Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease and the leading cause of dementia among the elderly worldwide1,2. Although the enhancement of central cholinergic transmission with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors has been proven to be clinically effective for symptomatic treatment, no potent disease-modifying treatment is currently available3. Therefore, it is vitally important to understand the complicated pathogenesis of AD to achieve further progress.

Mounting evidence suggests that the accumulation of iron in specific areas of the brain is a hallmark and one of the primary causes of neurodegenerative diseases including AD4,5,6. Abnormally high iron concentrations in the brain have been widely reported in AD patients7,8, and the well-known APP/PS1 transgenic mouse AD animal model9. Additionally, excess iron has been proven to cause neuronal damage in multiple in vitro and in vivo studies10,11,12 because excess iron can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS)13 and is closely associated with mitochondrial dysfunction14. Correspondingly, therapeutic strategies targeting iron dyshomeostasis have recently attracted considerable attention and have been both preclinically and clinically demonstrated to effectively decrease the progression of the neurological symptoms of AD15,16,17,18. Together, these results indicate that the identification of key therapeutic targets for treating iron dyshomeostasis and the discovery of active small molecules that target iron-mediated neuronal damage may shed new light on the development of effective therapeutic agents for AD treatment.

Huperzine A (HupA) (Figure 1), an alkaloid isolated from the Chinese herbal medicine Qian Ceng Ta (Huperzia serrata), possesses a potent AChE inhibitory effect and is a licensed drug that is widely used for AD treatment in China and is available as a nutraceutical in the United States19. Interestingly, increasing numbers of studies have demonstrated that HupA can ameliorate oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction20,21,22. First, HupA significantly suppresses ROS overproduction and lipid peroxidation in Aβ-23,24, H2O2-25 and glutamate26 -stimulated cellular models. Second, HupA also markedly ameliorates oxidative stress in chronic cerebrally hypoperfused and aged rats27,28 and attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction in APP/PS1 transgenic mice29 and rats after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)30. It has been suggested that ICH causes significant iron overload in the brain31, and the levels of brain iron in APP/PS1 transgenic mice are markedly greater than those in aged-matched control mice9. Together, the evidence indicates that excessive iron accumulation in neuronal cells is closely associated with massive oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction, which subsequently lead to neurotoxicity14,32. Therefore, it is of great interest to determine whether HupA can ameliorate iron overload-induced neuronal damage and whether these effects could be attributable to its anti-oxidative capacity or its regulation of iron metabolism. Additionally, because HupA is a potent AChE inhibitor, it is necessary to further clarify whether its influence on AChE activity is associated with the above-mentioned beneficial effects.

Figure 1
figure 1

The chemical structure of HupA.

PowerPoint slide

Materials and methods

Materials

HupA (purity >99%, Wan Bang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Wenling, China) was dissolved in 0.1 mol/L HCl at 5 mg/mL as a stock solution. Stock solutions of ferric ammonium citrate (FAC, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), deferoxamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and donepezil hydrochloride (King-Pharm, Nanjing, China) were prepared in deionized water at 10 mmol/L. All solutions were stored at -20 °C and diluted to the proper concentrations before use.

Primary cortical neuron culture and drug treatment

Primary neuronal cultures were prepared from embryonic day 16–17 (E16–17) embryos of Sprague-Dawley rats as previously described with slight modifications33. Briefly, the cortices were rapidly dissected from the whole-brain tissues in ice-cold high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (HG-DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), minced and dissociated in 0.125% trypsin with 0.2 mg/mL DNase I at 37 °C for 15 min. Next, the tissues were triturated with pipettes in HG-DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and filtered through a strainer (300/400 mesh). The cell suspensions were then plated into poly-L-lysine (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China)-coated plates or dishes. After 4 h of incubation, the culture medium was completely removed, and the cortical neurons were cultured in neurobasal medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 0.5 mmol/L L-glutamine, 2% B27 supplement, penicillin (60 mg/L) and streptomycin (50 mg/L). Half of the culture medium was refreshed every 3 d. After 9 d of culture, the culture medium was replaced with neurobasal medium (without B27 supplement), and the neurons were then treated with different concentrations of FAC with or without HupA for 24 h, whereas the control group was maintained in same amount of culture medium.

Cell viability assay

Primary cortical neurons cultured in 96-well plates were treated on the 9th day. After the application of the different treatments for 24 h, cell viability was measured using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) reduction assay. The cells were incubated with MTT solution (5 mg/mL) at 37 °C for 4 h. All culture media were then removed, and the resultant formazan was dissolved in DMSO (100 μL/well). Next, the plates were shaken for 5 min, and the absorbance was measured using a PerkinElmer microplate reader at 490 nm. The optical density (OD) values of all groups were normalized against the values of the control, and the cell viabilities are presented as the percentages of surviving cells relative to the control group. At least three independent experiments were performed.

Measurement of intracellular ROS

ROS generation was measured based on the oxidation of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-diacetate) to fluorescent 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF). Twenty-four hours after the different treatments, the cells in 96-well plates were incubated with 10 μmol/L of H2DCF-diacetate (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 °C in the dark for 45 min. The DCF intensities were quantified using a PerkinElmer microplate reader with 485-nm excitation and 520-nm emission filters. The fluorescence intensities were normalized to the control group and are presented as the relative ROS levels.

Detection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production

The neuronal ATP levels were measured using a bioluminescent ATP detection kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). After treatment, the cells in the 96-well plates were left at room temperature for 30 min and then lysed via the addition of the ATP-releasing reagent (100 μL/well). The lysates were incubated in the dark with the luciferin substrate and luciferase enzyme for 10 min to stabilize the luminescent signal. The bioluminescence intensity was measured using a PerkinElmer microplate reader. The bioluminescence intensities were normalized to those of the control group and are presented as the relative ATP levels.

Measurement of the labile iron pool (LIP) level

The cellular labile iron was measured with a fluorescence technique using the iron sensor calcein (CA)34. After treatment for 24 h, the cultures were washed three times with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) to remove the extracellular iron and then loaded with 0.25 μmol/L calcein acetomethoxy (CA-AM) (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. After loading, the cultures were washed twice with PBS to remove the excess CA-AM, and the cellular CA fluorescence intensity was measured using a PerkinElmer microplate reader at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm. The changes in the CA fluorescence intensities were equivalent to the amounts of cellular iron that were originally bound to the CA and proportional to the LIP level. The fluorescence intensities are presented as the percentages of the FAC group.

Protein extraction and Western blot analysis

Cells in 6-well plates were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4,1 mmol/L PMSF, 1% P8340, pH 7.4) for 30 min on ice and then centrifuged at 12 000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants were collected, and the protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

The protein samples were mixed with loading buffer containing 5% DTT and boiled for 10 min. The proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfonate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight: β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1; Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX, USA). The membranes were washed with Tris-buffered saline with Tween-80 (TBST) and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody (Kangchen, Shanghai, China) for 1 h at room temperature. The signals were detected using the ECL Plus detection kit (Amersham GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The immunoreactive bands were visualized via autoradiography, and the intensity of each band was quantified.

Cytosol purification and cytosolic-aconitase (c-aconitase) activity assay

After 24 h of the different treatments, the neurons were washed and harvested with cold HEPES buffer (100 mmol/L HEPES, 250 mmol/L sucrose, pH 7.4) and then treated with 0.007% digitonin on ice for 10 min. Next, the cell lysates were ultracentrifuged at 100 000×g for 1 h at 4 °C. The cytosolic fraction (supernatant) was tested for its protein concentration and immediately used to test the aconitase activity.

The aconitase activities were measured in the fresh cytosolic extracts with 50 μg of the cytosolic extract as the substrate in 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C35. The disappearance of the cis-aconitate was monitored spectrophotometrically at 240 nm. The units correspond to nmol of substrate consumed/min, and ɛ=3.6 mmol-1×cm-1.

AChE activity assay

After the different treatments for 24 h, the cells in the 6-well plates were washed with cold 0.1 mol/L PBS twice, scraped with 0.1 mol/L PBS buffer [0.5 % Triton, 0.05 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)] and homogenized. The homogenates were centrifuged at 14 000×g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used for the determination of AChE activity via a 96-well microplate assay based on Ellman's method36 with modifications. Thirty microliters of 2 mmol/L acetylthiocholine iodide (S-ACh), 50 μL of 0.2% 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 5 μL of 4 mmol/L tetraisopropyl pyrophosphoramide (iso-OMPA), 10 μL of 0.1 mol/L PB buffer, 109 μL of H2O and 50 μL of sample were added to the 96-well plates, which were then shaken for 20 min at 37 °C. Next, 10 μL of 3% SDS was added to stop the reaction, and the production of the yellow anion of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid was measured using a PerkinElmer microplate reader at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as the mean±SEM and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's test. P-values below 0.05 were considered significant. The statistical results are reported in the figure legends.

Results

HupA attenuated the decrease in survival of FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

We first examined the effects of HupA treatment on iron overload-induced neurotoxicity. To confirm the neuronal toxicity of iron, we used FAC as a source of iron. We first assessed the effects of FAC exposure at different concentrations (25–200 μmol/L) on the cell viabilities of the cortical neurons. The viabilities of the cells incubated with FAC at 25, 50, 100, and 200 μmol/L for 24 h were 95.46%, 92.16%, 85.03%, and 82.54% of the control group, respectively (Figure 2A). FAC exhibited concentration-dependent effects, and the cell viabilities of the rat cortical neurons were significantly decreased by FAC exposure at concentrations greater than 50 μmol/L (Figure 2A). We used FAC at the concentration of 100 μmol/L in the subsequent experiments. The viability of the neurons decreased to 85% of the control group upon incubation with 100 μmol/L FAC (Figure 2B, P<0.01 vs the control group), whereas treatment with 1 μmol/L or 10 μmol/L HupA markedly increased the cell viabilities to 90.90% and 97.04%, respectively (Figure 2B, P<0.05 and P<0.01 vs FAC-treated group, respectively). Morphological changes were also assessed in the present study. As illustrated in Figure 2C, the neuronal numbers decreased, and some neurons lost neurites or were replaced by debris after exposure to 100 μmol/L FAC for 24 h. In contrast, the cells exposed to the same amount of FAC and treated with 10 μmol/L of HupA exhibited preserved neuronal morphologies (Figure 2C).

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of HupA on cell injury induced by iron overload in rat cortical neurons. (A) Rat cortical neurons were treated with FAC (25, 50, 100, or 200 μmol/L) for 24 h. Cell viability was estimated using MTT assays. n=4. (B) Rat cortical neurons were treated with HupA (0.1, 1, or 10 μmol/L) and 100 μmol/L FAC for 24 h. n=4. (C) The morphological changes were observed using phase-contrast microscopy (200×). Data were expressed as percentage of control group, and shown as mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs FAC group.

PowerPoint slide

HupA inhibited ROS formation in the FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

We next evaluated the effects of HupA on ROS formation in the excessive iron-stimulated neurons because the ROS increment induced by intracellular iron is the crucial mediator of iron overload-associated neurotoxicity37. As illustrated in Figure 3, the levels of intracellular ROS were significantly increased to 175.80% in the primary rat cortical neurons incubated with FAC for 24 h compared with the control neurons (P<0.01). The positive control with the iron chelator deferoxamine (DFO) at 100 μmol/L exhibited a complete reversal of the ROS overproduction. Treatment with HupA at 1 and 10 μmol/L significantly decreased the ROS level increments to 146.81% and 137.97% (P<0.05 and P<0.01), respectively, compared with the group that was treated with only FAC (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects of HupA on the level of intracellular ROS in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons. FAC (100 μmol/L) caused a significant increase in the formation of ROS in neurons, which was significantly attenuated by both HupA (1 and 10 μmol/L) and DFO (100 μmol/L). ROS was detected by DCF-DA. n=7. Data were expressed as percentage of control group, and shown as mean±SEM. **P<0.01 vs control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs FAC group.

PowerPoint slide

HupA ameliorated the ATP decrease in the FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

Mitochondria play a critical role in iron overload-associated toxicity. Therefore, we conducted an ATP assay to evaluate the mitochondrial function of the FAC-exposed neurons that were treated with or without HupA. The results revealed that the level of ATP was significantly decreased to 85.59% after incubation with 100 μmol/L of FAC for 24 h (Figure 4, P<0.01 vs control neurons), and 100 μmol/L of DFO treatment markedly reversed this increase (P<0.01 vs the FAC group). Treatment with HupA at 1 and 10 μmol/L significantly enhanced the production of ATP to 92.71% and 95.66% (P<0.05 and P<0.01, Figure 4), respectively, compared with those in the group treated with FAC alone.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effects of HupA on the level of ATP in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons. FAC (100 μmol/L) caused a significant reduction of ATP, which was ameliorated by both HupA (1 and 10 μmol/L) and DFO (100 μmol/L); n=4. Data were expressed as percentage of control group, and shown as mean±SEM. **P<0.01 vs control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs FAC group.

PowerPoint slide

HupA decreased labile iron pool (LIP) levels of FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

We next assessed the effects of HupA treatment on the LIP after treatment with FAC because the LIP represents the metabolically active forms of intracellular iron. As illustrated in Figure 5, exposure to FAC at 100 μmol/L for 24 h resulted in a robust increase in the LIP level (P<0.01 vs control group) in the cortical neurons, whereas DFO treatment at 100 μmol/L of significantly decreased the increased LIP levels induced by FAC (P<0.01 vs the FAC group). Treatment with HupA at 1 and 10 μmol/L significantly decreased the intracellular LIP levels compared with those in the group treated with FAC alone (Figure 5, P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively).

Figure 5
figure 5

Effects of HupA on the level of LIP in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons. FAC (100 μmol/L) incubation caused a significant increase of LIP, which significantly reduced by both HupA (1 and 10 μmol/L) and DFO (100 μmol/L). LIP was detected by calcein-AM. n=5. Data were expressed as percentage of FAC treated group, and shown as mean±SEM. **P<0.01 vs control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs FAC group.

PowerPoint slide

HupA upregulated the expression of TfR1 and DMT1 and downregulated the activity of c-aconitase in the FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

Because previous studies have reported that TfR1, DMT1 and c-aconitase are important proteins involved in iron metabolism, we further evaluated the influence of HupA on the expression of TfR1 and DMT1 and the activity of c-aconitase in the FAC-exposed cortical neurons. TfR1 expression was significantly decreased in the rat cortical neurons after FAC treatment for 24 h (Figure 6A, P<0.01 vs the control group), whereas both 100 μmol/L of DFO and 10 μmol/L of HupA significantly ameliorated the decreased TfR1 expression induced by FAC (Figure 6A, P<0.01 vs the FAC group). The effect of HupA on the expression of DMT1 was similar to that of TfR1 (Figure 6B, P<0.05 or P<0.01 vs the FAC group). In contrast to the pattern of change for TfR1, FAC at 100 μmol/L significantly increased the c-aconitase activity (P<0.01 vs control group), whereas 10 μmol/L HupA treatment significantly reversed the change in c-aconitase activity in the FAC-exposed cortical neurons (Figure 6B, P<0.05 vs the FAC group).

Figure 6
figure 6

Effects of HupA on the levels of TfR1 and DMT1 and activity of c-aconitase in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons. FAC (100 μmol/L) incubation caused significant decreases of TfR1 (A) and DMT1 (B) expression, which were significantly reversed by HupA (10 μmol/L) treatment. (C) FAC (100 μmol/L) incubation caused significant increase of c-aconitase activity, which was significantly reversed by HupA (10 μmol/L) treatment. n=5. Data were expressed as percentage of FAC treated group, and shown as mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs FAC group.

PowerPoint slide

The inhibition of AChE activity had no effect on the ROS, ATP or LIP levels in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons

We further examined whether the AChE activity contributed to the ameliorative effects of HupA. The specific AChE inhibitor donepezil (Don) was used for comparison. We found that both the treatments with HupA and Don significantly and dose-dependently decreased the AChE activity, and the AChE-inhibiting effect of Don at 1 μmol/L was equivalent to that of HupA at 10 μmol/L (Figure 7A). Don at 1 μmol/L was then selected for the following experiment. In contrast to the ameliorative effects of HupA treatment at 10 μmol/L, 1 μmol/L Don had no observable effects on the iron overload-induced overproduction of ROS formation or decrease in ATP production in the rat cortical neurons (Figure 7B, 7C, P>0.05 vs the FAC group). Similarly, the robustly increased LIP level in the FAC-exposed cortical neurons (P<0.01 vs control group) was not affected by the Don treatment (Figure 7D, P>0.05 vs the FAC group).

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of Don on the level of ROS, ATP and LIP in FAC-exposed rat cortical neurons. (A) HupA (1 and 10 μmol/L) and Don (1 and 10 μmol/L) significantly reduced the AChE activity in concentration-dependent manner. n=3. (B) Don had no influence on the level of ROS in FAC-exposed neurons. n=3. (C) Don had no influence on the level of ATP production in FAC-exposed neurons. n=4. (D) Don had no effects on the level of LIP in FAC-exposed neurons. n=3. Data were shown as mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs control group.

PowerPoint slide

Discussion

Although the protective effects of HupA, a highly selective and potent AChE inhibitor, against neuronal damage have been well proven in multiple in vitro neuronal models26,30,38,39, whether and how this active natural product can directly ameliorate iron overload-induced neuronal damage has not yet been clarified. The most notable aspects of the present study include: 1) the significant effect of HupA on alleviating multifaceted iron overload-induced malignant changes in primary cortical neurons, and 2) the finding that the classical AChE-inhibiting effect of HupA may not contribute to its protection against iron-overload-induced neuronal damage.

Iron dysregulation and accumulation in the brain have been found to play critical roles in the etiologies of many neurodegenerative diseases including AD6,40, and there is considerable evidence indicating the cytotoxic effects of iron overload on multiple types of neurons and neuroblastoma cell lines41,42,43. Consistently with the results from these previous reports, the addition of exogenous iron to primary cortical neurons induced severe morphological damage and decreases in cell viability (Figure 2). These aberrant changes were significantly and dose-dependently ameliorated by HupA treatment (Figure 2). To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence regarding the protective effect of HupA against iron overload-induced injury to neuronal cells, which may shed additional light on the mechanisms underlying the anti-brain damage effects of HupA in animal models involving elevated iron levels in the central nervous system9,30.

Numerous studies have proven that iron is among the redox-active transition metals that can produce massive amounts of ROS, particularly hydroxyl radicals through the Fenton reaction37. These overproduced ROS that are triggered by excessive iron have been implicated as critical mediators of eventual neuronal damage44. Similarly to previous findings43,45, robust increases in the intracellular ROS levels in primary cortical neurons were observed after 24 h of exposure to FAC. Interestingly, the detrimental effects of iron were markedly attenuated by HupA treatment (Figure 3), which indicates that the neuroprotective effect of HupA may be at least partially attributable to its anti-oxidative effect. It is highly likely that the anti-oxidative effect of HupA in iron-stimulated neurons is attributable to its enhanced anti-oxidative capacity20 because HupA has been reported to significantly elevate the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)22 and to increase the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT)46. Nevertheless, HupA treatment-induced attenuation of iron-induced oxidative stress is unlikely to be associated with direct iron scavenging because there is no iron-chelating group in the HupA structure (Figure 1). Moreover, we observed a negative iron-chelation activity of HupA on the basis of UV-visible absorption spectra (data not shown).

A growing set of observations indicates that iron plays a detrimental role in mitochondrial dysfunction, which may consequently lead to neuronal damage14,47,48. The mitochondrion maintains the synthesis of iron-sulfur clusters and heme, which is the most abundant iron-containing prosthetic group in a large variety of proteins. Therefore, a fraction of the incoming iron must proceed through this organelle before reaching its final destination49. Indeed, numerous studies have proven that excessive iron exposure can induce mitochondrial dysfunction, including ATP decreases50, disturbances in the electron transport chain51, and mitochondrial fragmentation52. Because mitochondria generate most of the energy (ATP) that cells require and play vital roles in many important physiological and pathological events53,54,55, we evaluated the ameliorative effects of HupA on mitochondrial dysfunction by measuring ATP levels. The current study revealed that HupA treatment effectively improved mitochondrial function, as demonstrated by the upregulation of the ATP levels in the FAC-treated cortical neurons (Figure 4), and this effect may be closely related to the protective effect of HupA against excessive iron-induced decreases in cell survival. Additionally, ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction have been found to be closely related pathological phenomena in iron-associated neuronal models. ROS cause mitochondrial dysfunction because mitochondria are extremely sensitive to oxidative stress56. Moreover, mitochondria also produce ROS during the process of ATP generation57, thus suggesting that the effects of HupA on ROS decreases and mitochondrial protection may act synergistically. Therefore, the obvious ROS-decreasing effect of HupA might also have positively contributed to its beneficial effects on mitochondrial function in the FAC-exposed cortical neurons.

The LIP, which is defined as a low-molecular weight pool of weakly chelated iron, is increased by excessive iron incubation and thus causes cell injury58,59. In this pool, iron is redox-active and a cellular source that is available for iron metabolism regulation60,61. Iron regulatory protein-1 (IRP-1) functions as an mRNA-binding protein or as an aconitase depending on whether it disassembles or assembles iron-sulfur clusters in response to iron deficiency and abundance, respectively62,63,64,65. TfR1 and DMT1 are two major iron uptake proteins with iron-responsive elements (IREs) in their 3′-untranslated regions and are regulated by IRE/IRP65. Consistently with results from previous studies66, the present study demonstrated that iron incubation led to abnormal changes in iron metabolism signaling (Figures 5 and 6). Correspondingly, HupA treatment partly reversed the aberrant elevation of the intracellular LIP level, the down-regulation of TfR1 and DMT1 expression, and the up-regulation of c-aconitase activity after iron exposure. Therefore, in addition to the influences on ROS overproduction and mitochondrial dysfunction, HupA might also exhibit an antagonistic effect on exogenous iron overload-induced abnormal iron metabolism reactions. It has been reported that the enhancement of the LIP promotes ROS formation and mitochondrial dysfunction47,67, and our finding that HupA decreases the LIP level may contribute to the beneficial effects of HupA against FAC-induced aberrant changes in oxidation and mitochondrial function in cortical neurons. HupA may influence the cellular distribution of iron rather than decreasing the iron level via scavenging because the total iron level was not affected by HupA treatment (data not shown).

Because HupA is well known as a potent AChE inhibitor, it is necessary to understand whether the mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of HupA against iron-stimulated neurotoxicity is associated with the classical pharmacological target of HupA. We used the potent AChE inhibitor donepezil for comparison. When AChE activity was equally suppressed (∼60% inhibition compared with the control), the Don treatment was unable to regulate the ROS overproduction, mitochondrial dysfunction or intracellular LIP accumulation induced by iron overload (Figure 7). Therefore, the current findings indicate that the beneficial effects of HupA against the iron overload-induced aberrant cascade reaction may not be associated with its AChE-inhibiting effects.

In summary, we provided the first demonstration that HupA inhibits iron overload-induced damage in primary neurons and that this effect may be dependent on its regulation of ROS, mitochondrial function and the LIP level and independent of its AChE inhibition (Figure 8). Our study sheds additional light on the neuroprotective mechanism of HupA and may provide important information for the development of potential drugs for the treatment of iron overload-related neurodegenerative disease. However, additional studies are needed to better understand the precise mechanisms by which HupA is involved in this beneficial effect.

Figure 8
figure 8

A hypothetical scheme for the mechanism of HupA protection against iron overload induced neurotoxicity. Excessive iron treatment increases the level of LIP, in turn stimulates ROS generation and causes mitochondria dysfunction, which induces more ROS formation and eventually causes neuronal death. HupA significantly reduces the level of LIP and cellular ROS formation and ameliorates the mitochondrial function, and improves the cell viability. Interestingly, the mechanism of HupA protecting against iron overload neurotoxicity may not relevant to its cholinergic effect, in respect that inhibition of AChE activity by another specific AChE inhibitor–Don, to the same extent as that of HupA treatment, has no influence on iron overload induced LIP enhancement, ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunction. HupA, huperzine A; Don, donepezil.

PowerPoint slide

Author contribution

Ling-xue TAO, Xi-can TANG, and Hai-yan ZHANG designed the research; Ling-xue TAO, Xiao-tian HUANG, and Yu-ting CHEN performed the research; Ling-xue TAO analyzed data; Ling-xue TAO and Hai-yan ZHANG wrote the paper.