Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2015) 112, 1766–1771. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.141; published online 5 May 2015
Following the publication of this manuscript, the authors have noticed an error in Table 1.
The sixth line, which reads ‘N2 metastasis in multiple or bilateral inguinal lymph nodes & Unilateral or bilateral metastasis in four or more inguinal lymph nodes without ENE, ENE of LNM or pelvic lymph nodes’, should be deleted. The correct table is reproduced below.
Change history
22 December 2015
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/bjc.2015.141
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Li, ZS., Yao, K., Chen, P. et al. Erratum: Modification of N staging systems for penile cancer: a more precise prediction of prognosis. Br J Cancer 113, 1746 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.457
Published:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Updates in Staging and Reporting of Genitourinary Malignancies
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (2020)
-
What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging
World Journal of Urology (2020)
-
Comparaison des classifications TNM des 8es éditions de l’UICC et de l’AJCC en uropathologie
Annales de Pathologie (2019)
-
The updated points of TNM classification of urological cancers in the 8th edition of AJCC and UICC
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)
-
Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers
European Urology (2018)