Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

The impact of center experience on results of reduced intensity: allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for AML. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC-HSCT) is increasingly adopted for the treatment of older adults with AML. Our goal was to verify for the first time, if center experience influences outcome of RIC-HSCT. Results of 1413 transplantations from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors for adult patients with AML in first CR were analyzed according to the level of center activity. Transplants were performed in 203 European centers between 2001 and 2007. The 2-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) after RIC-HSCT performed in centers with the lowest activity (15 procedures/7 years) was 43±3% compared with 55±2% in the remainder (P<0.001). The incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 24±3% and 15±1% (P=0.004), whilst relapse rate was 33±3% and 31±1% (P=0.33), respectively. In a multivariate model, adjusted for other prognostic factors, low RIC-HSCT activity was associated with decreased chance of LFS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.64; P<0.001) and increased risk of NRM (HR=1.47, P=0.04) and relapse (HR=1.41, P=0.01). Center experience is a very important predictor of outcome and should be considered in future analyses evaluating the results of RIC-HSCT. The reasons why centers with low RIC-HSCT activity have worse outcomes should be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frassoni F, Labopin M, Powles R, Mary JY, Arcese W, Bacigalupo A et al. Effect of centre on outcome of bone-marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet 2000; 355: 1393–1398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horowitz MM, Przepiorka D, Champlin RE, Gale RP, Gratwohl A, Herzig RH et al. Should HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for leukemia be restricted to large centers? Blood 1992; 79: 2771–2774.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giebel S, Labopin M, Ehninger G, Beelen D, Blaise D, Ganser A et al. Association of Human Development Index with rates and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 122–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gratwohl A, Brand R, Niederwieser D, Baldomero H, Chabannon C, Cornelissen J et al. Introduction of a quality management system and outcome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1980–1986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, van Besien K, Rondón G, Anderlini P et al. Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy. Blood 1997; 89: 4531–4536.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, Kapelushnik Y, Aker M, Cividalli G et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood 1998; 91: 756–763.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Appelbaum FR . Hematopoietic-cell transplantation at 50. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1472–1475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ljungman P, Urbano-Ispizua A, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Demirer T, Dini G, Einsele H et al. Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: definitions and current practice in Europe. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 439–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohty M, de Lavallade H, Ladaique P, Faucher C, Vey N, Coso D et al. The role of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a donor vs no donor comparison. Leukemia 2005; 19: 916–920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoudjhane M, Labopin M, Gorin NC, Shimoni A, Ruutu T, Kolb HJ et al. Comparative outcome of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimen in HLA identical sibling allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age with acute myeloblastic leukaemia: a retrospective survey from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Leukemia 2005; 19: 2304–2312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forman SJ . What is the role of reduced-intensity transplantation in the treatment of older patients with AML? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009, 406–413.

  12. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Passweg J, Urbano-Ispizua A . European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Accreditation Committee. Increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning transplants: report of the 2001 EBMT activity survey. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 813–831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Schwendener A, Rocha V, Apperley J, Frauendorfer K . The EBMT activity survey 2007 with focus on allogeneic HSCT for AML and novel cellular therapies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 275–291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blaise D, Vey N, Faucher C, Mohty M . Current status of reduced-intensity-conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2007; 92: 533–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE . Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fine JP, Gray RJ . A proportional hazards model for subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SJ, Joffe S, Artz AS, Champlin RE, Davies SM, Jagasia M et al. Individual physician practice variation in hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 2162–2170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SJ, Astigarraga CC, Eapen M, Artz AS, Davies SM, Champlin R et al. Variation in supportive care practices in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 1231–1238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Loberiza FR, Zhang MJ, Lee SJ, Klein JP, LeMaistre CF, Serna DS et al. Association of transplant center and physician factors on mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States. Blood 2005; 105: 2979–2987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesnil F, Jouet JP, Tuppin P, Vernant JP, Golmard JL . Evaluation of centre and period effects in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in France. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 34: 645–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Morishima Y, Harada M . Hospital capacity and post-transplant survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: analysis of data from the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 1061–1067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Giebel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giebel, S., Labopin, M., Mohty, M. et al. The impact of center experience on results of reduced intensity: allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for AML. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 238–242 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.131

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links