Introduction

Direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs), an electrocatalytic energy conversion device that can directly convert the chemical energy of alcohol molecules (such as methanol, ethanol, propanol and so on) into electricity, is a highly promising power source in transportation and portable electronics.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Nowadays, one of the key challenges in the DAFC commercialization is to improve the efficiency, activity, alcohol tolerance and durability of cathodic Pt electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).1, 2, 6, 7 So far, many advanced Pt-based nanostructures with high ORR performance have been achieved by controlling their crystal facets,8, 9 composition,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 architecture16, 17 and interface structure.18, 19 Among various Pt-based nanostructures, three-dimensionally (3D) interconnected Pt–Pd bimetallic nanostructures show superior ORR activity and durability owing to their fascinating physical and chemical properties, such as (1) the superior electrochemical self-stability that effectively restrain dissolution under electrochemical conditions, owing to the high stability of the Pd element in acidic electrolyte; (2) the big surface area accessible to the reactant molecules; and (3) the particular 3D self-supported architecture that effectively restrain the Ostwald ripening effect, improve the electron transport in the solid ligaments and facilitate the mass transfer of oxygen molecules.20, 21, 22, 23

Apart from the activity and durability, the selectivity (that is, ethanol tolerance) is also a key issue for the synthesis of high-performance cathodic Pt electrocatalysts because the alcohol crossover always happens in DAFCs. In recent pioneering studies,24, 25, 26 Marković and co-workers24, 25 found that calix[4]arene molecule modified Pt could selectively block the ORR without affecting the hydrogen oxidation reaction activity and kinetics. Meanwhile, Yang andcolleagues26 found cage-bell structured Pt–Ru nanoparticles could selectively block the methanol oxidation reaction but allow the ORR because of the difference of molecular size between the methanol and oxygen molecules. Since then, some chemical functionalized Pt nanocrystals have successfully achieved the selectivity for the ORR in the presence of alcohol molecules because of the strong ensemble effects.6, 19 For example, in our previous work, we synthesized the polyallylamine (PAH, Supplementary Scheme S1)-functionalized Pt nanolances by chemical reduction of PAH–PtII complex using HCHO that exhibited a high ORR selectivity in the presence of methanol.19 However, the as-prepared Pt nanolances suffered from harsh and tedious ultraviolet (UV)/ozone post-treatment procedures before electrocatalytic applications. In this work, we report a one-step water-based thermal decomposition route to synthesize the PAH-functionalized Pd–Pt bimetallic core–shell nanodendrites with a Pd-rich PdPt alloy core and a Pt-rich PtPd alloy shell (PdPt@PtPd CSNDs) under hydrothermal conditions by using PAH that serves as a complexant, reductant and chemical functionalization molecule that can directly be used as a cathodic ORR electrocatalyst without tedious UV/ozone post-treatment procedure. The as-synthesized PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have high activity, good durability and fascinating selectivity for the ORR.

Experimental Procedure

Reagents and chemicals

PAH (Supplementary Scheme S1, average molecular weight 150 000) was supplied from Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Potassium tetrachloroplatinate(II) (K2PtCl4) and potassium tetrachloropalladate(II) (K2PdCl4) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Commercial Pt black was purchased from Johnson Matthey Corporation (London, UK). Other reagents were of analytical reagent grade and used without further purification.

Preparation of PdPt@PtPd CSND

In a typical synthesis, 1 ml of 0.025 M K2PtCl4, 1.1 ml of 0.025 M K2PdCl4 and 0.6 ml of 0.50 M PAH (Mw=150 000, molarity of PAH given with respect to the repeating unit) were added into 7.0 ml water under stirring. Then, the mixture solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 6 h. After the recation, the products were collected by centrifugation and further washed five times with water.

Electrochemical measurements

All electrochemical experiments were carried out on a CHI 660 C electrochemical workstation (CH instruments, Inc. Shanghai, China) at 30±1 °C, using a standard three-electrode system. Rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurements were performed on a RDE710 Gamry RDE (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA). A Pt wire and a saturated calomel electrode protected by Luggin capillary with a KCl solution were used as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. Potentials in this study were given relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode. The working electrode was prepared by mixing the electrocatalyst (10 mg) and the isopropanol/Nafion (Sigma Corporation, Cream Ridge, NJ, USA) solution (20% isopropanol and 0.02% Nafion), and sonicating the solution for 60 min.27 Then, 10 μl of the catalyst ink was put onto a clean glassy carbon electrode (5 mm diameter, 0.196 cm2) and dried at room temperature. The specific loading of the metal on the electrode surface was about 102 μg cm–2.

Characterization

Morphology, bulk composition, surface structure and crystal structure of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (JSM-2010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) accessory, transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Leeman Labs, Inc. Hudson, NH, USA) and X-ray diffraction (Model D/max-rC, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The surface composition of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, ESCALAB 250). The binding energy was calibrated by means of the C 1s peak energy of 284.6 eV. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Q600SDT, TA instruments, Inc. New Castle, DE, USA) under N2 atmosphere. After the reaction, molecular weight of PAH was calculated by measuring the intrinsic viscosity of PAH solution28, 29 using AMVn viscometer (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria).

Results and discussion

The preparation process of PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is illustrated in Scheme 1. In a typical synthesis, PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs are produced by heating an aqueous solution containing K2PtCl4, K2PdCl4 and PAH for 6 h at 180 °C (see Experimental procedures section for details). Herein, PAH first reacts with K2PtCl4 and K2PdCl4 to generate PAH-PtII (Fu et al.30) and PAH-PdII (Fu et al.31) complexes at room temperature, respectively, owing to the strong coordinating capability of PAH. Then, PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs were obtained by simultaneous thermal decomposition of both PAH-PtII and PAH-PdII complexes at high temperatures. During the thermal decomposition, the long carbon chain of PAH breaks up, resulting in the generation of PAH with a small molecular weight (Mw=14 000). Simultaneously, PAH with a small molecular weight firmly binds on the PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface because of interaction between –NH2 groups and metal atoms.30, 31 The PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs can be used as a cathodic ORR electrocatalyst after centrifugation, washing and drying, without further tedious UV/ozone post-treatment procedure of the electrocatalysts.

EDX, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry and X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out to characterize the bulk composition and crystal structure of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. On the basis of EDX analysis (Supplementary Figure S1), the Pd–Pt atomic ratio of prodcuts is measured to be 53:47, close to inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry analysis (56:44). Compared with standard diffraction data of single Pt (JCPDS-04-0802 Pt) and Pd (JCPDS-46-1043Pd), the representative diffraction peaks of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs are coincidently located between them (Figure 1a), demonstrating the formation of the solid-solution Pt–Pd alloy. The crystalline size of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is estimated to be 5 nm according to the Scherrer formula. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was performed to investigate the surface composition and electronic structure of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurement shows the Pd/Pt atomic ratio is 39:61 (Supplementary Figure S2), much lower than that measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Pd/Pt=56:44), hinting at the formation of a Pt-rich PtPd alloy shell. The detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses demonstrate the metallic Pt and Pd are predominant in PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Figures 1b and c), revealing the complete reduction of PtII and PdII precursors. Compared with the standard values of bulk Pt and Pd,32 the binding energies of Pt 4f and Pd 3d in PdPt@PtPd CSNDs negetively shift 0.7 and 0.4 eV, respectively. Meanwhile, N 1s signal is detected (Figure 1d), indicating PAH binds on the PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface. Because of the small discrepancy between electronegativity of Pt and Pd (Pt: 2.28 vs Pd: 2.20), the change in the binding energies of Pt 4f and Pd 3d mainly orignates from the electron donation induced by −NH2 groups in the PAH with the lone pair of electrons19 rather than the interaction between Pt and Pd elements.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern, (b) Pt 4f X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum, (c) Pd 3d XPS spectrum and (d) N 1s XPS spectrum of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. (Note that the vertical black dotted lines in b and c represent the standard value of Pt 4f7/2 and Pd 3d5/2, respectively.).

The morphology and surface structure of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs were further investigated by scanning electron microscopy and TEM. The scanning electron microscopy image clearly reveals that PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have a rough surface (Figure 2a). The TEM images show most of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have a dendritic shape and a narrow size distribution of 42–48 nm (Figure 2b) that consist of many subunit nanoparticles with ca. 6 nm diameters (Figure 2c). The selected area electron diffraction image shows the irregular spot pattern (Figure 2d), indicating their polycrystalline nature. The high-resolution TEM image taken from several subunit nanoparticles clearly shows well-resolved fringes with lattice spacing of 0.198 nm (Figure 2e) that is indexed to {100} crystal facets of face-centered cubic Pd–Pt alloy. At 140 °C, K2PtCl4 precursors could not be reduced by PAH (Supplementary Figure S3). At 220 °C, the PtPd nanoparticles generated severe aggregation (Supplementary Figure S4). Consequently, 180 °C was selected as the optimal synthesis temperature.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), (b, c) transmission electron microscopy (TEM), (d) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and (e) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. (f) High-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM and EDX mapping images of N, Pt and Pd elements. (g) Line scanning profiles of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs on (a) center and (b) edge of individual particle.

EDX elemental analysis mapping and EDX line scanning were performed to investigate the surface composition and the positional distribution of the Pd, Pt and N elements in PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. The pattern of the N element is very similar to the patterns of the Pd and Pt elements (Figure 2f), demonstrating the uniform binding of PAH on the PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface because of strong N–Pt and N–Pd bond interactions.30, 31 Meanwhile, the diameter of the Pt element pattern is slightly bigger than that of the Pd element pattern, confirming the core–shell structure of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Figure 2f). EDX line scanning spectrum on the center of the individual PdPt@PtPd CSNDs shows the presence of Pt and Pd elements (Figure 2ga), and the content of the Pd element is much higher than that of the Pt element (Figure 2ga). In contrast, the content of the Pt element is higher than that of the Pd element on the edge of the individual PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Figure 2gb). Thus, EDX line scanning spectra on the two positions clearly confirm that PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have a Pd-rich PdPt alloy core and a Pt-rich PtPd alloy shell. TEM images show that the single-component Pd nanodendrites and Pt nanodendrites can also be synthesized using the same thermal decomposition method (Supplementary Figure S5). Thermogravimetric analysis tests show the decomposition temperature of the PAH-PdII complex is lower than that of the PAH-PtII complex (Supplementary Figure S6). Meanwhile, linear sweeping voltammetry measurements show the onset reduction potential of PAH-PdII complex is higher than that of PAH-PtII complex (Supplementary Figure S7). Real time-dependent photographs show the onset conversion of PAH-PdII complex and PAH-PtII complex to Pd nanoparticles and Pt nanoparticles occur at 0.5 and 1 h, respectively (Supplementary Figure S8). Thus, the preferential reduction of the PdII precursor plays a key role in the formation of the particular core–shell nanostructures with a Pd-rich PdPt alloy core and a Pt-rich PtPd alloy shell.

The electrochemical behavior of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs in a 0.5 M H2SO4 solution was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and compared with that of commercial Pt black (Figure 3a). No detectable reduction peak of Pd oxide is observed in cyclic voltammogram for PdPt@PtPd CSNDs, confirming the alloy nature of the Pt–Pd shell. The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and commercial Pt black are calculated to be 27.4 and 17.1 m2 g−1 using a hydrogen adsorption–desorption method.22, 33, 34 Meanwhile, PdPt@PtPd CSNDs show a slight positive shift in the reduction peak potential of surface oxide compared with Pt black, indicating the PAH functionalization molecule blocks surface oxidation of Pt to some extent because of the interaction between PAH and Pt.19 After CV experiments, the N 1s peak is still distinctly observed for PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Supplementary Figure S9), indicating PAH molecules still adsorb on the surface of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Cyclic voltammograms of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte at 50 mV s–1. (b) Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) polarization curves of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte at 5 mV s–1 and rotation rate of 1600 r.p.m. Insert indicates the ik values of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black at a fixed potential of 0.9 V for the ORR.

The electrocatalytic performances of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black were investigated by a RDE technique in an O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte (Figure 3b). The current densities were normalized to the geometrical area of the electrode. Onset potential of ORR (EORR, a potential with −10 μA cm−2 current35, 36) and half-wave potential of ORR (E1/2, a potential at midpoint of residual current and limited diffusion current) on PdPt@PtPd CSNDs show a 30 mV (1.09 vs 1.06 V) and 30 mV (0.84 vs 0.81 V) positive shift compared with Pt black, showing the enhanced ORR kinetics for PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. The area-specific kinetic current density (ik), an important indicator of electrocatalytic activity, can be calculated by the Koutecky–Levich equation and corresponding ORR polarization curve.19, 30 As observed, ik of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (1.60 mA cm–2) is 1.80 times bigger than that of Pt black (0.89 mA cm–2) at 0.9 V (insert in Figure 2b), and this is also bigger than some previous values such as Pt–Cu bimetallic catalysts (0.84 mA cm–2),37 net-like Pt assembly (0.688 mA cm–2),38 Pt-on-Pd nanostructures (0.67 mA cm–2)23 and Pt@PdCu5/C catalyst (0.543 mA cm–2).39 The electronic effect induced by PAH functionalization,30 the increase in interfacial H+ concentration induced by PAH functionalization19 and the synergistic effect between Pt and Pd elements40 (Supplementary Figure S10) are responsible for the improved ORR activity. Furthermore, the ORR activities of electrocatalysts were also normalized to the ECSA and Pt mass of electrocatalysts. The ECSA-specific activity (0.464 A m–2) and Pt-mass activity (21.11 A g–1Pt) of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs for the ORR are 1.21 and 3.28 times bigger than that of Pt black (0.384 A m–2 and 6.43 A g–1Pt) at 0.9 V respectively (Supplementary Figure S11), indicating PdPt@PtPd CSNDs hold promise as a potentially practical cathodic ORR electrocatalyst.

The ethanol tolerance of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black were investigated by RDE and CV tests in the presence of ethanol. A large anodic current of ethanol oxidation is observed at the ORR polarization curve of Pt black but no anodic current is observed at the ORR polarization curve of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Figure 4a). Compared with Pt black, PdPt@PtPd CSNDs show a 517 mV increase in EORR, demonstrating their high ORR activity in the presence of ethanol (Figure 4b). Further CV tests show ECSA-normalized specific peak current density of ethanol oxidation for PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is 8.7 times lower than that for Pt black (Figure 3d). Meanwhile, CV and RDE tests show the unfunctionalized PtPd alloy nanoparticles have not obvious alcohol tolerance for the ORR (Supplementary Figure S12), indicating the ethanol tolerance of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs cannot be ascribed to alloying effect. Thus, the present experimental results indicate the PAH on the PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface serves effectively as barrier networks to block accessibility of ethanol, owing to its lager molecular size (size: 5.1 Å) than the O2 molecule (size: 3.4 Å), as shown in Scheme 2. To confirm molecular size-dependent selectivity, the CO stripping, methanol oxidation reaction and 1-propanol oxidation reaction on catalysts were further investigated by CV. CO-stripping measurements show the oxidation charge of pre-absorbed CO on PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is higher than that on commercial Pt black (Supplementary Figure S13), confirming ECSA of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is bigger than that of commercial Pt black. Meanwhile, it is observed that specific activity of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs decreases with increasing molecule size of alcohol, relative to commercial Pt black (Supplementary Figure S14), confirming the low ethanol oxidation activity on PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is due to the molecular size sorting by PAH. Moreover, the solubility experiments demonstrate PAH is ethanol phobic (insert in Figure 4b). Thus, PAH on PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface also blocks ethanol diffusion from aqueous solution to the active Pt sites.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) polarization curves of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte in the presence of 0.1 M CH3CH2OH at 5 mV s–1 and rotation rate of 1600 r.p.m. (b) Electrochemically active surface area (ECSA)-normalized cyclic voltammograms of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4+0.1 M CH3CH2OH electrolyte at 50 mV s–1. Insert indicates the digital photographs of (a) 1 ml of 0.5 M polyallylamine (PAH) aqueous solution after the addition of (a) 5 ml water and (b) 5 ml ethanol. As observed, white flocculation precipitation appears immediately after the addition of ethanol, indicating PAH is ethanol phobic.

The accelerated durability test41 (that is, continuously applying linear potential sweep between 0.6 and 1.1 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte at 50 mV s−1) was performed to investigate the electrocatalytic stability and long-term selectivity (that is, ethanol tolerance) of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs and Pt black. After 10 000 potential sweeps, PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have a 22 mV degradation in E1/2 for the ORR (Figure 5a), whereas Pt black has a 55 mV degradation in E1/2 for the ORR (Supplementary Figure S15). Although the chemical stability of the Pd element (that is, the dissolution in acidic media) is lower than that of the Pt element, the present experimental results demonstrate that PdPt@PtPd CSNDs have higher electrocatalytic stability than commercial Pt black. The particular 3D self-supported architecture that effectively restrains the Ostwald ripening effect42, 43, 44 contributes to the enhanced stability of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs (Supplementary Figure S16). The additional accelerated durability test measurements show the ORR stability of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is close to that of as-prepared Pt nanodendrites and much higher than that of as-prepared Pd nanodendrites (Supplementary Figure S17), and this can be ascribed to high Pt content on the PtPd alloy shell of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs. In addition, very importantly, the ethanol tolerance of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs is still retained well after 10 000 cycles (Figure 5b), clearly suggesting their long-term selectivity for the ORR. After the accelerated durability test experiments, the N 1s peak of PAH is still detected (Supplementary Figure S18). Thus, the high stability of the PAH functionalization molecules contributes to the long-term selectivity of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs for the ORR.

Figure 5
figure 5

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) polarization curves of PdPt@PtPd CSNDs before and after 10 000 potential sweeps in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte in (a) the absence and (b) presence of 0.1 M CH3CH2OH at 5 mV s–1 and rotation rate of 1600 r.p.m.

Conclusions

In summary, for the first time, we reported a facile water-based thermal decomposition approach to synthesize the well-defined chemical functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs by using a simultaneously PAH complexant, reductant and chemical functionalized molecule that could be used directly as an ORR electrocatalyst without the tedious UV/ozone post-treatment procedure. The PAH-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs showed an enhanced ORR activity and durability compared with commercial Pt black because of the increased interfacial H+ concentration, electronic effect, synergistic effect and particular 3D self-supported architecture. Meanwhile, the PAH functionalization imparted PdPt@PtPd CSNDs with extraordinary selectivity for the ORR because of its steric hindrance effect and ethanol-phobic property, making them indeed promising cathodic electrocatalysts for the practical DAFC application.

scheme 1

Schematic synthetic route of polyallylamine (PAH)-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs by the facile thermal decomposition route.

scheme 2

Schematic illustration of the differential diffusion and reaction of ethanol and O2 on the polyallylamine (PAH)-functionalized PdPt@PtPd CSNDs surface.