Abstract
Background:
The PIAS4 protein belongs to the family of protein inhibitors of activated STAT, but has since been implicated in various biological activities including the post-translational modification known as sumoylation. In this study, we explored the roles of PIAS4 in pancreatic tumourigenesis.
Methods:
The expression levels of PIAS4 in pancreatic cancer cells were examined. Cell proliferation and invasion was studied after overexpression and gene silencing of PIAS4. The effect of PIAS4 on hypoxia signalling was investigated.
Results:
The protein was overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cells compared with the normal pancreas. Gene silencing by PIAS4 small interfering RNA (siRNA) suppressed pancreatic cancer cell growth and overexpression of PIAS4 induced expression of genes related to cell growth. The overexpression of PIAS4 is essential for the regulation of the hypoxia signalling pathway. PIAS4 interacts with the tumour suppressor von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and leads to VHL sumoylation, oligomerization, and impaired function. Pancreatic cancer cells (Panc0327, MiaPaCa2) treated with PIAS4 siRNA suppressed expression of the hypoxia-inducible factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha and its target genes JMJD1A, VEGF, and STAT3.
Conclusion:
Our study elucidates the role of PIAS4 in the regulation of pancreatic cancer cell growth, where the suppression of its activity represents a novel therapeutic target for pancreatic cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has become one of the leading causes of death in industrialised countries (Vincent et al, 2011). It is usually diagnosed at late stages, where curative surgery provides poor prognosis, and other forms of therapy including chemotherapy lack efficacy (McCarthy, 2009; Colucci et al, 2010). Continuing efforts have been made to identify both biomarkers for early diagnosis and molecular targets for therapy (Natoni et al, 2005; Adachi et al, 2010). Emerging studies show that protein sumoylation by small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) proteins is an important post-translational modification in regulating the biological activities of proteins (Jackson, 2001). Sumoylation involves sequential actions by E1-activating enzyme, E2-conjugating enzyme, and E3 protein ligase (Wilkinson and Henley, 2010). Both positive and negative effects on protein functions by sumoylation have been reported (Depaux et al, 2007; Karamouzi et al, 2008). PIAS4 (protein inhibitor of activated STAT protein 4) is an E3-type SUMO ligase. It interacts with and suppresses the biological activity of the tumour suppressor protein von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) in renal clear-cell carcinoma (Sachdev et al, 2001). Sumoylation of VHL mediated by PIAS4 results in the formation of VHL oligomers, which in turn reduces its tumour suppressor activity against hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) (Cai et al, 2010; Cai and Robertson, 2010). Hypoxia has an essential role in tumourigenesis and metastasis of solid tumours including PDAC (Denko, 2008; Wilson and Hay, 2011). We found that PIAS4 is highly expressed in PDAC cell lines and tumours, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) against PIAS4 suppressed their proliferation. Our study demonstrates for the first time that PIAS4 may also constitute a therapeutic target against pancreatic cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Fourteen pancreatic cancer cell lines (AsPc1 BxPc3, Panc1, Panc0203, Panc0327, Panc0403, Panc0504, Panc0813, Panc1005, CFPAC1, CaPan2, MiaPaCa2, PL45, and SU8686) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). All the cell lines were maintained in either DMEM or RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. For the induction of hypoxia, cells were incubated in temperature-controlled hypoxic culture chambers at 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2.
Small interfering RNAs
Scrambled control siRNA and PIAS4-targeted siRNA mixtures (pool of 4) were purchased from Cell Signalling (Boston, MA, USA). Non-target negative control (NC) and exon-specific targeted siRNAs (siEXON2 and siEXON6 for exons 2 and 6, respectively) were from IDT (Coralville, IA, USA). Duplex sequences were NC: 5′-CGUUAAUCGGUAUAAUACGCGUAT-3′, 5′-CAGCAAUUAGCGCAUAUUAUGCGCAUA-3′; siEXON2: 5′-GCUCUACGGAAAGUACUUAAACGGA-3′, 5′-ÚCCGUUUAAGUACUUUCCGUAGAGCAC-3′; siEXON6: 5′-ACCUCACUCACCUCAUGUACCUGT-3′, 5′-GACAGGUACAUGAGGUGAGUGAGGUUG-3′). RNAiMAX (used for siRNA transfection) and Lipofectamine 2000 (used for plasmid DNA overexpression) were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).
Public databases
Oncomine (Compendia Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and the Human Protein Atlas were used for analysis and visualisation.
MTT assays
A total of 3000 pancreatic cancer cells were plated in 96-well plates and cultured for various durations as indicated. Cell viability was assayed using MTT (3-(4,5- Dimethylthiazol- 2- yl)- 2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and calculated with BioDataFit GraphPad Prism software (Castro Valley, CA, USA).
Colony formation and invasion assays
For colony assays, equal number of cells was seeded in 24-well plates at 24 h after siRNA transfection and 72 h later, the colonies were stained with 0.1% crystal violet in 50% methanol and quantified by measurement of optical density at 540 nm after dissolving the cells in 20% acetic acid. For migration assays, cells were serum-starved overnight and equal numbers of cells were plated on cell culture inserts with 8 μm membrane (Boyden chambers from Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in 24-well plates. After 24 h incubation, cells that did not pass through the filter were removed with a cotton swab, and the culture inserts were stained with 0.1% crystal violet in 50% methanol and photographed.
Real-time reverse transcription PCR
Total RNA from cell lines, as well as from tissue per IRB protocol, was extracted using Invitrogen Trizol and cleaned up with Qiagen RNase kit (Hilden, Germany). All RNAs after extraction were treated with DNase to remove genomic DNA. First strand cDNA synthesis kit from Fermentas (Waltham, MA, USA) was used to prepared cDNA from 2 to 5 μg RNA. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR ready-mixed reagents from Fermentas in Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast PCR system (Foster City, CA, USA). All PCR reactions were performed in triplicates. PCR products were checked for specificity on a 2% agarose gel. Expression levels of GAPDH were used as internal controls to calculate relative target gene expression levels.
Immunoprecipitation assays
Cells were co-transfected with PIAS4 and different VHL expression vectors by Invitrogen Lipofectamine 2000. At 48 h after transfection, cells were lysed with lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 5 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40 with Fermentas protease inhibitors. For immunoprecipitation, the cell lysates were incubated with antibody at 4 °C for 2 h, and the immunoprecipitated complexes were bound to protein A/G-Sepharose beads from Invitrogen at 4 °C overnight. The beads were washed four times with lysis buffer, and proteins were eluted in sample buffer and resolved on 10% SDS–PAGE for western blot analysis. Von Hippel–Lindau expression vectors included pCSVHL-WT, pCSVHL-W88S, pCSVHL-Y112H, and pCSVHL-R167Q.
Western blot analysis
Protein lysates were prepared using the Fermentas ProteoJET Mammalian Cell Lysis Reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Twenty micrograms of protein lysates were used in SDS–PAGE followed by western blot transfer. Antibodies (phospho-NFκB, phospho-GSK3β, phospho-STAT3; phospho-ERK, MYC, Cyclin D1, α-tubulin, VHL; GAPDH; PIAS4, HIF1α) were purchased from Cell Signaling (Boston, MA, USA), Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Novus (Littleton, CO, USA). SuperSignal West Dura or West Femto chemiluminescent substrates from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA) were used to detect the immunocomplexes.
Reporter assays
For Myc reporter assays, cells at subconfluent density in 12-well plates were co-transfected with 1 μg of Myc-LUC, 25 ng of Renilla luciferase pRL-TK transfection control and 1 μg of either PIAS4 expression vector (pCMV-PIAS4) or empty vector (pCMV). The Myc reporter construct (Myc-LUC) contains 700 bp of c-Myc promoter cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase cDNA. Reporter activities were determined using the Dual Luciferase Assay Kit from Promega (Fitchburg, WI, USA). Results were calculated from triplicates of two independent experiments. For hypoxia-response element reporter assays, HRE-LUC was used, which contains three repeats of the hypoxia-response element upstream of the thymidine kinase minimal promoter driving the luciferase reporter. The cells were co-transfected with HRE-LUC and pCMV-PIAS4, and either pCSVHL-WT, pCSVHL-W88S, pCSVHL-Y112H, pCSVHL-R167Q or pCS, with Renilla luciferase pRL-TK as a transfection control.
Results
Expression levels of PIAS4 are elevated in pancreatic cancer cells compared with normal pancreas
The expression of PIAS4 in 12 pancreatic cancer cell lines and 11 pancreatic tumours, as well as 6 normal pancreas samples was assessed by real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR). Elevated levels of PIAS4 occurred in pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumours compared with normal pancreas with a mean increase of three-fold in pancreatic cancer cell lines and six-fold in fresh pancreatic tumours (P=0.0154) (Figure 1A). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that PIAS4 was strongly expressed in pancreatic tumours compared with surrounding pancreatic parenchyma (Figure 1B). This observation was corroborated by mining public databases. The Oncomine expression data showed upregulation of PIAS4 transcript in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Supplementary Figure 1; Buchholz et al, 2005). The Human Protein Atlas reported positive PIAS4 staining in both the cytosol and membrane of pancreatic tumours and negative staining in normal pancreas (Supplementary Figure 2; Uhlen et al, 2010). The expression of PIAS4 protein was further quantified in 14 pancreatic cancer cell lines by western blot analysis. High or moderate expression of PIAS4 was detected in Panc0203, Panc0327, Panc0403, Panc1005, MiaPaCa2, and CFPAC human pancreatic cancer cell lines (Figure 1C).
Gene silencing by PIAS4 siRNA suppressed cell growth in human pancreatic cancer cells; whereas PIAS4 overexpression induced cell growth genes
To test the role of endogenous PIAS4 in cell proliferation, two cell lines (Panc0327 and Panc1005) with high and two (AsPc1 and BxPc3) with low PIAS4 expression were used for siRNA transfection first with PIAS4 siRNA mixture containing a pool of four siRNAs and compared with scrambled control siRNA. Liquid culture proliferation assays showed that pancreatic cancer cells transfected with PIAS4 siRNA had slower cell growth compared with two controls (wt: wild-type; ctrl siRNA: control siRNA) (Figure 2A). Also, colony assays of Panc0327 and Panc1005 showed decreased colony number in cells transfected with PIAS4 siRNA compared with either wild-type cells or cells transfected with control scrambled siRNA (ctrl siRNA) (Figure 2B). In addition, we tested two extra siRNA targeting either exon 2 (siEXON2) or exon 6 (siEXON6) of PIAS4 in these pancreatic cancer cells. We found that pancreatic cancer cell lines transfected with both of these siRNAs suppressed cell proliferation compared with either NC (non-target siRNA NC) or wild-type cells (Figure 2C).
Exogenous PIAS4 was expressed in a low PIAS4-expressing pancreatic cancer cell line (Panc1) to examine its effect on pancreatic cancer cells. Proteins related to cell cycle and cell proliferation (Cyclin D1, MYC, phosphorylated ERK, and phosphorylated GSK3β) were increased in Panc1 cells transfected with pCMV-PIAS4 compared with cells transfected with the empty vector (Figure 2D). In addition, the phosphorylation level of NFkB/p65 was elevated after overexpression of PIAS4 in Panc1 cells, suggesting the activation of the NFkB signalling pathway by PIAS4 (Figure 2D). Also, MYC reporter assays showed more than 15-fold induction of the MYC promoter activity in pancreatic cancer cells transfected with the PIAS4 expression vector compared with cells transfected with the empty vector (Figure 2E).
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha is regulated by PIAS4 via sumoylation of VHL
Because pancreatic cancer frequently occurs in a low oxygen environment, we examined the expression levels of PIAS4 and HIF1α mRNA under hypoxic conditions (1% O2). Real-time RT–PCR showed that PIAS4 and HIF1α were induced 15- to 20-fold by hypoxia in Panc0327 and Panc1005 within 4 h (Figure 3A). The induction levels were less in BxPc3 and AsPc1 pancreatic cancer cell lines at 4- to 8-fold but still significant (Figure 3A). We investigated the protein expression levels of HIF1α and PIAS4, as well as STAT3, a modulator of cell proliferation mediated by HIF1α, in BxPc3 cells under hypoxia. After 2 h exposure to 1% O2, acute induction of HIF1α was associated with the induction of phosphorylated STAT3; and this induction of both proteins was diminished after 48 h of 1% O2 exposure (Figure 3B). The PIAS4 protein level was also induced after 2 h exposure to hypoxia, and the expression levels remained elevated under chronic hypoxia conditions (48 h, 1% O2,) (Figure 3B). In addition, we explored the role of PIAS4 in NFκB, AKT, and MAPK pathways under hypoxic condition. Increase in phosphorylation levels of AKT and ERK was associated with the induction of HIF1α and phosphorylated STAT3 after 2 h exposure to 1% O2; and levels of these activated proteins decreased after 48 h of 1% O2 exposure. On the other hand, NFκB exhibited significant basal phosphorylation which decreased after acute and chronic hypoxia (Figure 3B).
A previous study in renal cell carcinoma cells showed that PIAS4 siRNA increased the degradation of HIF1α by activation of VHL. Initially, we investigated the effect of PIAS4 siRNA on levels of HIF1α at normoxia conditions. Knockdown of PIAS4 in MiaPaCa2 pancreatic cancer cells decreased levels of HIF1α as well as expression of the HIF1α target gene VEGF (Figure 4A). Surprisingly, VHL expression level was also suppressed by PIAS4 siRNA in these cells (Figure 4A), suggesting another mechanism of VHL regulation by PIAS4. Because pancreatic cancer cells are highly invasive, the effect of PIAS4 knockdown was studied using Boyden chamber assays. The MiaPaCa2 cells transfected with PIAS4 siRNA exhibited both suppression of cell proliferation on adherent cells and decreased cell invasion through Boyden chambers compared with wild-type and control siRNA transfected cells (Figure 4B). Furthermore, we examined the effect of PIAS4 siRNA on the HIF1α pathway under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) in MiaPaCa2 cells. Real-time RT–PCR showed that the induction of both VEGF and another HIF1α target gene, JMJD1A, were suppressed after PIAS4 siRNA transfection in MiaPaCa2 cells compared with the two control conditions (wild-type untransfected and control siRNA transfected) (Figure 4C).
Next, we examined the effect of PIAS4 siRNA on the protein expression levels of HIF1α and STAT3 in pancreatic cancer cells (MiaPaCa2 and Panc0327) in hypoxic conditions (1% O2,). In the two control conditions (wild-type and control siRNA), the induction of HIF1α protein was readily detectable after exposure to hypoxia for 2 h (Figure 5A and B). The expression levels of the induced HIF1α protein continued to be robustly expressed even after 48 h exposure to hypoxia in these cells with control siRNA (Figure 5A and B). In PIAS4 siRNA knockdown cells, the induction levels of HIF1α were either decreased as in MiaPaCa2 cells (Figure 5A) or the HIF1α induction was markedly delayed with prominent expression only after 48 h exposure to hypoxia in Panc0327 cells compared with controls (Figure 5B). The phosphorylation level of STAT3 was prominently diminished in PIAS4 siRNA transfected cells, and chronic hypoxia (48 h) was unable to induce STAT3 phosphorylation in these cells (Figure 5A and B).
The protein level of HIF1α can be regulated by VHL-mediated degradation; and E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of VHL can be affected by its levels of sumoylation. In MiaPaCa2 pancreatic cancer cells treated with PIAS4 siRNA, the levels of SUMO1 in total cell lysates were decreased as shown by western blot analysis (Figure 6A) when PIAS4 was knocked down by >90% (Figure 6B), Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that PIAS4 and VHL interacted, and as expected this interaction was diminished after PIAS4 siRNA was transfected into MiaPaCa2 cells (Figure 6C). When the same western blot was probed with VHL antibodies, the sumoylation levels of VHL were increased under hypoxic conditions in the two control cells (wild-type and ctrl siRNA transfected) but the sumoylation was suppressed in PIAS4 siRNA-treated cells (Figure 6D). Although the real-time PCR results demonstrated decreased levels of VHL after siRNA treatment (Figure 4A), no decrease in the levels of VHL protein occurred in these cells (Figure 6D).
Prior investigators described (Cai et al, 2010) that the binding domain of PIAS4 for VHL was between amino acids 54 and 120. We used two VHL expression vectors containing mutations in this region (pCSVHL-W88S; pCSVHL-Y112H) and one mutation outside of this region (pCSVHL-R167Q) to examine the binding between VHL and PIAS4. Co-expression of PIAS4 and wild-type VHL again showed binding between them and this interaction was lost when wild-type VHL was replaced with VHL containing mutations in the PIAS-binding region (W88S and Y112H) (Figure 7A). The binding was retained when the VHL mutation occurred outside of the PIAS4-binding region (R167Q) (Figure 7A). Interaction between VHL and PIAS4 was able to regulate HIF1α activity in a reporter assay containing the hypoxia-response element (HRE-LUC) (Figure 7B). The loss of the interaction between VHL and PIAS4 subsequently suppressed the induction of HIF1α activity (Figure 7B). In addition, we found that mutation of VHL at amino acid 167 also suppressed the hypoxia-response element (reporter assays) (Figure 7B), although it did not disrupt the interaction between PIAS4 and VHL.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that PIAS4 is a potential anticancer target in pancreatic cancer cells by regulating HIF1α signalling through interaction and sumoylation of VHL. PIAS4 belongs to the PIAS protein family, which includes PIAS1, PIAS2 (or PIASX), PIAS3, and PIAS4 (or PIASγ). They share sequence homology and were initially characterised as protein inhibitors of activated STAT proteins (Jackson, 2001). Subsequent studies showed that the PIAS family of proteins modulated transcription by different mechanisms, such as regulation of DNA-binding activity of transcription factors, recruitment of either corepressors or coactivators or engage in post-translational modification by their SUMO E3 ligase activity (Bischof et al, 2006; Wilkinson and Henley, 2010). In the non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line H1299, PIAS4 interacted with p53 and inhibited p53-mediated transactivation of its target genes BAX and p21, although it did not inhibit apoptosis (Nelson et al, 2001). In the prostate cancer cells LNCaP, PIAS4 interacted with the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR) and acted as a transcriptional corepressor of AR which is central to prostate cancer development and progression (Gross et al, 2004). Conditional expression of PIAS4 induced apoptosis in a human chronic myeloid leukaemia cell line KCL22 (Ohmine et al, 2001). However, in synovial sarcomas, PIAS4-mediated sumoylation resulted in overexpression of nuclear receptor coactivator 3, which is essential for tumour formation (Sun et al, 2011). In hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells, PIAS4 modulates sumoylation of NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator), and NF-κB activation in response to DNA damage and knockdown of PIAS4 by siRNA in these cells inhibited NF-κB activation (Mabb et al, 2006).
Our examination of PIAS4 expression in a panel of 14 pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumours indicated that dysregulation of PIAS4 frequently occurred in pancreatic cancers. Substantial increase in the PIAS4 protein expression levels was found in tumour tissues compared with normal pancreatic epithelium. By gene silencing of PIAS4 with siRNA, we demonstrated that inhibition of PIAS4 with either pooled siRNAs or individual siRNA targeting specific exons in four cell lines was associated with decrease in cell number. Also, knockdown of PIAS4 in pancreatic cancer cells suppressed cell invasiveness as measured by Boyden chamber assays. Forced expression of PIAS4 in one cell line (Panc1) resulted in induction of genes related to cell growth such as Myc. A Myc reporter assay demonstrated that PIAS4 activated the Myc promoter. C-Myc is a target of the LEF/TCF transcription factor (Koenig et al, 2006). PIAS4 may either directly stimulate the Myc promoter or acts as a coactivator of LEF/TCF, which subsequently enhances transcription of Myc. In a previous study in COS cells, PIAS4 colocalised with TCF in the nucleus, sumoylated TCF, and activated TCF transcription (Ihara et al, 2005). In addition, we found that overexpression of PIAS4 caused an increase, albeit subtle, in phosphorylation of NFκB/p65 in Panc1 pancreatic cancer cells. We were unable to detect phosphorylated IKKβ or IκBα, which suggests that this signalling pathway is not robust in Panc1 cells. Previous studies showed that upon DNA damage, PIAS4 caused NF-κB activation in HepG2 cells (Mabb et al, 2006), but inhibited NF-κB activity in skin squamous cell carcinomas (Albor and Kulesz-Martin, 2007).
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma exists in a hypoxic microenvironment (Couvelard et al, 2008), and by real-time RT–PCR, we showed that PIAS4 was inducible together with HIF1α under hypoxic conditions (1% O2). Induction of PIAS4 positively correlated with levels of HIF1α in acute hypoxic conditions. Two pancreatic cancer cell lines (AsPc1 and BxPc3) had low levels and two (Panc0327 and Panc1005) had higher levels of induction of both PIAS4 and HIF1α. In contrast, with chronic hypoxia, the kinetics of PIAS4 and HIF1α induction were divergent. For example, elevated levels of PIAS4 mRNA and protein paralleled each other in BxPc3 cells after both acute and chronic exposure to hypoxia. On the other hand, HIF1α RNA was continuously increased during a 4- to 24-h period of hypoxia, but its protein accumulation diminished at 48 h of hypoxia in the BxPc3 cells and Panc0327 (data not shown). Phosphorylation levels of AKT and ERK also exhibited similar kinetics as HIF1α. These data suggest that regulation of HIF1α signalling by PIAS4 may be an acute response to hypoxia; and additional regulatory mechanisms are involved in chronic hypoxic conditions. Notably, NFκB exhibited significant basal phosphorylation which decreased after acute and chronic hypoxia. We suspect that this represents crosstalk regulation between signallings of NFκB and HIF1α.
An earlier study of colon cancer demonstrated high PIAS4 expression with little angiogensis in colon cancer tissue, which was associated with enhanced HIF1α sumoylation and deactivation of HIF1α activity (Kang et al, 2010). By contrast, our study showed that induction of PIAS4 is positively correlated with induction of HIF1α. In the hypoxia signalling cascade, HIF1α activates downstream target genes including VEGF and JMJD1A and promotes tumourigenesis (Tang et al, 2004; Krieg et al, 2010). Our real-time RT–PCR results showed that PIAS4 siRNA suppressed the expression of HIF1α in pancreatic cancer cells; and when these cells were exposed to hypoxia for 48 h, the induction of the HIF1α downstream targets, VEGF and JMJD1A, was also attenuated during PIAS4 knockdown. The histone demethylase JMJD1A is a member of the jumonji domain-containing family; and its function is oxygen-dependent and regulated by HIF1α (Beyer et al, 2008). JMJD1A has been identified as a useful biomarker for hypoxic tumour cells such as colorectal and renal cell carcinomas (Beyer et al, 2008; Uemura et al, 2010; Guo et al 2011). Alternatively, PIAS4 may directly regulate JMJD1A, and the study of the ability of PIAS4 to modulate epigenetic histone modifications via JMJD1A will be of interest.
Another important protein involved in hypoxic signalling is STAT3 (Gray et al, 2005). In cancers of diverse origins, the activities of both STAT3 and HIF1α are upregulated in part by an autocrine loop (Lang et al, 2007; Anglesio et al, 2011). Activation of HIF1α transcriptional activity by multiple growth stimuli and hypoxia is mediated by STAT3 (Gray et al, 2005; Lang et al, 2007). Thus, through the action of STAT3, HIF1α upregulates genes involved in enhanced cell proliferation and survival (Lang et al, 2007). Our study showed that PIAS4 siRNA decreased or delayed the induction of HIF1α expression, and suppressed phosphorylation levels of STAT3. After 48 h of hypoxia, STAT3 remained suppressed and was not reactivated suggesting an additional non-HIF1α-dependent mechanism of STAT3 regulation by PIAS4 in these pancreatic cancer cells. In addition to STAT3, STAT5a and 5b have also been implicated in pancreatic tumourigenesis (Kataoka et al, 2007; Moser et al, 2012). Although a previous study showed weak positive staining of STAT5b in normal pancreatic ducts adjacent to the tumour and 50% of tumour samples exhibited positive staining for STAT5b (Moser et al, 2012), no phosphorylated STAT5a or 5b were detected in BxPc3 cells suggesting at least for the pancreatic cancer cells STAT3 has a more prominent role in the context of PIAS4. Phosphorylation of STAT3 is mediated by the Janus-activated kinase (JAK) (Zhong and Darnell, 1994); and in a KRAS-induced mouse model of PDAC, a selective JAK2 inhibitor blocked STAT3 phosphorylation and reduced the formation of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms and adenocarcinomas (Corcoran et al, 2011). Prior studies have found that the endogenous JAK2 inhibitor protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) can become sumoylated and inactivated in mammalian fibroblasts (Dadke et al, 2007). The PIAS4 siRNA knockdown cells showed a global decrease in SUMO1 levels. Potentially, PTP1B may be a substrate of PIAS4 sumoylation resulting in increased JAK2 activity with subsequent phosphorylation of STAT3. Therefore, the JAK/STAT pathway in PDAC may be suppressed by PIAS4 siRNA.
Our observation of either decreased or delayed HIF1α induction in PIAS4 siRNA knockdown pancreatic cancer cells was likely due to the decreased sumoylation of VHL. Von Hippel–Lindau acts as a tumour suppressor by degradation of HIF1α (Kaelin, 2008). Von Hippel–Lindau sumoylation inactivates its tumour-suppressing activity (Cai et al, 2010). Coimmunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that the functional interaction between PIAS4 and VHL is essential for regulation of HIF1α activity. We showed that loss of binding between PIAS4 and two mutant VHL constructs reduced HIF1α transcriptional activity as demonstrated by luciferase assays. In addition, although the VHL mutant R167Q did not interfere with binding between PIAS4 and VHL, it was still able to suppress HIF1α transcriptional activity. This amino acid is a part of the alpha helix containing domain involved in interaction between VHL and elongin BC complex that targets HIF1α for proteasomal degradation (Iwai et al, 1999). How this mutation decreased the transcriptional activity of HIF1α requires further study. On the basis of our results, we present a mechanism for the role of PIAS4 in pancreatic cancer (Figure 8). The model illustrates that in the hypoxic condition, PIAS4 sumoylates and inactivates VHL which leads to HIF1α activation. Hypoxia also induces PIAS4 expression. In normoxic condition, PIAS4 alone is sufficient to activate STAT3, NFκB, ERK and subsequently transcriptional activation of MYC, Cyclin D1, VEGF, and JMJD1A. As a result, pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis are promoted. In summary, our study demonstrated the essential role of PIAS4 in the regulation of pancreatic cancer cell growth by VHL sumoylation and enhanced HIF1α activity. Our data strongly suggest that inhibition of PIAS4 activity can be a novel therapeutic approach in the management of pancreatic cancers.
Change history
01 October 2013
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Adachi Y, Yamamoto H, Ohashi H, Endo T, Carbone DP, Imai K, Shinomura Y (2010) A candidate targeting molecule of insulin-like growth factor- I receptor for gastrointestinal cancers. World J Gastroenterol 16: 5779–5789.
Albor A, Kulesz-Martin M (2007) Novel initiation genes in squamous cell carcinomagenesis: a role for substrate-specific ubiquitylation in the control of cell survival. Mol Carcin 46: 585–590.
Anglesio MS, George J, Kulbe H, Friedlander M, Rischin D, Lemech C, Power J, Coward J, Cowin PA, House CM, Chakravarty P, Gorringe KL, Campbell IG, Group AOCS, Okamoto A, Birrer MJ, Huntsman DG, de Fazio A, Kalloger SE, Balkwill F, Gilks CB, Bowtell DD (2011) IL6-STAT3-HIF signaling and therapeutic response to the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib in ovarian clear cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17: 2538–2548.
Beyer S, Kristensen MM, Jensen KS, Johansen JV, Staller P (2008) The histone demethylases JMJD1A and JMJD2B Are transcriptional targets of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF. J Biol Chem 283: 36542–36552.
Bischof O, Schwamborn K, Martin N, Werner A, Sustmann C, Grosschedl R, Dejean A (2006) The E3 SUMO ligase PIASy is a regulator of cellular senescence and apoptosis. Mol Cell 22: 783–794.
Buchholz M, Braun M, Heidenblut A, Kestler HA, Kloppel G, Schmiegel W, Hahn SA, Luttges J, Gress TM (2005) Transcriptome analysis of microdissected pancreatic intraepithelial neoplastic lesions. Oncogene 24: 6626–6636.
Cai QL, Robertson ES (2010) Ubiquitin/SUMO modification regulates VHL protein stability and nucleocytoplasmic localization. PLoS One 5 (9): e12636.
Cai QL, Verma SC, Kumar P, Ma M, Robertson ES (2010) Hypoxia inactivates the VHL tumour suppressor through PIASy-mediated SUMO modification. PLoS One 5 (3): e9720.
Colucci G, Labianca R, Di Costanzo F, Gebbia V, Carteni G, Massidda B, Dapretto E, Manzione L, Piazza E, Sannicolo M, Ciaparrone M, Cavanna L, Giuliani F, Maiello E, Testa A, Pederzoli P, Falconi M, Gallo C, Di Maio M, Perrone F (2010) Randomized Phase III Trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: The GIP-1 Study. J Clin Oncol 28: 1645–1651.
Corcoran RB, Contino G, Deshpande V, Tzatsos A, Conrad C, Benes CH, Levy DE, Settleman J, Engelman JA, Bardeesy N (2011) STAT3 plays a critical role in KRAS-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 71: 5020–5029.
Couvelard A, Deschamps L, Rebours V, Sauvanet A, Gatter K, Pezzella F, Ruszniewski P, Bedossa P (2008) Overexpression of the oxygen sensors PHD-1, PHD-2, PHD-3, and FIH Is associated with tumour aggressiveness in pancreatic endocrine tumours. Clin Cancer Res 14: 6634–6639.
Dadke S, Cotteret S, Yip S-C, Jaffer ZM, Haj F, Ivanov A, Rauscher F, Shuai K, Ng T, Neel BG, Chernoff J (2007) Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B by sumoylation. Nat Cell Biol 9: 80–85.
Denko NC (2008) Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 705–713.
Depaux A, Regnier-Ricard F, Germani A, Varin-Blank N (2007) A crosstalk between hSiah2 and Pias E3-ligases modulates Pias-dependent activation. Oncogene 26: 6665–6676.
Gray MJ, Zhang J, Ellis LM, Semenza GL, Evans DB, Watowich SS, Gallick GE (2005) HIF-1[alpha], STAT3, CBP//p300 and Ref-1//APE are components of a transcriptional complex that regulates Src-dependent hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF in pancreatic and prostate carcinomas. Oncogene 24: 3110–3120.
Gross M, Yang R, Top I, Gasper C, Shuai K (2004) PIASy-mediated repression of the androgen receptor is independent of sumoylation. Oncogene 23: 3059–3066.
Guo X, Shi M, Sun L, Wang Y, Gui Y, Cai Z, Duan X (2011) The expression of histone demethylase JMJD1A in renal cell carcinoma. Neoplasma 58: 153–157.
Ihara M, Yamamoto H, Kikuchi A (2005) SUMO-1 modification of PIASy, an E3 ligase, is necessary for PIASy-dependent activation of Tcf-4. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3506–3518.
Iwai K, Yamanaka K, Kamura T, Minato N, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Klausner RD, Pause A (1999) Identification of the von Hippel–Lindau tumour-suppressor protein as part of an active E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 12436–12441.
Jackson PK (2001) A new RING for SUMO: wrestling transcriptional responses into nuclear bodies with PIAS family E3 SUMO ligases. Genes Dev 15: 3053–3058.
Kaelin WG Jr (2008) The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 865–873.
Kang X, Li J, Zou Y, Yi J, Zhang H, Cao M, Yeh ETH, Cheng J (2010) PIASy stimulates HIF1[alpha] SUMOylation and negatively regulates HIF1[alpha] activity in response to hypoxia. Oncogene 29: 5568–5578.
Karamouzis MV, Konstantinopoulos PA, Badra FA, Papavassiliou AG (2008) SUMO and estrogen receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107: 195–210.
Kataoka TR, Ioka T, Tsukamoto Y, Matsumura M, Ishiguro S, Nishizawa Y (2007) Nuclear expression of STAT5 in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Int J Surg Pathol 15: 277–281.
Koenig A, Mueller C, Hasel C, Adler G, Menke A (2006) Collagen Type I Induces disruption of E-cadherin–mediated cell-cell contacts and promotes proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 66: 4662–4671.
Krieg AJ, Rankin EB, Chan D, Razorenova O, Fernandez S, Giaccia AJ (2010) Regulation of the histone demethylase JMJD1A by hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} enhances hypoxic gene expression and tumour growth. Mol Cell Biol 30: 344–353.
Lang SA, Moser C, Gaumann A, Klein D, Glockzin G, Popp FC, Dahlke MH, Piso P, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK, Stoeltzing O (2007) Targeting heat shock protein 90 in pancreatic cancer impairs insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling, disrupts an interleukin-6/signal-transducer and activator of transcription 3/hypoxia-inducible factor-1α autocrine loop, and reduces orthotopic tumor growth. Clin Cancer Res 13: 6459–6468.
Mabb AM, Wuerzberger-Davis SM, Miyamoto S (2006) PIASy mediates NEMO sumoylation and NF-[kappa]B activation in response to genotoxic stress. Nat Cell Biol 8: 986–993.
Moser C, Ruemmele P, Gehmert S, Schenk H, Kreutz‡ MP, Mycielska ME, Hackl C, Kroemer A, Schnitzbauer AA, Stoeltzing O, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK, Lang SA (2012) STAT5b as molecular target in pancreatic cancer – inhibition of tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastases. Neoplasia 14: 11.
McCarthy N (2009) Pancreatic cancer on your marks. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 846.
Natoni F, Diolordi L, Santoni C, Montani MSG (2005) Sodium butyrate sensitises human pancreatic cancer cells to both the intrinsic and the extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta-Mol Cell Res 1745: 318–329.
Nelson V, Davis GE, Maxwell SA (2001) A putative protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIASy) interacts with p53 and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation but not apoptosis. Apoptosis 6: 221–234.
Ohmine K, Ota J, Ueda M, Ueno S, Yoshida K, Yamashita Y, Kirito K, Imagawa S, Nakamura Y, Saito K, Akutsu M, Mitani K, Kano Y, Komatsu N, Ozawa K, Mano H (2001) Characterization of stage progression in chronic myeloid leukemia by DNA microarray with purified hematopoietic stem cells. Oncogene 20: 8249–8257.
Sachdev S, Bruhn L, Sieber H, Pichler A, Melchior F, Grosschedl R (2001) PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes Dev 15: 3088–3103.
Sun Y, Perera J, Rubin BP, Huang JT (2011) SYT-SSX1 (synovial sarcoma translocated) regulates PIASy ligase activity to cause overexpression of NCOA3 protein. J Biol Chem 286: 18623–18632.
Tang N, Wang L, Esko J, Giordano FJ, Huang Y, Gerber H-P, Ferrara N, Johnson RS (2004) Loss of HIF-1α in endothelial cells disrupts a hypoxia-driven VEGF autocrine loop necessary for tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 6: 485–495.
Uemura M, Yamamoto H, Takemasa I, Mimori K, Hemmi H, Mizushima T, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Matsuura N, Doki Y, Mori M (2010) Jumonji domain containing 1A is a novel prognostic marker for colorectal cancer: in vivo identification from hypoxic tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 16: 4636–4646.
Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M, Zwahlen M, Kampf C, Wester K, Hober S, Wernerus H, Bjorling L, Ponten F (2010) Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nat Biotech 28: 1248–1250.
Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M (2011) Pancreatic cancer. The Lancet 378: 607–620.
Wilkinson KA, Henley JM (2010) Mechanisms, regulation and consequences of protein sumoylation. Biochem J 428: 133–145.
Wilson WR, Hay MP (2011) Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 393–410.
Zhong ZWZ, Darnell JE Jr. (1994) Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science 264: 4.
Acknowledgements
We thank Marcia and Jeff Green for their generous support for our pancreatic cancer research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Chien, W., Lee, K., Ding, L. et al. PIAS4 is an activator of hypoxia signalling via VHL suppression during growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Br J Cancer 109, 1795–1804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.531
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.531
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
SUMOylation modulates eIF5A activities in both yeast and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2024)
-
The emerging roles of SUMOylation in the tumor microenvironment and therapeutic implications
Experimental Hematology & Oncology (2023)
-
Correlation analysis of lipid metabolism genes with the immune microenvironment in gastric cancer and the construction of a novel gene signature
Clinical and Translational Oncology (2022)
-
The SUMO pathway in pancreatic cancer: insights and inhibition
British Journal of Cancer (2021)
-
Impact of posttranslational modifications in pancreatic carcinogenesis and treatments
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2021)