Abstract
Apocrine differentiation in human breast cancers has been assessed using immunohistochemistry to detect zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein and the findings related to standard prognostic factors, disease free interval (DFI) and survival in 145 women with early breast cancer. Breast tumour samples from women with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were assessed. Routinely fixed and processed tissue was used throughout. Sixty-six (45%) tumours did not stain with the antibody. Fifty-two (36%) exhibited positive apocrine staining while for 27 (19%) only a few cells were reactive. The presence of apocrine differentiation was unrelated to lymph node status, menstrual status, tumour grade or size, oestrogen receptor (E2R) or progesterone receptor status. However, patients whose tumours exhibited apocrine staining had a shorter disease-free interval (DFI) (P = 0.03) and survival (P = 0.03). A Cox's multiple regression analysis of the data found that the presence of staining added significantly (P = 0.047) to the predictive value of node status (P = 0.0001), menstrual status (P = 0.0001), tumour size (P = 0.0026) and E2R status (P = 0.0014) for patient survival. The other seven prognostic factors tested did not reach significance and were rejected from the model. Apocrine differentiation in breast cancer appears to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis tumours.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bundred, N., Walker, R., Everington, D. et al. Is apocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma of prognostic significance?. Br J Cancer 62, 113–117 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1990.240
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1990.240