Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Slow platelet recovery after PBPC transplantation from unrelated donors

Abstract

The effects of the composition of PBPC grafts from matched related donors (MRDs) and matched unrelated donors (MUDs) have not been compared. In a single-center study, the compositions of 55 MRD PBPC grafts and 33 MUD grafts were studied for their effect on the rate of engraftment in patients who had evidence of donor cell engraftment on day +28. The MUD grafts came more frequently from young male donors and contained more CD34+ cells but similar numbers of colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst forming units-erythroid. The recovery of neutrophils to >500/mm3 was equally fast in both groups, but recovery of platelets to >20 000/mm3 was significantly delayed in the MUD group (P<0.001). The MUD group also required more transfusions of platelets and red cells. Patients receiving grafts containing low numbers of CFU-GM had markedly delayed platelet recovery. The patients with the slowest engraftment tended to have prolonged transportation times. Storage experiments suggested a major loss of viable CD34+ cells and CFU-GM when undiluted PBPC products are stored at room temperature. The data suggest that a fraction of the MUD grafts suffer during transportation. In vitro proliferation assays should be part of the validation and auditing of transportation of MUD grafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacigalupo A, Frassoni F, Van Lint M . Bone marrow or peripheral blood as a source of stem cells for allogeneic transplants. Curr Opin Hematol 2000; 7: 343–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cutler C, Antin JH . Peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation: a review. Stem Cells 2001; 19: 108–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B, Clift R, Forman SJ, Negrin R et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared to peripheral blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stem Cell Trialists' Collaborative Group. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell compared with bone marrow transplantation in the management of hematologic malignancies: an individual patient data meta-analysis of nine randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5074–5087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BMT CTN. A phase III randomized multi-center trial comparing G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell with marrow transplantation from HLA-compatible unrelated donors. http://web.emmes.com/study/bmt/protocol/0201__protocol/0201__protocol.html.

  6. Haynes A, Hunter A, McQuaker G, Anderson S, Bienz N, Russell NH . Engraftment characteristics of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with cyclophosphamide and the delayed addition of G-CSF. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 16: 359–363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shpall EJ, Champlin R, Glaspy JA . Effect of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cell dose on hematopoietic recovery. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1998; 4: 84–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen EM, Hanks SG, Terry C, Akard LP, Thompson JM, Dugan MJ et al. Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, CFU-GM, or both? Transfusion 2007; 47: 817–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Burch B, Palmer P, Allen C, Schwarzenberg L et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy. Blood 1995; 86: 3961–3969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderlini P, Körbling M . The use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from normal donors for allografting. Stem Cells 1997; 15: 9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miffin G, Russell NH, Hutchinson RM, Morgan G, Potter M, Pagliuca A et al. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies—an analysis of kinetics of engraftment and GVHD risk. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mavroudis D, Read E, Cottler-Fox M, Couriel D, Molldrem J, Carter C et al. CD34+ cells dose predicts survival, post-transplant morbidity, and rate of hematologic recovery after allogeneic marrow transplants for hematologic malignancies. Blood 1996; 88: 3223–3229.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Urbano-Ispizua A, Solano C, Brunet S, Hernandez F, Sanz G, Alegre A et al. Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: analysis of short-term engraftment and acute GVHD incidence in 33 cases. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 35–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kottaridis PD, Milligan DW, Chopra R, Chakraverty RK, Chakrabarti S, Robinson S et al. In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation. Blood 2000; 96: 2419–2425.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neumann F, Graef T, Tapprich C, Vaupel M, Steidl U, Germing U et al. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil vs cyclosporine A and methotrexate for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 1089–1093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies SM, Kollman C, Anasetti C, Antin JH, Gajewski J, Casper JT et al. Engraftment and survival after unrelated-donor bone marrow transplantation: a report from the National Marrow Donor Program. Blood 2000; 96: 4096–4102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stroncek DF, Confer DL, Leitman SF . Peripheral blood progenitor cells for HPC transplants involving unrelated donors. Transfusion 2000; 40: 731–741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderlini P, Lauppe J, Przepiorka D, Seong D, Champlin R, Korbling M . Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis in normal donors: feasibility and yield of second collections. Br J Haematol 1997; 96: 415–417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Jansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansen, J., Hanks, S., Akard, L. et al. Slow platelet recovery after PBPC transplantation from unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 43, 499–505 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.346

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links