Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Quantification of minimal residual disease levels by flow cytometry at time of transplant predicts outcome after myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in ALL

Abstract

The potential impact on patient outcome of different Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels at time of transplant in patients with lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) remains uncertain. In this study, we quantified MRD levels at time of transplant using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). Mononuclear cells from marrow aspirates were obtained from 102 adult and child patients before their conditioning regimen. Quantification of MRD levels was carried out by detecting patient-specific leukemia-associated immunophenotypes using four-color MFC. Thirty patients exhibited measurable levels of MRD at the time of transplant, with low levels (0.01 to 0.1%) in 12 cases, intermediate levels (>0.1 to 1%) in 8 cases and high levels (>1%) in 10 cases. The leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 65.9±7.0%, 42.9±15.7% and 0% for negative, low levels 0.1% and intermediate-high levels >0.1%, respectively (P<0.001, log-rank test). Overall survival (OS) was 52.3±7.6%, 28.6±13.8% and 0% for MRD-negative, low levels 0.1% and intermediate-high levels >0.1%, respectively (P<0.001, log-rank test). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that detection of leukemia cells by flow cytometry at transplant was the most significantly adverse factor for OS, LFS and EFS after transplant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT . Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet 2008; 371: 1030–1043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith AR, Baker KS, Defor TE, Verneris MR, Wagner JE, Macmillan ML . Hematopoietic cell transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second complete remission: similar outcomes in recipients of unrelated marrow and umbilical cord blood versus marrow from HLA matched sibling donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1086–1093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomblyn MB, Arora M, Baker KS, Blazar BR, Brunstein CG, Burns LJ et al. Myeloablative hematopoyetic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: analysis of graft sources and long-term outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3634–3641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferra C, Sanz J, de la Camara R, Sanz G, Bermudez A, Valcarcel D et al. Unrelated transplantation for poor-prognosis adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: long-term outcome analysis and study of the impact of hematopoietic graft source. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 957–966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiehl MG, Kraut L, Schwerdtfeger R, Hertenstein B, Remberger M, Kroeger N et al. Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: no difference in related compared with unrelated transplant in first complete remission. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2816–2825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood 2008; 111: 1827–1833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S, Cho BS, Kim SY, Choi SM, Lee DG, Eom KS et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission enhances graft-versus-leukemia effect in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: antileukemic activity of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 1083–1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Hancock ML, Boyett JM, Behm FG, Raimondi SC et al. Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2000; 96: 2691–2696.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vidriales MB, Pérez JJ, López-Berges MC, Gutiérrez N, Ciudad J, Lucio P et al. Minimal residual disease in adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias: early immunophenotypic evaluation has high clinical value. Blood 2003; 101: 4695–4700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campana D . Minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2010; 2010: 7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sramkova L, Muzikova K, Fronkova E, Krejci O, Sedlacek P, Formankova R et al. Detectable minimal residual disease before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts extremely poor prognosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 48: 93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krejci O, van der Velden VH, Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Goulden N, Hancock J et al. Level of minimal residual disease prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts prognosis in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a report of the Pre-BMT MRD Study Group. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 849–851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goulden N, Bader P, Van Der Velden V, Moppett J, Schilham M, Masden HO et al. Minimal residual disease prior to stem cell transplant for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2003; 122: 24–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bader P, Hancock J, Kreyenberg H, Goulden NJ, Niethammer D, Oakhill A et al. Minimal residual disease (MRD) status prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a powerful predictor for post-transplant outcome in children with ALL. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1668–1672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knechtli CJ, Goulden NJ, Hancock JP, Grandage VL, Harris EL, Garland RJ et al. Minimal residual disease status before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is an important determinant of successful outcome for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1998; 92: 4072–4079.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Velden VH, Joosten SA, Willemse MJ, van Wering ER, Lankester AW, van Dongen JJ et al. Real-time quantitative PCR for detection of minimal residual disease before allogeneic stem cell transplantation predicts outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2001; 15: 1485–1487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uzunel M, Mattsson J, Jaksch M, Remberger M, Ringdén O . The significance of graft-versus-host disease and pretransplantation minimal residual disease status to outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2001; 98: 1982–1984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Henze GH, Eckert C, Reising M, Willasch A et al. Prognostic value of minimal residual disease quantification before allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the ALL-REZ BFM Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 377–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung W, Campana D, Yang J, Pei D, Coustan-Smith E, Gan K et al. High success of hematopoietic cell transplantation regardless of donor source in children with very high-risk leukemia. Blood 2011; 118: 223–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Elorza I, Palacio C, Dapena JL, Gallur L, de Toledo JS, de Heredia CD . Relationship between minimal residual disease measured by multiparametric flow cytometry prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2010; 95: 936–941.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Foster JH, Hawkins DS, Loken MR, Wells DA, Thomson B . Minimal residual disease detected prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 163–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doney K, Gooley TA, Deeg HJ, Flowers ME, Storb R, Appelbaum FR . Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with full-intensity conditioning for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a single center, 1998–2006. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanchez J, Serrano J, Gomez P, Martinez F, Martin C, Madero L et al. Clinical value of immunological monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2002; 116: 686–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanchez-Garcia J, Serrano J, Gomez P, Martinez F, Martin C, Roman-Gomez J et al. The impact of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease on normal and malignant B-lymphoid precursors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2006; 91: 340–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spinelli O, Peruta B, Tosi M, Guerini V, Salvi A, Zanotti MC et al. Clearance of minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the prediction of the clinical outcome of adult patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2007; 92: 612–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coustan-Smith E, Campana D . Immunologic minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparative approach to molecular testing. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2010; 23: 347–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dworzak MN, Gaipa G, Ratei R, Veltroni M, Schumich A, Maglia O et al. Standardization of flow cytometric minimal residual disease evaluation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Multicentric assessment is feasible. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2008; 74: 331–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coustan-Smith E, Song G, Clark C, Key L, Liu P, Mehrpooya M et al. New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2011; 117: 6267–6276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Topp MS, Kufer P, Gökbuget N, Goebeler M, Klinger M, Neumann S et al. Targeted therapy with the T-cell-engaging antibody blinatumomab of chemotherapy-refractory minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients results in high response rate and prolonged leukemia-free survival. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2493–2498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pulsipher MA, Bader P, Klingebiel T, Cooper LJ . Allogeneic transplantation for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the emerging role of peritransplantation minimal residual disease/chimerism monitoring and novel chemotherapeutic, molecular, and immune approaches aimed at preventing relapse. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15 (S1): 62–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, Dueckers G, Handgretinger R, Lang P et al. Increasing mixed chimerism is an important prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: possible role for pre-emptive immunotherapy? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1696–1705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weber G, Karbach J, Kuçi S, Kreyenberg H, Willasch A, Koscielniak E et al. WT1 peptide-specific T cells generated from peripheral blood of healthy donors: possible implications for adoptive immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2009; 23: 1634–1642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion BFU2009-11826, by Asociacion Medicina e Investigación (AMI) and by a donation form ‘Instituto Roche para las soluciones Integrales en Salud’. J Serrano-Lopez has a fellowship from Spanish Foundation of Hematology and Hemotherapy (FEHH) and Fundación Reina Sofía de Córdoba.

Author contributions: JS-G, JSL and AT-G designed the study. JS-G, JS-L and JMG-C performed cytometric assays. PG-G, FM, RR, CM, AR-V, JRM-H and JC collected patient samples and clinical data. JS-G, JSL and MAA performed statistical analyses and interpreted data. JS-G wrote the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and gave their final approval. JS-G is responsible of figures and tables.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Sanchez-Garcia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Bone Marrow Transplantation website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanchez-Garcia, J., Serrano, J., Serrano-Lopez, J. et al. Quantification of minimal residual disease levels by flow cytometry at time of transplant predicts outcome after myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in ALL. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 396–402 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.147

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links