Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Data Registration

Stem cell transplantation in children: how to design a new study

Abstract

In contrast to adults, 50% or more of medicines used in children have never been actually studied in the paediatric population in the European Union community (EU). Under the impression that compliance with good clinical practice (GCP) requirements will lead to an improved quality of clinical trials, the ratification of the EU Directive 2001/20/EG now imposes the same GCP regulations demanded for commercial clinical trials on non-commercial trials or so-called investigator-initiated trials (IITs). Although it is desirable that all clinical trials comply with ICH–GCP, ensuring that an IIT conforms creates a significant burden for the principal investigator, turning an IIT into a substantial logistic, administrative and financial enterprise. This can only be achieved with a multidisciplinary approach, including physicians, statisticians, data managers, administrators and others. In particular, ‘treatment optimization studies’—the most important clinical trials in paediatric oncology—are affected by this new law, potentially resulting in significant delays in the implementation of new and innovative treatment strategies in the paediatric population. This significant drawback was not foreseen but is now recognized and lead to measures to improve the situation for both non-commercial and paediatric clinical trials. Draft guidance on ‘specific modalities for non-commercial trials’, posted for comment last October, attempts to redress some of the research-crippling problems caused by the initial legislation; however, major problems remain. The EU regulation (EC) no. 1901/2006 ‘on medicinal products for paediatric use’ was enacted in January 2007. This new regulation is a promising step in the right direction, as it will facilitate the development and accessibility of medicinal products specifically for use in children. To adapt to and benefit from this new situation and encourage IIT, a coordinated approach of high expertise is necessary to support and guide the novice in the field of IIT to successfully launch, conduct and complete clinical trials especially in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bull JP . The historical development of clinical therapeutic trials. J Chronic Dis 1959; 10: 218–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. The Digitalis Investigation Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 525–533.

  3. Silverman WA . The lesson of retrolental fibroplasia. Sci Am 1977; 236: 100–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Medicine CfEB. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. In: Oxford-Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (http://www.cebm.net); 2001.

  5. Conroy S, Choonara I, Impicciatore P, Mohn A, Arnell H, Rane A et al. Survey of unlicensed and off label drug use in paediatric wards in European countries. European network for drug investigation in children. BMJ 2000; 320: 79–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner S, Nunn AJ, Fielding K, Choonara I . Adverse drug reactions to unlicensed and off-label drugs on paediatric wards: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 965–968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choonara I . Clinical trials of medicines in children. BMJ 2000; 321: 1093–1094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirkey H . Therapeutic orphans. J Pediatr 1968; 72: 119–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Banik N . Evaluation of EDC Versus Paper in a Multinational Asthma Trial. Presented at the DIA European Data Management Meeting. Berlin, October, 1998.

  10. Barrett MJ, Brown EG, Twist AE . The Forrester Report: Web Clinical Trials Break Through. July, 2001 (http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/faculty/Sirkka.Jarvenpaa/spring2002/strategy/Forrester%20Web%20based%20clinical%20trials%20EXCELLENT1.pdf).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Zoe Doran for helpful discussions and for reviewing the paper prior to submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Corbacioglu.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

SC is currently in receipt of a grant from Gentium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbacioglu, S., on behalf of the EBMT Paediatric Working Party. Stem cell transplantation in children: how to design a new study. Bone Marrow Transplant 41 (Suppl 2), S30–S34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.51

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.51

Keywords

Search

Quick links