Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comparative studies of suppression of malignant cancer cell phenotype by antisense oligo DNA and small interfering RNA


One of the distinguishing features of malignant tumor cells is the ability to proliferate in an anchorage-independent manner; methods that effectively suppress this phenotype may be applicable to the therapeutic inhibition of the malignancy of cancers. Interfering RNA is a potentially powerful tool for cancer therapy because of its specificity of target selection and remarkably high efficiency in target mRNA suppression. We studied the use of two knockdown strategies, antisense oligo DNA (AS-ODN) and small interfering RNA (siRNA), and showed how the anchorage-independent proliferation of malignant cells could be blocked efficiently. Anchorage-independent proliferation of rat fibroblasts transformed with v-src was suppressed with only a single 1-μ M dose of AS-ODN; similar suppression using siRNA required treatment with 1 nM siRNA every 12 h. With our experimental system, the molecular stability of AS-ODN allowed the use of a simple treatment regimen to control the amount of the target molecule, providing that the treatment dose was sufficiently high. In comparison, siRNA treatment was effective at lower doses, but more frequent treatment was necessary to achieve the same suppression of proliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes




  1. Dove A . Antisense and sensibility. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20: 121–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ochiya T, Terada M . Antisense approaches to in vitro organ culture. Methods Enzymol 1999; 314: 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhtar S, Kole R, Juliano RL . Stability of antisense DNA oligodeoxynucleotide analogs in cellular extracts and sera. Life Sci 1991; 49: 1793–1801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC . Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998; 391: 806–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fire A . RNA-triggered gene silencing. Trends Genet 1999; 15: 358–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caplen NJ, Parrish S, Imani F, Fire A, Morgan RA . Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 9742–9747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T . Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 2001; 411: 494–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammond SM, Caudy AA, Hannon GJ . Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: 110–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharp PA . RNA interference 2001. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 485–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zamore PD . RNA interference: listening to the sound of silence. Nat Struct Biol 2001; 8: 746–750.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ . Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 2001; 409: 363–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond SM, Boettcher S, Caudy AA, Kobayashi R, Hannon GJ . Argonaute2, a link between genetic and biochemical analyses of RNAi. Science 2001; 293: 1146–1150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nykanen A, Haley B, Zamore PD . ATP requirements and small interfering RNA structure in the RNA interference pathway. Cell 2001; 107: 309–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertrand JR, Pottier M, Vekris A, Opolon P, Maksimenko A, Malvy C . Comparison of antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs in cell culture and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 296: 1000–1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyagishi M, Hayashi M, Taira K . Comparison of the suppressive effects of antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs directed against the same targets in mammalian cells. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 2003; 13: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brummelkamp T, Bemards R, Agami R . Stable suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference. Cancer Cell 2002; 2: 243–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawasaki H, Taira K . Short hairpin type of dsRNAs that are controlled by tRNAval promoter significantly induce RNA-mediated gene silencing in the cytoplasm of human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 700–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez LA, Naguibneva I, Lehrmann H, Vervisch A, Tchenio T, Lozano G et al. Synthetic small inhibiting RNAs: efficient tools to inactivate oncogenic mutations and restore p53 pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 14849–14854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Pham TT, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ, Kay MA . RNA interference in adult mice. Nature 2002; 418: 38–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Song E, Lee S-K, Wang J, Ince N, Ouyang N, Min J et al. RNA interference targeting Fas protects mice from fulminant hepatitis. Nat Med 2003; 9: 347–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Verma UN, Surabhi RM, Schmaltieg A, Becerra C, Gaynor RB . Small interfering RNAs directed against beta-catenin inhibit the in vitro and in vivo growth of colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 1291–1300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zender L, Hutker S, Liedtke C, Tillmann HL, Zender S, Mundt B et al. Caspase 8 small interfering RNA prevents acute liver failure in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 7797–7802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman VH, Shin SI . Cellular tumorigenicity in nude mice: correlation with cell growth in semi-solid medium. Cell 1974; 3: 355–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuschl T, Zamore PD, Lehmann R, Bartel DP, Sharp PA . Target mRNA degradation by double strand RNA in vitro. Genes Dev 1999; 49: 1793–1801.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Sayuko Kaminosono, Haruna Yamanami, and Kotaro Oka (Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Japan) for their kind help with the experiments and for providing the laboratory environment for this study. This study was supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and from Keio University's 21st Century COE Program for Understanding and Control of Life Function via Systems Biology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Hiroi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiroi, N., Funahashi, A. & Kitano, H. Comparative studies of suppression of malignant cancer cell phenotype by antisense oligo DNA and small interfering RNA. Cancer Gene Ther 13, 7–12 (2006).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


This article is cited by


Quick links