Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 48, pages 1497–1505 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

AML treatment presents significant challenges in the elderly, who more often have poor risk cytogenetic and molecular markers, comorbidities and compromised performance status. Although population-based studies indicate that treated patients’ survival is better than those who are not treated, there is an understandable reluctance of physicians to choose aggressive therapy. Even in this older population 40–60% CR rates are achievable. Several scoring systems and web-based programs help to predict TRM and CR rates. These sources can assist physicians in the difficult decision-making process of aggressive therapy in an individual patient. Clofarabine and hypomethylating agents are reasonable options and can induce CR in patients who cannot receive standard induction with anthracyclines and cytarabine. Despite encouraging CR rates, median survival remains short (<12 months) in elderly AML patients. Even those patients achieving CR have limited long-term survival (∼20% at 3 years) without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). AlloHCT is feasible and can provide approximately 40% survival at 2 years in appropriately selected patients. Although increased age is associated with poorer survival, higher comorbidities and poor performance status have more negative impact than age per se. The short duration of CR demands that leukemia and transplant physicians collaborate immediately after diagnosis to move quickly toward alloHCT. This collaboration is also essential to choosing the right individuals to transplant and to bridging post-remission therapy (intermediate-dose cytarabine, a hypomethylating agent or FLT-3 inhibitor) in this sometimes frail population. Future studies should be designed not only to address who should receive alloHCT, but also to improve our understanding of AML biology and the process of its cure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klepin HD, Balducci L . Acute myelogenous leukemia in older adults. Oncologist 2009; 14: 222–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bureau USC 2010 Census shows 65 and older population growing faster than total U.S. population. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb11-cn192.html.

  3. Oran B, Weisdorf DJ . Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study. Haematologica 2012; 97: 1916–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Juliusson G . Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia benefit from intensive chemotherapy: an update from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2011; 11 (Suppl 1): S54–S59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oshima K, Takahashi W, Asano-Mori Y, Izutsu K, Takahashi T, Arai Y et al. Intensive chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myelogeneous leukemia: a propensity score analysis by the Japan Hematology and Oncology Clinical Study Group (J-Hocs). Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 1533–1539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baz R, Rodriguez C, Fu AZ, Jawde RA, Kalaycio M, Advani A et al. Impact of remission induction chemotherapy on survival in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2007; 110: 1752–1759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Mollgard L, Stockelberg D et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood 2009; 113: 4179–4187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Juliusson G, Lazarevic V, Horstedt AS, Hagberg O, Hoglund M, Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry G. Acute myeloid leukemia in the real world: why population-based registries are needed. Blood 2012; 119: 3890–3899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2006; 107: 3481–3485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mrozek K, Marcucci G, Nicolet D, Maharry KS, Becker H, Whitman SP et al. Prognostic significance of the European Leukemianet Standardized System for reporting cytogenetic and molecular alterations in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 4515–4523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, Oliver F, Chatters S, Harrison CJ et al. The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 Trial. Blood 2001; 98: 1312–1320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wedding U, Rohrig B, Klippstein A, Fricke HJ, Sayer HG, Hoffken K . Impairment in functional status and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132: 665–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walter RB, Othus M, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Cortes JE, Pierce SA et al. Prediction of early death after induction therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with pretreatment risk scores: a novel paradigm for treatment assignment. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4417–4423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 2005; 106: 2912–2919.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Swords R, Santini V . In elderly patients with AML, which patients should be considered fit or unfit for standard induction therapy? Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012; 2012: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Djunic I, Virijevic M, Novkovic A, Djurasinovic V, Colovic N, Vidovic A et al. Comorbidity as a risk factor for overall survival and decision criteria for intensity of chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Med Oncol 2012; 29: 1077–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giles FJ, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Verstovsek S, Thomas D et al. The haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index score is predictive of early death and survival in patients over 60 years of age receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Brit J Haematol 2007; 136: 624–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Etienne A, Esterni B, Charbonnier A, Mozziconacci MJ, Arnoulet C, Coso D et al. Comorbidity is an independent predictor of complete remission in elderly patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2007; 109: 1376–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Breccia M, Frustaci AM, Cannella L, Stefanizzi C, Latagliata R, Cartoni C et al. Comorbidities and Flt3-Itd abnormalities as independent prognostic indicators of survival in elderly acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Hematol Oncol 2009; 27: 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krug U, Rollig C, Koschmieder A, Heinecke A, Sauerland MC, Schaich M et al. Complete remission and early death after intensive chemotherapy in patients aged 60 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia: a web-based application for prediction of outcomes. Lancet 2010; 376: 2000–2008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G et al. Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 4422–4429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wheatley K, Brookes CL, Howman AJ, Goldstone AH, Milligan DW, Prentice AG et al. Prognostic factor analysis of the survival of elderly patients with AML in the MRC AML11 and LRF AML14 trials. Br J Haematol 2009; 145: 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valcarcel D, Montesinos P, Sanchez-Ortega I, Brunet S, Esteve J, Martinez-Cuadron D et al. A Scoring system to predict the risk of death during induction with anthracycline plus cytarabine-based chemotherapy in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2012; 118: 410–417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gardin C, Turlure P, Fagot T, Thomas X, Terre C, Contentin N et al. Postremission treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy: results of the Multicenter Randomized Acute Leukemia French Association (Alfa) 9803 Trial. Blood 2007; 109: 5129–5135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lowenberg B, Ossenkoppele GJ, van Putten W, Schouten HC, Graux C, Ferrant A et al. High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1235–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, Wierzbowska A, Mazur G, Mayer J et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2670–2677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lubbert M, Ruter BH, Claus R, Schmoor C, Schmid M, Germing U et al. A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy. Haematologica 2012; 97: 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blum W, Garzon R, Klisovic RB, Schwind S, Walker A, Geyer S et al. Clinical response and Mir-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 7473–7478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cashen AF, Schiller GJ, O'Donnell MR, DiPersio JF . Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 556–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Faderl S, Ravandi F, Huang X, Wang X, Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G et al. Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine followed by clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia frontline therapy for older patients. Cancer 2012; 118: 4471–4477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Kell J, Dennis M, Milligan D, Paolini S et al. European development of clofarabine as treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2389–2395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kantarjian HM, Erba HP, Claxton D, Arellano M, Lyons RM, Kovascovics T et al. Phase II study of clofarabine monotherapy in previously untreated older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and unfavorable prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 549–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pollyea DA, Zehnder J, Coutre S, Gotlib J, Gallegos L, Abdel-Wahab O et al. Sequential azacitidine plus lenalidomide combination for elderly patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2012; 98: 591–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fehniger TA, Uy GL, Trinkaus K, Nelson AD, Demland J, Abboud CN et al. A phase 2 study of high-dose lenalidomide as initial therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011; 117: 1828–1833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sekeres MA, Gundacker H, Lancet J, Advani A, Petersdorf S, Liesveld J et al. A phase 2 study of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with deletion 5q acute myeloid leukemia: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0605. Blood 2011; 118: 523–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stone RM, Berg DT, George SL, Dodge RK, Paciucci PA, Schulman PP et al. Postremission therapy in older patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and intermediate-dose cytarabine with standard-dose cytarabine. Blood 2001; 98: 548–553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schlenk RF, Frohling S, Hartmann F, Fischer JT, Glasmacher A, del Valle F et al. Phase III study of all-trans retinoic acid in previously untreated patients 61 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2004; 18: 1798–1803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lowenberg B, Beck J, Graux C, van Putten W, Schouten HC, Verdonck LF et al. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin as postremission treatment in aml at 60 years of age or more: results of a multicenter phase 3 study. Blood 2010; 115: 2586–2591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Frohling S, Schlenk RF, Kayser S, Morhardt M, Benner A, Dohner K et al. Cytogenetics and Age are major determinants of outcome in intensively treated acute myeloid leukemia patients older than 60 years: results from AMLSG Trial AML HD98-B. Blood 2006; 108: 3280–3288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tallman MS, Rowlings PA, Milone G, Zhang MJ, Perez WS, Weisdorf D et al. Effect of postremission chemotherapy before human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission. Blood 2000; 96: 1254–1258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCormack SE, Cao Q, Oran B, Weisdorf DJ, Warlick ED . Pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy may not improve outcomes after reduced intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. Leuk Res 2011; 35: 757–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lazarus HM, Rowe JM . Reduced-intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia: is this strategy correct. Leukemia 2006; 20: 1673–1682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Storb R . Can reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation cure older adults with AML? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007; 20: 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Champlin R, Khouri I, Anderlini P, De Lima M, Hosing C, McMannis J et al. Nonmyeloablative preparative regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation - biology and current indications. Oncology (New York) 2003; 17: 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koreth J, Aldridge J, Kim HT, Alyea EP 3rd, Cutler C, Armand P et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients over 60 years: hematologic malignancy outcomes are not impaired in advanced age. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 792–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sorror ML, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, Franke GN, Laport GG, Chauncey TR et al. Long-term outcomes among older patients following nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. JAMA 2011; 306: 1874–1883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. McClune BL, Weisdorf DJ, Pedersen TL, da Silva GT, Tallman MS, Sierra J et al. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1878–1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chevallier P, Szydlo RM, Blaise D, Tabrizi R, Michallet M, Uzunov M et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients over 60 years: a report from the Sfgm-Tc. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ostronoff F, Storer B, Storb R, Bhatia R, Maziarz R, Pulsipher M et al. Interaction of age and comorbidities and their impacts on hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. Blood 2011; 118 abstarc 665.

  50. Majhail NS, Brunstein CG, Shanley R, Sandhu K, McClune B, Oran B et al. Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with AML/MDS: umbilical cord blood is a feasible option for patients without HLA-matched sibling donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 494–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ucbida N, Wake A, Takagi S, Yamamoto H, Kato D, Matsuhashi Y et al. Umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning for elderly patients with hematologic diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. de Latour R, Brunstein CG, Porcher R, Chevallier P, Robin M, Warlick ED et al. Similar outcome between siblings, unrelated donors and cord blood after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission. Blood 2012; 120 (abstract 1985).

  53. Farag SS, Maharry K, Zhang MJ, Perez WS, George SL, Mrozek K et al. Comparison of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation with chemotherapy in patients age 60–70 years with acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1796–1803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kurosawa S, Yamaguchi T, Uchida N, Miyawaki S, Usuki K, Watanabe M et al. Comparison of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-M3 acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Devine S, Owzar K, Blum W, DeAngelo D, Sotone R, Hsu J et al. A phase II Study of allogeneic transplantation for older patients with AML in first complete remission using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen: result from CALGB 100103/BMT CTN 0502. Blood 2012 (abstract 230).

  56. Deschler B, Binek K, Ihorst G, Marks R, Wasch R, Bertz H et al. Prognostic factor and quality of life analysis in 160 patients aged &gt;or =60 years with hematologic neoplasias treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 967–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T et al. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Offner F, Cordonnier C, Ljungman P, Prentice HG, Engelhard D, De Bacquer D et al. Impact of previous aspergillosis on the outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1098–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fukuda T, Boeckh M, Guthrie KA, Mattson DK, Owens S, Wald A et al. Invasive aspergillosis before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 10-year experience at a single transplant center. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004; 10: 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shimoni A, Hardan I, Shem-Tov N, Yeshurun M, Yerushalmi R, Avigdor A et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in AML and MDS using myeloablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning: the role of dose intensity. Leukemia 2006; 20: 322–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Duval M, Klein JP, He WS, Cahn JY, Cairo M, Camitta BM et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3730–3738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Oran B, Giralt S, Saliba R, Hosing C, Popat U, Khouri I et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome using reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and melphalan. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 454–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sayer HG, Kroger M, Beyer J, Kiehl M, Klein SA, Schaefer-Eckart K et al. Reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: disease status by marrow blasts is the strongest prognostic factor. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 1089–1095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Paschka P, Marcucci G, Ruppert AS, Mrozek K, Chen HK, Kittles RA et al. Adverse prognostic significance of kit mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia with Inv(16) and T(8;21): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3904–3911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Jourdan E, Boissel N, Chevret S, Delabesse E, Renneville A, Cornillet P et al. Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML). Blood 2013; 121: 2213–2223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European Leukemianet. Blood 2010; 115: 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hengeveld M, Suciu S, Karrasch M, Specchia G, Marie JP, Muus P et al. Intensive consolidation therapy compared with standard consolidation and maintenance therapy for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia aged between 46 and 60 years: final results of the randomized phase III Study (AML 8b) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne Dell'adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 825–835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Boumber Y, Kantarjian H, Jorgensen J, Wen S, Faderl S, Castoro R et al. A randomized study of decitabine versus conventional care for maintenance therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission. Leukemia 2012; 26: 2428–2431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Buyse M, Squifflet P, Lange BJ, Alonzo TA, Larson RA, Kolitz JE et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating il-2 monotherapy as remission maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011; 117: 7007–7013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. de Lima M, Giralt S, Thall PF, de Padua Silva L, Jones RB, Komanduri K et al. maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study. Cancer 2010; 116: 5420–5431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ustun C, Kalla A, Farrow S, Deremer DL, Jillella A . Decitabine as “bridge therapy” to a mud transplant in relapsed aml postautologous stem cell transplantation. Am J Hematol 2008; 83: 825–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lubbert M, Bertz H, Ruter B, Marks R, Claus R, Wasch R et al. Non-intensive treatment with low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Dac) prior to allogeneic blood sct of older MDS/AML patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 585–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Stone RM . Is it time to revisit standard post-remission therapy? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2012; 25: 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. de Lima M, McNiece I, Robinson SN, Munsell M, Eapen M, Horowitz M et al. Cord-blood engraftment with ex vivo mesenchymal-cell coculture. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2305–2315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Brunstein CG, Weisdorf DJ . Future of cord blood for oncology uses. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 699–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hematology-Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    C Ustun & D Weisdorf

  2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, CaseWestern Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    H M Lazarus

Authors
  1. C Ustun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H M Lazarus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Weisdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Weisdorf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ustun, C., Lazarus, H. & Weisdorf, D. To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 1497–1505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.67

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.67

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links