Abstract
Background:
Identification of tumour antigens is crucial for the development of vaccination strategies against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most studies come from eastern-Asia, where hepatitis-B is the main cause of HCC. However, tumour antigen expression is poorly studied in low-endemic, western areas where the aetiology of HCC differs.
Methods:
We constructed tissue microarrays from resected HCC tissue of 133 patients. Expression of a comprehensive panel of cancer-testis (MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3/4, MAGE-A10, MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, NY-ESO-1, SSX-2, sperm protein 17), onco-fetal (AFP, Glypican-3) and overexpressed tumour antigens (Annexin-A2, Wilms tumor-1, Survivin, Midkine, MUC-1) was determined by immunohistochemistry.
Results:
A higher prevalence of MAGE antigens was observed in patients with hepatitis-B. Patients with expression of more tumour antigens in general had better HCC-specific survival (P=0.022). The four tumour antigens with high expression in HCC and no, or weak, expression in surrounding tumour-free-liver tissue, were Annexin-A2, GPC-3, MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2, expressed in 90, 39, 17 and 20% of HCCs, respectively. Ninety-five percent of HCCs expressed at least one of these four tumour antigens. Interestingly, GPC-3 was associated with SALL-4 expression (P=0.001), an oncofetal transcription factor highly expressed in embryonal stem cells. SALL-4 and GPC-3 expression levels were correlated with vascular invasion, poor differentiation and higher AFP levels before surgery. Moreover, patients who co-expressed higher levels of both GPC-3 and SALL-4 had worse HCC-specific survival (P=0.018).
Conclusions:
We describe a panel of four tumour antigens with excellent coverage and good tumour specificity in a western area, low-endemic for hepatitis-B. The association between GPC-3 and SALL-4 is a novel finding and suggests that GPC-3 targeting may specifically attack the tumour stem-cell compartment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, with over half a million deaths per year worldwide (El-Serag et al, 2001; Jemal et al, 2011). HCC is more prevalent in eastern Asia (Jemal et al, 2011) where hepatitis-B (HBV) accounts for 65% of HCC cases (Perz et al, 2006). In contrast, western Europe is a low-endemic area where HBV is not the main cause of HCC (Perz et al, 2006), and HCC is often diagnosed in non-cirrhotic livers (Verhoef et al, 2004; Witjes et al, 2012). However, it is estimated that the incidence of HCC is expected to continue to rise significantly in western Europe and North America due to the hepatitis C virus infections during the 1960s and 1970s (IARC, 2011).
Primary treatment for early-stage disease includes resection, local ablation and, in selected cases, liver transplantation. However, only 20% of patients are candidates for curative procedures (El-Serag et al, 2008). Once the cancer is advanced cure is no longer possible and median survival is a dismal 6–8 months, which can be extended to 10–13 months with the addition of sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Llovet et al, 2008; Abou-Alfa et al, 2010).
Recognition of the important role of the immune system in cancer surveillance and elimination (Zou, 2005) has led to the development of various immunotherapeutic strategies against cancer (Mellman et al, 2011). One such strategy, cancer vaccination, holds great promise, as has been recently demonstrated in prostate cancer (Kantoff et al, 2010a, 2010b). In HCC, cancer vaccine trials have shown promising results, in particular after local therapy to prevent relapses (Kuang et al, 2004; Lee et al, 2005; Peng et al, 2005a). However, despite the promise of cancer vaccines, success has been limited due to a number of factors. One of these is the proper identification of tumour antigens. Important requirements for inclusion of tumour antigens in therapeutic vaccines are immunogenicity, prevalence of expression within the cancer population, tumour tissue specificity and biologic significance (Cheever et al, 2009; Lang et al, 2009; Kvistborg et al, 2013).
Multiple studies have described the expression of tumour antigen panels in HCC, but the vast majority of these studies were conducted in east Asian populations (Chen et al, 2001; Luo et al, 2002; Peng et al, 2005b; Nakamura et al, 2006; Sera et al, 2008; Shirakawa et al, 2009; Yan et al, 2011; Yorita et al, 2011; Liang et al, 2013; Xia et al, 2013) where the aetiology of HCC is predominately related to HBV. Very few such studies have been performed in western, low-endemic areas (Riener et al, 2009).
Tumour tissue specificity refers to the predominant, most preferably exclusive, expression of the tumour antigen in cancer and not in normal tissues (Kvistborg et al, 2013). A strict interpretation of this requirement would limit tumour antigens to antigens resulting from somatic mutations, chromosomal translocations resulting in neo-antigens, or viral-derived antigens. However, exome sequencing has recently shown that somatic mutation patterns in HCC are strongly variable between individual patients and therefore not suitable for design of off-the-shelf therapeutic vaccines (Fujimoto et al, 2012). The most promising alternative tumour antigens are cancer-testis antigens, which are exclusively expressed in germ cells but not in other normal tissues (Hofmann et al, 2008), and oncofetal antigens, expressed primarily during embryogenesis but not broadly in adult humans (AFP, Glypican-3). Both types of antigens are aberrantly expressed in various types of cancer. In addition, self-antigens that are overexpressed in cancer (Survivin, Wilms tumor-1, Midkine and Annexin-A2) are also considered tumour antigens, and several clinical trials are underway in HCC and other cancers, targeting these types of overexpressed self-antigens. Many of the existing studies in HCC do not include tumour antigen expression in the corresponding surrounding tumour-free liver (TFL) compartment and thus tissue specificity cannot be assessed.
In this study, we used immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMAs) to examine, on the protein level, the expression pattern in HCC of a comprehensive panel of 15 tumour antigens belonging to different categories, including the cancer testis antigens MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3/4, MAGE-A10, MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, NY-ESO-1, Sperm Protein 17 (SP17) and SSX-2, the oncofetal proteins AFP and Glypican-3 (GPC-3), the overexpressed tumour antigens Annexin-A2, Wilms tumour-1 (WT-1), Survivin, Midkine (MDK) and the glycoprotein MUC-1. All these antigens have previously demonstrated immunogenicity in human studies. In addition, we tested for the expression of SALL-4, a transcription factor involved in the maintenance of embryonic and cancer stem cells (Zeng et al, 2014). SALL-4 has recently been shown to be expressed in an HCC subtype with stem-cell like features and to be associated with poor prognosis (Oikawa et al, 2013; Yong et al, 2013b; Zeng et al, 2014). The goal of the study was to identify a panel of biologically relevant tumour antigens with (a) broad expression in a western European population of HCC patients and (b) specific expression in the tumour tissue with no, or little, expression in surrounding TFL tissue.
Materials and Methods
Patient population and tissue samples
Archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 133 patients who underwent hepatic resection (n=94) or liver transplantation (n=39) for HCC in our centre, between July 2004 and October 2013, were used for this study. Clinicopathologic characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients had undergone procedures with curative intent and none had received systemic therapy before resection or transplantation. Patients with evidence of residual cancer after resection were excluded. Informed consent for the use of tissue for research purposes was obtained from all patients.
TMA construction
Three 0.6-mm cores were taken from the tumorous area of 133 patients and two 0.6-mm cores were taken from the corresponding TFL tissue of 105 of these patients. The tumorous as well as the TFL areas with vital tissue were marked by an experienced pathologist using archived H&E glass slides. In each TMA we included cores of testis, placenta, tonsil, ovary, stomach, prostate, bladder, kidney, lung and liver as control tissues. The TMAs were made using a Beecher automated tissue-arrayer ATA-27 (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm thick sections mounted on Superfrost Plus slides (Erie Scientific LLC, Portsmouth, NH, USA). The sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 min. Antigen retrieval was performed in a microwave for 10 min using the appropriate antigen retrieval buffer for each antigen (Table 2). After serum block, primary antibodies were applied at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies (Table 2) were carefully selected to be monoclonal (with the exception of AFP and SP17) and to have been validated in scientific literature. HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit polymer secondary antibody (Envision, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) was then applied for 1 h, followed by diaminobenzadine (DAB) as the chromogen detection method. The slides were stained with haematoxylin followed by dehydration. The above protocol was used for all antibodies with the exception of GPC-3 and AFP where an automated BenchMark ULTRA instrument (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tuscon, AZ, USA) was used in a clinical laboratory setting. Scoring was performed by two independent investigators and differences resolved by mutual agreement. Intensity was scored as either none, weak, moderate or strong, while percentage of positive cells was scored as <5%, 5–25%, 25–75% and >75%. For a staining to be considered positive at least 5% of cells had to be stained. Negative controls consisted of omission of the primary antibody and appropriate positive control tissues were used for all antibodies. H-scores were calculated by multiplying the intensity score (0 to 3) with the level of % of positive cells where 1=<5%, 2=5–25%, 3=25–75% and 4=>75%.
Statistical analysis
The association of the expression level of tumour antigens with the various subgroup populations was analysed using the χ2-test. The association of the tumour antigen expression with the clinicopathologic parameters was analysed using the χ2-tests for categorical variables and the Student’s t-test for continues variables. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and corresponding P-values were obtained using Cox regression analysis. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 21 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Tumour antigen expression in HCC and TFL tissue
The expression of the 15 tumour antigens in both tumour and TFL tissue is shown in Table 3. No expression of SSX-2 and MUC-1 was observed, although the antibodies properly stained testis (seminiferous duct cells) and gastric control tissue, respectively. The prevalence of expression of MAGE-A3/4, NY-ESO-1, AFP, MAGE-A1 and MAGE-A10 was low (<10% of patients), while increasing numbers of HCC showed expression of MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, GPC-3, MDK, Survivin, WT-1, SP17 and Annexin-A2 (prevalence ranging from 17 to 90%, Table 3). However, the overexpressed self-antigens MDK, Survivin, WT-1 and SP17 showed equal expression in tumours and in TFL tissues. Thus, the tumour antigens with the highest differential expression level between tumour tissue and TFL tissue are Annexin-A2 (90.2 vs 37.1%), GPC-3 (39.1 vs 0%), MAGE-C2 (19.5 vs 0%) and MAGE-C1 (17.3 vs 0%). This conclusion did not change when we analysed only the 105 patients with paired tumour and TFL tissue as compared to the entire cohort of 133 patients. Representative immunohistochemical stainings of these four tumour antigens in HCC and TFL tissue are shown in Figure 1, while representative immunohistochemical stainings of all the tumour antigens can be seen in Supplementary Figure 1. The distribution of intensity and the percentage of stained cells in tumour tissue, and in the case of Annexin-A2 in TFL tissue, are shown in Figure 2. MAGE-C1 and GPC-3 showed cytoplasmic expression in tumour cells, while MAGE-C2 showed nuclear expression in tumour cells. Annexin-A2 showed membranous and cytoplasmic expression in hepatocytes in HCC and TFL tissue, and stained sinusoidal endothelium. These expression patterns are in agreement with previous observations in HCC (Riener et al, 2009; Longerich et al, 2011; Liang et al, 2013). Only hepatocyte and not sinusoidal staining was scored for Annexin-A2. Moreover, Annexin-A2 expression showed a weaker intensity in the hepatocytes of the TFL tissue than the corresponding tumour cells (Figures 2D and E). Looking at aetiologic factors, there was a significantly higher prevalence of expression of MAGE-A3/4 (P=0.011), MAGE-A1 (P=0.034) and MAGE-C1 (P=0.008) in patients with HBV infection compared with patients without HBV infection, while MAGE-C2 (P=0.264) and GPC-3 (P=0.334) showed a statistical trend towards higher expression in patients with HBV infection (Figure 3).
Tumour antigen index
As in previous studies (Liang et al, 2013) a tumour antigen index (TAA) was calculated based on the total number of antigens co-expressed in a given tumour tissue. Patients were grouped based on whether they co-expressed 0–2 tumour antigens, 3–6 tumour antigens or 7–9 tumour antigens. No patients co-expressed more than 9 out of the 15 tumour antigens. The higher the TAA index the better the HCC-specific survival was (P=0.020, Supplementary Figure 2). In multivariable analysis this was an independent prognostic factor for HCC-specific survival (Table 4).
Co-expression patterns of MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, GPC-3 and Annexin-A2
Further analysis was performed on the four antigens with the greatest differences in expression between tumour and TFL tissue, namely MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, GPC-3 and Annexin-A2. Expression of at least one of these antigens was observed in tumour tissues of 95% of patients, while 48% of patients expressed only one antigen, 30% expressed two antigens, 11% expressed three antigens and 6% expressed four antigens (Figure 4A). Co-expression of these antigens in individual patients is shown in Figure 4B. Ninety-two percent of patients express, individually, or in combination, Annexin-A2 and GPC-3. Of the patients that do not express Annexin-A2 or GPC-3, 3% express MAGE-C1 or MAGE-C2. In 11% of patients MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2 add a second tumour antigen to patients that otherwise express only one antigen, either GPC-3 or Annexin-A2. Finally, in 10% of patients MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2 add a third antigen to patients that co-express GPC-3 and Annexin-A2. Interestingly, MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2 are significantly and strongly co-expressed in tumours of our HCC patients (P<0.001, Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.68). This panel of four antigens also covers tumours of most HBV-negative patients (95%), of which 52% expressed one antigen, 29% expressed two antigens, 9% expressed three antigens and 5% expressed four antigens. Together, these data show that this panel of four tumour antigens may be suitable for vaccination studies in HCC patients in western low-endemic areas.
Expression of SALL-4 and co-expression with GPC-3
SALL-4 is a transcription factor involved in the maintenance of embryonic and cancer stem cells (Zeng et al, 2014) and has recently been shown to be expressed in an HCC subtype with stem-cell like features associated with poor prognosis (Oikawa et al, 2013; Yong et al, 2013b; Zeng et al, 2014). In our study SALL-4 nuclear expression was seen in 26% of tumours and in none (0%) of the TFL samples. Like in previous studies (Zeng et al, 2014), SALL-4 was more frequently expressed in tumours of patients with HBV infection (40 vs 22%, P=0.05) and its expression was correlated with poor differentiation (P=0.002) and higher AFP levels before surgery (P=0.007), while there was a trend towards correlation with vascular invasion (P=0.081). Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between SALL-4 expression and GPC-3 expression (P=0.001, Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.29, Figure 5). While neither SALL-4 or GPC-3 were individually associated with HCC-specific survival, there was a trend towards worse HCC-specific survival in patients co-expressing both GPC-3 and SALL-4 (P=0.190, Supplementary Figure 3a). In addition, when the strength of the staining was taken into consideration in the form of the H-score (intensity x % of positive cells) patients who co-expressed high levels of both SALL-4 (H-score>2) and GPC-3 (H-score>3) had a significantly worse HCC-specific survival (P=0.018, Supplementary Figure 3b). This was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (Table 4).
Relationship of individual tumour antigen expression with known prognostic markers
Of all the tumour antigens tested, GPC-3 was the one most strongly associated with known prognostic factors. Specifically, GPC-3 was associated with poor tumour differentiation (P=0.004), the presence of vascular invasion (P=0.002) and higher AFP before resection (P=0.03).
Discussion
The aim of this study was to identify a panel of tumour antigens suited for immunotherapeutic approaches, such as vaccination, for HCC in western-European, low-endemic areas, where HBV infection is not the main aetiology of HCC and where the diagnosis is often made in non-cirrhotic livers (Verhoef et al, 2004; Witjes et al, 2012). In our cohort, only 23% of patients were HBV positive, 14% HCV-positive and 48% had no liver cirrhosis. In addition, 77.4% of our patients are of western-European decent. Supplementary Table 1 describes the hepatitis-B status of patients per patient region of origin. Groups other that western-European are too small for subgroup analysis of antigen expression.
The observed prevalence of expression of testis and oncofetal antigens was generally lower than previous studies reported. Most of these previous studies have been conducted in East Asia where HBV infection is the most prevalent cause of HCC and the majority of HCC patients have liver cirrhosis. For example, a previous east Asian study reported that 36% of patients expressed MAGE-C1 (Xia et al, 2013), while we found only 17% expression. Supporting the association between cancer testis antigens and HBV infection, we found increased prevalence of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3/4 and MAGE-C1 expression in HBV-positive patients. The prevalence of MAGE-C1 expression in HCC tissues in our HBV positive patients was similar to that reported by Xia et al (2013) (32% in HBV positive vs 13% in HBV negative patients). The only other large western study that has examined several of these antigens by immunohistochemistry is by Riener et al (2009) who studied 146 HCC patients from Switzerland, of which only 12% had HBV. In that study MAGE-C1 expression was found expressed in 12% of patients, NY-ESO-1 in 2% and MAGE-A3/4 in 0%, results that are similar to our findings. Likewise, expression of the oncofetal protein GPC-3 was found in 61–84% of patients in four Asian studies with HBV positivity ranging between 25 and 85% (Shirakawa et al, 2009; Yan et al, 2011; Yorita et al, 2011; Liang et al, 2013), and all these studies showed evidence of increased GPC-3 expression in the HBV-positive patients compared with the HBV-negative patients. In our study GPC-3 expression was found in 39% of all patients but in 48% of HBV-positive patients.
Another explanation for the relatively low prevalence of tumour antigen expression observed in our study is that many previous studies have used RT-PCR measuring mRNA expression (Chen et al, 2001; Luo et al, 2002; Peng et al, 2005b), while we have measured protein expression by immunohistochemistry. In fact, large discrepancies between tumour antigen expression in HCC by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry have been reported. For example, Nakamura et al (2006) found 18/41 of HCC samples (43%) expressing NY-ESO-1 by RT-PCR while only 3 (7%) expressed the protein. It is likely that protein expression rather than RNA expression is a reliable predictor of suitability of tumour antigens for vaccination studies.
While the absence of MUC-1 expression in HCC is in agreement with previous work (Cao et al, 1999), the absence of SSX-2 in our study (0%) is in contrast to the study by Liang et al (2013) where a prevalence of 75% was reported. The use of different antibody clones may be one explanation. Clone 4D10, used in the Liang et al (2013) study, was not tested in TFL samples to examine tumour specificity. In addition, two studies (Luo et al, 2002; Wu et al, 2006) using RT-PCR have shown expression in 2/21 and 13/36 HCC-patients, respectively, indicating that it is unlikely that the true protein expression level of SSX-2 in HCC is very high. Finally, despite the lack of staining in tumour or TFL tissue, antibody clone E3AS, which we used, showed proper staining of positive control seminiferous duct cells in testis tissue (Supplementary Figure 1).
AFP was found to be expressed in few HCC samples (7%) in our study. While an incidence as low as 2% has been reported (Ferrandez-Izquierdo and Llombart-Bosch, 1987) most studies show expression of AFP in around 17–50% of HCC tumours (Ganjei et al, 1988; Brumm et al, 1989; Minervini et al, 1997; Tsuji et al, 1999; Lau et al, 2002). To ensure accuracy of AFP staining in our study AFP expression was determined twice, under clinical laboratory conditions (automated BenchMark ULTRA instrument), which yielded identical results. On further examination AFP expression was strongly correlated with serum AFP level before resection (P<0.001). Of the patients with a serum AFP >400 μg l−1 29% expressed AFP in their tumours vs only 3% in patients with a serum AFP <400 μg l−1 (P=0.001). This correlation of AFP serum levels with tumour AFP expression has been demonstrated before (Li et al, 2011). In our cohort, however, only 17% of our patients had an AFP value above 400 μg l−1. Thus, one possible explanation for the low incidence of AFP staining is the relative low number of patients with high serum AFP levels. Indeed, most contemporary series report high AFP serum levels (>400 μg l−1) in 27 to 45% of patients undergoing resection (Wang et al, 2009; Ma et al, 2013; Liu et al, 2014).
While MDK, SP17, WT-1 and Survivin were expressed in the majority of tumours, we observed similar expression in adjacent TFL tissues, suggesting they might be unsuitable for vaccination studies in HCC due to lack of tumour-tissue specificity. Indeed these four antigens have been shown to be expressed in tissues other than cancer (Scharnhorst et al, 2001; Deguchi et al, 2002; Kannangai et al, 2005; Monma et al, 2013), or other than cancer and testis in the case of SP17 (Lacy and Sanderson, 2001; Frayne and Hall, 2002). Although in some reports the expression of MDK, SP17 and WT-1 has been shown to be lower in TFL tissue than in HCC tissue (Koide et al, 1999; Sera et al, 2008; Xia et al, 2013; Zhu et al, 2013), in the case of Survivin another report corroborates the equal or higher TFL, compared with tumour, expression (Chau et al, 2007).
It has been previously shown by Liang et al (2013), that the higher the number of tumour antigens expressed by a given tumour the better the survival is. The hypothesis is that the higher the number of tumour antigens present the more the immunologic targets available to the immune system. In our study, in agreement with Liang et al (2013), we show that the higher the number of tumour antigens present in a given tumour the better the HCC-specific mortality is (Table 4, Supplementary Figure 2). While our findings are supportive of the above hypothesis, further validation and experimentation is necessary to prove the concept.
Therapeutic vaccination with a panel of tumour antigens, as opposed to a single antigen, would have the advantage of better coverage of the target tumour cell population as well as covering patients who express different antigens in their tumours. The panel that we selected (MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, GPC-3 and Annexin-A2) covers 95% of patients, with nearly 50% of them expressing at least two antigens. In addition, as in many patients expression of each individual antigen is limited to only 5–25% of tumour cells (Figure 2), targeting multiple antigens per patient may be needed to realise a successful clinical outcome. In addition, our antigen panel lacks, for the most part, expression in TFL tissue, which is an advantage, as it may reduce unwanted side effects. Even in the case of Annexin-A2, where a sizable proportion of TFL samples expressed the antigen (37%), the level of expression was much lower than that in the corresponding tumour samples (Figure 2D and E).
Biologically, GPC-3, a heparin sulphate proteoglycan expressed during embryogenesis, has been shown to be a poor prognostic factor in multiple studies (Shirakawa et al, 2009; Yan et al, 2011; Yorita et al, 2011; Liang et al, 2013). We confirm that GPC-3 expression is associated with higher serum AFP level (Yorita et al, 2011; Liang et al, 2013), worse tumour differentiation (Shirakawa et al, 2009; Yan et al, 2011; Yorita et al, 2011) and the presence of vascular invasion (Yorita et al, 2011). The immunogenicity of GPC-3 has been well demonstrated, and a phase I clinical cancer vaccine trial has already demonstrated tolerability and biologic efficacy (Sawada et al, 2012). In addition, gene expression profiling has shown that GPC-3 is significantly overexpressed in CD90+ HCC stem cells (Ho et al, 2012), suggesting that targeting GPC-3 may enable eradication of the tumour stem cell compartment. Our newly reported association of GPC-3 with SALL-4 strengthens the notion that GPC-3 is involved in stem cell biology in HCC. In fact, we show that patients who co-express high levels of both GPC-3 and SALL-4 have worse HCC-specific survival (Supplementary Figure 3b), indicating that the co-expression is biologically significant. However, it should be noted that strong co-expression is a relatively infrequent event occurring in 7.5% of patients. While other studies (Yan et al, 2011; Yong et al, 2013a) have shown worse overall survival for patients expressing individually GPC-3 or SALL-4 we did not show such an association. This is likely due to the fact that our study is smaller in size and was not designed to test the presence of biomarkers in HCC. In fact, when considering patients with higher GPC-3 staining, or patients with higher SALL-4 staining, statistical trends towards worse HCC-specific survival are apparent and consistent with the smaller size of our cohort (Supplementary Figure 3c and d). Finally, although both GPC-3 and SALL-4 are considered possible therapeutic targets in HCC (Filmus and Capurro, 2013; Yakaboski et al, 2014), information on immunogenicity of SALL-4 is lacking. Therefore, further research on immunogenicity of SALL-4 is needed before we can suggest to include SALL-4 in a therapeutic vaccine.
Annexin-A2, a calcium-dependent phospholipid binding protein, is involved in membrane formation, exocytosis and interaction with the extracellular matrix (Gerke and Moss, 2002). It is overexpressed in HCC (Yu et al, 2007; Mohammad et al, 2008) and multiple other cancers (Zhang et al, 2012), is involved in invasion and metastasis (Zhao et al, 2010), and immunogenicity has been demonstrated (Liu et al, 2011; Zheng and Jaffee, 2012). Our results are in agreement with Liu et al (2013) in that Annexin-A2 is expressed in the majority of patients with HCC and expression is significantly more pronounced in the tumour cells as compared with the surrounding TFL tissue. Our study is one of the very few to examine the protein level expression of Annexin-A2 in a ‘western’ cohort. Longerich et al (2011) demonstrated Annexin-A2 expression in HCC in a small western European patient cohort, but did not study expression in TFL tissue.
MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2 are involved in embryogenesis, their expression is known to be reactivated in various cancers, and they are known immunogens (Li et al, 2004). The strong co-expression between MAGE-C1 and MAGE-C2 was not surprising, as the two genes are located close to each other on chromosome X (q27) and are likely translated together. However, despite their strong co-expression, a little less than half of positive cases expressed either one of the two antigens alone indicating a potential value in including both of these antigens in a tumour vaccine.
In conclusion, we show that there are aetiological differences in tumour antigen expression in HCC. In addition, we describe a panel of four antigens, MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, GPC-3 and Anexxin-A2, which combine several favourable characteristics for future vaccination studies in patients in western low-endemic areas, such as combined coverage for the majority of patients, as well as tumour specificity. Finally, we demonstrate for the first time a relationship between GPC-3 and SALL-4 expression, which further substantiates that targeting GPC-3 may enable eradication of the HCC tumour stem-cell compartment.
References
Abou-Alfa GK, Johnson P, Knox JJ, Capanu M, Davidenko I, Lacava J, Leung T, Gansukh B, Saltz LB (2010) Doxorubicin plus sorafenib vs doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized trial. JAMA 304: 2154–2160.
Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, O'Brien SL, McSherry E, O'Connor DP, Fagan A, Culhane AC, Higgins DG, Jirstrom K, Millikan RC, Landberg G, Duffy MJ, Hewitt SM, Gallagher WM (2008) Altered cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 2681–2689.
Brumm C, Schulze C, Charels K, Morohoshi T, Kloppel G (1989) The significance of alpha-fetoprotein and other tumour markers in differential immunocytochemistry of primary liver tumours. Histopathology 14: 503–513.
Cao Y, Karsten U, Otto G, Bannasch P (1999) Expression of MUC1, Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen, Tn, sialosyl-Tn, and alpha2,6-linked sialic acid in hepatocellular carcinomas and preneoplastic hepatocellular lesions. Virchows Arch 434: 503–509.
Chau GY, Lee AF, Tsay SH, Ke YR, Kao HL, Wong FH, Tsou AP, Chau YP (2007) Clinicopathological significance of survivin expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Histopathology 51: 204–218.
Cheever MA, Allison JP, Ferris AS, Finn OJ, Hastings BM, Hecht TT, Mellman I, Prindiville SA, Viner JL, Weiner LM, Matrisian LM (2009) The prioritization of cancer antigens: a national cancer institute pilot project for the acceleration of translational research. Clin Cancer Res 15: 5323–5337.
Chen CH, Chen GJ, Lee HS, Huang GT, Yang PM, Tsai LJ, Chen DS, Sheu JC (2001) Expressions of cancer-testis antigens in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Lett 164: 189–195.
Deguchi M, Shiraki K, Inoue H, Okano H, Ito T, Yamanaka T, Sugimoto K, Sakai T, Ohmori S, Murata K, Furusaka A, Hisatomi H, Nakano T (2002) Expression of survivin during liver regeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297: 59–64.
dos Santos NR, Torensma R, de Vries TJ, Schreurs MW, de Bruijn DR, Kater-Baats E, Ruiter DJ, Adema GJ, van Muijen GN, van Kessel AG (2000) Heterogeneous expression of the SSX cancer/testis antigens in human melanoma lesions and cell lines. Cancer Res 60: 1654–1662.
El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, Reddy KR (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 134: 1752–1763.
El-Serag HB, Mason AC, Key C (2001) Trends in survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between 1977 and 1996 in the United States. Hepatology 33: 62–65.
Ferrandez-Izquierdo A, Llombart-Bosch A (1987) Immunohistochemical characterization of 130 cases of primary hepatic carcinomas. Pathol Res Pract 182: 783–791.
Filmus J, Capurro M (2013) Glypican-3: a marker and a therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS J 280: 2471–2476.
Frayne J, Hall L (2002) A re-evaluation of sperm protein 17 (Sp17) indicates a regulatory role in an A-kinase anchoring protein complex, rather than a unique role in sperm-zona pellucida binding. Reproduction 124: 767–774.
Fujimoto A, Totoki Y, Abe T, Boroevich KA, Hosoda F, Nguyen HH, Aoki M, Hosono N, Kubo M, Miya F, Arai Y, Takahashi H, Shirakihara T, Nagasaki M, Shibuya T, Nakano K, Watanabe-Makino K, Tanaka H, Nakamura H, Kusuda J, Ojima H, Shimada K, Okusaka T, Ueno M, Shigekawa Y, Kawakami Y, Arihiro K, Ohdan H, Gotoh K, Ishikawa O, Ariizumi S, Yamamoto M, Yamada T, Chayama K, Kosuge T, Yamaue H, Kamatani N, Miyano S, Nakagama H, Nakamura Y, Tsunoda T, Shibata T, Nakagawa H (2012) Whole-genome sequencing of liver cancers identifies etiological influences on mutation patterns and recurrent mutations in chromatin regulators. Nat Genet 44: 760–764.
Ganjei P, Nadji M, Albores-Saavedra J, Morales AR (1988) Histologic markers in primary and metastatic tumors of the liver. Cancer 62: 1994–1998.
Gerke V, Moss SE (2002) Annexins: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 82: 331–371.
Ho DW, Yang ZF, Yi K, Lam CT, Ng MN, Yu WC, Lau J, Wan T, Wang X, Yan Z, Liu H, Zhang Y, Fan ST (2012) Gene expression profiling of liver cancer stem cells by RNA-sequencing. PLoS One 7: e37159.
Hofmann O, Caballero OL, Stevenson BJ, Chen YT, Cohen T, Chua R, Maher CA, Panji S, Schaefer U, Kruger A, Lehvaslaiho M, Carninci P, Hayashizaki Y, Jongeneel CV, Simpson AJ, Old LJ, Hide W (2008) Genome-wide analysis of cancer/testis gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 20422–20427.
IARC (2011) Available at http://www-dep.iarc.fr/ (accessed 08.10.14).
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
Jungbluth AA, Stockert E, Chen YT, Kolb D, Iversen K, Coplan K, Williamson B, Altorki N, Busam KJ, Old LJ (2000) Monoclonal antibody MA454 reveals a heterogeneous expression pattern of MAGE-1 antigen in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded lung tumours. Br J Cancer 83: 493–497.
Kannangai R, Wang J, Liu QZ, Sahin F, Torbenson M (2005) Survivin overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with p53 dysregulation. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 35: 53–60.
Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, Berger ER, Small EJ, Penson DF, Redfern CH, Ferrari AC, Dreicer R, Sims RB, Xu Y, Frohlich MW, Schellhammer PF (2010a) Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 363: 411–422.
Kantoff PW, Schuetz TJ, Blumenstein BA, Glode LM, Bilhartz DL, Wyand M, Manson K, Panicali DL, Laus R, Schlom J, Dahut WL, Arlen PM, Gulley JL, Godfrey WR (2010b) Overall survival analysis of a phase II randomized controlled trial of a Poxviral-based PSA-targeted immunotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 1099–1105.
Koide N, Hada H, Shinji T, Ujike K, Hirasaki S, Yumoto Y, Hanafusa T, Kadomatsu K, Muramatsu H, Muramatsu T, Tsuji T (1999) Expression of the midkine gene in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 46: 3189–3196.
Kuang M, Peng BG, Lu MD, Liang LJ, Huang JF, He Q, Hua YP, Totsuka S, Liu SQ, Leong KW, Ohno T (2004) Phase II randomized trial of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for postsurgical recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10: 1574–1579.
Kvistborg P, van Buuren MM, Schumacher TN (2013) Human cancer regression antigens. Curr Opin Immunol 25: 284–290.
Lacy HM, Sanderson RD (2001) Sperm protein 17 is expressed on normal and malignant lymphocytes and promotes heparan sulfate-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Blood 98: 2160–2165.
Landry C, Brasseur F, Spagnoli GC, Marbaix E, Boon T, Coulie P, Godelaine D (2000) Monoclonal antibody 57B stains tumor tissues that express gene MAGE-A4. Int J Cancer 86: 835–841.
Lang JM, Andrei AC, McNeel DG (2009) Prioritization of cancer antigens: keeping the target in sight. Expert Rev Vaccines 8: 1657–1661.
Langner C, Ratschek M, Rehak P, Schips L, Zigeuner R (2004) Expression of MUC1 (EMA) and E-cadherin in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic immunohistochemical analysis of 188 cases. Mod Pathol 17: 180–188.
Lau SK, Prakash S, Geller SA, Alsabeh R (2002) Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 33: 1175–1181.
Lee WC, Wang HC, Hung CF, Huang PF, Lia CR, Chen MF (2005) Vaccination of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells: a clinical trial. J Immunother 28: 496–504.
Li B, He X, Pang X, Zhang H, Chen J, Chen W (2004) Elicitation of both CD4 and CD8 T-cell-mediated specific immune responses to HCA587 protein by autologous dendritic cells. Scand J Immunol 60: 506–513.
Li P, Wang SS, Liu H, Li N, McNutt MA, Li G, Ding HG (2011) Elevated serum alpha fetoprotein levels promote pathological progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 17: 4563–4571.
Liang J, Ding T, Guo ZW, Yu XJ, Hu YZ, Zheng L, Xu J (2013) Expression pattern of tumour-associated antigens in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with immune infiltration and disease progression. Br J Cancer 109: 1031–1039.
Liu A, Liu D, Zhao S, Zheng J, Cao D, Zhang H (2011) Up regulation of annexin A2 on murine H22 hepatocarcinoma cells induced by cartilage polysaccharide. Cancer Epidemiol 35: 490–496.
Liu C, Duan LG, Lu WS, Yan LN, Xiao GQ, Jiang L, Yang J, Yang JY (2014) Prognosis evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of BCLC, TNM and Hangzhou criteria staging systems. PLoS One 9: e103228.
Liu Z, Ling Q, Wang J, Xie H, Xu X, Zheng S (2013) Annexin A2 is not a good biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Oncol Lett 6: 125–129.
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, Schwartz M, Porta C, Zeuzem S, Bolondi L, Greten TF, Galle PR, Seitz JF, Borbath I, Haussinger D, Giannaris T, Shan M, Moscovici M, Voliotis D, Bruix J Group, S.I.S. (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359: 378–390.
Longerich T, Haller MT, Mogler C, Aulmann S, Lohmann V, Schirmacher P, Brand K (2011) Annexin A2 as a differential diagnostic marker of hepatocellular tumors. Pathol Res Pract 207: 8–14.
Luo G, Huang S, Xie X, Stockert E, Chen YT, Kubuschok B, Pfreundschuh M (2002) Expression of cancer-testis genes in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Immun 2: 11.
Ma WJ, Wang HY, Teng LS (2013) Correlation analysis of preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. World J Surg Oncol 11: 212.
Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G (2011) Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 480: 480–489.
Minervini MI, Demetris AJ, Lee RG, Carr BI, Madariaga J, Nalesnik MA (1997) Utilization of hepatocyte-specific antibody in the immunocytochemical evaluation of liver tumors. Mod Pathol 10: 686–692.
Mohammad HS, Kurokohchi K, Yoneyama H, Tokuda M, Morishita A, Jian G, Shi L, Murota M, Tani J, Kato K, Miyoshi H, Deguchi A, Himoto T, Usuki H, Wakabayashi H, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y, Iwama H, Deguchi K, Uchida N, Sabet EA, Arafa UA, Hassan AT, El-Sayed AA, Masaki T (2008) Annexin A2 expression and phosphorylation are up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol 33: 1157–1163.
Monma F, Hozumi Y, Ikematsu S, Kawaguchi M, Kadomatsu K, Suzuki T (2013) Expression of midkine in normal human skin, dermatitis and neoplasms: association with differentiation of keratinocytes. J Dermatol 40: 980–986.
Nakamura S, Nouso K, Noguchi Y, Higashi T, Ono T, Jungbluth A, Chen YT, Old LJ, Nakayama E, Shiratori Y (2006) Expression and immunogenicity of NY-ESO-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: 1281–1285.
Nakatsuka S, Oji Y, Horiuchi T, Kanda T, Kitagawa M, Takeuchi T, Kawano K, Kuwae Y, Yamauchi A, Okumura M, Kitamura Y, Oka Y, Kawase I, Sugiyama H, Aozasa K (2006) Immunohistochemical detection of WT1 protein in a variety of cancer cells. Mod Pathol 19: 804–814.
Oikawa T, Kamiya A, Zeniya M, Chikada H, Hyuck AD, Yamazaki Y, Wauthier E, Tajiri H, Miller LD, Wang XW, Reid LM, Nakauchi H (2013) Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4), a stem cell biomarker in liver cancers. Hepatology 57: 1469–1483.
Peng BG, Liang LJ, He Q, Kuang M, Lia JM, Lu MD, Huang JF (2005a) Tumor vaccine against recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11: 700–704.
Peng JR, Chen HS, Mou DC, Cao J, Cong X, Qin LL, Wei L, Leng XS, Wang Y, Chen WF (2005b) Expression of cancer/testis (CT) antigens in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma and its correlation with clinical parameters. Cancer Lett 219: 223–232.
Perz JF, Armstrong GL, Farrington LA, Hutin YJ, Bell BP (2006) The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol 45: 529–538.
Riener MO, Wild PJ, Soll C, Knuth A, Jin B, Jungbluth A, Hellerbrand C, Clavien PA, Moch H, Jochum W (2009) Frequent expression of the novel cancer testis antigen MAGE-C2/CT-10 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer 124: 352–357.
Sawada Y, Yoshikawa T, Nobuoka D, Shirakawa H, Kuronuma T, Motomura Y, Mizuno S, Ishii H, Nakachi K, Konishi M, Nakagohri T, Takahashi S, Gotohda N, Takayama T, Yamao K, Uesaka K, Furuse J, Kinoshita T, Nakatsura T (2012) Phase I trial of a glypican-3-derived peptide vaccine for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: immunologic evidence and potential for improving overall survival. Clin Cancer Res 18: 3686–3696.
Scharnhorst V, van der Eb AJ, Jochemsen AG (2001) WT1 proteins: functions in growth and differentiation. Gene 273: 141–161.
Schultz-Thater E, Piscuoglio S, Iezzi G, Le Magnen C, Zajac P, Carafa V, Terracciano L, Tornillo L, Spagnoli GC (2011) MAGE-A10 is a nuclear protein frequently expressed in high percentages of tumor cells in lung, skin and urothelial malignancies. Int J Cancer 129: 1137–1148.
Sera T, Hiasa Y, Mashiba T, Tokumoto Y, Hirooka M, Konishi I, Matsuura B, Michitaka K, Udaka K, Onji M (2008) Wilms' tumour 1 gene expression is increased in hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis. Eur J Cancer 44: 600–608.
Shirakawa H, Suzuki H, Shimomura M, Kojima M, Gotohda N, Takahashi S, Nakagohri T, Konishi M, Kobayashi N, Kinoshita T, Nakatsura T (2009) Glypican-3 expression is correlated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci 100: 1403–1407.
Tsuji M, Kashihara T, Terada N, Mori H (1999) An immunohistochemical study of hepatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma with alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, epithelial membrane antigen, and cytokeratins 18 and 19. Pathol Int 49: 310–317.
Vaughan HA, Svobodova S, Macgregor D, Sturrock S, Jungbluth AA, Browning J, Davis ID, Parente P, Chen YT, Stockert E St, Clair F, Old LJ, Cebon J (2004) Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of human melanomas for expression of the human cancer-testis antigens NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1. Clin Cancer Res 10: 8396–8404.
Verhoef C, Visser O, de Man RA, de Wilt JH, JN IJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML (2004) Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Netherlands incidence, treatment and survival patterns. Eur J Cancer 40: 1530–1538.
Wang CC, Iyer SG, Low JK, Lin CY, Wang SH, Lu SN, Chen CL (2009) Perioperative factors affecting long-term outcomes of 473 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 1832–1842.
Witjes CD, Karim-Kos HE, Visser O, van den Akker SA, de Vries E, Ijzermans JN, de Man RA, Coebergh JW, Verhoef C (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-endemic area: rising incidence and improved survival. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24: 450–457.
Wu LQ, Lu Y, Wang XF, Lv ZH, Zhang B, Yang JY (2006) Expression of cancer-testis antigen (CTA) in tumor tissues and peripheral blood of Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Life Sci 79: 744–748.
Xia QY, Liu S, Li FQ, Huang WB, Shi LN, Zhou XJ (2013) Sperm protein 17, MAGE-C1 and NY-ESO-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: expression frequency and their correlation with clinical parameters. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 6: 1610–1616.
Yakaboski E, Jares A, Ma Y (2014) Stem cell gene SALL4 in aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma: a cancer stem cell-specific target? Hepatology 60: 419–421.
Yan B, Wei JJ, Qian YM, Zhao XL, Zhang WW, Xu AM, Zhang SH (2011) Expression and clinicopathologic significance of glypican 3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 15: 162–169.
Yee DS, Narula N, Ramzy I, Boker J, Ahlering TE, Skarecky DW, Ornstein DK (2007) Reduced annexin II protein expression in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131: 902–908.
Yong KJ, Chai L, Tenen DG (2013a) Oncofetal gene SALL4 in aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369: 1171–1172.
Yong KJ, Gao C, Lim JS, Yan B, Yang H, Dimitrov T, Kawasaki A, Ong CW, Wong KF, Lee S, Ravikumar S, Srivastava S, Tian X, Poon RT, Fan ST, Luk JM, Dan YY, Salto-Tellez M, Chai L, Tenen DG (2013b) Oncofetal gene SALL4 in aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 368: 2266–2276.
Yorita K, Takahashi N, Takai H, Kato A, Suzuki M, Ishiguro T, Ohtomo T, Nagaike K, Kondo K, Chijiiwa K, Kataoka H (2011) Prognostic significance of circumferential cell surface immunoreactivity of glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 31: 120–131.
Yu GR, Kim SH, Park SH, Cui XD, Xu DY, Yu HC, Cho BH, Yeom YI, Kim SS, Kim SB, Chu IS, Kim DG (2007) Identification of molecular markers for the oncogenic differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Med 39: 641–652.
Zeng SS, Yamashita T, Kondo M, Nio K, Hayashi T, Hara Y, Nomura Y, Yoshida M, Hayashi T, Oishi N, Ikeda H, Honda M, Kaneko S (2014) The transcription factor SALL4 regulates stemness of EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 60: 127–134.
Zhang X, Liu S, Guo C, Zong J, Sun MZ (2012) The association of annexin A2 and cancers. Clin Transl Oncol 14: 634–640.
Zhao P, Zhang W, Tang J, Ma XK, Dai JY, Li Y, Jiang JL, Zhang SH, Chen ZN (2010) Annexin II promotes invasion and migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro via its interaction with HAb18G/CD147. Cancer Sci 101: 387–395.
Zheng L, Jaffee EM (2012) Annexin A2 is a new antigenic target for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 1: 112–114.
Zhu WW, Guo JJ, Guo L, Jia HL, Zhu M, Zhang JB, Loffredo CA, Forgues M, Huang H, Xing XJ, Ren N, Dong QZ, Zhou HJ, Ren ZG, Zhao NQ, Wang XW, Tang ZY, Qin LX, Ye QH (2013) Evaluation of midkine as a diagnostic serum biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 19: 3944–3954.
Zhuang R, Zhu Y, Fang L, Liu XS, Tian Y, Chen LH, Ouyang WM, Xu XG, Jian JL, Gure AO, Fortunato S, Ritter G, Old LJ, Simpson AJ, Chen YT, Jin B, Jungbluth AA (2006) Generation of monoclonal antibodies to cancer/testis (CT) antigen CT10/MAGE-C2. Cancer Immun 6: 7.
Zou W (2005) Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 263–274.
Acknowledgements
We graciously thank the following professors for providing as with valuable monoclonal antibodies for our research: Professor Giulio Spagnoli, Department of Surgery, Research Laboratory, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, for providing monoclonal antibodies against MAGE-A10 (clone 3GA11) (Schultz-Thater et al, 2011) and MAGE-A3/4 (clone 57B) (Landry et al, 2000). Professor Ad Geurts van Kessel, Department of Human Genetics, University Hospital Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands, for providing a monoclonal antibody against SSX-2 (clone E3AS) (dos Santos et al, 2000). Professor Boquan Yin, Department of Immunology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, PR China, for providing a monoclonal antibody against MAGE-C2 (clone CT-10) (Zhuang et al, 2006). The study was financially supported by the grant 2012-17 from the Gastrostart Foundation of the Netherlands Society of Gastroenterology to Jaap Kwekkeboom and the VENI grant 916-13-032 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/ZonMw) to Q Pan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Sideras, K., Bots, S., Biermann, K. et al. Tumour antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-endemic western area. Br J Cancer 112, 1911–1920 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.92
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.92
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Immune suppressive checkpoint interactions in the tumour microenvironment of primary liver cancers
British Journal of Cancer (2022)
-
Microwave ablation enhances tumor-specific immune response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy (2021)
-
Prognostic significance of annexin A2 and annexin A4 expression in patients with cervical cancer
BMC Cancer (2016)
-
Comment on ‘Tumour antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-endemic western area’
British Journal of Cancer (2016)
-
Reply to: Comment on ‘Tumour antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-endemic western area’
British Journal of Cancer (2016)