Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A descriptive model of preventability in maternal morbidity and mortality

Journal of Perinatology volume 26, pages 79–84 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To develop a descriptive model of preventability for maternal morbidity and mortality that can be used in quality assurance and morbidity and mortality review processes.

Study Design:

This descriptive study was part of a larger case–control study conducted at the University of Illinois at Chicago in which maternal deaths were cases and women with severe maternal morbidity served as controls. Morbidities and mortalities were classified by a team of clinicians as preventable or not preventable. Qualitative analysis of data was conducted to identify and categorize different types of preventable events.

Results:

Of 237 women, there were 79 women with preventable events attributable to provider or system factors. The most common types of preventable events were inadequate diagnosis/recognition of high-risk (54.4%), treatment (38.0%), and documentation (30.7%).

Conclusions:

A descriptive model was illustrated that can be used to categorize preventable events in maternal morbidity and mortality and can be incorporated into quality assurance and clinical case review to enhance the monitoring of hospital-based obstetric care and to decrease medical error.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maternal mortality – United States, 1982–1996. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1998; 47: 705–707.

  2. Callaghan WM, Berg CJ . Maternal mortality surveillance in the United States: moving into the twenty-first century. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2002; 57: 131–134 139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg CJ, Chang J, Callaghan WM, Whitehead SJ . Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997. Obstetr Gynecol 2003; 101: 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Center for Health Statistics (US). Healthy people 2000 review. Hyattsville, Md.: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1993.

  5. Danel I, Berg C, Johnson CH, Atrash H . Magnitude of maternal morbidity during labor and delivery: United States, 1993–1997. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 631–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance – United States, 1991–1999. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2003; 52: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Panting-Kemp A, Geller S, Nguyen T, Simonson L, Nuwayhid B, Castro L . Maternal deaths in an urban perinatal network, 1992–1998. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2000; 183: 1207–1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nannini A, Weiss J, Goldstein R, Fogerty S . Pregnancy-associated mortality at the end of the twentieth century: Massachusetts, 1990–1999. J Am Med Women's Assoc 2002; 57: 140–143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox SM, Brown ML, Simonson L, Driscoll CA et al. The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2004; 191: 939–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox S, Brown M, Simonson L, Kilpatrick S . A scoring system identified near-miss maternal morbidity during pregnancy. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 716–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox SM, Kilpatrick S . Defining a conceptual framework for near-miss maternal morbidity. J Am Med Women's Assoc 2002; 57: 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geller SE, Ahmed S, Brown ML, Cox SM, Rosenberg D, Kilpatrick SJ . International Classification of Diseases-9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it? Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2004; 190: 1629–1633 discussion 1633-1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    S E Geller & S J Kilpatrick

  2. Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    S M Cox

Authors
  1. S E Geller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S M Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S J Kilpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S E Geller.

Additional information

Funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association of Schools of Public Health ‘Investigation of Factors Associated with Maternal Mortality’ (S1069/19–20)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geller, S., Cox, S. & Kilpatrick, S. A descriptive model of preventability in maternal morbidity and mortality. J Perinatol 26, 79–84 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211432

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211432

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links