated as a continuous variable for the purposes of these survival analyses.11 Patient age and sex, diagnosis, disease status, patient/donor CMV, CD34+ stem cell dose and HCT-CI index score were analysed for their association with NRM, relapse risk, OS and PFS using univariable analyses. All factors significant for any outcome in the univariable analysis in addition to age were included in the multivariable model.


Transplant outcomes

The 1-year estimate of OS for the whole group was 56% (48–63%) and 33% (23–43%) at 5 years. The PFS at 1 year was 50% (42–57%) and 27% (18–37%) at 5 years. Ninety-two (49%) patients are alive of whom 81 remain in continuous remission after a median follow-up of 24 months (range 2–90). Fifty-eight patients died because of transplant-related complications. The NRM in the first year posttransplant was 26%. The main causes of NRM were infectious complications (n=22) and GvHD (n=22). Of the patients, 39% developed grade I–II acute GVHD and 13% grade III–IV acute GVHD.

Fifty-two patients relapsed after transplant. The RR at 1 year was 24% (18–31%) and 37% at 5 years (28–45%). Thirty-seven patients died as a consequence of disease recurrence and four of transplant-related causes. Eleven patients are alive post relapse. Four patients received DLI of whom three are still alive at a range of 16–30 months post DLI. One patient received a second transplant, and is still alive 46 months after the second allograft.

Predictors of outcome

The results of a univariable analysis of factors impacting on OS, NRM and relapse risk are summarised in Table 2. On multivariable analysis, disease status at transplant (HR 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.95 P=0.004) and HCT-CI index (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.52–2.10 P= 0.001) influenced OS (Table 3). Specifically, patients who had a HCT-CI index of 0 or 1 experienced a statistically significantly improved survival compared with those a HCT-CI index of 2 or greater: 2-year OS 59% (95% CI 49–69%) compared with 6% (95% CI, 1–17%) (P=0001) (Figure 1). On multivariable analysis, NRM was influenced by HCT-CI score (HR 1.87; CI 1.56–2.22 P=0.001) but no other factors were of significance (Figure 2). Alemtuzumab dose did not impact outcome. No factors were shown to correlate with RR on univariable or multivariable analysis.

Table 2 Univariable analysis of pre-transplant factors determining survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality
Table 3 Multivariable analysis of pre-transplant factors determining survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality
Figure 1

OS according to pre-transplant HCT-CI.

Figure 2

Non-relapse mortality according to pre-transplant HCT-CI.


An increasing number of older adults are undergoing allo-SCT, many using an alemtuzumab-based RIC. This is the first study to examine predictors of outcome in this challenging patient group. Our data confirm the important impact of the HCT-CI on patient outcome, which has been previously demonstrated in younger patients but, in contrast to previous studies, we observed an exceptionally poor tolerance of more than one co-morbidity in this older population. Thus, although broadly equivalent outcomes to those reported in younger patients are observed in the presence of an HCT-CI of 0 or 1, TRM rises abruptly in older patients with an HCT-CI score of 2 or more resulting in a markedly reduced OS. On the basis of these data, older patients, with an HCT-CI of greater than 1, should only be considered for an allogeneic transplant using an alemtuzumab-based RIC regimen, in their current formulation, after careful deliberation. Importantly our data confirm that patient age itself should not itself be considered a barrier to the safe delivery of a potentially curative allograft in patients with a low HCT-CI. Supporting the thesis that biological age, as manifest by co-morbidity status, rather than chronological age is the critical determinant of transplant outcome, we observed no impact of age within the group of patients we studied. The observation that the other key determinant of outcome after a RIC allograft is disease status has been reported in a number of previous reports.17,23 Taken together, with the profoundly adverse impact of multiple co-morbidities on transplant outcome, our data allow the identification of a population of older patients with active disease in whom allogeneic transplantation is very unlikely to deliver a survival benefit. As a consequence, these data now inform clinical practice at the reporting centres and patients with a HCT-CI of greater than 1 are only transplanted in exceptional circumstances or according to an investigational protocol.

The extent to which the use of alemtuzumab as a component of the conditioning regimen contributes to the marked impact of the HCT-CI on transplant outcome is unclear. Further studies in this age group, in patients transplanted using differing preparative regimens and forms of T-cell depletion, are now warranted. One previous, smaller study reported no impact of the HCT-CI on outcome but included patients transplanted using a range of preparative regimens and degrees of T-cell depletion, which complicated interpretation,24 and a separate study performed in patients over the age of 60 transplanted using a non-alemtuzumab-based regimen identified an impact of co-morbidities as determined by the less precise Karnovsky score.25 To date, other studies addressing the impact of HCT-CI status on outcome post transplant have not specifically focussed on elderly patients and it will be of interest to observe whether the marked impact of co-morbidities on outcome is also observed in patients transplanted using a T-cell replete protocol. Transplantation of a higher dose of CD34+ cells has been reported to be correlated with improved immune reconstitution and it is of interest that there was no impact of stem cell dose on outcome in the patient population studied.26

This study confirms that alemtuzumab-based RIC allografts can be delivered safely in patients above the age of 60 with a low rate of GVHD. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that co-morbidity scoring is mandatory in older patients considered for a RIC allograft to identify those with an acceptable procedure-related toxicity. Novel strategies that permit the safe delivery of allogeneic transplants in older patients with significant co-morbidities are urgently required.


  1. 1

    McClune BL, Weisdorf DJ, Pedersen TL, Tunes da Silva G, Tallman MS, Sierra J et al. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1878–1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Bertz H, Potthoff K, Finke J . Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors in older patients with myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1480–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Falda M, Busca A, Baldi I, Mordini N, Bruno B, Allione B et al. Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with hematological malignancies: results from the GITMO (Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo) multicenter prospective clinical trial. Am J Hematol 2007; 82: 863–866.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Chevallier P, Szydlo RM, Blaise D, Tabrizi R, Michallet M, Uzunov M et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients over 60 years: a report from the SFGM-TC. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Blaise DP, Michel Boiron J, Faucher C, Mohty M, Bay JO, Bardoux VJ et al. Reduced intensity conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia as a first-line treatment. Cancer 2005; 104: 1931–1938.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Chakraverty R, Peggs K, Chopra R, Milligan DW, Kottaridis PD, Verfuerth S et al. Limiting transplantation-related mortality following unrelated donor stem cell transplantation by using a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Blood 2002; 99: 1071–1078.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Koreth J, Aldridge J, Kim HT, Alyea EP 3rd, Cutler C, Armand P et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients over 60 years: hematologic malignancy outcomes are not impaired in advanced age. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 792–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Malladi RK, Peniket AJ, Littlewood TJ, Towlson KE, Pearce R, Yin J et al. Alemtuzumab markedly reduces chronic GVHD without affecting overall survival in reduced-intensity conditioning sibling allo-SCT for adults with AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 709–715.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Carpenter B, Haque T, Dimopoulou M, Atkinson C, Roughton M, Grace S et al. Incidence and dynamics of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after alemtuzumab-based conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation 2010; 90: 564–570.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Chakraverty R, Orti G, Roughton M, Shen J, Fielding A, Kottaridis P et al. Impact of in vivo alemtuzumab dose before reduced intensity conditioning and HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics, GVHD, and immune reconstitution. Blood 2010; 116: 3080–3088.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Sorror M, Storer B, Sandmaier B, Maloney D, Chauncey T, Langston A et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index and Karnofsky performance status are independent predictors or morbidity and mortality after allogeneic nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. Cancer 2008; 112: 1992–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Sorror ML, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, Franke GN, Laport GG, Chauncey TR et al. Long-term outcomes among older patients following nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. JAMA 2011; 306: 1874–1883.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bokhari SW, Watson L, Nagra S, Cook M, Byrne JL, Craddock C et al. Role of HCT-comorbidity index, age and disease status at transplantation in predicting survival and non-relapse mortality in patients with myelodysplasia and leukemia undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning hemopoeitic progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 528–534.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Lim ZY, Ingram W, Brand R, Ho A, Kenyon M, Devereux S et al. Impact of pretransplant comorbidities on alemtuzumab-based reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 633–639.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kottaridis PD, Milligan DW, Chopra R, Chakraverty RK, Chakrabarti S, Robinson S et al. In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents GvHD following nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation. Cytotherapy 2001; 3: 197–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Olavarria E, Siddique S, Griffiths MJ, Avery S, Byrne JL, Piper KP et al. Post-transplant imatinib as a strategy to postpone the requirement for immunotherapy in patients undergoing reduced intensity allografts for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2007; 110: 4614–4617.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Faulkner RD, Craddock C, Byrne JL, Mahendra P, Haynes AP, Prentice HG et al. BEAM-alemtuzumab reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoproliferative diseases: GVHD, toxicity, and survival in 65 patients. Blood 2004; 103: 428–434.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Marsh JC, Gupta V, Lim Z, Ho AY, Ireland RM, Hayden J et al. Alemtuzumab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide reduces chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 2011; 118: 2351–2357.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977; 35: 1–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Fine JP, Gray RJ . A proportional hazard models for the subdistribution of a competing risk. JASA 1999; 94: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Gray RJ . A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Annals of Statistics 1988; 16: 1141–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Craddock C, Nagra S, Peniket A, Brookes C, Buckley L, Nikolousis E et al. Factors predicting long-term survival after T-cell depleted reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantion for acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2010; 95: 989–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    McSweeney PA, Niederwieser D, Shizuru JA, Sandmaier BM, Molina AJ, Maloney DG et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with hematologic malignancies: replacing high-dose cytotoxic therapy with graft-versus-tumor effects. Blood 2001; 97: 3390–3400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Deschler B, Binek K, Ihorst G, Marks R, Wasch R, Bertz H et al. Prognostic factor and quality of life analysis in 160 patients aged >or =60 years with hematologic neoplasias treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 967–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Mavroudis D, Read E, Cottler-Fox M, Couriel D, Molldrem J, Carter C et al. CD34+ cell dose predicts survival, posttransplant morbidity, and rate of hematologic recovery after allogeneic marrow transplants for hematologic malignancies. Blood 1996; 88: 3223–3229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The hard work of the data managers at the contributing transplant centres is gratefully acknowledged. The work of the BSBMT registry was originally supported by a grant from Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Craddock.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolousis, E., Nagra, S., Pearce, R. et al. Impact of pre-transplant co-morbidities on outcome after alemtuzumab-based reduced intensity conditioning allo-SCT in elderly patients: A British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation study. Bone Marrow Transplant 50, 82–86 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links