Original Contribution | Published:

Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization

American Journal of Gastroenterology volume 97, pages 19861993 (2002) | Download Citation




Functional GI disorders are common in the general population. However, their impact on health status and health resource use in Canada has not been well examined. We describe 1) health-related quality of life in Canadians with functional constipation or other functional GI disorders versus Canadian normative data or those without a functional GI disorder and 2) health resource utilization in subject's self-reporting of constipation.


An independent research firm was employed to conduct a randomly selected national survey examining GI symptoms and personal health. Household members 18 yr or older were recruited by a random-digit dial technique. Participants were then mailed a questionnaire and data were retrieved by a follow-up phone call. All functional GI disorders were defined using Rome II criteria, and constipation was further defined using self-report. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Short Form 36.


One thousand one hundred forty-nine subjects (49.3% male) with a mean age of 42.2 yr completed the survey. The prevalence of any Rome II functional GI disorder was 61.7%. The rate of functional constipation was 14.9%, whereas that of self-reported constipation was 27.2%. The mean physical and mental component summary and eight subscores of the Short Form 36 were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than Canadian norms for both self-reported constipation and Rome II functional constipation. Subjects with no GI disorder had significantly better Short Form 36 scores than the Canadian norms. The rate of physician visits for constipation was strongly predicted by the physical component of the Short Form 36. Most subjects (66.2%) were satisfied with their current constipation treatment.


Constipation is common in the Canadian population and significantly impairs health-related quality of life. Poor quality of life is an important predictor of health care utilization in these subjects.

  • Subscribe to The American Journal of Gastroenterology for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    , , , et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders: Prevalence, sociodemography and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1569–1580.

  2. 2.

    , , , et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: Relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:3530–3540.

  3. 3.

    , , . The impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:67–71.

  4. 4.

    , , . Impact of irritable bowel syndrome on quality of life and resource use in the United States and United Kingdom. Digestion 1999;60:77–81.

  5. 5.

    , . Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958–1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:606–611.

  6. 6.

    . Quality of life, health status and clinical research. Med Care 1989;27(suppl 3):S148–S156.

  7. 7.

    , . Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996;334:835–840.

  8. 8.

    , . Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA 1995;273:59–65.

  9. 9.

    , , , et al. Factors associated with poor health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2001;120:170–178.

  10. 10.

    . Chronic liver disease and health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 2001;120:305–307 (editorial).

  11. 11.

    , , . Speech and survival. Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1981;305:982–987.

  12. 12.

    , . Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:1083–1089.

  13. 13.

    , , , et al. Bowel disorders impair functional status and quality of life in the elderly: A population based study. J Gerontol Med Sci 1995;4:M184–M189.

  14. 14.

    , , , et al. The lower the QOL, the higher health care costs in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2001;120(suppl 1):A-636.

  15. 15.

    , , , et al. Impact of differences in severity of irritable bowel syndrome on patient’s well being and resource use. Gastroenterology 2001;120(suppl 1):A-406.

  16. 16.

    VOXCO. Interviewer CATI for Windows. Available at: .

  17. 17.

    Canada Survey Sampler. Available at: .

  18. 18.

    , , , et al. Appendix B. The Rome II Modular Questionnaire. In: Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, et al, eds. The functional gastrointestinal disorders. Degnon: McLean, VA, 2000:670–688.

  19. 19.

    , , , SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, 1993.

  20. 20.

    , , SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, 1994.

  21. 21.

    , . The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–483.

  22. 22.

    , , . The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247–263.

  23. 23.

    , , , et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: Summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33(suppl):AS264–AS279.

  24. 24.

    , , , et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. In: Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, et al, eds. The functional gastrointestinal disorders. Degnon: Washington, 2000:351–432.

  25. 25.

    , , , et al. An epidemiological survey of constipation in Canada: Definitions, rates, demographics and predictors of health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:3130–3137.

  26. 26.

    , Introduction to the practice of statistics, 2nd ed. WH Freeman: New York, 1993.

  27. 27.

    , , , et al. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in Canada: First population based survey using the Rome II criteria with suggestions for improving the questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:225–235.

  28. 28.

    , , , et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. CMAJ 2000;163:265–271.

  29. 29.

    , , , et al. A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:1153–1162.

  30. 30.

    , , , et al. Functional constipation and outlet delay: A population-based study. Gastroenterology 1993;105:781–790.

  31. 31.

    , , , et al. Impact of irritable bowel syndrome on quality of life. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:2248–2253.

  32. 32.

    , , , . The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Med 1998;104:252–258.

  33. 33.

    , , . Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res 1994;3:329–338.

  34. 34.

    , , , et al. The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 2000;119:654–660.

  35. 35.

    , , , et al. Impact of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes mellitus on health-related quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2001:71–2001:76.

Download references


This study was made possible by an unrestricted grant from Janssen-Ortho.

Author information


  1. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    • E J Irvine
  2. Health Economics, Janssen-Ortho Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    • S. Ferrazzi
    •  & L Rance
  3. Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

    • P Pare
  4. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    • W G Thompson


  1. Search for E J Irvine in:

  2. Search for S. Ferrazzi in:

  3. Search for P Pare in:

  4. Search for W G Thompson in:

  5. Search for L Rance in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E J Irvine.

About this article

Publication history






Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.