Original Contribution | Published:

Colon/Small Bowel

Lesions of All Types Exist in Colon Polyps of All Sizes

The American Journal of Gastroenterology volume 113, pages 303306 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Objectives:

Although large polyps are known to harbor more advanced neoplasia than small polyps, the extent of the relationship between size and type is not fully known. The study aim was to establish benchmarks for the prevalence of different histologic polyp types among varying size categories.

Methods:

The Miraca Life Sciences Database is an electronic repository of histopathologic patient records from private practices throughout the United States. We extracted the records of 483,998 unique patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy between January 2008 and December 2014. A total of 550,811 polyps were stratified by their endoscopic size measurement. Polyps of each size were further stratified as hyperplastic polyp (HP), tubular adenoma (TA), tubulovillous adenoma (TVA), sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, and adenocarcinoma.

Results:

Of all 550,811 polyps, 447,343 (81%) were 1–9 mm in size, and 103,517 (19%) were 10 mm or larger. A fraction of 18,591/550,811 polyps (3.4%) harbored histologic features of advanced adenoma, such as TVA, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. Of these, 4,725/18,591 (25%) occurred in polyps 1–9 mm and 13,868/18,591 (75%) occurred in polyps 10 mm or larger. The fractions of advanced adenoma were 0.6% (0.5–0.6%) in 1–5 mm polyps and 2.1% (2.0–2.2%) in 6–9 mm polyps, as compared to 13.4% (13.2–13.6%) in polyps 10 mm or larger. The frequency of HP significantly decreased with increasing polyp size, whereas the frequency of TA remained largely unaffected by polyp size.

Conclusions:

While advanced histopathology was found more frequently in colorectal polyps of larger than smaller size, one quarter of all advanced histopathology existed in polyps of <10 mm.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:210–217.

  2. 2.

    , , . Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:940–944.

  3. 3.

    , , et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:343–348.

  4. 4.

    , , et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1100–1105.

  5. 5.

    , . Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:2384–2388.

  6. 6.

    , , et al. Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1022–1030.

  7. 7.

    , , et al. Influence of patient age and colorectal polyp size on histopathology findings. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2014;27:109–113.

  8. 8.

    , , et al. The risk of advanced histology in small-sized colonic polyps: are non-invasive colonic imaging modalities good enough? Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:1071–1075.

  9. 9.

    , , et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1315–1330.

  10. 10.

    , , et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143:844–857.

  11. 11.

    , , et al. Evolution of screen-detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1682–1690.

  12. 12.

    , . Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:40–44.

  13. 13.

    . Colorectal cancer: management of small polyps detected by CT colonography. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;6:568–70.

  14. 14.

    , . Defining the risk of small polyps: potential value of CTC. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1691–1693.

  15. 15.

    , , et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1395–1401.

  16. 16.

    , , . Distribution of colorectal polyps: implications for screening. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017;31:481–488.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Miraca Life Sciences, Irving, Texas, USA

    • Kevin O Turner
    •  & Robert M Genta
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

    • Kevin O Turner
    •  & Robert M Genta
  3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

    • Amnon Sonnenberg
  4. Gastroenterology Section, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA

    • Amnon Sonnenberg

Authors

  1. Search for Kevin O Turner in:

  2. Search for Robert M Genta in:

  3. Search for Amnon Sonnenberg in:

Competing interests

Guarantor of the article: Amnon Sonnenberg, MD, MSc.

Specific author contributions: Study conception and design: K.O. Turner; A. Sonnenberg; and R.M. Genta; data analysis: A. Sonnenberg; K.O. Turner; and R.M. Genta; writing of manuscript: A. Sonnenberg; K.O. Turner; and R.M. Genta.

Financial support: None.

Potential competing interests: K.O. Turner and R.M. Genta are employed by Miraca Life Sciences, Irving, TX, USA. A. Sonnenberg declares no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amnon Sonnenberg.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.439