Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Transplant Outcomes

A prospective registration study to determine feasibility of hematopoietic SCT in adults with acute leukemia: planning, expectations and reality

Abstract

For adults with acute leukemia, it is important to know whether the therapeutic schemes initially planned were actually implemented. The European Group for Blood and Marrow transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party prospectively followed 695 consecutive patients who were registered at the time of HLA typing. Of 304 patients with an available matched sibling donor (MSD), SCT was planned in 264, chemotherapy in 33 and autografting in 7. For the rest, an unrelated donor (UD) search was initiated in 198. Among these, 117 were transplanted, 114 received chemotherapy and 77 underwent autografting. Probabilities of receiving a planned treatment were 60 and 65% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Patients scheduled to receive MSD SCT had an 82% probability, whereas those scheduled to undergo UD SCT had a 57% probability, of receiving their transplant at 1 year. The only factor associated with a lower probability of MSD SCT in first remission was delayed HLA typing (HR=0.82; P=0.03). One year after enrollment, 40% of patients did not follow their initial treatment plan. Because OS was 50% only at 3 years and only 57% of the patients without a MSD underwent SCT, this suggests room for improvement in outcomes for adults with acute leukemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Gratwohl A, Bregni M, Cesaro S, Dreger P et al. The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 906–923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gratwohl A . Cord blood meets its match. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 1177–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldomero H, Gratwohl M, Gratwohl A, Tichelli A, Niederwieser D, Madrigal A et al. The EBMT activity survey 2009: trends over the past 5 years. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 485–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ljungman P, Bregni M, Brune M, Cornelissen J, de Witte T, Dini G et al. Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe 2009. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 219–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H . European survey on clinical use of cord blood for hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic indications. Transfus Apher Sci 2010; 42: 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vellenga E, van Putten W, Ossenkoppele GJ, Verdonck LF, Theobald M, Cornelissen JJ et al. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011; 118: 6037–6042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suciu S . on behalf of the AMLcgoE. Metaanalysis of randomised trials comparing autologous BMT (ABMT) vs chemotherapy (CT) or ABMT vs no further treatment (NFT) as post remission treatment in adult AML patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 43a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cornelissen JJ, Gratwohl A, Schlenk RF, Sierra J, Bornhauser M, Juliusson G et al. The European LeukemiaNet AML Working Party consensus statement on allogeneic HSCT for patients with AML in remission: an integrated-risk adapted approach. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012; 9: 579–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hehlmann R, Grimwade D, Simonsson B, Apperley J, Baccarani M, Barbui T et al. The European LeukemiaNet: achievements and perspectives. Haematologica 2011; 96: 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine JPG, R.J . A proportional hazards model for subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruggeri A, Rocha V, Masson E, Labopin M, Cunha R, Absi L et al. Impact of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies on graft failure and survival after reduced intensity conditioning-unrelated cord blood transplantation. A Eurocord, Societe Francophone d'Histocompatibilite et d'Immunogenetique (SFHI) and Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) analysis. Haematologica 2013; 98: 1154–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scaradavou A, Brunstein CG, Eapen M, Le-Rademacher J, Barker JN, Chao N et al. Double unit grafts successfully extend the application of umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia. Blood 2013; 121: 752–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolanos-Meade J, Fuchs EJ, Luznik L, Lanzkron SM, Gamper CJ, Jones RJ et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide expands the donor pool for patients with sickle cell disease. Blood 2012; 120: 4285–4291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang XJ, Zhu HH, Chang YJ, Xu LP, Liu DH, Zhang XH et al. The superiority of haploidentical related stem cell transplantation over chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. Blood 2012; 119: 5584–5590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, Lazarus HM, Rowe JM, Paietta E et al. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1649–1656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harousseau JL, Cahn JY, Pignon B, Witz F, Milpied N, Delain M et al. Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive chemotherapy as postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia. The Groupe Ouest Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM). Blood 1997; 90: 2978–2986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zittoun RA, Mandelli F, Willemze R, de Witte T, Labar B, Resegotti L et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 217–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Giebel S, Labopin M, Ehninger G, Beelen D, Blaise D, Ganser A et al. Association of human development index with rates and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 122–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Velardi A . Haplo-BMT: which approach? Blood 2013; 121: 719–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N-C Gorin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labopin, M., Gorin, NC., Polge, E. et al. A prospective registration study to determine feasibility of hematopoietic SCT in adults with acute leukemia: planning, expectations and reality. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 376–381 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.178

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.178

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links