Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

From the blogosphere

A recent literature search had Jennifer Rohn, a posdoc at University College London, seeing double. On her Nature Network blog, Mind the Gap, she describes how she turned up what seemed to be the exact same paper, with the same author list, published in two journals (

On closer inspection, Rohn finds that the two papers are identical. One is published in Cell, whereas the other features as a chapter in a meeting proceedings book. “How common is this sort of double publication? And how do people feel about it?” asks Rohn, opening up a lengthy discussion.

Those commenting speculate that the book chapter was an obligation filled with an easy, already-finished manuscript or that a junior author submitted the second version without the senior author's knowledge. One commenter wonders whether a duplicate set he found should be turned in as scientific misconduct. Meanwhile, on a related note, another person observes that publishing papers in different languages reaches more readers. Doubling up, it seems, is a grey area of scientific publication.

Additional information

Visit Nautilus for regular news relevant to Nature authors → and see Peer-to-Peer for news for peer reviewers and about peer review → .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

From the blogosphere. Nature 463, 400 (2010).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing